Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
187 lines (155 loc) · 20.8 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

187 lines (155 loc) · 20.8 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Apache Struts

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep security analysis is to perform a thorough security assessment of the Apache Struts framework, focusing on its key components and their interactions. This analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess existing security controls, and provide actionable mitigation strategies to enhance the security posture of applications built using Struts. The analysis will specifically consider:

  • Action Execution Flow: How Struts processes incoming requests and executes actions.
  • Parameter Handling: How Struts handles user-supplied parameters, including binding them to objects.
  • OGNL (Object-Graph Navigation Language) Evaluation: The security implications of Struts' use of OGNL for expression evaluation.
  • Interceptors: The role of interceptors in the request processing pipeline and their security implications.
  • Result Rendering: How Struts renders responses (JSPs, templates) and the associated security risks.
  • Configuration Files: The security implications of Struts configuration files (struts.xml, validation.xml).
  • Tag Libraries: Security considerations related to Struts' tag libraries.
  • Integration with Security Frameworks: How Struts integrates with authentication and authorization frameworks.

Scope:

This analysis focuses on the Apache Struts framework itself, version 2.5.x and later (with consideration for older versions where relevant due to the "Legacy Features" accepted risk). It does not cover the security of specific applications built using Struts, except insofar as those applications are affected by the framework's inherent characteristics. It also does not cover the security of the underlying application server (Tomcat, Jetty, etc.) or operating system, except where Struts configuration directly impacts their security. The analysis considers the deployment model described (Docker/Kubernetes) and the build process outlined.

Methodology:

  1. Component Decomposition: Break down the Struts framework into its key architectural components based on the provided documentation, codebase analysis (where possible), and publicly available information.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component, identify potential threats based on common attack vectors against web applications and Struts' specific history of vulnerabilities. This includes, but is not limited to, injection attacks (OGNL, XSS, SQL), remote code execution (RCE), denial of service (DoS), and authentication/authorization bypasses.
  3. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls (identified in the Security Design Review) in mitigating the identified threats.
  4. Vulnerability Inference: Based on the component analysis and threat modeling, infer potential vulnerabilities that may exist within the Struts framework or arise from its typical usage patterns.
  5. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities and strengthen the overall security posture. These strategies will be tailored to the Struts framework and its configuration.
  6. Prioritization: Prioritize the mitigation strategies based on the severity of the associated vulnerabilities and the feasibility of implementation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component, focusing on inferring architecture, components, and data flow.

2.1 Action Execution Flow

  • Architecture: Struts follows a Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern. The core of the action execution flow is the ActionServlet (or FilterDispatcher in older versions), which acts as the front controller. It receives HTTP requests, parses them, and dispatches them to the appropriate Action class based on the configuration in struts.xml.
  • Components:
    • ActionServlet/FilterDispatcher: The entry point for requests.
    • struts.xml: Configuration file mapping URLs to Action classes.
    • Action Classes: Contain the business logic to be executed.
    • Interceptors: Components that intercept the request before and after the Action execution.
    • ValueStack: A stack-like data structure holding the Action object and related data.
    • Result: Determines how the response is rendered (e.g., JSP, Freemarker).
  • Data Flow:
    1. Request arrives at ActionServlet/FilterDispatcher.
    2. struts.xml is consulted to determine the appropriate Action class.
    3. Interceptors are executed (pre-processing).
    4. Parameters are populated into the Action object (using OGNL).
    5. The Action's execute() method is called.
    6. Interceptors are executed (post-processing).
    7. The Result is rendered.
  • Security Implications:
    • Improper Action Mapping: Incorrect configuration in struts.xml could expose unintended actions or allow attackers to bypass security checks.
    • Interceptor Bypass: If interceptors are misconfigured or bypassed, security checks (e.g., authentication, authorization) might be circumvented.
    • Unintended Method Execution: Attackers might manipulate parameters to invoke methods other than the intended execute() method, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or vulnerabilities.

2.2 Parameter Handling

  • Architecture: Struts uses OGNL to bind request parameters to properties of Action objects (and other objects on the ValueStack). This is a powerful but potentially dangerous mechanism.
  • Components:
    • ParametersInterceptor: The interceptor responsible for populating parameters.
    • ValueStack: Where the target objects for parameter binding reside.
    • OGNL Engine: The component that evaluates OGNL expressions.
  • Data Flow:
    1. ParametersInterceptor intercepts the request.
    2. It retrieves parameter values from the request.
    3. It uses OGNL expressions to set the values of corresponding properties in Action objects (or other objects on the ValueStack).
  • Security Implications:
    • OGNL Injection: This is the most critical security concern with Struts. If user-supplied input is directly incorporated into OGNL expressions without proper sanitization, attackers can inject malicious OGNL code, leading to:
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Executing arbitrary Java code on the server.
      • Data Exfiltration: Accessing and stealing sensitive data.
      • System Manipulation: Modifying server state or configuration.
    • Mass Assignment: Similar to OGNL injection, attackers might manipulate parameters to set properties they shouldn't have access to, potentially leading to data corruption or privilege escalation.
    • Type Conversion Errors: Incorrect type conversions during parameter binding can lead to unexpected behavior or exceptions, potentially causing denial of service.

2.3 OGNL Evaluation

  • Architecture: OGNL is a powerful expression language used throughout Struts for various purposes, including parameter binding, tag attribute evaluation, and result rendering.
  • Components:
    • OGNL Library: The core library that parses and evaluates OGNL expressions.
    • ValueStack: The context in which OGNL expressions are evaluated.
  • Data Flow: OGNL expressions are evaluated against the ValueStack, which provides access to Action objects, request parameters, and other contextual data.
  • Security Implications:
    • OGNL Injection (as described above): This is the primary security concern. Anywhere OGNL is used, there's a potential for injection if user input is not properly handled.
    • Performance Issues: Complex or poorly written OGNL expressions can impact performance, potentially leading to denial of service.

2.4 Interceptors

  • Architecture: Interceptors are a key part of Struts' request processing pipeline. They provide a way to execute code before and after the Action execution, allowing for cross-cutting concerns like logging, authentication, authorization, and validation.
  • Components:
    • Interceptor Interface: The interface that all interceptors implement.
    • InterceptorStack: A collection of interceptors that are executed in a defined order.
    • struts.xml: Configuration file defining interceptors and interceptor stacks.
  • Data Flow:
    1. Request arrives at ActionServlet/FilterDispatcher.
    2. The configured InterceptorStack is invoked.
    3. Each interceptor in the stack is executed in order (pre-processing).
    4. The Action is executed.
    5. Each interceptor in the stack is executed in reverse order (post-processing).
  • Security Implications:
    • Interceptor Bypass: If attackers can bypass interceptors responsible for security checks, they can potentially access protected resources or execute unauthorized actions.
    • Incorrect Interceptor Configuration: Misconfigured interceptors (e.g., incorrect order, missing interceptors) can weaken security.
    • Vulnerable Interceptors: Custom interceptors might contain vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

2.5 Result Rendering

  • Architecture: Struts supports various result types, including JSPs, Freemarker templates, Velocity templates, and others. The Result object determines how the response is rendered.
  • Components:
    • Result Interface: The interface that all result types implement.
    • struts.xml: Configuration file mapping action results to specific result types and templates.
    • Template Engines (JSP, Freemarker, Velocity, etc.): The engines that process the templates.
  • Data Flow:
    1. The Action returns a result code (e.g., "success", "error").
    2. struts.xml is consulted to determine the appropriate Result type and template.
    3. The Result object is executed.
    4. The template engine processes the template, using data from the ValueStack.
    5. The rendered output is sent back to the client.
  • Security Implications:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If user-supplied data is not properly encoded before being included in the rendered output, attackers can inject malicious JavaScript code, leading to XSS attacks. This is a major concern with JSPs and other template engines.
    • Template Injection: In some cases, attackers might be able to inject malicious code into the template itself, leading to server-side code execution.
    • Information Disclosure: Templates might inadvertently expose sensitive information if they are not carefully designed.

2.6 Configuration Files

  • Architecture: Struts relies heavily on configuration files, primarily struts.xml and validation.xml.
  • Components:
    • struts.xml: Defines actions, interceptors, results, and other core configuration settings.
    • validation.xml: Defines validation rules for Action properties.
  • Data Flow: These files are read by Struts during initialization and used to configure the framework's behavior.
  • Security Implications:
    • Misconfiguration: Incorrect configuration settings can lead to various vulnerabilities, including:
      • Exposing unintended actions.
      • Disabling security checks.
      • Enabling dynamic method invocation (which is highly discouraged).
      • Using insecure result types.
    • Sensitive Information Disclosure: Configuration files might contain sensitive information (e.g., database credentials) if not properly managed. This is especially true if they are stored in version control without proper precautions.

2.7 Tag Libraries

  • Architecture: Struts provides tag libraries (e.g., <s:property>, <s:form>) to simplify the creation of dynamic HTML content in JSPs. These tags often use OGNL expressions to access data from the ValueStack.
  • Components:
    • Struts Tag Library: The set of custom tags provided by Struts.
    • JSP Engine: The component that processes JSPs and executes the tags.
  • Data Flow:
    1. The JSP engine encounters a Struts tag.
    2. The tag's attributes are evaluated (often using OGNL).
    3. The tag accesses data from the ValueStack (using OGNL).
    4. The tag generates HTML output.
  • Security Implications:
    • OGNL Injection: If user-supplied data is used in tag attributes without proper sanitization, OGNL injection is possible.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If tag output is not properly encoded, XSS vulnerabilities can arise.

2.8 Integration with Security Frameworks

  • Architecture: Struts itself does not provide a complete authentication and authorization framework. It relies on integration with external frameworks like Spring Security, Apache Shiro, or the application server's built-in security mechanisms.
  • Components:
    • Interceptors (can be used to integrate with security frameworks).
    • External Security Framework (Spring Security, Apache Shiro, etc.).
  • Data Flow: The integration typically involves using interceptors to intercept requests, delegate authentication and authorization checks to the external framework, and then proceed with the Struts action execution based on the results.
  • Security Implications:
    • Incorrect Integration: If the integration with the security framework is not properly configured, authentication and authorization checks might be bypassed.
    • Vulnerabilities in the Security Framework: Vulnerabilities in the chosen security framework can impact the security of the Struts application.
    • Reliance on Application Server Security: If relying solely on the application server's security, misconfiguration of the server can lead to vulnerabilities.

3. Mitigation Strategies

This section provides actionable and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to the identified threats, specifically for Apache Struts.

Vulnerability Category Specific Vulnerability Mitigation Strategy Priority
OGNL Injection RCE via parameter manipulation 1. Strictly limit OGNL evaluation: Use the SecurityMemberAccess class (and its configuration options) to restrict which classes and methods can be accessed via OGNL. This is the most important mitigation. Configure a whitelist of allowed classes and methods, rather than a blacklist. Disable dynamic method invocation (allowStaticMethodAccess=false in struts.xml). 2. Use the TextParseUtil.translateVariables method carefully: Avoid using this method with user-supplied input directly. If you must, ensure that the input is thoroughly validated and sanitized before being passed to this method. 3. Prefer alternative approaches to OGNL: Whenever possible, use standard Java methods or other mechanisms to access data, rather than relying on OGNL expressions. 4. Regularly update Struts: Newer versions of Struts often include security enhancements and fixes for OGNL-related vulnerabilities. 5. Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF): Configure WAF rules to detect and block OGNL injection attempts. High
OGNL Injection Data exfiltration via OGNL (Same as above) High
Mass Assignment Setting unauthorized properties 1. Use DTOs (Data Transfer Objects): Instead of binding parameters directly to domain objects, use DTOs that only expose the properties that should be modifiable by the user. 2. Use the allowedMethods and excludedMethods parameters in the ParametersInterceptor: Explicitly define which methods can be invoked via parameter binding. 3. Use @InputConfig annotation: Limit allowed parameters. High
XSS Injecting malicious JavaScript 1. Encode all output: Use the <s:property> tag with escapeHtml="true" (or escapeJavaScript="true" where appropriate) to automatically encode output. This is the primary defense against XSS. 2. Use a Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a CSP to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded, mitigating the impact of XSS attacks. 3. Avoid using altSyntax: Disable the altSyntax feature in Struts, which can make it easier to introduce XSS vulnerabilities. High
Interceptor Bypass Bypassing security checks 1. Ensure correct interceptor configuration: Carefully review the struts.xml configuration to ensure that security interceptors (authentication, authorization) are correctly configured and applied to all relevant actions. 2. Use a default interceptor stack: Define a default interceptor stack that includes all necessary security interceptors, and apply it to all actions unless there's a specific reason not to. 3. Avoid using excludeMethods in security interceptors: Be very cautious when excluding methods from security checks, as this can create vulnerabilities. High
Action Mapping Issues Exposing unintended actions 1. Use wildcard mappings carefully: Avoid overly broad wildcard mappings in struts.xml, as they can expose unintended actions. 2. Use strict naming conventions: Adopt clear naming conventions for actions and methods to reduce the risk of accidental exposure. 3. Regularly review struts.xml: Periodically review the struts.xml configuration to ensure that it is accurate and secure. Medium
Template Injection Server-side code execution 1. Avoid user-controlled template paths: Do not allow users to specify the path or name of the template to be rendered. 2. Sanitize user input used in templates: If user input must be included in templates, ensure it is thoroughly validated and sanitized before being used. 3. Use a secure template engine: Choose a template engine that is known to be secure and has built-in protection against template injection. High
Misconfiguration Various vulnerabilities 1. Follow security best practices: Consult the official Struts security documentation and follow all recommended security best practices. 2. Use a secure configuration template: Start with a secure configuration template and customize it as needed, rather than building the configuration from scratch. 3. Regularly review configuration files: Periodically review all Struts configuration files (struts.xml, validation.xml, etc.) to ensure they are accurate and secure. 4. Use environment variables: Store sensitive configuration data (e.g., database credentials) in environment variables, rather than hardcoding them in configuration files. Medium
Dependency Issues Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries 1. Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use SCA tools (as recommended in the Security Design Review) to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries. 2. Regularly update dependencies: Keep all third-party libraries up to date to patch known vulnerabilities. 3. Use a dependency management tool: Use Maven or Gradle to manage dependencies and ensure that only trusted and up-to-date libraries are used. High
Authentication/Authorization Bypass Accessing protected resources 1. Integrate with a robust security framework: Use a well-established security framework like Spring Security or Apache Shiro for authentication and authorization. 2. Configure the security framework correctly: Ensure that the security framework is properly configured to protect all relevant resources and enforce appropriate access controls. 3. Use fine-grained authorization: Implement fine-grained authorization controls to restrict access to resources based on user roles and permissions. High

4. Prioritization and Conclusion

The mitigation strategies are prioritized based on the severity of the associated vulnerabilities and the feasibility of implementation. OGNL injection is the most critical vulnerability in Struts and should be addressed with the highest priority. XSS is also a significant concern and requires careful attention to output encoding. Proper configuration and dependency management are essential for maintaining a secure Struts application.

This deep security analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Apache Struts framework. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, developers can significantly reduce the risk of vulnerabilities and build more secure web applications. Regular security reviews, penetration testing, and staying informed about the latest Struts security advisories are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture. The use of SAST, DAST and SCA tools, as recommended, is critical for ongoing security.