Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
135 lines (104 loc) · 9.64 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

135 lines (104 loc) · 9.64 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for baseflow/photoview

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or disrupt application functionality by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the PhotoView component or its usage within the application.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via PhotoView Exploitation * ├───(OR)─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in PhotoView Package * │ ├───(OR)─ Malicious Image Exploitation * │ │ ├───(AND)─ Supply Malicious Image * │ │ │ ├───(OR)─ Upload Malicious Image (if app allows uploads) │ │ │ └───(OR)─ Link to Malicious Image (via URL input, etc.) │ │ └───(OR)─ Denial of Service (DoS) via Image │ │ └───(OR)─ UI Injection via Malicious Image Data │ ├───(OR)─ Logic/Implementation Flaws in PhotoView Usage * │ │ ├───(OR)─ Path Traversal/Local File Inclusion (LFI) * │ └───(OR)─ Dependency Vulnerabilities │ └───(OR)─ Vulnerable Flutter Framework │ └───(OR)─ Vulnerable Image Processing Libraries ├───(OR)─ Misconfiguration/Improper Usage of PhotoView in Application * │ ├───(OR)─ Insecure Image Source Configuration * │ │ ├───(AND)─ Application Loads Images from Untrusted Sources (e.g., user-provided URLs without validation) │ │ └───(AND)─ No Proper Validation/Sanitization of Image Source

Attack Tree Path: Compromise Application via PhotoView Exploitation

  • This is the root goal and represents the overall objective of the attacker.
  • It is critical because successful exploitation at any of the sub-nodes leads to achieving this goal.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in PhotoView Package

  • This node represents a major attack vector focusing on directly exploiting weaknesses within the PhotoView package itself.
  • It is critical because vulnerabilities in PhotoView can have a broad impact on any application using it.

Attack Tree Path: Malicious Image Exploitation

  • This is a significant sub-goal within exploiting PhotoView vulnerabilities, focusing on using crafted images as the attack vector.
  • It is critical because image processing is a complex area prone to vulnerabilities, and images are a common input to PhotoView.

Attack Tree Path: Supply Malicious Image

  • Threat: Attacker provides a specially crafted image to the application.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if application accepts user-provided images via upload or URL).
  • Impact: Medium to High (DoS, UI Injection, potentially RCE if image parsing vulnerabilities are exploited).
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all image data.
    • Use secure image decoding libraries and keep them updated.
    • Implement image size and complexity limits to prevent DoS.
    • Sanitize image metadata and filenames before displaying them.

Attack Tree Path: Upload Malicious Image (if app allows uploads)

  • Threat: Attacker uploads a malicious image directly to the application.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if upload functionality exists).
  • Impact: Medium to High (same as "Supply Malicious Image").
  • Mitigation: Same as "Supply Malicious Image" plus:
    • Implement secure file upload mechanisms.
    • Perform server-side validation and scanning of uploaded files.

Attack Tree Path: Link to Malicious Image (via URL input, etc.)

  • Threat: Attacker provides a URL pointing to a malicious image.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if application accepts user-provided image URLs).
  • Impact: Medium to High (same as "Supply Malicious Image").
  • Mitigation: Same as "Supply Malicious Image" plus:
    • Validate and sanitize user-provided URLs.
    • Use content security policies (if applicable) to restrict image sources.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) via Image

  • Threat: Attacker provides an image designed to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory), causing application slowdown or crash.
  • Likelihood: Medium (relatively easy to craft DoS images).
  • Impact: Medium (Application unavailability, service disruption).
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement image size and complexity limits.
    • Implement resource monitoring and throttling.
    • Use image optimization techniques and caching.

Attack Tree Path: UI Injection via Malicious Image Data

  • Threat: Attacker crafts an image with malicious data in metadata or filename, which is then displayed by the application without proper sanitization, leading to UI disruption or minor data leakage.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if metadata/filenames are directly displayed without sanitization).
  • Impact: Low (Minor data leakage, UI disruption, potential social engineering).
  • Mitigation:
    • Sanitize and validate image metadata and filenames before displaying them in the UI.
    • Avoid directly displaying potentially malicious data from image sources without encoding.

Attack Tree Path: Logic/Implementation Flaws in PhotoView Usage

  • This node highlights vulnerabilities arising from how developers incorrectly or insecurely use the PhotoView component in their application.
  • It is critical because even a secure component can be rendered vulnerable by improper usage.

Attack Tree Path: Path Traversal/Local File Inclusion (LFI)

  • Threat: If the application uses PhotoView to display local files based on user input without proper sanitization, an attacker can manipulate the input to access files outside the intended directory, potentially gaining access to sensitive system files.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if application handles local file paths based on user input).
  • Impact: High (Access to sensitive local files, potential system compromise).
  • Mitigation:
    • Never directly use user input to construct file paths for PhotoView.
    • Use secure methods for accessing and displaying local files, such as whitelisting allowed directories or using content providers.
    • Implement strict path sanitization and validation if local file access is absolutely necessary.

Attack Tree Path: Misconfiguration/Improper Usage of PhotoView in Application

  • This node is a broader category encompassing various ways developers can misconfigure or improperly use PhotoView, leading to vulnerabilities.
  • It is critical because misconfigurations are common and often easily exploitable.

Attack Tree Path: Insecure Image Source Configuration

  • Attack Vector: Application Loads Images from Untrusted Sources (e.g., user-provided URLs without validation)

    • Threat: Application loads images from untrusted sources (e.g., user-provided URLs) without proper validation, exposing the application to malicious images and related attacks.

    • Likelihood: Medium (Common mistake in application development).

    • Impact: Medium (Exposure to malicious images, potential phishing, malware distribution if images are not just displayed but processed further).

    • Mitigation:

      • Validate and sanitize image URLs or paths before loading them into PhotoView.
      • Implement content security policies (if applicable in the application context).
      • Use trusted and reputable image sources whenever possible.

    • Attack Vector: No Proper Validation/Sanitization of Image Source

      • Threat: Even if image sources are seemingly controlled, lack of proper validation and sanitization can still lead to vulnerabilities if attackers can find ways to inject malicious content or manipulate the source.
      • Likelihood: High (If developers are unaware of the risks and skip validation).
      • Impact: Medium (Exposure to malicious images, potential phishing, malware distribution if images are not just displayed but processed further).
      • Mitigation: Same as "Insecure Image Source Configuration" - emphasize the importance of always validating and sanitizing image sources, regardless of perceived trust.

Attack Tree Path: Vulnerable Flutter Framework & Vulnerable Image Processing Libraries

  • Threat: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in the Flutter framework or underlying image processing libraries used by Flutter or PhotoView.
  • Likelihood: Low (Flutter and libraries are actively maintained, but vulnerabilities can exist).
  • Impact: High (RCE, Data Breach, System Compromise - depending on the specific vulnerability).
  • Mitigation:
    • Keep Flutter framework updated to the latest stable version.
    • Regularly update all dependencies.
    • Monitor Flutter security advisories and dependency vulnerability databases.
    • Use security scanning tools to detect known vulnerabilities in dependencies.