Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
147 lines (135 loc) · 12.1 KB

File metadata and controls

147 lines (135 loc) · 12.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bumptech/glide

Objective: Compromise Application Using Glide Library

Attack Tree Visualization

[CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via Glide
├───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Network-Based Image Loading [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR]─ Malicious Image from Compromised Server [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND]─ Application loads image from compromised server
│   │       └───[Action]─ Application uses Glide to load image URL pointing to compromised server
│   │       │       ├─── Likelihood: Very High (If server is compromised)
│   │       │       ├─── Impact: Moderate-Significant (DoS, potential exploit via image)
│   │       │       ├─── Effort: Minimal (Once server is compromised)
│   │       │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice
│   │       │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium (Detecting malicious image content might be harder)
│   │       └───[Impact]─ Serve malicious image content (e.g., large image for DoS, image with embedded exploits if parsing vulnerability exists in app or underlying libraries)
│   ├───[OR]─ Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack on Image Download [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND]─ Intercept network traffic between application and image server
│   │   │   └───[Action]─ Network sniffing, ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing on insecure network (e.g., public Wi-Fi)
│   │   │       ├─── Likelihood: Medium (Public Wi-Fi), Low (Secure Networks)
│   │   │       ├─── Impact: Moderate (Image manipulation, potential data injection)
│   │   │       ├─── Effort: Low-Medium
│   │   │       ├─── Skill Level: Beginner-Intermediate
│   │   │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard (Depending on network monitoring)
│   ├───[OR]─ Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Image [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND]─ Application uses Glide to load and process large image
│   │       └───[Action]─ Application does not implement proper resource limits or error handling for large images
│   │       │       ├─── Likelihood: Medium (Common oversight)
│   │       │       ├─── Impact: Moderate (Application crash, UI freeze)
│   │       │       ├─── Effort: Minimal
│   │       │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice
│   │       │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Very Easy (Application monitoring, user reports)
│   │       └───[Impact]─ Application crashes due to OutOfMemoryError, UI freezes, resource exhaustion.
├───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Local Storage/Cache Mechanisms [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR]─ Cache Poisoning (Indirect via Network Attacks) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND]─ Glide caches the malicious image
│   │       └───[Action]─ Glide's caching mechanism stores the compromised image
│   │       │       ├─── Likelihood: Very High (If network attack succeeds and caching is enabled)
│   │       │       ├─── Impact: Moderate (Persistent malicious content)
│   │       │       ├─── Effort: Minimal (Automatic caching by Glide)
│   │       │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice
│   │       │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Medium (Cache inspection, anomaly detection)
│   │       └───[Impact]─ Subsequent loads of the same image URL will serve the malicious cached version, even if the original server is fixed. Persistent compromise until cache is cleared.
└───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Misconfiguration or Misuse of Glide API [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    ├───[OR]─ Insecure Image Loading Configuration [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   └───[AND]─ Application uses HTTP URLs when HTTPS is available and recommended
    │       └───[Action]─ Application uses HTTP URLs when HTTPS is available and recommended
    │       │       ├─── Likelihood: Medium (Legacy systems, oversight)
    │       │       ├─── Impact: Moderate (MitM vulnerability)
    │       │       ├─── Effort: Minimal (Using HTTP URLs)
    │       │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice
    │       │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, network traffic analysis)
    │       └───[Impact]─ Increased risk of MitM attacks, exposure of user data if images contain sensitive information.
    ├───[OR]─ Improper Error Handling and Resource Management [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   └───[AND]─ Application does not handle Glide's error callbacks or resource loading failures gracefully
    │       └───[Action]─ Application ignores Glide's `RequestListener` errors or `onLoadFailed()` callbacks
    │       │       ├─── Likelihood: Medium (Common oversight in development)
    │       │       ├─── Impact: Minor-Moderate (Application instability, unexpected behavior)
    │       │       ├─── Effort: Minimal (Developer oversight)
    │       │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice (Developer error)
    │       │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, testing)
    │       └───[Impact]─ Application crashes, unexpected behavior, potential information disclosure through error messages.
    └───[OR]─ [CRITICAL NODE] Lack of Input Validation on Image URLs (Application Responsibility, but Glide-Related) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └───[AND]─ Application accepts user-provided image URLs without proper validation
            └───[Action]─ Application allows users to input or control image URLs directly (e.g., profile picture upload, custom image URL input)
            │       ├─── Likelihood: Medium-High (Common feature in many apps)
            │       ├─── Impact: Moderate (Redirection, loading malicious content, network attacks)
            │       ├─── Effort: Minimal (Application design flaw)
            │       ├─── Skill Level: Novice (Application design flaw)
            │       └─── Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, security testing)
            └───[Impact]─ Redirection to phishing sites, loading of inappropriate content, potential for network-based attacks as described above.
  • This is the root goal and represents any successful attack that leverages Glide to compromise the application. It is critical because all subsequent attack paths lead to this objective.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Malicious Image from Compromised Server [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Loading images from a server that has been compromised by an attacker.
      • Action: Application uses Glide to load an image URL pointing to the compromised server.
      • Likelihood: Very High (if the server is compromised).
      • Impact: Moderate-Significant (Denial of Service by serving large images, potential exploitation if image parsing vulnerabilities exist in the application or underlying libraries).
      • Effort: Minimal (once the server is compromised).
      • Skill Level: Novice.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium (detecting malicious image content might be harder than detecting server compromise).
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack on Image Download [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Intercepting network traffic between the application and the image server to inject malicious content.
      • Action: Network sniffing, ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing on insecure networks (e.g., public Wi-Fi).
      • Likelihood: Medium (on public Wi-Fi), Low (on secure networks).
      • Impact: Moderate (image manipulation, potential data injection).
      • Effort: Low-Medium.
      • Skill Level: Beginner-Intermediate.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard (depending on network monitoring capabilities).
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Image [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Serving an excessively large image to overwhelm the application's resources.
      • Action: Application does not implement proper resource limits or error handling for large images when loading via Glide.
      • Likelihood: Medium (common oversight in application development).
      • Impact: Moderate (application crash, UI freeze, resource exhaustion).
      • Effort: Minimal.
      • Skill Level: Novice.
      • Detection Difficulty: Very Easy (application monitoring, user reports).
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Cache Poisoning (Indirect via Network Attacks) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Leveraging a successful network-based attack (Malicious Image or MitM) to poison Glide's cache.
      • Action: Glide's caching mechanism stores the malicious image obtained from a network attack.
      • Likelihood: Very High (if a network attack succeeds and caching is enabled).
      • Impact: Moderate (persistent malicious content served even after the original server is fixed, until cache is cleared).
      • Effort: Minimal (automatic caching by Glide).
      • Skill Level: Novice.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (cache inspection, anomaly detection).
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Insecure Image Loading Configuration [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Configuring Glide to use insecure protocols or disabling security features.
      • Action: Application uses HTTP URLs when HTTPS is available and recommended.
      • Likelihood: Medium (legacy systems, developer oversight).
      • Impact: Moderate (increased risk of MitM attacks, exposure of user data if images contain sensitive information).
      • Effort: Minimal (using HTTP URLs).
      • Skill Level: Novice.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (code review, network traffic analysis).
    • Improper Error Handling and Resource Management [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Failing to handle errors and resource loading failures gracefully in Glide.
      • Action: Application ignores Glide's RequestListener errors or onLoadFailed() callbacks.
      • Likelihood: Medium (common oversight in development).
      • Impact: Minor-Moderate (application instability, unexpected behavior, potential information disclosure through error messages).
      • Effort: Minimal (developer oversight).
      • Skill Level: Novice (developer error).
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (code review, testing).
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Lack of Input Validation on Image URLs (Application Responsibility, but Glide-Related) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Accepting user-provided image URLs without proper validation, allowing malicious URLs to be loaded via Glide.
      • Action: Application allows users to input or control image URLs directly (e.g., profile picture upload, custom image URL input).
      • Likelihood: Medium-High (common feature in many apps).
      • Impact: Moderate (redirection to phishing sites, loading of inappropriate content, potential for network-based attacks).
      • Effort: Minimal (application design flaw).
      • Skill Level: Novice (application design flaw).
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (code review, security testing).