Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
175 lines (162 loc) · 20 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

175 lines (162 loc) · 20 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/kafka

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Kafka ACLs (Access Control Lists)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Kafka ACLs (Access Control Lists)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Required Access Levels: Determine which users, applications, or services need to interact with Kafka and what operations they need to perform (e.g., produce to topic 'A', consume from topic 'B', create topics).
    2. Configure Authorizers: Ensure Kafka brokers are configured to use an authorizer (e.g., kafka.security.auth.authorizer.AclAuthorizer).
    3. Define ACL Rules: Use Kafka's kafka-acls.sh command-line tool or programmatic APIs to create ACL rules. Each rule specifies:
      • Principal: The user or service being granted permissions (e.g., User:CN=producer-app,OU=Services,O=Example).
      • Resource Type: The Kafka resource being protected (e.g., Topic, Group, Cluster).
      • Resource Name: The specific resource name (e.g., topic-name, consumer-group-name).
      • Operation: The allowed operation (e.g., Read, Write, Create, Delete, Describe).
      • Permission Type: Allow or Deny.
    4. Apply ACLs: Execute the kafka-acls.sh commands to apply the defined ACL rules to the Kafka cluster.
    5. Test and Verify: Test application functionality to ensure ACLs are correctly configured and authorized users/applications can access required resources while unauthorized access is blocked.
    6. Regularly Review and Update: Periodically review ACL rules to ensure they remain aligned with application needs and security policies. Update ACLs as user roles and application requirements change.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Data Access (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users or applications from reading sensitive data from Kafka topics.
    • Unauthorized Data Modification (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users or applications from writing or modifying data in Kafka topics, ensuring data integrity.
    • Unauthorized Administrative Actions (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users from performing administrative actions like creating, deleting, or altering topics or consumer groups, protecting cluster stability and configuration.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Data Access: High risk reduction. ACLs directly control read access.
    • Unauthorized Data Modification: High risk reduction. ACLs directly control write access.
    • Unauthorized Administrative Actions: High risk reduction. ACLs directly control administrative operations.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. ACLs are enabled on the Kafka cluster and basic read/write ACLs are configured for core application topics in the production environment. ACLs are managed manually using kafka-acls.sh.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Granular ACLs: More granular ACLs are needed for specific consumer groups and topics, especially for new microservices being onboarded.
    • Automated ACL Management: ACL management is currently manual and needs to be automated through infrastructure-as-code or a dedicated ACL management tool for better scalability and consistency across environments (staging, development).
    • ACLs for Schema Registry and Kafka Connect: ACLs are not yet implemented for Schema Registry and Kafka Connect components, leaving them potentially vulnerable to unauthorized access.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable and Enforce Authentication (SASL/SCRAM)

  • Mitigation Strategy: SASL/SCRAM Authentication
  • Description:
    1. Choose SASL/SCRAM Mechanism: Select SASL/SCRAM as the authentication mechanism for Kafka brokers and clients. SCRAM-SHA-512 is recommended for stronger security.
    2. Configure Broker Listeners: Modify Kafka broker configuration files (server.properties) to enable SASL/SCRAM listeners. This typically involves setting properties like:
      • listeners=SASL_SSL://:9093 (for TLS encrypted connections with SASL)
      • security.inter.broker.protocol=SASL_SSL
      • sasl.mechanism.inter.broker.protocol=SCRAM-SHA-512
      • sasl.enabled.mechanisms=SCRAM-SHA-512
      • listener.name.sasl_ssl.sasl.mechanism.inter.broker.protocol=SCRAM-SHA-512
      • listener.name.sasl_ssl.security.protocol=SASL_SSL
    3. Configure Authentication Provider: Configure a SASL authentication provider on the brokers. Kafka supports various providers, including a simple org.apache.kafka.common.security.scram.ScramCredentialUtils for testing or integration with external systems like LDAP or Kerberos.
    4. Create User Credentials: Use kafka-configs.sh or programmatic APIs to create user credentials (usernames and passwords) for applications and users that need to access Kafka. Store these credentials securely (e.g., in a secrets manager).
    5. Configure Client Authentication: Configure Kafka producers and consumers to use SASL/SCRAM authentication. This involves setting client configuration properties like:
      • security.protocol=SASL_SSL
      • sasl.mechanism=SCRAM-SHA-512
      • sasl.jaas.config=org.apache.kafka.common.security.scram.ScramLoginModule required username="<username>" password="<password>";
    6. Test and Verify: Test producer and consumer applications to ensure they can successfully authenticate with the Kafka cluster using the configured credentials.
    7. Enforce Authentication: Ensure that all client connections are required to authenticate. Disable or remove any listeners that allow unauthenticated connections.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access to Kafka Cluster (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized clients from connecting to the Kafka cluster and potentially exploiting vulnerabilities or accessing data.
    • Spoofing/Impersonation (High Severity): Prevents malicious actors from impersonating legitimate applications or users to gain unauthorized access.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Access to Kafka Cluster: High risk reduction. Authentication is the primary barrier against unauthorized access.
    • Spoofing/Impersonation: High risk reduction. Strong authentication mechanisms like SCRAM make impersonation significantly harder.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. SASL/SCRAM authentication is enabled for external client connections in the production environment. Internal broker communication uses TLS but not SASL.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Internal Broker Authentication: SASL/SCRAM should be enabled for inter-broker communication to enhance security within the Kafka cluster itself.
    • Centralized Credential Management: User credentials are currently managed directly within Kafka. Integration with a centralized identity and access management (IAM) system or secrets manager is needed for better credential lifecycle management and auditing.
    • Enforcement in Non-Production Environments: Authentication is not consistently enforced in staging and development environments, creating potential security gaps.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS Encryption for Data in Transit

  • Mitigation Strategy: TLS Encryption for Data in Transit
  • Description:
    1. Generate TLS Certificates: Obtain or generate TLS certificates for Kafka brokers and clients. Use a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) for production environments.
    2. Configure Broker Listeners for TLS: Modify Kafka broker configuration files (server.properties) to enable TLS listeners. This typically involves setting properties like:
      • listeners=SASL_SSL://:9093,SSL://:9092 (for both SASL/SSL and SSL listeners if needed)
      • security.inter.broker.protocol=SASL_SSL or SSL
      • ssl.keystore.location=/path/to/broker.keystore.jks
      • ssl.keystore.password=keystore-password
      • ssl.truststore.location=/path/to/truststore.jks
      • ssl.truststore.password=truststore-password
    3. Distribute Certificates: Distribute the broker's certificate (or the CA certificate) to clients and configure clients to trust the broker's certificate.
    4. Configure Client TLS: Configure Kafka producers and consumers to use TLS encryption. This involves setting client configuration properties like:
      • security.protocol=SASL_SSL or SSL
      • ssl.truststore.location=/path/to/client.truststore.jks
      • ssl.truststore.password=truststore-password
    5. Enforce TLS: Ensure that all sensitive communication channels (client-broker, broker-broker, ZooKeeper-broker if applicable) are configured to use TLS. Disable or remove any listeners that allow unencrypted connections for sensitive traffic.
    6. Cipher Suite Selection: Review and configure appropriate TLS cipher suites to ensure strong encryption algorithms are used and weaker or deprecated ciphers are disabled.
    7. Certificate Rotation: Implement a process for regular TLS certificate rotation to minimize the impact of compromised certificates.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Eavesdropping (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and reading sensitive data transmitted between Kafka components.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and manipulating communication between Kafka components.
    • Data Tampering in Transit (Medium Severity): TLS provides integrity checks, reducing the risk of data modification during transmission.
  • Impact:
    • Data Eavesdropping: High risk reduction. TLS encryption makes data unreadable to eavesdroppers.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High risk reduction. TLS authentication and encryption prevent MITM attacks.
    • Data Tampering in Transit: Medium risk reduction. TLS provides integrity, but application-level integrity checks might be needed for critical data.
  • Currently Implemented: Fully implemented in production and staging environments for client-broker and broker-broker communication. TLS certificates are managed using a dedicated certificate management system.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • TLS for ZooKeeper (if applicable): If using ZooKeeper, ensure TLS is also configured for communication between Kafka brokers and ZooKeeper. (If using Kafka Raft, this is less relevant).
    • Consistent Cipher Suite Enforcement: Cipher suite configuration should be reviewed and hardened across all Kafka components and environments to ensure consistent security posture.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Quotas

  • Mitigation Strategy: Kafka Resource Quotas
  • Description:
    1. Identify Resource Limits: Determine appropriate resource limits for producers and consumers based on application requirements and cluster capacity. Consider factors like:
      • Produce Rate: Maximum bytes per second a producer can send.
      • Consumer Fetch Rate: Maximum bytes per second a consumer can fetch.
      • Request Percentage: Maximum percentage of broker request handler threads a client can utilize.
      • Connection Count: Maximum number of connections from a client.
    2. Configure Quotas: Use Kafka's kafka-configs.sh command-line tool or programmatic APIs to define resource quotas. Quotas can be set at different levels:
      • User Quotas: Limit resources for specific users (principals).
      • Client ID Quotas: Limit resources for specific client IDs (application instances).
      • Default Quotas: Set default quotas that apply to all users or client IDs that don't have specific quotas defined.
    3. Apply Quotas: Execute the kafka-configs.sh commands to apply the defined quotas to the Kafka cluster.
    4. Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor resource quota usage and set up alerts to detect when clients are approaching or exceeding their quotas.
    5. Quota Adjustment: Regularly review and adjust quotas based on application performance, cluster capacity, and observed usage patterns.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents a single misbehaving or malicious client from consuming excessive resources (bandwidth, CPU, memory) and impacting the performance and availability of the Kafka cluster for other applications.
    • "Noisy Neighbor" Problem (Medium Severity): Prevents one application from negatively impacting the performance of other applications sharing the same Kafka cluster due to excessive resource consumption.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion: High risk reduction. Quotas limit resource consumption, preventing resource exhaustion by individual clients.
    • "Noisy Neighbor" Problem: Medium risk reduction. Quotas help to isolate resource usage and mitigate the "noisy neighbor" effect.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Default produce and consumer bandwidth quotas are configured at the cluster level in production.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Granular Quotas: More granular quotas are needed for specific applications and services, especially for new applications with varying resource requirements.
    • Client ID Based Quotas: Quotas are primarily user-based. Client ID based quotas should be implemented for better control over individual application instances.
    • Quota Monitoring and Alerting: Basic monitoring is in place, but more robust alerting and visualization of quota usage are needed for proactive management.
    • Quotas in Non-Production Environments: Quotas are not consistently enforced in staging and development environments, potentially masking resource contention issues during testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Kafka and Dependencies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Kafka and Dependency Updates
  • Description:
    1. Establish Update Process: Define a process for regularly checking for new Kafka releases and security advisories from the Apache Kafka project and related dependencies (e.g., ZooKeeper, Kafka Connect connectors).
    2. Monitor Security Advisories: Subscribe to Kafka security mailing lists and monitor security vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE databases) for reported vulnerabilities affecting Kafka and its dependencies.
    3. Patch Management: Develop a patch management strategy that includes:
      • Vulnerability Assessment: Evaluate the severity and impact of identified vulnerabilities on your Kafka environment.
      • Prioritization: Prioritize patching based on vulnerability severity and exploitability.
      • Testing: Thoroughly test patches and updates in a non-production environment (staging) before deploying to production.
      • Deployment: Apply patches and updates to production Kafka brokers, clients, and related components in a controlled and staged manner.
      • Verification: Verify that patches are successfully applied and that the vulnerabilities are remediated.
    4. Automate Updates (where possible): Explore automation tools and techniques to streamline the update process, such as using configuration management tools (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) or container orchestration platforms (e.g., Kubernetes) for rolling updates.
    5. Dependency Scanning: Integrate dependency scanning tools into your development and deployment pipelines to automatically identify vulnerable dependencies used by Kafka clients and applications.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Prevents attackers from exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in Kafka or its dependencies to gain unauthorized access, cause denial of service, or compromise data.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Regularly patching eliminates known vulnerabilities, significantly reducing the attack surface.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Kafka version upgrades are performed periodically, but the process is largely manual and reactive to major version releases. Security advisories are monitored, but patch application is not always timely.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Automated vulnerability scanning for Kafka and its dependencies is not yet implemented.
    • Proactive Patch Management: A more proactive and automated patch management process is needed to ensure timely application of security patches.
    • Dependency Scanning for Client Applications: Dependency scanning should be integrated into the CI/CD pipeline for applications using Kafka clients to identify and address vulnerable client libraries.

Mitigation Strategy: Follow Kafka Security Hardening Guidelines

  • Mitigation Strategy: Follow Kafka Security Hardening Guidelines
  • Description:
    1. Review Official Documentation: Consult the official Apache Kafka documentation and security guides for recommended hardening practices.
    2. Configuration Review: Systematically review Kafka broker, client, and related component configurations against security best practices. This includes:
      • Disabling Default Settings: Change default configurations that might be insecure (e.g., default ports, example configurations).
      • Minimize Exposed Ports: Only expose necessary ports and services.
      • Secure Inter-Broker Communication: Ensure secure communication between brokers (TLS, SASL).
      • Secure ZooKeeper Communication (if applicable): Secure communication between Kafka and ZooKeeper (TLS).
      • Resource Limits: Configure appropriate resource limits (quotas).
      • Logging and Auditing: Enable comprehensive logging and auditing of security-related events.
    3. Regular Audits: Conduct periodic security audits to verify that hardening guidelines are being followed and to identify any configuration drifts or new vulnerabilities.
    4. Stay Informed: Keep up-to-date with the latest Kafka security recommendations and best practices as they evolve.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Reduces the risk of vulnerabilities arising from insecure default configurations or deviations from security best practices.
    • Unnecessary Exposure of Services (Medium Severity): Minimizes the attack surface by disabling or securing unnecessary services and ports.
  • Impact:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities: Medium to High risk reduction. Hardening guidelines address common misconfiguration issues.
    • Unnecessary Exposure of Services: Medium risk reduction. Reducing the attack surface limits potential entry points for attackers.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Some basic hardening steps have been taken based on initial Kafka setup, but a comprehensive review against latest guidelines is needed.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Comprehensive Hardening Review: A systematic and documented review of Kafka configurations against current security hardening guidelines is missing.
    • Automated Configuration Checks: Automated tools or scripts to continuously monitor Kafka configurations for compliance with hardening guidelines are not implemented.
    • Hardening in Non-Production Environments: Hardening practices are not consistently applied across all environments (staging, development), leading to potential inconsistencies and vulnerabilities in non-production setups.