Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
162 lines (106 loc) · 18.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

162 lines (106 loc) · 18.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/shardingsphere

Objective: Compromise Application Data and/or Availability via ShardingSphere Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Data and/or Availability via ShardingSphere Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE - ROOT GOAL]
├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1. Exploit SQL Injection Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - SQL Injection]
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1. Bypass Sharding Logic via SQL Injection
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Craft SQL to access data across shards without authorization [CRITICAL NODE - Cross-Shard Access via SQLi]
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.2. Inject malicious SQL through ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - Proxy SQL Injection]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.2.2. Leverage insecure application code that passes unsanitized input to ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - App-Level SQL Injection]
├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2. Exploit Authentication and Authorization Weaknesses in ShardingSphere
│   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.1.3. Exploit misconfigurations allowing unauthorized access [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Misconfiguration]
│   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.2.3. Circumvent authorization checks through SQL injection or other bypass techniques (see 1.1) [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Bypass via SQLi]
├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3. Exploit Configuration and Management Interface Vulnerabilities
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1. Access and manipulate unsecured ShardingSphere configuration files [CRITICAL NODE - Unsecured Config Files]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.1. Gain unauthorized access to configuration files on disk
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere's governance center (ZooKeeper/Etcd) [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center Vulnerability]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.2.1. Compromise ZooKeeper/Etcd instance used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Compromised ZooKeeper/Etcd]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.2.2. Manipulate cluster metadata in ZooKeeper/Etcd to disrupt ShardingSphere operation [CRITICAL NODE - Metadata Manipulation]
├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4. Exploit Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - DoS Vulnerabilities]
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.1. Resource Exhaustion attacks on ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - Proxy Resource Exhaustion]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.1.1. Send a large volume of requests to overload Proxy resources (CPU, memory, connections) [CRITICAL NODE - Volumetric DoS]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.1.2. Craft complex or slow SQL queries to consume excessive resources [CRITICAL NODE - Slow Query DoS]
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.2. DoS attacks targeting ShardingSphere governance center [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center DoS]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.2.1. Overload ZooKeeper/Etcd with excessive requests [CRITICAL NODE - ZooKeeper/Etcd Volumetric DoS]
├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 5. Exploit Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities]
│   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 5.1. Leverage known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Known Dependency Vulnerabilities]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 5.1.1. Identify vulnerable dependencies (e.g., Log4j, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE - Vulnerable Dependency Identification]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 5.1.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in outdated or unpatched dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - Unpatched Dependencies]
│   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 5.1.3. Exploit transitive dependencies with vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE - Transitive Dependency Vulnerabilities]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit SQL Injection Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - SQL Injection]

SQL Injection is a consistently prevalent and impactful vulnerability type in web applications and database systems. ShardingSphere, while adding a layer of abstraction, does not inherently prevent SQL injection.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Bypass Sharding Logic via SQL Injection

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. Craft SQL to access data across shards without authorization [CRITICAL NODE - Cross-Shard Access via SQLi]

  • 1.1.1. Craft SQL to access data across shards without authorization [CRITICAL NODE - Cross-Shard Access via SQLi]: * Attack Vector: Attackers exploit SQL injection flaws in application code or ShardingSphere configurations to craft malicious SQL queries. These queries are designed to bypass the intended sharding logic, allowing access to data across multiple shards without proper authorization. * Why High-Risk: Successful exploitation leads to unauthorized access to sensitive data distributed across the sharded database, potentially resulting in a significant data breach.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2. Inject malicious SQL through ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - Proxy SQL Injection]

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.2. Leverage insecure application code that passes unsanitized input to ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - App-Level SQL Injection]

  • 1.2.2. Leverage insecure application code that passes unsanitized input to ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - App-Level SQL Injection]: * Attack Vector: The most common SQL injection scenario. Application code fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user inputs before constructing SQL queries that are then passed to ShardingSphere Proxy. * Why High-Risk: Application-level SQL injection is easy to exploit if input validation is weak or missing. It can lead to data breaches, data manipulation, and even complete database takeover, especially when combined with ShardingSphere's distributed nature.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Authentication and Authorization Weaknesses in ShardingSphere

Weaknesses in authentication and authorization controls can directly lead to unauthorized access, bypassing all other security measures.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.3. Exploit misconfigurations allowing unauthorized access [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Misconfiguration]

  • 2.1.3. Exploit misconfigurations allowing unauthorized access [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Misconfiguration]: * Attack Vector: Misconfigurations in ShardingSphere Proxy or related components (like firewalls, network ACLs) that inadvertently expose the Proxy or its management interfaces to unauthorized networks or users. * Why High-Risk: Misconfigurations are common and often overlooked. They can provide direct, unauthenticated access to ShardingSphere Proxy, allowing attackers to bypass authentication entirely and potentially gain control over the sharded database.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.3. Circumvent authorization checks through SQL injection or other bypass techniques (see 1.1) [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Bypass via SQLi]

  • 2.2.3. Circumvent authorization checks through SQL injection or other bypass techniques (see 1.1) [CRITICAL NODE - Auth Bypass via SQLi]: * Attack Vector: Attackers use SQL injection (as described in path 1) or other application-level bypass techniques to circumvent ShardingSphere's authorization checks. This allows them to perform actions or access data they are not authorized for. * Why High-Risk: Authorization bypass, especially through SQL injection, can undermine the entire security model. Even if authentication is strong, a successful bypass can grant attackers elevated privileges and access to sensitive resources.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Configuration and Management Interface Vulnerabilities

Configuration and management interfaces are critical points of control. Compromising them can have widespread and severe consequences.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1. Access and manipulate unsecured ShardingSphere configuration files [CRITICAL NODE - Unsecured Config Files]

  • 3.1. Access and manipulate unsecured ShardingSphere configuration files [CRITICAL NODE - Unsecured Config Files]: * Attack Vector: Attackers gain unauthorized access to the file system where ShardingSphere configuration files are stored. This could be through OS-level vulnerabilities, stolen credentials, or insider threats. * Why High-Risk: Configuration files often contain sensitive information like database credentials, connection strings, and security settings. Access to these files allows attackers to steal credentials, modify configurations to gain further access, or disrupt the system's operation. * 3.1.1. Gain unauthorized access to configuration files on disk: This is a sub-node detailing the action of accessing the files.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1. Gain unauthorized access to configuration files on disk

This is a sub-node detailing the action of accessing the files.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere's governance center (ZooKeeper/Etcd) [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center Vulnerability]

  • 3.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere's governance center (ZooKeeper/Etcd) [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center Vulnerability]: * Attack Vector: Attackers target vulnerabilities or misconfigurations in the governance center (ZooKeeper/Etcd) used by ShardingSphere. This could involve exploiting known vulnerabilities in ZooKeeper/Etcd itself, or misconfigurations that allow unauthorized access. * Why High-Risk: The governance center is the central nervous system of a ShardingSphere cluster. Compromising it can lead to cluster-wide instability, data corruption, denial of service, and complete cluster takeover. * 3.2.1. Compromise ZooKeeper/Etcd instance used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Compromised ZooKeeper/Etcd]: Direct compromise of the ZooKeeper/Etcd instance. * 3.2.2. Manipulate cluster metadata in ZooKeeper/Etcd to disrupt ShardingSphere operation [CRITICAL NODE - Metadata Manipulation]: Manipulating the data stored in ZooKeeper/Etcd to disrupt ShardingSphere's functionality.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2.1. Compromise ZooKeeper/Etcd instance used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Compromised ZooKeeper/Etcd]

Direct compromise of the ZooKeeper/Etcd instance.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2.2. Manipulate cluster metadata in ZooKeeper/Etcd to disrupt ShardingSphere operation [CRITICAL NODE - Metadata Manipulation]

Manipulating the data stored in ZooKeeper/Etcd to disrupt ShardingSphere's functionality.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - DoS Vulnerabilities]

DoS attacks can disrupt application availability, leading to business disruption and reputational damage. While not directly leading to data breaches, they are a significant threat to service continuity.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1. Resource Exhaustion attacks on ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - Proxy Resource Exhaustion]

  • 4.1. Resource Exhaustion attacks on ShardingSphere Proxy [CRITICAL NODE - Proxy Resource Exhaustion]: * Attack Vector: Attackers overwhelm the ShardingSphere Proxy with requests, consuming its resources (CPU, memory, connections) and making it unresponsive. * Why High-Risk: The Proxy is the entry point for application requests. A successful DoS attack on the Proxy effectively renders the entire application unavailable. * 4.1.1. Send a large volume of requests to overload Proxy resources (CPU, memory, connections) [CRITICAL NODE - Volumetric DoS]: Classic volumetric DoS attack. * 4.1.2. Craft complex or slow SQL queries to consume excessive resources [CRITICAL NODE - Slow Query DoS]: Using application logic to send queries that are intentionally slow or resource-intensive.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1.1. Send a large volume of requests to overload Proxy resources (CPU, memory, connections) [CRITICAL NODE - Volumetric DoS]

Classic volumetric DoS attack.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1.2. Craft complex or slow SQL queries to consume excessive resources [CRITICAL NODE - Slow Query DoS]

Using application logic to send queries that are intentionally slow or resource-intensive.

Attack Tree Path: 4.2. DoS attacks targeting ShardingSphere governance center [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center DoS]

  • 4.2. DoS attacks targeting ShardingSphere governance center [CRITICAL NODE - Governance Center DoS]: * Attack Vector: Attackers target the governance center (ZooKeeper/Etcd) with DoS attacks, aiming to disrupt cluster coordination and stability. * Why High-Risk: Disrupting the governance center can lead to cluster-wide instability, ShardingSphere malfunction, and ultimately, service downtime. * 4.2.1. Overload ZooKeeper/Etcd with excessive requests [CRITICAL NODE - ZooKeeper/Etcd Volumetric DoS]: Volumetric DoS attack against the governance center.

Attack Tree Path: 4.2.1. Overload ZooKeeper/Etcd with excessive requests [CRITICAL NODE - ZooKeeper/Etcd Volumetric DoS]

Volumetric DoS attack against the governance center.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Exploit Vulnerabilities in ShardingSphere Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities]

Modern applications rely heavily on third-party libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be easily exploited and have wide-ranging impacts.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1. Leverage known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Known Dependency Vulnerabilities]

  • 5.1. Leverage known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by ShardingSphere [CRITICAL NODE - Known Dependency Vulnerabilities]: * Attack Vector: Attackers exploit publicly known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by ShardingSphere. This often involves scanning for vulnerable dependencies and using readily available exploits. * Why High-Risk: Dependency vulnerabilities are common, and exploits are often publicly available. Failure to manage and patch dependencies promptly can leave applications vulnerable to easy and widespread attacks. * 5.1.1. Identify vulnerable dependencies (e.g., Log4j, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE - Vulnerable Dependency Identification]: Identifying vulnerable dependencies through scanning. * 5.1.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in outdated or unpatched dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - Unpatched Dependencies]: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in dependencies that are not updated. * 5.1.3. Exploit transitive dependencies with vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE - Transitive Dependency Vulnerabilities]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in dependencies of dependencies, which are often overlooked.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1.1. Identify vulnerable dependencies (e.g., Log4j, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE - Vulnerable Dependency Identification]

Identifying vulnerable dependencies through scanning.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in outdated or unpatched dependencies [CRITICAL NODE - Unpatched Dependencies]

Exploiting known vulnerabilities in dependencies that are not updated.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1.3. Exploit transitive dependencies with vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE - Transitive Dependency Vulnerabilities]

Exploiting vulnerabilities in dependencies of dependencies, which are often overlooked.