Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (108 loc) · 7.61 KB

File metadata and controls

126 lines (108 loc) · 7.61 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for blankj/androidutilcode

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Access/Disrupt Application via androidutilcode (Focusing on High-Risk Exploits)

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      Attacker's Goal:
                      Gain Unauthorized Access/Disrupt Application via androidutilcode
                                                |
          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          |                                         |
  1. Exploit Utility Function                  2. Leverage Misconfigured
     Vulnerabilities                             Permissions/Settings
          |                                         |
  ------------------------                 ------------------------
  |       |                                   |       |       |
1.1     1.2                                 2.1     2.2     2.3
File    Shell                               Overly  Insec   Weak
Utils   Cmds                                Permiss -ure    Crypto
        Utils                               -ive    Stor-   -graphy
                                            Perms   -age
* 1.1 File Utilities (FileUtils) - [HIGH RISK] - Path Traversal {CRITICAL}
    *  Accessing sensitive files (databases, shared prefs) {CRITICAL}
    *  Overwriting application files {CRITICAL}
* 1.2 Shell Command Utilities (ShellUtils) - [HIGH RISK] - Command Injection {CRITICAL}
    *  Executing arbitrary commands with application privileges {CRITICAL}
    *  Gaining root access (if app has root) {CRITICAL}
* 2.1 Overly Permissive Permissions - [HIGH RISK] (Enabler for other attacks)
    *  Facilitates exploitation of other vulnerabilities (e.g., file access)
* 2.2 Insecure Storage - [HIGH RISK]
    *  Reading unencrypted sensitive data (passwords, API keys) from SharedPreferences {CRITICAL}
    *  Reading unencrypted data from external storage {CRITICAL}
* 2.3 Weak Cryptography Implementation - [HIGH RISK]
    *  Decrypting sensitive data due to weak keys/algorithms {CRITICAL}
    *  Bypassing authentication/authorization {CRITICAL}
*   **Description:** The attacker crafts malicious file paths (e.g., using `../../` sequences) to access files outside the intended directory. This is possible if the application uses `FileUtils` methods with user-supplied input without proper sanitization.
*   **Likelihood:** Medium to High
*   **Impact:** High to Very High
*   **Effort:** Low to Medium
*   **Skill Level:** Novice to Intermediate
*   **Detection Difficulty:** Medium to Hard
*   **Example Attack:**
    1.  Application uses `FileUtils.readFileToString(userInputPath)`.
    2.  Attacker provides `userInputPath = "../../../../data/data/com.example.app/databases/sensitive.db"`.
    3.  Application reads and potentially exposes the contents of `sensitive.db`.
*   **Mitigation:**
    *   Strictly validate and sanitize user-supplied file paths.
    *   Use `getCanonicalPath()` to resolve symbolic links and ensure the path is within the allowed directory.
    *   Avoid relative paths based on user input.
    *   Use the principle of least privilege for file access.
*   **Description:** The attacker injects malicious shell commands into user input that is then used by `ShellUtils` to execute commands. This allows the attacker to run arbitrary commands on the device.
*   **Likelihood:** Low to Medium
*   **Impact:** Very High
*   **Effort:** Low
*   **Skill Level:** Intermediate
*   **Detection Difficulty:** Medium to Hard
*   **Example Attack:**
    1.  Application uses `ShellUtils.execCmd("ls " + userInput, false)`.
    2.  Attacker provides `userInput = "; rm -rf /data/data/com.example.app/*;"`.
    3.  Application executes the injected `rm` command, potentially deleting critical data.
*   **Mitigation:**
    *   *Avoid* using `ShellUtils` with user-supplied input whenever possible.
    *   If unavoidable, use extreme caution and implement robust input sanitization and validation.
    *   Use `ProcessBuilder` with separate arguments instead of concatenating strings.
    *   Prefer built-in Android APIs over shell commands.
*   **Description:** The application requests more permissions than it needs (e.g., `READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` when it only needs to access a specific file). This expands the attack surface.
*   **Likelihood:** High
*   **Impact:** Medium to High (Enabler)
*   **Effort:** Very Low
*   **Skill Level:** Novice
*   **Detection Difficulty:** Very Easy
*   **Example:** Application requests `WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` but only needs to read a single configuration file. An attacker exploiting a separate vulnerability can now write arbitrary files to external storage.
*   **Mitigation:**
    *   Request only the *minimum* necessary permissions.
    *   Use the principle of least privilege.
    *   Regularly review and justify each permission request.
    *   Use scoped storage where possible.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Insecure Storage

*   **Description:** Sensitive data (passwords, API keys, personal information) is stored without encryption using `SPUtils` (SharedPreferences) or other storage mechanisms.
*   **Likelihood:** Medium to High
*   **Impact:** High to Very High
*   **Effort:** Low to Medium
*   **Skill Level:** Intermediate
*   **Detection Difficulty:** Medium
*   **Example:** Application stores the user's password in plain text in SharedPreferences. An attacker with device access or another app with read access to shared preferences can retrieve the password.
*   **Mitigation:**
    *   *Always* encrypt sensitive data before storing it.
    *   Use the Android Keystore system for storing cryptographic keys.
    *   Consider using `EncryptedSharedPreferences`.
*   **Description:** The application uses weak cryptographic algorithms, insecure modes of operation, hardcoded keys, or predictable random number generators when using `EncryptUtils` or other crypto-related functions.
*   **Likelihood:** Medium
*   **Impact:** High to Very High
*   **Effort:** Medium to High
*   **Skill Level:** Advanced
*   **Detection Difficulty:** Hard to Very Hard
*   **Example:** Application uses `EncryptUtils` with a hardcoded key and DES encryption. An attacker can easily decrypt the data.
*   **Mitigation:**
    *   Follow cryptographic best practices.
    *   Use strong algorithms (e.g., AES-256 with GCM).
    *   Use secure key management (Android Keystore).
    *   Avoid hardcoding keys.
    *   Use a secure random number generator.
    *   Regularly review and update cryptographic implementations.