Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
184 lines (141 loc) · 11.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

184 lines (141 loc) · 11.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/rocketmq

Mitigation Strategy: Enable and Enforce Authentication

  • Description:

    1. Configure Nameserver Authentication: In namesrv.conf, set rocketmq.namesrv.authEnable=true.
    2. Configure Broker Authentication: In broker.conf, set aclEnable=true to activate ACL-based authentication.
    3. Create Access Keys: Generate AccessKey and SecretKey pairs for clients (producers, consumers, admin tools).
    4. Client-Side Configuration: Configure clients to use authentication by providing AccessKey and SecretKey during initialization (e.g., using accessKey and secretKey properties in Java clients).
    5. Test Authentication: Verify that only clients with valid credentials can connect and operate.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized clients from interacting with RocketMQ.
      • Data Breaches (Medium Severity): Reduces risk by limiting access to message data.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Mitigates DoS from unauthorized clients.

    • Impact:

      • Unauthorized Access: High reduction.
      • Data Breaches: Medium reduction.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Medium reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented (Development environment uses basic placeholder authentication).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Production Environment: Full authentication enforcement needed.
      • Stronger Mechanism: Transition to ACL or robust provider integration.
      • Secure Key Management: Implement secure key storage and rotation.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) using ACLs

  • Description:

    1. Enable ACL: Ensure aclEnable=true is set in broker.conf.
    2. Configure ACL Rules: Define rules in acl.properties specifying permissions (PUB, SUB, ADMIN) for users/groups on topics/groups.
    3. Define Roles: Identify application roles (producer, consumer, admin).
    4. Assign Permissions: Map roles to ACL rules (e.g., producer role -> PUB on topic X).
    5. Apply ACLs to Users: Assign roles/ACLs to users/applications via AccessKeys.
    6. Test ACLs: Verify users only have intended permissions and unauthorized actions are blocked.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access beyond roles.
      • Data Breaches (Medium Severity): Further limits data access based on roles.
      • Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Enforces least privilege, mitigating insider risks.

    • Impact:

      • Privilege Escalation: High reduction.
      • Data Breaches: Medium reduction (incremental to authentication).
      • Insider Threats: Medium reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented (Basic ACLs for development topics).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Granular ACLs: Implement for production topics/groups based on roles.
      • Comprehensive Roles: Define roles reflecting user/application responsibilities.
      • Regular ACL Review: Establish process for reviewing and updating ACLs.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS/SSL Encryption for Communication

  • Description:

    1. Generate Certificates: Obtain/generate TLS/SSL certificates for brokers and nameservers.
    2. Configure Nameserver TLS: In namesrv.conf, set tlsEnable=true, tlsTestModeEnable=false, and configure certificate paths (tlsServerKeyStorePath, tlsTrustStorePath, tlsServerKeyStorePassword).
    3. Configure Broker TLS: In broker.conf, set tlsEnable=true, tlsTestModeEnable=false, and configure certificate paths similarly.
    4. Client-Side Configuration (TLS): Configure clients to use TLS (e.g., rocketmq.client.ssl.enable=true in Java clients).
    5. Test TLS Connection: Verify clients connect via TLS and communication is encrypted.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Eavesdropping (High Severity): Prevents interception of message data in transit.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Protects against MITM attacks.
      • Data Tampering in Transit (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of message modification during transmission.

    • Impact:

      • Eavesdropping: High reduction.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: High reduction.
      • Data Tampering in Transit: Medium reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented (TLS/SSL not enabled in any environment).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • All Environments: Implement TLS across Dev, Staging, Prod.
      • Certificate Management: Implement certificate lifecycle management.
      • Mutual TLS (mTLS) Consideration: Evaluate and implement mTLS if needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Message Body Encryption (Application-Level)

  • Description:

    1. Choose Encryption Algorithm: Select strong algorithm (AES-256, ChaCha20).
    2. Key Management System: Implement secure KMS or vault for keys.
    3. Encryption at Producer: Encrypt message payload before sending to RocketMQ using KMS key.
    4. Decryption at Consumer: Decrypt message payload after receiving from RocketMQ using KMS key.
    5. Error Handling: Implement error handling for encryption/decryption failures.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Data Breaches at Rest (High Severity): Protects data even if RocketMQ storage is compromised.
      • Data Breaches in Transit (Defense in Depth) (Medium Severity): Additional layer if TLS is compromised.
      • Insider Threats (Data Access) (Medium Severity): Limits access to decrypted content.

    • Impact:

      • Data Breaches at Rest: High reduction.
      • Data Breaches in Transit (Defense in Depth): Medium reduction.
      • Insider Threats (Data Access): Medium reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented (Application-level encryption not used).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Producer/Consumer Applications: Implement encryption/decryption logic.
      • Key Management Integration: Integrate with KMS.
      • Performance Testing: Assess impact on message processing.

Mitigation Strategy: Message Signing for Integrity (Application-Level)

  • Description:

    1. Choose Signing Algorithm: Select digital signature algorithm (RSA-SHA256, ECDSA-SHA256).
    2. Key Management for Signing: Securely manage signing keys (producers need private key).
    3. Signing at Producer: Generate signature of payload using private key and attach to message.
    4. Verification at Consumer: Verify signature using producer's public key.
    5. Signature Failure Handling: Discard messages with invalid signatures and log.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Message Tampering in Transit (High Severity): Detects modifications during transmission.
      • Message Tampering at Rest (Medium Severity): Detects tampering while stored.
      • Non-Repudiation (Low Severity): Provides origin verification.

    • Impact:

      • Message Tampering in Transit: High reduction.
      • Message Tampering at Rest: Medium reduction.
      • Non-Repudiation: Low reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented (Message signing not used).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Producer/Consumer Applications: Implement signing/verification logic.
      • Key Management for Signing: Securely manage signing keys.
      • Performance Testing: Assess performance impact.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas

  • Description:

    1. Configure Broker Limits: In broker.conf, set limits like maxMessageSize, maxConsumerConnections, maxProducerConnections, maxQueueLength.
    2. Configure Nameserver Limits (if applicable): Check namesrv.conf for relevant limits.
    3. Monitor Resource Usage: Monitor broker/nameserver resource usage (CPU, memory, network).
    4. Alerting on Exceedance: Set up alerts for resource limit breaches.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion DoS attacks.
      • Resource Starvation (Medium Severity): Prevents resource monopolization.
      • System Instability (Medium Severity): Maintains system stability.

    • Impact:

      • Denial of Service (DoS): High reduction.
      • Resource Starvation: Medium reduction.
      • System Instability: Medium reduction.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented (Basic message size limits configured).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive Limits: Configure limits for connections, queue lengths, etc.
      • Resource Monitoring & Alerting: Implement robust monitoring and alerts.
      • Dynamic Quotas (if needed): Explore dynamic quota management.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Monitoring (RocketMQ Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Comprehensive Monitoring: Monitor RocketMQ brokers and nameservers:
      • RocketMQ metrics (throughput, latency, queue depth, connections).
      • Security logs (authentication/authorization failures, errors).
    2. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Integration: Integrate RocketMQ logs with SIEM for analysis.
    3. Alerting and Incident Response: Set up alerts for suspicious activity and security events. Establish incident response plan.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Undetected Security Breaches (High Severity): Increases detection likelihood.
      • Configuration Drift (Medium Severity): Helps identify misconfigurations.
      • Zero-Day Exploits (Medium Severity): Enables faster detection and mitigation.

    • Impact:

      • Undetected Security Breaches: High reduction (through early detection).
      • Configuration Drift: Medium reduction.
      • Zero-Day Exploits: Medium reduction (through faster response).

    • Currently Implemented: Basic Monitoring Implemented (Basic system monitoring, lacking security focus).

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive Security Monitoring: Monitor security-related events/logs.
      • SIEM Integration: Integrate with SIEM system.
      • Incident Response Plan: Develop formal incident response plan for RocketMQ security.