Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
72 lines (61 loc) · 9.4 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

72 lines (61 loc) · 9.4 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for apolloconfig/apollo

Attack Surface: Unauthorized Configuration Access and Modification

  • Description: Attackers gain unauthorized access to the Apollo Portal (Admin Service) or API, allowing them to view, modify, or delete configurations.
    • How Apollo Contributes: Apollo provides a centralized configuration management system, which, if not properly secured, becomes a single point of failure for configuration control. This is inherent to Apollo's core functionality.
    • Example: An attacker bypasses weak authentication on the Apollo Portal and changes the database connection string to point to a malicious database, stealing user data.
    • Impact: Complete application compromise, data breaches, denial of service, injection of malicious code.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strong Authentication: Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users accessing the Apollo Portal. Integrate with existing SSO/IAM solutions.
      • Robust Authorization: Enforce the principle of least privilege. Grant users only the minimum necessary permissions to specific namespaces and applications. Regularly review and audit user roles and permissions.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Apollo Config Service and Portal on a separate network segment, limiting access from untrusted networks. Use firewalls and network access control lists (ACLs).
      • API Security: Secure the Apollo API with API keys, OAuth 2.0, or other appropriate authentication and authorization mechanisms. Implement rate limiting and input validation on the API.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of the Apollo Portal and API to identify and address vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Configuration Poisoning

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious configuration values into the system, either through the Portal, API, or by compromising the configuration storage.
    • How Apollo Contributes: Apollo's dynamic configuration capabilities, a core feature, introduce the risk of malicious configurations being applied if not properly validated. The ability to change configurations at runtime is central to Apollo.
    • Example: An attacker with write access to a specific namespace injects a configuration value that disables a security feature, allowing for further exploitation. Or, if the application uses configuration values to construct file paths, an attacker could inject a path traversal payload (e.g., ../../etc/passwd).
    • Impact: Varies widely, from minor disruptions to complete application compromise, depending on the nature of the injected configuration.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the application's use of configuration)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input Validation (Server-Side): Implement rigorous server-side validation for all configuration values. Define allowed data types, formats, and ranges. Reject any input that doesn't conform to the defined schema. This validation must occur within the Apollo server itself.
      • Configuration Schemas: Use configuration schemas (e.g., JSON Schema) to define the structure and allowed values for configurations. Enforce schema validation on the server-side (within Apollo).
      • Review and Approval Process: Implement a multi-person approval workflow for configuration changes, especially for critical configurations. This workflow should be integrated into the Apollo change management process.
      • Configuration Auditing: Regularly audit configuration values for anomalies and unexpected changes. Use automated tools to detect potential malicious configurations within the Apollo system.
      • Least Privilege (Namespaces): Utilize Apollo's namespace feature to limit the scope of configuration changes. Grant users access only to the namespaces they need. This is a built-in Apollo mitigation.
      • Sandboxing (if applicable): If the application dynamically executes configuration values (e.g., as code), consider running this code in a sandboxed environment to limit its impact. This is generally a high-risk practice and should be avoided if possible.

Attack Surface: Sensitive Data Exposure in Configurations

  • Description: Developers inadvertently store sensitive data (API keys, passwords, secrets) directly within Apollo configurations without proper encryption.
    • How Apollo Contributes: Apollo's ease of use and its role as a central configuration store can lead to developers taking shortcuts and storing secrets directly in configurations, rather than using a dedicated secrets management solution. The temptation to store secrets directly in Apollo is the key contribution.
    • Example: A developer stores a database password directly in an Apollo configuration value. An attacker gains read access to the configuration and obtains the password.
    • Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized access to other systems, reputational damage.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Never Store Secrets in Configurations: Emphasize this rule to all developers. Provide clear guidelines and training on secure configuration practices.
      • Secrets Management Integration: Integrate Apollo with a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault). Apollo supports referencing external secrets; this is the crucial mitigation.
      • Automated Scanning: Implement automated scanning of configurations within Apollo for potential secrets. Use tools that can detect common secret patterns (e.g., API keys, passwords).
      • Education and Training: Train developers on secure coding practices and the proper use of secrets management tools.

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) against Apollo Config Service

  • Description: Attackers flood the Apollo Config Service with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate applications.
    • How Apollo Contributes: Apollo is a central point for configuration retrieval; if it's down, applications can't get their configurations. This is a direct consequence of Apollo's architecture.
    • Example: An attacker launches a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack against the Apollo Config Service, preventing applications from starting or updating their configurations.
    • Impact: Application unavailability.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Rate Limiting and Throttling: Implement rate limiting and throttling on the Apollo Config Service itself to prevent abuse.
      • Scalable Infrastructure: Deploy the Apollo Config Service on a robust and scalable infrastructure that can handle high loads. Use load balancing and auto-scaling. This is directly related to how Apollo is deployed.
      • Caching (Server-Side): Implement caching mechanisms within the Apollo Config Service to reduce the load.
      • Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor the Apollo Config Service for performance and availability. Set up alerts to notify administrators of potential DoS attacks.
      • CDN (Content Delivery Network): Consider using a CDN to distribute configuration data, reducing the load on the origin server (Apollo).

Attack Surface: Configuration Tampering during Transit (MitM)

  • Description: Attackers intercept and modify configurations in transit between the Apollo Config Service and the application.
    • How Apollo Contributes: While Apollo uses HTTPS, misconfigurations or compromised certificates can still allow for MitM attacks specifically targeting the communication between the application and the Apollo server.
    • Example: An attacker compromises a network device and intercepts traffic between the application and the Apollo Config Service, injecting a malicious configuration value.
    • Impact: The application receives and uses a malicious configuration, leading to various security issues.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strong TLS Configuration: Enforce strong TLS configurations (modern ciphers, strong key exchange, disable weak protocols like SSLv3) for the connection to the Apollo server.
      • Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning on the client-side (within the application) specifically for the Apollo server's certificate to prevent the use of fraudulent certificates.
      • Certificate Authority (CA) Security: Ensure the CA used to issue certificates for the Apollo Config Service is trusted and secure. Use a reputable CA.
      • Regular Certificate Updates: Regularly update and rotate certificates for the Apollo Config Service to minimize the impact of potential certificate compromises.
      • Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic for suspicious activity, such as unexpected connections or certificate changes, particularly focusing on traffic to and from the Apollo server.