Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (67 loc) · 11.9 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (67 loc) · 11.9 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for apolloconfig/apollo

Attack Surface: Weak Admin Service Authentication

  • Description: Using default or easily guessable credentials for the Apollo Admin Service, which is the primary interface for managing configurations within Apollo.
  • Apollo Contribution: Apollo's Admin Service relies on authentication to protect configuration management. Weak credentials directly undermine this security, providing a trivial entry point for attackers to control Apollo.
  • Example: An administrator deploys Apollo and fails to change the default "apollo" username and password. An attacker easily guesses these defaults and gains full administrative access to the Apollo configuration system.
  • Impact: Full administrative access to Apollo, enabling attackers to read, modify, and delete configurations. This can lead to widespread application disruption, data breaches through configuration manipulation, and injection of malicious settings.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Change Default Credentials: Immediately replace default administrator usernames and passwords during Apollo setup.
    • Enforce Strong Password Policies: Implement and enforce robust password complexity requirements and mandatory password rotation for all administrative accounts.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enable MFA for all administrator accounts accessing the Apollo Admin Service to significantly enhance authentication security.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Restrict administrative access to the Apollo Admin Service to only essential personnel, minimizing the potential attack surface.

Attack Surface: Insecure API Authentication (Admin & Config Service)

  • Description: Weak or absent authentication mechanisms for Apollo's internal APIs (Admin Service and Config Service) and APIs used by client applications to fetch configurations.
  • Apollo Contribution: Apollo's architecture relies heavily on APIs for communication between its components and with client applications. Insecure APIs become direct and exploitable pathways for unauthorized access and manipulation within the Apollo ecosystem.
  • Example: The API used by the Config Service to distribute configurations to applications lacks proper authentication. An attacker intercepts network traffic and directly queries this unprotected API to retrieve sensitive application configurations without any authorization checks.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive configuration data, potentially leading to data breaches. Compromise of Admin Service APIs could grant attackers the ability to modify configurations, manage namespaces, and perform other administrative actions.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement API Authentication: Enforce strong API authentication methods such as API keys, OAuth 2.0, or mutual TLS for all Apollo APIs (Admin Service, Config Service, and client-facing APIs).
    • Secure API Key Management: Implement secure storage and management practices for API keys. Avoid embedding keys directly in code or configuration files. Utilize secure vault solutions if necessary.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for API Access: Restrict API access based on the principle of least privilege, ensuring only authorized clients and services can access specific APIs and resources.
    • Regularly Review and Rotate API Keys: Establish a policy for periodic review and rotation of API keys to limit the window of opportunity in case of key compromise.

Attack Surface: Configuration Injection/Poisoning

  • Description: Attackers with unauthorized access to the Apollo Admin Service inject malicious or unintended configurations, which are then distributed to and loaded by applications, leading to widespread application compromise.
  • Apollo Contribution: Apollo's core function is configuration management, making it a direct target for configuration injection attacks. Compromising the Admin Service allows attackers to directly manipulate the configurations that control application behavior.
  • Example: An attacker gains unauthorized access to the Apollo Admin Service (e.g., through weak authentication) and modifies a configuration value that dictates the logging level for applications. They change it to "DEBUG" and also modify the logging destination to an attacker-controlled server. Sensitive application data is now logged and exfiltrated to the attacker.
  • Impact: Severe application compromise, data breaches, denial of service, and potential for remote code execution depending on how applications utilize and process configurations received from Apollo. This can have cascading effects across all applications managed by the compromised Apollo instance.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Access Control to Admin Service: Implement robust authentication and authorization for the Admin Service (as detailed in point 1) to prevent unauthorized access.
    • Input Validation in Configuration Values: Applications must implement rigorous input validation and sanitization of configuration values received from Apollo before using them, especially for security-sensitive settings or values used in critical operations.
    • Code Review of Configuration Usage: Conduct thorough code reviews to ensure applications handle configurations securely and are resilient to potentially malicious or unexpected configuration values.
    • Configuration Versioning and Rollback: Leverage Apollo's built-in configuration versioning and rollback features to quickly revert to known-good configurations in case of accidental or malicious modifications.
    • Auditing of Configuration Changes: Enable comprehensive auditing and logging of all configuration changes within Apollo to detect and investigate any suspicious or unauthorized modifications.

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Apollo Portal

  • Description: Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities within the Apollo Portal web UI, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the browsers of users accessing the Portal.
  • Apollo Contribution: The Apollo Portal is the administrative web interface for managing Apollo. XSS vulnerabilities in the Portal directly expose administrators to attacks when interacting with Apollo.
  • Example: An attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into a namespace description field within the Apollo Portal. When an administrator views this namespace, the injected script executes in their browser, potentially stealing their session cookies, redirecting them to a phishing site, or performing administrative actions on their behalf within Apollo.
  • Impact: Session hijacking of Apollo administrators, account takeover, potential defacement of the Apollo Portal interface, and the ability for attackers to further compromise the Apollo system through administrative access gained via XSS.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Sanitization and Output Encoding: Implement rigorous input sanitization and output encoding throughout the Apollo Portal codebase to prevent the injection and execution of malicious scripts.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP) for the Apollo Portal to restrict the sources from which the browser can load resources, significantly mitigating the impact of potential XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Regular Security Scans of Apollo Portal: Conduct frequent automated and manual security scans and penetration testing specifically targeting the Apollo Portal to proactively identify and remediate XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Keep Apollo Portal Up-to-Date: Ensure the Apollo Portal is always running the latest stable version to benefit from the latest security patches and bug fixes, including those addressing XSS vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Insecure Configuration Fetching over HTTP

  • Description: Client applications are configured to fetch configurations from the Apollo Config Service using unencrypted HTTP connections instead of HTTPS.
  • Apollo Contribution: While Apollo supports secure HTTPS communication, misconfiguration or lack of enforced HTTPS usage for client-to-Config Service communication directly exposes configuration data during transit.
  • Example: An application is mistakenly configured to fetch configurations from the Apollo Config Service using HTTP. An attacker positioned on the network performs a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack and intercepts the HTTP traffic, gaining access to potentially sensitive configuration data being transmitted in plaintext.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive configuration data in transit, allowing attackers to read and potentially modify configurations as they are being transmitted. This can lead to data breaches and application compromise if attackers manipulate configurations during transit.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enforce HTTPS for Configuration Fetching: Mandate and enforce the use of HTTPS for all communication between client applications and the Apollo Config Service. Configure both the Config Service and client libraries to exclusively use HTTPS.
    • TLS/SSL Configuration: Ensure proper and robust TLS/SSL configuration on the Apollo Config Service, including the use of valid and trusted certificates and strong cipher suites.
    • Network Security: Implement network security controls to protect the communication channels between client applications and the Apollo Config Service, further reducing the risk of MITM attacks.

Attack Surface: Vulnerable Dependencies in Apollo Components

  • Description: Apollo components (Admin Service, Config Service, Portal, Client Libraries) rely on third-party libraries that may contain publicly known security vulnerabilities.
  • Apollo Contribution: Like all modern software, Apollo depends on external libraries. Vulnerabilities within these dependencies directly introduce security risks into the Apollo platform itself.
  • Example: A critical vulnerability is discovered in a widely used logging library that is a dependency of the Apollo Config Service. If Apollo uses a vulnerable version of this library, attackers could exploit this vulnerability to potentially gain remote code execution on the Apollo Config Service server.
  • Impact: The impact varies depending on the specific vulnerability, ranging from denial of service and information disclosure to remote code execution and complete system compromise of Apollo components.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning: Implement regular automated dependency scanning of all Apollo components and client libraries to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies.
    • Dependency Updates: Establish a process for promptly updating Apollo components and client libraries to the latest versions, including applying security patches for vulnerable dependencies as soon as they become available.
    • Vulnerability Management Process: Develop a comprehensive vulnerability management process to track, prioritize, and remediate identified dependency vulnerabilities in a timely manner.
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Utilize Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to gain deep visibility into the software bill of materials for Apollo and continuously monitor for new and emerging dependency vulnerabilities.