Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (94 loc) · 12.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

105 lines (94 loc) · 12.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/struts

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Struts Up-to-Date

  • Description:
    1. Identify Current Struts Version: Determine the exact version of Apache Struts used in the project by checking dependency management files (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle) or deployed libraries.
    2. Monitor Struts Security Bulletins: Regularly check the official Apache Struts security bulletin page and subscribe to their mailing list for security advisories related to Struts versions.
    3. Upgrade Struts: If security vulnerabilities are announced for the current version or a newer stable version is available with security patches, plan and execute an upgrade to the latest secure Struts version.
    4. Test After Upgrade: After upgrading Struts, perform thorough testing to ensure application functionality remains intact and no regressions are introduced due to the upgrade.
    5. Continuous Monitoring: Establish a process to continuously monitor for new Struts security advisories and plan for timely updates.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): High Severity. Outdated Struts versions are primary targets for RCE exploits, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Medium to High Severity. Some Struts vulnerabilities can lead to DoS attacks, making the application unavailable.
    • Data Breach: Medium to High Severity. Vulnerabilities in Struts can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data managed by the application.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): High Impact. Significantly reduces the risk of RCE by patching known Struts vulnerabilities.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Medium Impact. Reduces the risk of DoS attacks related to known Struts flaws.
    • Data Breach: Medium Impact. Reduces the risk of data breaches stemming from Struts vulnerabilities.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Dependency management is used, and developers are generally aware of updates. However, a proactive, scheduled approach to monitoring Struts security bulletins and upgrades is missing.
    • Location: Dependency management in pom.xml, informal team communication.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal process for regularly monitoring Apache Struts security advisories.
    • Scheduled checks for Struts version updates and planned upgrades.
    • Documented procedure for Struts upgrades and rollback plans.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Struts Specific Context)

  • Description:
    1. Focus on Struts Actions: Specifically target input validation within Struts action classes, as these are the primary entry points for user requests in a Struts application.
    2. Validate Action Inputs: Implement robust input validation within each Struts action to ensure all user-provided data (request parameters, form fields) conforms to expected formats, types, and constraints before processing.
    3. Sanitize for OGNL: Exercise extreme caution when using user input in OGNL expressions, a common source of Struts vulnerabilities.
      • Avoid Dynamic OGNL: Minimize or eliminate the construction of dynamic OGNL expressions based on user input. Prefer parameterized actions.
      • Strict Sanitization (If OGNL unavoidable): If dynamic OGNL is absolutely necessary, rigorously sanitize user input by whitelisting allowed characters and rejecting anything else.
    4. Utilize Struts Validation Framework: Leverage the built-in Struts validation framework (XML or programmatic) to define and enforce validation rules for action forms in a structured and centralized manner. Configure validation in struts.xml or action classes.
    5. Handle Validation Errors in Struts: Use Struts' error handling mechanisms to manage validation failures. Return informative error messages (without revealing sensitive details) and prevent further processing of invalid requests within the Struts action flow.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • OGNL Injection: High Severity. Prevents attackers from injecting malicious OGNL expressions, a critical Struts-specific vulnerability leading to RCE.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Medium Severity. Reduces XSS risks by preventing injection of malicious scripts through user input processed by Struts actions.
    • SQL Injection: Medium Severity. Prevents SQL injection by validating and sanitizing input used in database queries within Struts actions.
  • Impact:
    • OGNL Injection: High Impact. Effectively eliminates OGNL injection vulnerabilities if implemented correctly in Struts actions.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Medium Impact. Significantly reduces XSS risks related to input processed by Struts.
    • SQL Injection: Medium Impact. Significantly reduces SQL injection risks related to input handled by Struts actions.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic validation exists in some Struts actions, but it's inconsistent and not comprehensive. Struts validation framework is used in limited areas. OGNL usage is reviewed, but dynamic OGNL might still be present.
    • Location: Scattered across Struts action classes, some struts.xml validation configurations.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Comprehensive input validation for all Struts actions and user inputs.
    • Consistent and widespread use of the Struts validation framework.
    • Thorough review and elimination of dynamic OGNL expression construction within Struts actions.
    • Centralized and reusable input validation rules specifically for Struts actions.

Mitigation Strategy: Output Encoding and Contextual Escaping (Struts Views)

  • Description:
    1. Focus on Struts Views: Concentrate on output encoding within Struts views (JSPs, FreeMarker, etc.) where data is rendered to the user's browser.
    2. Context-Specific Encoding in Struts Views: Ensure output encoding is applied contextually within Struts views, based on where user-controlled data is displayed (HTML, JavaScript, URL, etc.).
    3. Utilize Struts Tag Libraries for Encoding: Primarily use Struts tag libraries (like <s:property>, <s:url>) for outputting data in views. These tags often provide built-in encoding capabilities. Specifically, use escapeHtml="true" attribute of <s:property> for HTML encoding.
    4. Consistent Encoding in Struts Views: Apply output encoding consistently across all Struts views where user-controlled data is rendered to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): High Severity. Prevents XSS attacks by ensuring user-controlled data displayed in Struts views is treated as data, not executable code, in the browser.
  • Impact:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): High Impact. Effectively eliminates XSS vulnerabilities related to output injection in Struts views if implemented correctly.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. HTML encoding using <s:property escapeHtml="true" .../> is used in some JSPs, but consistency is lacking across all Struts views. JavaScript and URL encoding within Struts views are less consistently applied.
    • Location: JSPs, some usage of Struts tag libraries with encoding attributes.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Consistent output encoding across all JSPs and view technologies used in the Struts application.
    • Implementation of JavaScript and URL encoding within Struts views where necessary.
    • Automated checks or code analysis to ensure proper output encoding in Struts views.
    • Developer training specifically on using Struts tag libraries for secure output encoding.

Mitigation Strategy: CSRF Protection (Struts Interceptor)

  • Description:
    1. Enable Struts CSRF Interceptor: Ensure the Struts CSRF interceptor is enabled in the struts.xml configuration file. This is typically done by including the token interceptor in the default interceptor stack or relevant action interceptor stacks.
    2. Use Struts Token Tag in Forms: In all JSPs or view templates containing forms that submit data to the server (especially state-changing forms), use the <s:token> tag within <s:form>. This tag automatically generates and includes a CSRF token as a hidden field in the form, which is validated by the Struts interceptor.
    3. Struts AJAX CSRF Handling (If Applicable): If AJAX is used for state-changing operations in the Struts application, ensure CSRF tokens are also included and validated. This might require custom JavaScript to retrieve and include the token and server-side logic to validate it in conjunction with the Struts interceptor.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): High Severity. Prevents CSRF attacks by leveraging the Struts CSRF interceptor and token mechanism to ensure requests originate from legitimate user actions within the application.
  • Impact:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): High Impact. Effectively eliminates CSRF vulnerabilities if the Struts CSRF interceptor and token tag are correctly and consistently implemented.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. The Struts CSRF interceptor is enabled in struts.xml. The <s:token> tag is used in some forms, but not consistently across all forms, particularly in older parts of the application. AJAX CSRF protection using Struts mechanisms is likely missing.
    • Location: struts.xml, some JSPs with forms using <s:token>.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Consistent use of <s:token> in all forms performing state-changing operations within the Struts application.
    • Implementation of CSRF protection for AJAX requests within the Struts application context, potentially using custom JavaScript and server-side validation alongside the Struts interceptor.
    • Regular audits to ensure Struts CSRF protection is enabled and correctly implemented in all relevant forms and AJAX calls.

Mitigation Strategy: Error Handling and Information Disclosure (Struts Configuration)

  • Description:
    1. Configure Custom Struts Error Pages: Configure custom error pages within Struts (and potentially the application server) to handle different HTTP error codes (e.g., 404, 500). These custom pages should be generic and user-friendly, avoiding detailed technical error messages that Struts might otherwise display by default.
    2. Generic Error Messages in Struts: Ensure that error handling logic within Struts actions and custom error pages displays generic error messages to users. Avoid revealing specific error details, stack traces, or internal Struts framework information that could be exploited by attackers.
    3. Secure Struts Error Logging: Implement robust error logging for debugging and monitoring purposes within the Struts application. Log detailed error information (including Struts-specific context) to server-side logs, but ensure these logs are securely stored and access-controlled, and avoid logging sensitive data in production logs.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure: Medium Severity. Prevents attackers from gaining sensitive information about the Struts application's internal workings, configuration, or potential vulnerabilities through detailed Struts error messages.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Medium Impact. Significantly reduces the risk of information disclosure through Struts-related error messages.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Custom error pages are configured for some common error codes. Generic error messages are displayed in some cases, but detailed Struts error messages might still be exposed in certain scenarios. Error logging is in place, but secure log storage and sensitive data filtering in Struts logs might be insufficient.
    • Location: web.xml (error page configuration), Struts action exception handling, logging configuration.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Consistent custom error pages for all relevant HTTP error codes within the Struts application.
    • Thorough review and sanitization of error messages displayed to users by Struts actions and error pages.
    • Secure log storage and access controls for Struts application logs.
    • Regular review of Struts logging practices to ensure sensitive data is not logged in production.