Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
183 lines (141 loc) · 17.5 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

183 lines (141 loc) · 17.5 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Apache Solr

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Apache Solr, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and build process, as described in the provided security design review. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Solr's architecture and common deployment scenarios. This goes beyond generic security advice and delves into Solr-specific configurations and best practices.

Scope:

  • Apache Solr Core: The core search engine functionality, including indexing, querying, and data handling.
  • SolrCloud: The distributed deployment model, including its interaction with ZooKeeper.
  • Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms: The built-in security features (Basic Auth, Kerberos, JWT, RBAC, Rule-based authorization, PKI authentication).
  • Data Flow: The movement of data from external sources, through indexing, to query responses.
  • Build Process: The security controls implemented during the build and release of Solr.
  • Deployment: The SolrCloud deployment model, as described in the design review.
  • Configuration: Security-relevant configuration options and files (e.g., security.json, solr.xml).

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Analysis: Infer the architecture, components, and data flow based on the provided C4 diagrams, element descriptions, and general knowledge of Solr. Identify potential attack surfaces and security-sensitive operations within each component.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each identified component and data flow, consider potential threats based on the business risks outlined in the security design review (data breaches, DoS, data corruption, etc.). Use STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) as a guiding framework.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: Analyze the existing security controls and accepted risks to identify potential vulnerabilities. Consider known Solr vulnerabilities (CVEs), common misconfigurations, and weaknesses in the build process.
  4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified vulnerability, propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies. These recommendations will be tailored to Solr's configuration options, APIs, and best practices. Prioritize mitigations based on impact and feasibility.
  5. Documentation Review: Leverage information from the official Apache Solr documentation (reference guide, security sections) to refine the analysis and recommendations.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component, referencing the C4 diagrams and element descriptions.

2.1. User (Person)

  • Threats: Spoofing (impersonating another user), credential theft, unauthorized access attempts.
  • Security Controls: Authentication (Basic Auth, Kerberos, JWT), Authorization (RBAC).
  • Vulnerabilities: Weak passwords, lack of multi-factor authentication, session hijacking, brute-force attacks.
  • Mitigation:
    • Enforce strong password policies (length, complexity, history).
    • Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) whenever possible, especially for administrative users.
    • Use short-lived session tokens and secure cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure).
    • Implement rate limiting and account lockout mechanisms to mitigate brute-force attacks.
    • Solr Specific: Utilize Solr's built-in authentication plugins (Basic Auth, Kerberos, JWT) and integrate with existing identity providers (LDAP, Active Directory) for centralized user management. Configure appropriate roles and permissions in security.json.

2.2. Solr (Software System)

  • Threats: Solr query injection, XSS, DoS, data breaches, unauthorized access, data corruption, remote code execution (RCE).
  • Security Controls: Authentication, Authorization, SSL/TLS, Audit Logging, Input Validation.
  • Vulnerabilities: Unvalidated input, misconfigured security settings, known CVEs in Solr or its dependencies, insufficient logging.
  • Mitigation:
    • Input Validation: Sanitize all user-supplied input, especially query parameters. Use Solr's প্যারামিটার ইনসুলেশন features (if applicable) or custom request parsers to validate and escape input. Crucially, avoid building Solr queries by directly concatenating user input. Use parameterized queries.
    • XSS Prevention: Sanitize data before indexing to prevent stored XSS. Encode output appropriately in search results to prevent reflected XSS. Use Solr's built-in escaping mechanisms where available.
    • DoS Mitigation: Limit the size and complexity of queries. Configure request rate limiting. Use Solr's maxBooleanClauses setting to prevent overly complex boolean queries. Monitor resource usage and scale SolrCloud appropriately.
    • Authorization: Implement strict RBAC using security.json. Grant least privilege to users and roles. Regularly review and audit permissions.
    • SSL/TLS: Enable SSL/TLS for all communication (client-server and inter-node). Use strong ciphers and protocols. Validate certificates properly.
    • Audit Logging: Enable detailed audit logging to track security-relevant events. Monitor logs for suspicious activity. Integrate with a SIEM system for centralized log analysis.
    • Solr Specific: Regularly update Solr to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities. Carefully review and configure security.json and solr.xml. Use the Rule-based authorization plugin for fine-grained control.

2.3. ZooKeeper (Software System)

  • Threats: Unauthorized access to ZooKeeper, manipulation of SolrCloud configuration, DoS against ZooKeeper.
  • Security Controls: Authentication, Authorization, SSL/TLS (if configured).
  • Vulnerabilities: Unauthenticated access to ZooKeeper, weak ZooKeeper credentials, known ZooKeeper vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation:
    • Authentication: Always enable ZooKeeper authentication (SASL). Use strong credentials.
    • Authorization: Configure ZooKeeper ACLs to restrict access to Solr nodes and authorized clients.
    • SSL/TLS: Enable SSL/TLS for ZooKeeper communication to protect sensitive data in transit.
    • Network Isolation: Isolate ZooKeeper nodes on a separate network segment from Solr nodes and public networks.
    • Solr Specific: Follow Solr's documentation for securing ZooKeeper. Use a dedicated ZooKeeper ensemble for Solr, not a shared one. Regularly update ZooKeeper.

2.4. External Data Sources (Software System)

  • Threats: Data breaches at the source, injection of malicious data into Solr.
  • Security Controls: Varies depending on the data source.
  • Vulnerabilities: Weak security controls at the data source, unvalidated data.
  • Mitigation:
    • Data Source Security: Ensure that external data sources have adequate security controls in place.
    • Data Validation: Validate and sanitize data before importing it into Solr. This is critical to prevent injection attacks and data corruption.
    • Solr Specific: Use Solr's DataImportHandler (DIH) with appropriate transformers and validators to clean and sanitize data. Consider using a secure intermediary system to pre-process data before ingestion.

2.5. Monitoring Tools (Software System)

  • Threats: Unauthorized access to monitoring data, manipulation of monitoring configurations.
  • Security Controls: Authentication, Authorization (if configured).
  • Vulnerabilities: Weak credentials, unauthenticated access, vulnerabilities in the monitoring tools themselves.
  • Mitigation:
    • Authentication and Authorization: Secure access to monitoring tools with strong authentication and authorization.
    • Network Isolation: Restrict access to monitoring tools to authorized networks and users.
    • Solr Specific: If using Solr's built-in metrics, secure the metrics endpoint appropriately.

2.6. Administrator (Person)

  • Threats: Credential theft, insider threats, misconfiguration of Solr.
  • Security Controls: Authentication, Authorization.
  • Vulnerabilities: Weak passwords, lack of MFA, excessive privileges.
  • Mitigation:
    • Enforce strong password policies and MFA for administrative accounts.
    • Implement the principle of least privilege. Grant administrators only the necessary permissions.
    • Regularly audit administrative activity.
    • Solr Specific: Use Solr's RBAC to define specific roles for administrators (e.g., read-only, configuration, security).

2.7. Load Balancer (Software System)

  • Threats: DDoS attacks, SSL/TLS vulnerabilities, man-in-the-middle attacks.
  • Security Controls: SSL/TLS termination, DDoS protection (depending on implementation).
  • Vulnerabilities: Misconfigured SSL/TLS, vulnerabilities in the load balancer software.
  • Mitigation:
    • Use a reputable load balancer with robust security features.
    • Configure SSL/TLS correctly, using strong ciphers and protocols.
    • Implement DDoS protection mechanisms.
    • Regularly update the load balancer software.

2.8 Solr Node (Container)

  • This is covered under 2.2 Solr (Software System)

2.9 Build Process

  • Threats: Introduction of vulnerabilities through compromised dependencies, malicious code injection, insecure build configurations.
  • Security Controls: Source Code Management (Git), Build Automation (Ant/Gradle), Dependency Management, SAST, SCA, License Compliance, Artifact Repository, Code Signing.
  • Vulnerabilities: Outdated or vulnerable dependencies, insufficient SAST/SCA coverage, lack of code signing.
  • Mitigation:
    • Dependency Management: Regularly update dependencies to the latest secure versions. Use a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) to identify and remediate known vulnerabilities. Use a curated list of approved dependencies.
    • SAST: Integrate SAST tools (e.g., FindBugs, SpotBugs, SonarQube) into the build pipeline to identify potential security vulnerabilities in the Solr codebase. Address all identified issues before releasing.
    • SCA: Use SCA tools to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies. Address all identified issues before releasing.
    • Code Signing: Digitally sign all release artifacts to ensure their integrity and authenticity. Use a trusted code signing certificate.
    • Build Server Security: Harden the build server and restrict access to authorized personnel.
    • Solr Specific: Review Solr's build scripts (Ant, Gradle) for potential security issues. Ensure that the build process does not introduce any vulnerabilities.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized)

This section summarizes the most critical and actionable mitigation strategies, prioritized by impact and feasibility.

  1. Enable and Configure Authentication and Authorization (High Priority):

    • Action: Configure security.json to enable authentication (Basic Auth, Kerberos, or JWT). Define roles and permissions using Solr's RBAC. Integrate with an existing identity provider (LDAP, Active Directory) if possible. Never run Solr without authentication in a production environment.
    • Rationale: This is the foundation of Solr security. Without authentication and authorization, anyone can access and potentially modify the index.

  2. Enable SSL/TLS for All Communication (High Priority):

    • Action: Configure Solr to use SSL/TLS for all client-server and inter-node communication. Obtain and install valid SSL certificates. Configure strong ciphers and protocols.
    • Rationale: Protects data in transit from eavesdropping and tampering. Essential for protecting sensitive data and credentials.

  3. Secure ZooKeeper (High Priority):

    • Action: Enable ZooKeeper authentication (SASL). Configure ZooKeeper ACLs. Enable SSL/TLS for ZooKeeper communication. Isolate ZooKeeper on a separate network segment.
    • Rationale: ZooKeeper is critical for SolrCloud operation. Compromising ZooKeeper can lead to complete control over the Solr cluster.

  4. Implement Robust Input Validation and Sanitization (High Priority):

    • Action: Sanitize all user-supplied input, especially query parameters. Use Solr's built-in sanitization features or custom request parsers. Never build Solr queries by directly concatenating user input. Use parameterized queries. Validate and sanitize data before indexing.
    • Rationale: Prevents Solr query injection and XSS attacks, which are common attack vectors against search platforms.

  5. Regularly Update Solr and Dependencies (High Priority):

    • Action: Establish a process for regularly updating Solr and its dependencies to the latest secure versions. Monitor security advisories from the Apache Solr project and dependency vendors.
    • Rationale: Patches known vulnerabilities and reduces the risk of exploitation.

  6. Implement Rate Limiting and Resource Limits (Medium Priority):

    • Action: Configure request rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks. Use Solr's maxBooleanClauses setting to limit the complexity of boolean queries. Monitor resource usage and scale SolrCloud appropriately.
    • Rationale: Protects Solr from being overwhelmed by malicious or unintentional high-volume requests.

  7. Enable and Monitor Audit Logging (Medium Priority):

    • Action: Enable detailed audit logging to track security-relevant events. Monitor logs for suspicious activity. Integrate with a SIEM system for centralized log analysis.
    • Rationale: Provides visibility into security events and helps with incident response.

  8. Harden the Operating System and Network (Medium Priority):

    • Action: Use a dedicated, hardened operating system for Solr servers. Implement network segmentation to isolate Solr from other systems. Configure firewalls to restrict access to Solr and ZooKeeper ports.
    • Rationale: Reduces the attack surface and limits the impact of a potential compromise.

  9. Secure the Build Process (Medium Priority):

    • Action: Integrate SAST and SCA tools into the build pipeline. Address all identified issues before releasing. Digitally sign all release artifacts. Harden the build server.
    • Rationale: Prevents vulnerabilities from being introduced during the build process.

  10. Implement Data at Rest Encryption (Low Priority - Dependent on Requirements):

    • Action: If required by the application or compliance regulations, encrypt sensitive data at rest. Solr itself does not provide built-in data-at-rest encryption. This must be implemented at the operating system or storage layer (e.g., using LUKS, dm-crypt, or encrypted file systems).
    • Rationale: Protects sensitive data from unauthorized access if the storage media is compromised.

4. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Questions:

    • What specific SAST and SCA tools are currently used in the Solr build process? This needs to be confirmed with the Solr development team. Recommendations: SonarQube, FindBugs/SpotBugs (for SAST), OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk (for SCA).
    • What is the process for handling security vulnerabilities reported by external researchers or discovered internally? This needs to be clarified. A well-defined vulnerability disclosure and response process is crucial.
    • Are there any specific compliance requirements (e.g., PCI DSS, HIPAA) that apply to Solr deployments? This needs to be determined based on the specific use case and data being indexed. Compliance requirements will significantly impact the required security controls.
    • What is the current patching and update strategy for Solr and its dependencies? A formal patching and update strategy should be documented and followed.
    • What is the disaster recovery plan for Solr deployments? A disaster recovery plan should be in place to ensure business continuity in case of a major outage. This should include backups, replication, and failover procedures.
    • Is data at rest encryption used or required for any specific deployments? This depends on the sensitivity of the data and compliance requirements.
    • What are the specific monitoring tools and procedures used for Solr? This needs to be clarified. Monitoring should include performance metrics, resource usage, and security events.

  • Assumptions: The assumptions made in the security design review are generally reasonable, but they need to be validated. Specifically, the assumption that "basic security best practices are followed" needs to be confirmed through a review of the actual implementation.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Apache Solr. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly reduce their risk exposure and ensure the secure operation of their Solr deployments. The key is to move beyond generic security advice and focus on the specific configuration options and features provided by Solr itself. Continuous monitoring, regular security audits, and staying up-to-date with the latest security advisories are also essential for maintaining a strong security posture.