Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (131 loc) · 11.2 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (131 loc) · 11.2 KB

Threat Model Analysis for apache/solr

  • Description: An attacker directly accesses the Solr Admin UI or API endpoints (e.g., /solr/admin/, /solr/<collection>/select) without providing any credentials. The attacker can then issue arbitrary commands, view data, modify configurations, or even shut down the Solr instance.
  • Impact:
    • Complete data breach (read all indexed data).
    • Data modification or deletion.
    • Service disruption (DoS, shutdown).
    • System compromise (if RCE vulnerabilities exist).
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • Solr Admin UI (web interface).
    • Solr API endpoints (all request handlers).
    • Authentication and Authorization plugins (if misconfigured or disabled).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enable Authentication: Implement Solr's built-in authentication (Basic Auth, Kerberos, etc.) using the security.json file. Use strong, unique passwords.
    • Network Segmentation: Restrict network access to the Solr Admin UI and API to a trusted internal network using firewall rules (e.g., iptables, AWS Security Groups). Do not expose Solr directly to the public internet.
    • IP Whitelisting: Configure Solr to only accept connections from specific, trusted IP addresses or ranges.
    • Disable Admin UI (if possible): If the Admin UI is not strictly required for operational tasks, disable it entirely via configuration.
    • Use a Reverse Proxy: Place a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache) in front of Solr to handle authentication and authorization before requests reach Solr.
  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious queries using specific Solr query parameters to reveal sensitive information. Examples:
    • fl=*: Returns all fields, potentially exposing internal or sensitive data.
    • debugQuery=on: Reveals detailed query parsing and scoring information, including field names and internal structures.
    • facet.field=<sensitive_field>: Enumerates all values of a sensitive field, even if the user doesn't have direct access to read that field's data.
    • Using terms component to enumerate field values.
  • Impact:
    • Leakage of sensitive data (PII, internal IDs, etc.).
    • Exposure of index structure and internal field names.
    • Facilitates further attacks (e.g., crafting more targeted queries).
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • Query Parsers (e.g., Standard, DisMax, eDisMax).
    • Request Handlers (e.g., /select, /query).
    • Faceting components.
    • Terms component.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Strictly validate and sanitize all user-supplied input used in Solr queries. Use a whitelist approach for allowed parameters and values.
    • Parameter Whitelisting: Implement a strict whitelist of allowed query parameters and their permitted values. Reject any requests containing unauthorized parameters.
    • Field List Control (fl): Never use fl=* in production. Explicitly specify the required fields in the fl parameter.
    • Disable Debugging (debugQuery): Ensure debugQuery=on (and similar debugging options) is disabled in production environments.
    • Facet Restrictions: Limit faceting to specific, non-sensitive fields. Control the number of facet values returned (facet.limit). Consider using the JSON Facet API for more granular control.
    • Request Handler Configuration: Configure request handlers to restrict the use of potentially dangerous parameters.
  • Description: An attacker submits computationally expensive queries designed to consume excessive server resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O). Examples:
    • Queries with leading wildcards (e.g., *sensitive).
    • Complex regular expressions.
    • Deeply nested boolean queries.
    • Queries with very large rows values.
    • Excessive faceting requests.
    • Joins or graph queries on large datasets.
  • Impact:
    • Solr server becomes unresponsive.
    • Legitimate users are unable to access the service.
    • Potential for cascading failures if Solr is a critical component.
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • Query Parsers.
    • Request Handlers.
    • Caching mechanisms (if overwhelmed).
    • Underlying JVM and operating system.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Query Timeouts: Set reasonable timeouts for Solr queries (e.g., using timeAllowed parameter) to prevent long-running queries from consuming resources indefinitely.
    • Resource Limits: Configure Solr and the underlying JVM to limit the resources (CPU, memory) that can be consumed by a single query or request.
    • Disable/Restrict Expensive Query Types: If leading wildcard queries, complex regular expressions, or other expensive query types are not essential, disable them or restrict their use to trusted users/roles.
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting (at the application or network level) to prevent attackers from submitting a large number of requests in a short period.
    • Caching: Use Solr's caching mechanisms effectively to reduce the load on the server. However, ensure the cache itself is not vulnerable to DoS.
    • Monitoring: Continuously monitor Solr's resource usage (CPU, memory, disk I/O, query latency) to detect and respond to potential DoS attacks.
  • Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability in older versions of Solr's VelocityResponseWriter to execute arbitrary code on the Solr server. This typically involves injecting malicious Velocity template code.
  • Impact:
    • Complete system compromise.
    • Data theft, modification, or deletion.
    • Installation of malware.
    • Use of the compromised server for further attacks.
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • VelocityResponseWriter (specifically, older, vulnerable versions).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Upgrade Solr: This is the primary and most effective mitigation. Upgrade to a recent, patched version of Solr where this vulnerability has been addressed.
    • Disable VelocityResponseWriter: If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable the VelocityResponseWriter entirely if it is not absolutely required for your application. This can be done in solrconfig.xml.
    • Input Validation (if VelocityResponseWriter must be used): If you must use an older, vulnerable version and cannot disable the component, implement extremely rigorous input validation and sanitization to prevent the injection of malicious Velocity template code. This is a very risky approach and should be avoided if at all possible.
  • Description: An attacker submits a malicious XML document to a Solr endpoint that is configured to process XML. The XML contains external entity references that, when processed, can lead to:
    • Reading local files on the Solr server.
    • Accessing internal network resources.
    • Denial of service.
  • Impact:
    • Information disclosure (local files, internal network data).
    • Denial of service.
    • Potential for server-side request forgery (SSRF).
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • Any Solr component that processes XML input (e.g., Update handlers, DataImportHandler).
    • XML Query Parser.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Disable External Entities: Configure Solr's XML parser to disable the processing of external entities and DTDs. This is the most effective mitigation. This can often be done through JVM system properties (e.g., -Djavax.xml.accessExternalDTD="" -Djavax.xml.accessExternalSchema="") or within solrconfig.xml.
    • Use JSON: Prefer JSON over XML for data exchange with Solr. JSON parsers are generally less susceptible to XXE attacks.
    • Input Validation: If XML input is unavoidable, validate the XML against a strict schema before passing it to Solr.
  • Description: An attacker with write access to the Solr index (either through compromised credentials or a misconfigured authorization system) intentionally corrupts or deletes the index data.
  • Impact:
    • Data loss.
    • Service disruption.
    • Loss of search functionality.
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • Update Handlers (e.g., /update, /update/json, /update/csv).
    • Solr Admin UI (if write access is granted).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Authorization: Implement strict authorization rules using Solr's authorization framework. Limit write access to the index to only authorized users and roles. Use the principle of least privilege.
    • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery strategy for the Solr index. Regularly back up the index data to a secure location. Test the restoration process.
    • Replication: Use Solr's replication feature to create redundant copies of the index. This provides high availability and fault tolerance, allowing you to quickly recover from index corruption or deletion.
    • Audit Logging: Enable detailed audit logging to track all write operations to the index. This can help identify the source of any malicious activity.
  • Description: An attacker exploits a misconfigured DataImportHandler to:
    • Upload malicious files to the Solr server.
    • Inject arbitrary data into the index.
    • Execute arbitrary code (if the DIH is configured to use scripting).
  • Impact:
    • System compromise (if malicious files are executed).
    • Data corruption.
    • Information disclosure.
  • Affected Solr Component:
    • DataImportHandler (DIH).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure DIH Configuration: Carefully review and secure the DIH configuration (data-config.xml).
    • Restrict File Access: If the DIH is used to import data from files, restrict the directories that Solr can access. Do not allow Solr to read files from arbitrary locations on the filesystem.
    • Disable Scripting (if possible): If scripting is not required, disable it in the DIH configuration. If scripting is necessary, use a secure scripting engine and carefully validate any user-supplied input.
    • Input Validation: Validate and sanitize all data imported through the DIH.
    • Authorization: Restrict access to the DIH to authorized users and roles.