Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
273 lines (212 loc) · 16.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

273 lines (212 loc) · 16.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dromara/hutool

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation Before Convert (hutool-core)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all Convert usage: Locate all instances where hutool-core's Convert class methods are used.
    2. Define expected data types and formats: For each input to Convert, define the expected data type, format, and allowed values.
    3. Implement pre-conversion validation: Before calling any Convert method, implement validation checks:
      • Type checking: Ensure the input is of the expected basic type.
      • Format validation: Use regular expressions to enforce specific formats.
      • Range checking: For numeric inputs, verify values are within acceptable limits.
      • Whitelist validation: If applicable, check against a whitelist of allowed values.
    4. Handle validation failures: If validation fails, do not proceed with the conversion. Reject the input, log the error, and potentially sanitize (with extreme caution).
    5. Use Type-Specific Methods: Prefer methods like Convert.toInt(Object, int) over generic Convert.convert(Class<T>, Object).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Type Confusion Attacks (High Severity): Prevents injecting unexpected data types.
    • Injection Attacks (High Severity): Reduces injection risks by validating input formats.
    • Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Reduces errors from unexpected input values.

  • Impact:

    • Type Confusion Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Injection Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Logic Errors: Risk moderately reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • API Endpoints: Partially implemented (inconsistent). See UserController.java.
    • File Uploads: Not implemented. See FileUploadController.java.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • File Uploads: Complete validation missing.
    • Internal Data Processing: Missing in some internal functions (e.g., ReportGenerator.java).
    • Legacy Code: Missing in older code (e.g., LegacyDataImporter.java).

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize and Control Reflection (ReflectUtil - hutool-core)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all ReflectUtil usage: Find all uses of hutool-core's ReflectUtil.
    2. Justify each use case: Determine if reflection is absolutely necessary.
    3. Implement a whitelist (if unavoidable): Create a whitelist of allowed classes and methods. Store it securely and enforce it strictly.
    4. Use Security Manager (if applicable): Configure a Security Manager to restrict reflection access.
    5. Avoid using setAccessible(true): If you must use reflection, avoid using setAccessible(true).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Security Restriction Bypass (High Severity): Prevents accessing private fields/methods.
    • Code Injection (High Severity): Reduces risk of injecting malicious code.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Limits discovery of internal details.

  • Impact:

    • Security Restriction Bypass: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Information Disclosure: Risk moderately reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Core Functionality: Limited use with a basic whitelist (not comprehensive). See PluginManager.java.
    • No Security Manager: Not currently used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Whitelist Enhancement: Existing whitelist needs review and expansion.
    • Security Manager Integration: Explore feasibility.
    • Audit of Existing Uses: Thorough audit needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize and Validate File Paths and URLs (FileUtil, URLUtil - hutool-core)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all FileUtil/URLUtil usage: Locate all instances where these are used with untrusted data.
    2. Normalize paths: Use FileUtil.normalize(String path) as a first step.
    3. Implement path traversal prevention:
      • Avoid direct user input: Do not construct paths directly from user input.
      • Use whitelists (if possible): Use a whitelist of allowed paths.
      • Base directory restriction: Define a base directory and verify normalized paths are within it using File.getCanonicalPath().
      • Reject suspicious characters: Reject paths with "../", "..", or control characters.
    4. URL validation:
      • Use URLUtil.url(String urlStr): Parse and check for basic validity.
      • Protocol whitelisting: Restrict allowed URL protocols.
      • Domain whitelisting (if applicable): Use a whitelist if accessing specific domains.
      • Avoid open redirects: Validate target URLs during redirects.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Path Traversal (High Severity): Prevents accessing files outside the intended scope.
    • Local File Inclusion (LFI) (High Severity): Prevents including local files.
    • Remote File Inclusion (RFI) (High Severity): Prevents including remote files.
    • Open Redirect (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of redirecting to malicious sites.

  • Impact:

    • Path Traversal/LFI/RFI: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Open Redirect: Risk moderately reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • File Uploads: Partial implementation. See FileUploadController.java.
    • URL Handling: Basic parsing, but no whitelisting. See ExternalServiceIntegration.java.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • File Uploads: Comprehensive path traversal prevention missing.
    • URL Handling: Need protocol and domain whitelisting.
    • Configuration Files: Review and secure loading from user-specified directories.

Mitigation Strategy: Use SecureUtil.createSecureRandom() for Security-Sensitive Operations (hutool-core)

  • Description: 1. Identify security-sensitive operations: Find where random numbers are used for security (passwords, keys, session IDs, tokens, etc.). 2. Replace RandomUtil: Replace hutool-core's RandomUtil with SecureUtil.createSecureRandom() or java.security.SecureRandom in these operations. 3. Proper seeding (if necessary): Use a strong, unpredictable source of entropy if seeding is required. 4. Avoid Predictable Seeds: Never use predictable values as seeds.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cryptographic Weakness (High Severity): Prevents using weak PRNGs.
    • Session Hijacking (High Severity): Reduces risk if session IDs are predictable.
    • CSRF Attacks (High Severity): Weak CSRF tokens can be predicted.

  • Impact:

    • Cryptographic Weakness: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Session Hijacking: Risk significantly reduced.
    • CSRF Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Password Reset Tokens: SecureRandom is used. See PasswordResetService.java.
    • Session IDs: Handled by the application server (assumed secure).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • API Keys: Currently using RandomUtil.randomString(). See ApiKeyGenerator.java.
    • CSRF Tokens: Currently using RandomUtil. See CsrfTokenManager.java.

Mitigation Strategy: Use Strong Cryptographic Algorithms and Configurations (SecureUtil - hutool-crypto)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all hutool-crypto usage: Locate all uses of SecureUtil and related crypto classes.
    2. Use Strong Algorithms: Ensure only strong, modern algorithms are used (e.g., AES-256 with GCM, SHA-256 or SHA-3). Avoid deprecated algorithms.
    3. Proper Key Management: Securely store and manage keys. Never hardcode them. Use a KMS or environment variables.
    4. Correct IVs/Nonces: Use unique, unpredictable IVs/nonces for each encryption with symmetric ciphers (CBC, GCM).
    5. Authenticated Encryption: Prefer authenticated encryption modes (GCM, CCM).
    6. Regular Review: Periodically review crypto code for best practices.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Breaches (High Severity): Weak crypto can lead to data exposure.
    • Data Tampering (High Severity): Lack of authentication allows data modification.
    • Cryptographic Weakness (High Severity): Using outdated or weak algorithms.

  • Impact:

    • Data Breaches: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Tampering: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Cryptographic Weakness: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Data Encryption: Uses AES-256, but IV handling needs review. See DataEncryptionService.java.
    • Key Storage: Keys are stored in environment variables.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • IV/Nonce Review: Ensure unique IVs/nonces are used for every encryption operation.
    • Authenticated Encryption: Switch to GCM or CCM mode for AES.
    • Algorithm Audit: Review all crypto usage to confirm strong algorithms are consistently used.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Password Hashing with DigestUtil (hutool-crypto)

  • Description:

    1. Identify password hashing: Locate all uses of DigestUtil for password hashing.
    2. Use Strong Hashing Algorithms: Use Argon2, bcrypt, or scrypt (e.g., DigestUtil.bcrypt* methods).
    3. Salt Passwords: Ensure passwords are salted before hashing. DigestUtil.bcrypt* handles this.
    4. Avoid Weak Hashes: Do not use MD5, SHA-1, or other simple hashes for passwords.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Password Cracking (High Severity): Weak hashing makes passwords vulnerable to cracking.
    • Brute-Force Attacks (High Severity): Strong hashing slows down brute-force attempts.
    • Dictionary Attacks (High Severity): Salting prevents pre-computed rainbow table attacks.

  • Impact:

    • Password Cracking: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Brute-Force Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Dictionary Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • User Authentication: Uses DigestUtil.bcrypt for password hashing. See UserService.java.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Legacy Systems: Some older systems might still be using weaker hashing. Need to identify and migrate these.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce HTTPS and Validate Certificates with HttpUtil (hutool-http)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all HttpUtil usage: Locate all uses of hutool-http's HttpUtil.
    2. Enforce HTTPS: Ensure all external communication uses HTTPS.
    3. Validate Certificates: Configure HttpUtil to properly validate server certificates. Do not disable certificate validation.
    4. Handle Redirects Carefully: Limit redirects and validate target URLs.
    5. Set Timeouts: Use appropriate timeouts to prevent DoS.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): HTTPS prevents eavesdropping and data tampering.
    • Data Breaches (High Severity): Protects sensitive data transmitted over the network.
    • Impersonation (High Severity): Certificate validation prevents connecting to fake servers.

  • Impact:

    • MitM Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Breaches: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Impersonation: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • External API Calls: Uses HTTPS, but certificate validation settings need review. See ExternalServiceIntegration.java.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Certificate Validation Review: Ensure strict certificate validation is enabled and correctly configured.
    • Redirect Handling: Review and improve redirect handling logic.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Data Transmission (POST vs. GET) with HttpUtil (hutool-http)

  • Description:

    1. Identify sensitive data: Determine which data is considered sensitive (passwords, API keys, etc.).
    2. Use POST for sensitive data: When using HttpUtil, ensure sensitive data is sent in the request body using the POST method, never in URL parameters (GET).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Prevents sensitive data from being logged in server logs or browser history.
    • Shoulder Surfing (Low Severity): Makes it harder for someone to see sensitive data on the screen.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Shoulder Surfing: Risk reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Login Form: Uses POST for login credentials. See AuthController.java.
    • API Calls: Mostly uses POST, but some GET requests might include sensitive parameters.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • API Call Review: Audit all API calls to ensure sensitive data is always sent via POST.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure JSON Deserialization with JSONUtil (hutool-json)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all JSONUtil usage: Locate all instances where hutool-json's JSONUtil is used to parse JSON.
    2. Validate JSON Schema (if possible): Validate incoming JSON against a predefined schema.
    3. Avoid Arbitrary Object Deserialization: Deserialize to specific, well-defined data structures, not arbitrary objects.
    4. Limit Deserialization Depth: Limit the maximum depth of nested JSON objects.
    5. Consider Alternatives: Explore safer JSON parsing libraries if needed.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious objects.
    • Code Injection (High Severity): Reduces risk if deserialization leads to code execution.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Limiting depth prevents stack overflow attacks.

  • Impact:

    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced.
    • DoS: Risk moderately reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • API Responses: Deserializes JSON responses to specific DTOs. See ApiClient.java.
    • Configuration Files: Loads configuration from JSON files, but no schema validation.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Schema Validation: Implement JSON schema validation for configuration files and API responses.
    • Depth Limiting: Configure JSONUtil (or the underlying parser) to limit deserialization depth.

Mitigation Strategy: Prevent Template Injection with TemplateUtil (hutool-extra)

  • Description:

    1. Identify all TemplateUtil usage: Locate all uses of hutool-extra's template engine.
    2. Escape User Input: Always escape user-supplied data before inserting it into templates. Use the template engine's built-in escaping.
    3. Context-Aware Escaping: Use the correct escaping function for the context (HTML, JavaScript, etc.).
    4. Avoid User-Controlled Templates: Do not allow users to upload or modify template files.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Prevents injecting malicious scripts into web pages.
    • Template Injection (High Severity): Prevents attackers from controlling the template logic.

  • Impact:

    • XSS: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Template Injection: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Email Templates: Uses TemplateUtil with escaping, but needs review for context-awareness. See EmailService.java.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Context-Aware Escaping Review: Ensure the correct escaping functions are used in all templates.
    • Template Source Control: Ensure template files are stored securely and cannot be modified by unauthorized users.