Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
178 lines (160 loc) · 17.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

178 lines (160 loc) · 17.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for camunda/camunda-bpm-platform

Objective: Gain unauthorized access to application data or functionality by exploiting vulnerabilities within the Camunda BPM Platform.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Camunda BPM Platform [CR]
├───[OR] Exploit Web Application Vulnerabilities (Camunda Web Apps: Cockpit, Admin, Tasklist) [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Injection Attacks [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] SQL Injection [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Craft malicious SQL queries to extract data, modify data, or gain control [HR] [CR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Inject malicious scripts to steal credentials, redirect users, or deface application [HR]
│   ├───[OR] Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Default Credentials [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Attempt default credentials for Camunda web apps or underlying database [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Weak Password Policies [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Brute-force or dictionary attacks against Camunda user accounts [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Authorization Flaws [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Identify flaws in Camunda's authorization model to access restricted resources or actions [HR]
│   ├───[OR] Vulnerable Dependencies [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Exploit known vulnerabilities in these libraries (e.g., via public exploits) [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Craft malicious requests to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users [HR]

├───[OR] Exploit REST API Vulnerabilities (Camunda REST API) [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] API Key/Token Leakage or Weakness [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Obtain leaked API keys or exploit weak API key generation/management [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Lack of Proper Authorization Checks [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Access or manipulate data without proper permissions [HR]
│   ├───[OR] Injection Attacks (Similar to Web Apps, but via API parameters) [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] SQL Injection (if API interacts with database directly) [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Craft malicious SQL queries via API requests [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Data Exposure via API [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Extract sensitive application data via API requests [HR]

├───[OR] Exploit Process Engine Vulnerabilities (Camunda Core) [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Process Definition Injection [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Execute malicious processes to perform unauthorized actions or gain control [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Scripting Vulnerabilities (Groovy, JavaScript in BPMN) [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Exploit scripting vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code within the engine context [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Deserialization Vulnerabilities
│   │   └───[AND] Inject malicious serialized objects to execute arbitrary code [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Engine Logic Bugs
│   │   └───[AND] Manipulate process execution flow or gain unauthorized access through engine bugs [CR]

├───[OR] Exploit Configuration and Deployment Issues [HR] [CR]
│   ├───[OR] Default Configuration [HR]
│   │   └───[AND] Exploit default configurations that are insecure (e.g., default ports, exposed management interfaces) [HR]
│   ├───[OR] Insecure Deployment Practices [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Exposed Management Interfaces (JMX, H2 Console if enabled in production) [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Reconfigure Camunda, access sensitive data, or execute code via management interfaces [HR] [CR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Insecure File Permissions [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Access or modify sensitive configuration or data files [HR]
│   │   ├───[OR] Lack of Security Hardening [HR]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Leverage known vulnerabilities in unpatched Camunda versions [HR] [CR]

└───[OR] Social Engineering (Targeting Camunda Users/Administrators) [HR] [CR]
    └───[AND] Obtain credentials or access to Camunda web applications, APIs, or management interfaces [HR] [CR]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Web Application Vulnerabilities (Camunda Web Apps: Cockpit, Admin, Tasklist) [HR] [CR]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Injection Attacks [HR]:
      • SQL Injection [HR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting vulnerabilities in input handling within Camunda web applications to inject malicious SQL queries.
        • Risk: Can lead to data breaches, data manipulation, and potentially gaining control over the underlying database and application.
        • Mitigation: Use parameterized queries or ORM frameworks, implement strict input validation and sanitization, regularly perform SQL injection vulnerability scanning.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) [HR]:
        • Attack: Injecting malicious JavaScript code into web pages served by Camunda web applications, which is then executed in users' browsers.
        • Risk: Can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, defacement of the application, and redirection to malicious sites.
        • Mitigation: Implement robust output encoding, use Content Security Policy (CSP), regularly scan for XSS vulnerabilities, educate users about phishing and suspicious links.
    • Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HR]:
      • Default Credentials [HR]:
        • Attack: Attempting to log in using default usernames and passwords for Camunda web applications or the underlying database.
        • Risk: If default credentials are not changed, attackers can gain immediate administrative access.
        • Mitigation: Change all default credentials immediately upon deployment, enforce strong password policies, regularly audit user accounts.
      • Weak Password Policies [HR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting weak password policies by using brute-force or dictionary attacks to guess user passwords.
        • Risk: Successful password cracking can lead to unauthorized access to user accounts and application functionalities.
        • Mitigation: Enforce strong password policies (complexity, length, rotation), implement account lockout mechanisms, consider multi-factor authentication (MFA).
      • Authorization Flaws [HR]:
        • Attack: Identifying and exploiting flaws in Camunda's authorization model to access resources or perform actions that should be restricted.
        • Risk: Can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of processes, and privilege escalation.
        • Mitigation: Thoroughly review and test Camunda's authorization configurations, implement role-based access control (RBAC), regularly audit access permissions.
    • Vulnerable Dependencies [HR]:
      • Exploit known vulnerabilities in these libraries (e.g., via public exploits) [HR] [CR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting known security vulnerabilities in outdated or vulnerable third-party libraries used by Camunda web applications.
        • Risk: Vulnerable dependencies can provide easy entry points for attackers to compromise the application and potentially the server.
        • Mitigation: Regularly update Camunda BPM Platform and all its dependencies, use dependency scanning tools to identify vulnerable libraries, subscribe to security advisories for used libraries.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) [HR]:
      • Attack: Tricking an authenticated user into unknowingly sending malicious requests to the Camunda web application, performing actions on their behalf.
      • Risk: Can lead to unauthorized actions being performed, such as process modification, data changes, or account manipulation.
      • Mitigation: Implement anti-CSRF tokens in web forms and API requests, use proper HTTP method handling (e.g., using POST for state-changing operations).

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit REST API Vulnerabilities (Camunda REST API) [HR] [CR]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HR]:
      • API Key/Token Leakage or Weakness [HR]:
        • Attack: Obtaining leaked API keys or exploiting weak API key generation or management practices.
        • Risk: Leaked or weak API keys can grant unauthorized access to the entire API or specific endpoints.
        • Mitigation: Securely store and manage API keys (e.g., using secrets management systems), implement API key rotation, monitor API key usage for anomalies, use strong API key generation methods.
      • Lack of Proper Authorization Checks [HR]:
        • Attack: Identifying API endpoints that lack proper authorization checks, allowing access or manipulation of data without proper permissions.
        • Risk: Can lead to unauthorized data access, data manipulation, and abuse of API functionalities.
        • Mitigation: Implement robust authorization checks for all API endpoints, follow the principle of least privilege, use a consistent authorization mechanism across the API.
    • Injection Attacks (Similar to Web Apps, but via API parameters) [HR]:
      • SQL Injection (if API interacts with database directly) [HR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting vulnerabilities in API parameter handling to inject malicious SQL queries when the API interacts directly with the database.
        • Risk: Similar to web application SQL injection, can lead to data breaches, data manipulation, and system compromise.
        • Mitigation: Use parameterized queries or ORM frameworks in API backend, implement strict input validation and sanitization for API parameters, regularly perform API security testing.
    • Data Exposure via API [HR]:
      • Extract sensitive application data via API requests [HR]:
        • Attack: Identifying API endpoints that expose sensitive data without proper authorization or filtering in API responses.
        • Risk: Unintentional exposure of sensitive data can lead to privacy violations, data breaches, and reputational damage.
        • Mitigation: Carefully design API responses to only include necessary data, implement proper authorization and filtering for sensitive data, regularly review API responses for potential data leaks.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Process Engine Vulnerabilities (Camunda Core) [HR] [CR]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Process Definition Injection [HR]:
      • Execute malicious processes to perform unauthorized actions or gain control [HR] [CR]:
        • Attack: Injecting malicious BPMN process definitions into the Camunda process engine, often through deployment APIs or file uploads.
        • Risk: Malicious processes can be designed to perform arbitrary actions within the engine's context, potentially leading to full application compromise.
        • Mitigation: Restrict access to process deployment functionalities, implement strict validation and sanitization of BPMN process definitions before deployment, perform security reviews of process definitions.
    • Scripting Vulnerabilities (Groovy, JavaScript in BPMN) [HR]:
      • Exploit scripting vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code within the engine context [HR] [CR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting vulnerabilities in custom scripts (Groovy, JavaScript) embedded within BPMN processes.
        • Risk: Scripting vulnerabilities can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code within the Camunda process engine's context, potentially gaining full control.
        • Mitigation: Carefully review and sanitize all custom scripts, limit the use of scripting if possible, use secure coding practices in scripts, consider using sandboxed scripting environments, regularly audit BPMN processes for script vulnerabilities.
    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities:
      • Inject malicious serialized objects to execute arbitrary code [CR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting insecure deserialization of objects within Camunda, such as process variables or external task payloads.
        • Risk: Deserialization vulnerabilities can lead to remote code execution if malicious serialized objects are injected.
        • Mitigation: Avoid deserializing untrusted data, use secure serialization methods, regularly update Camunda and dependencies to patch known deserialization vulnerabilities.
    • Engine Logic Bugs:
      • Manipulate process execution flow or gain unauthorized access through engine bugs [CR]:
        • Attack: Discovering and exploiting subtle bugs in the Camunda process engine's core logic.
        • Risk: Engine logic bugs can be very difficult to detect and exploit, but successful exploitation can lead to unpredictable behavior, unauthorized access, or even complete system compromise.
        • Mitigation: Thoroughly test Camunda deployments, stay updated with Camunda security advisories and patches, participate in security research and bug bounty programs, implement robust monitoring and logging to detect anomalous engine behavior.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Configuration and Deployment Issues [HR] [CR]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Default Configuration [HR]:
      • Exploit default configurations that are insecure (e.g., default ports, exposed management interfaces) [HR]:
        • Attack: Exploiting insecure default configurations that are often present in initial deployments, such as default ports being open or management interfaces being exposed without proper authentication.
        • Risk: Default configurations can provide easy access points for attackers to gain initial foothold or sensitive information.
        • Mitigation: Change all default configurations to secure settings, disable unnecessary features and services, follow security hardening guides for Camunda and the underlying infrastructure.
    • Insecure Deployment Practices [HR]:
      • Exposed Management Interfaces (JMX, H2 Console if enabled in production) [HR]:
        • Reconfigure Camunda, access sensitive data, or execute code via management interfaces [HR] [CR]:
          • Attack: Accessing exposed management interfaces like JMX or H2 Console (if enabled in production) without proper authentication.
          • Risk: Management interfaces often provide powerful administrative capabilities, allowing attackers to reconfigure Camunda, access sensitive data, or even execute code on the server.
          • Mitigation: Disable management interfaces in production environments, if needed, restrict access to management interfaces to authorized networks and users, implement strong authentication for management interfaces.
      • Insecure File Permissions [HR]:
        • Access or modify sensitive configuration or data files [HR]:
          • Attack: Exploiting insecure file permissions on Camunda configuration files or data directories.
          • Risk: Insecure file permissions can allow attackers to read sensitive configuration data, modify application settings, or tamper with data files.
          • Mitigation: Implement proper file permissions based on the principle of least privilege, regularly audit file permissions, use file integrity monitoring systems.
      • Lack of Security Hardening [HR]:
        • Leverage known vulnerabilities in unpatched Camunda versions [HR] [CR]:
          • Attack: Exploiting known security vulnerabilities in outdated and unpatched versions of Camunda BPM Platform.
          • Risk: Unpatched vulnerabilities are easy targets for attackers, as exploits are often publicly available.
          • Mitigation: Regularly update Camunda BPM Platform to the latest version, apply security patches promptly, subscribe to Camunda security advisories, implement a vulnerability management process.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Social Engineering (Targeting Camunda Users/Administrators) [HR] [CR]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Obtain credentials or access to Camunda web applications, APIs, or management interfaces [HR] [CR]:
      • Attack: Using social engineering techniques like phishing, pretexting, or baiting to trick Camunda users or administrators into revealing their credentials or granting unauthorized access.
      • Risk: Social engineering attacks can bypass technical security controls and provide attackers with direct access to the application and its data.
      • Mitigation: Implement security awareness training for all users, educate users about phishing and social engineering tactics, encourage users to report suspicious activities, implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the impact of compromised credentials.