Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
300 lines (273 loc) · 25.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

300 lines (273 loc) · 25.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for google/exoplayer

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update ExoPlayer

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update ExoPlayer
  • Description:
    1. Establish Dependency Management: Use a dependency manager (like Gradle for Android projects) to manage ExoPlayer and its modules.
    2. Monitor for Updates: Regularly check for new ExoPlayer releases on the official GitHub repository or through dependency management tool notifications.
    3. Review Release Notes: Examine release notes for security fixes and improvements in new versions.
    4. Update Dependency Version: Update your project's dependency declaration to the latest stable ExoPlayer version.
    5. Thorough Testing: Test your application's media playback after updating to ensure compatibility and no regressions are introduced, especially related to security-sensitive functionalities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Addresses publicly known security flaws in older ExoPlayer versions.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk by patching known vulnerabilities.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Gradle is used for dependency management, updates are manual and infrequent.
    • Implemented in: build.gradle files.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated update checks and notifications.
    • Regular, scheduled updates of ExoPlayer.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for Media URLs and Paths (in context of ExoPlayer usage)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for Media URLs and Paths (for ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Identify ExoPlayer Input Points: Pinpoint where your application feeds media URLs or file paths to ExoPlayer's MediaItem or related classes.
    2. Define Allowed Sources: Determine trusted sources for media (e.g., specific domains, local directories).
    3. Validate Before ExoPlayer: Before creating MediaItem and passing it to ExoPlayer, validate the URL or path:
      • URL Validation: Check protocol (e.g., https://, file://), domain against a whitelist, and path structure.
      • Path Validation: For local paths, ensure they are within allowed directories and sanitize against path traversal attempts.
    4. Reject Invalid Input: If validation fails, do not pass the URL/path to ExoPlayer. Handle the error gracefully and log the invalid input.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Path Traversal (High Severity): Prevents attackers from using manipulated paths to access unauthorized local files via ExoPlayer's file access capabilities.
    • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from making ExoPlayer initiate requests to unintended servers by controlling the media URL.
    • Injection Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces risks from injection attempts through manipulated URLs or paths passed to ExoPlayer.
  • Impact:
    • Path Traversal (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk of unauthorized file access.
    • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk of unintended server requests.
    • Injection Attacks (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of URL/path based injection attacks.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Basic protocol checks for some URL inputs.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Comprehensive validation of URL domains and path structures specifically for ExoPlayer inputs.
    • Path validation for local file paths used with ExoPlayer.

Mitigation Strategy: Consider Sandboxing Media Processing (for ExoPlayer)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Consider Sandboxing Media Processing (ExoPlayer Specific)
  • Description:
    1. Choose Sandboxing Method: Select a suitable sandboxing technique for your platform (e.g., OS-level sandboxing, process isolation).
    2. Isolate ExoPlayer Process: Configure your application to run the ExoPlayer instance and its media decoding/rendering in a sandboxed process.
    3. Restrict Sandbox Permissions: Limit the sandboxed ExoPlayer process's permissions:
      • Network Access: Restrict to only necessary domains for media streaming.
      • File System Access: Limit to read-only access to media files and temporary storage.
      • System Resources: Limit CPU, memory, and other resource usage.
    4. Secure Communication: Establish secure inter-process communication (IPC) between the main application and the sandboxed ExoPlayer process.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) through Media Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Limits the impact of RCE exploits within ExoPlayer or media codecs by containing them within the sandbox.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents vulnerabilities in media processing from leading to system-wide privilege escalation.
    • Data Exfiltration (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of data leaks if media processing is compromised, as the sandbox limits access to sensitive data.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (High Reduction): Significantly reduces impact by containing RCE within the sandbox.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk of privilege escalation.
    • Data Exfiltration (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of data exfiltration.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Not currently implemented. No sandboxing for ExoPlayer processes.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Research and implementation of a suitable sandboxing solution for ExoPlayer.
    • Configuration of sandbox permissions and secure IPC.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Media Format and Type (before ExoPlayer processing)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Validate Media Format and Type (for ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Define Allowed Media Types: Determine the media formats and MIME types your application intends to support with ExoPlayer.
    2. Obtain Media Type Information: Before passing media to ExoPlayer:
      • For URLs: Check Content-Type header from HTTP response.
      • For Files: Use file extension or magic number detection to identify format.
    3. Validate Against Allowed List: Compare the obtained media type against your list of allowed types.
    4. Reject Invalid Types: If the media type is not allowed, do not pass it to ExoPlayer. Handle the error and log the rejected media.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Format-Specific Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Prevents processing of unexpected or malicious media formats that might exploit codec or parser vulnerabilities within ExoPlayer.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Low Severity): Reduces risk of DoS from malformed media files designed to crash or overload ExoPlayer.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Format-Specific Vulnerabilities (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk by limiting processed media types.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Low Reduction): Slightly reduces DoS risk.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Content-Type header is sometimes checked, but not consistently enforced.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Consistent and robust media type validation for all ExoPlayer inputs.
    • Magic number/file signature based validation for improved reliability.

Mitigation Strategy: Follow DRM Provider's Best Practices (in ExoPlayer DRM Integration)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Follow DRM Provider's Best Practices (ExoPlayer DRM)
  • Description:
    1. Consult DRM Provider Documentation: Thoroughly review the security guidelines and best practices provided by your chosen DRM system (e.g., Widevine, FairPlay, PlayReady) specifically for ExoPlayer integration.
    2. Implement DRM Securely in ExoPlayer: Adhere to the DRM provider's recommendations when implementing DRM within your ExoPlayer setup. This includes:
      • Correctly configuring DrmSessionManager.
      • Securely handling license requests and responses.
      • Properly managing DRM sessions and keys within ExoPlayer.
    3. Regularly Review DRM Integration: Periodically review your DRM implementation in ExoPlayer against the latest best practices from the DRM provider to ensure ongoing security.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • DRM Bypass/Content Theft (High Severity): Incorrect DRM implementation in ExoPlayer can create vulnerabilities allowing attackers to bypass DRM and access protected content without authorization.
    • License Server Compromise (Medium Severity): While less direct, weak DRM integration can sometimes indirectly contribute to vulnerabilities in license server interactions.
  • Impact:
    • DRM Bypass/Content Theft (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk of DRM bypass and content theft by ensuring correct implementation.
    • License Server Compromise (Medium Reduction): Indirectly reduces risks related to license server interactions.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Basic DRM integration is in place, but best practices adherence needs review.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal review and audit of current DRM integration against DRM provider best practices.
    • Establishment of a process to stay updated on DRM security guidelines.

Mitigation Strategy: Apply Principle of Least Privilege (ExoPlayer Configuration)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Apply Principle of Least Privilege (ExoPlayer Configuration)
  • Description:
    1. Review ExoPlayer Configuration Options: Examine all configurable options available in ExoPlayer's Player.Builder, MediaSource.Factory, RenderersFactory, and other configuration classes.
    2. Identify Necessary Features: Determine the minimum set of features and functionalities required for your application's media playback needs.
    3. Disable Unnecessary Features: Disable or avoid enabling ExoPlayer features that are not strictly required. This might include:
      • Unnecessary renderers or decoders.
      • Features related to specific network protocols if not used.
      • Experimental or less-used functionalities.
    4. Restrict Permissions: Configure ExoPlayer with the minimal permissions it needs. For example, limit network access to only necessary domains if possible through custom DataSource.Factory implementations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Increased Attack Surface (Medium Severity): Unnecessary features and permissions in ExoPlayer increase the attack surface, potentially providing more avenues for exploitation if vulnerabilities are discovered in those features.
  • Impact:
    • Increased Attack Surface (Medium Reduction): Reduces the attack surface by disabling unnecessary features and limiting permissions.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Basic configuration is done, but not specifically reviewed for least privilege.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal review of ExoPlayer configuration to identify and disable unnecessary features.
    • Documentation of the principle of least privilege in ExoPlayer configuration guidelines.

Mitigation Strategy: Review ExoPlayer Configuration for Security Implications

  • Mitigation Strategy: Review ExoPlayer Configuration for Security Implications
  • Description:
    1. Security Focused Configuration Review: Conduct a dedicated security review of your ExoPlayer configuration settings.
    2. Analyze Configuration Options: Examine each configuration option used in Player.Builder, MediaSource.Factory, RenderersFactory, etc., specifically considering its security implications.
    3. Identify Potential Risks: Identify configuration settings that might introduce or increase security risks, such as:
      • Insecure default values.
      • Overly permissive network settings.
      • Caching configurations that might expose sensitive data.
      • Debug or logging settings enabled in production.
    4. Adjust Configuration: Adjust configuration settings to mitigate identified security risks.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Incorrect or insecure ExoPlayer configuration can lead to various vulnerabilities, such as information disclosure, insecure network communication, or unexpected behavior.
  • Impact:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk by identifying and correcting insecure configuration settings.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Not currently implemented. No dedicated security review of ExoPlayer configuration.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Scheduled security reviews of ExoPlayer configuration.
    • Documentation of secure configuration guidelines for ExoPlayer.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Storing Sensitive Data in ExoPlayer Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Storing Sensitive Data in ExoPlayer Configuration
  • Description:
    1. Identify Sensitive Data: Determine if any sensitive information (API keys, credentials, DRM secrets, etc.) is being directly embedded or hardcoded within ExoPlayer configuration files or settings.
    2. Remove Sensitive Data from Configuration: Remove any identified sensitive data from ExoPlayer configuration.
    3. Use Secure Storage Mechanisms: Utilize secure storage mechanisms for sensitive data, such as:
      • Environment variables.
      • Secure key vaults or configuration management systems.
      • Encrypted storage.
    4. Retrieve Data at Runtime: Retrieve sensitive data from secure storage at runtime and pass it to ExoPlayer through appropriate APIs or mechanisms, instead of embedding it in configuration.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data (High Severity): Storing sensitive data in configuration files or easily accessible locations can lead to data breaches if the application or configuration is compromised.
    • Hardcoded Credentials (High Severity): Hardcoding credentials directly in configuration is a major security vulnerability.
  • Impact:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk of data exposure by removing sensitive data from configuration.
    • Hardcoded Credentials (High Reduction): Eliminates risk of hardcoded credentials in ExoPlayer configuration.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. We generally avoid hardcoding credentials, but a specific review for ExoPlayer configuration is needed.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Dedicated review to ensure no sensitive data is present in ExoPlayer configuration.
    • Establish guidelines to prevent storing sensitive data in ExoPlayer configuration in the future.

Mitigation Strategy: Carefully Vet Third-Party Extensions (for ExoPlayer)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Carefully Vet Third-Party Extensions (ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Extension Usage: List all third-party ExoPlayer extensions or modules used in your project.
    2. Security Vetting Process: Establish a process for vetting the security of third-party extensions before integration:
      • Source Code Review: If possible, review the source code of the extension for potential vulnerabilities.
      • Reputation and Trustworthiness: Assess the reputation and trustworthiness of the extension developer or organization.
      • Community Support and Activity: Check for active community support, recent updates, and bug fixes, which can indicate better maintenance and security.
      • Vulnerability History: Check if the extension has a history of reported vulnerabilities.
      • Permissions and Functionality: Understand the permissions and functionalities requested by the extension and ensure they are justified and minimal.
    3. Prioritize Reputable Extensions: Prefer using extensions from reputable sources with a strong security track record.
    4. Document Vetting Results: Document the vetting process and results for each third-party extension.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Extensions (High Severity): Malicious or compromised extensions can introduce vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malware into your application through ExoPlayer.
    • Vulnerable Extensions (Medium Severity): Even non-malicious extensions can contain security vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Severity): Using untrusted extensions increases the risk of supply chain attacks.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Extensions (High Reduction): Reduces risk of integrating malicious extensions through vetting.
    • Vulnerable Extensions (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of using vulnerable extensions by identifying potential issues.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk from supply chain attacks related to ExoPlayer extensions.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Basic checks are done, but no formal vetting process.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formalized security vetting process for third-party ExoPlayer extensions.
    • Documentation of vetted extensions and vetting results.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Extensions Updated (ExoPlayer)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Keep Extensions Updated (ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Track Extension Versions: Maintain a record of the versions of all third-party ExoPlayer extensions used in your project.
    2. Monitor for Updates: Regularly check for new versions of used extensions from their official sources (e.g., GitHub repositories, release pages).
    3. Review Extension Update Notes: When updates are available, review the release notes for security fixes and improvements.
    4. Update Extension Dependencies: Update your project's dependency declarations to use the latest versions of extensions.
    5. Test After Updates: Test your application's media playback functionality after extension updates to ensure compatibility and no regressions, especially related to security.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Extensions (High Severity): Outdated extensions can contain known security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Extensions (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk by patching known vulnerabilities in extensions.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Extension updates are manual and infrequent.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated checks for extension updates.
    • Regular, scheduled updates of ExoPlayer extensions.

Mitigation Strategy: Perform Security Audits of Extensions (ExoPlayer)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Perform Security Audits of Extensions (ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Critical Extensions: Identify ExoPlayer extensions that are considered critical due to their functionality, permissions, or exposure.
    2. Schedule Security Audits: Schedule regular security audits for critical extensions.
    3. Conduct Audits: Perform security audits of extension code. This can involve:
      • Manual Code Review: Reviewing the extension's source code for potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding practices, or backdoors.
      • Automated Security Scanning: Using static analysis tools to scan extension code for common vulnerabilities.
      • Penetration Testing (If Applicable): For complex extensions, consider penetration testing to identify runtime vulnerabilities.
    4. Remediate Findings: Address any security vulnerabilities identified during audits by updating extensions, applying patches, or implementing workarounds.
    5. Document Audit Results: Document the audit process, findings, and remediation actions.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Undiscovered Vulnerabilities in Extensions (High Severity): Proactively identifies and mitigates undiscovered vulnerabilities in third-party ExoPlayer extensions before they can be exploited.
    • Backdoors or Malicious Code in Extensions (High Severity): Audits can help detect intentionally malicious code or backdoors in extensions.
  • Impact:
    • Undiscovered Vulnerabilities in Extensions (High Reduction): Significantly reduces risk by proactively finding and fixing vulnerabilities.
    • Backdoors or Malicious Code in Extensions (High Reduction): Reduces risk of malicious code in extensions being deployed.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Not currently implemented. No security audits are performed on ExoPlayer extensions.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Establishment of a security audit process for ExoPlayer extensions.
    • Scheduling and conducting audits for critical extensions.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Limits (for ExoPlayer)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Limits (ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Resource Consumption Points: Determine ExoPlayer's resource consumption points that can be controlled, such as:
      • Buffer sizes (audio, video, text).
      • Bandwidth usage.
      • Decoding resources (e.g., number of decoders).
      • Caching behavior.
    2. Define Resource Limits: Define appropriate resource limits for ExoPlayer based on your application's requirements and device capabilities.
    3. Configure ExoPlayer Limits: Configure ExoPlayer to enforce these resource limits through its configuration options. This might involve:
      • Setting buffer sizes in DefaultLoadControl.
      • Implementing custom BandwidthMeter if needed.
      • Managing caching through CacheDataSourceFactory.
    4. Monitor Resource Usage: Monitor ExoPlayer's resource usage during playback to ensure limits are effective and not causing performance issues.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) through Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from causing DoS by sending media streams designed to exhaust device resources (CPU, memory, bandwidth) via ExoPlayer.
    • Resource Starvation (Low Severity): Prevents media playback from consuming excessive resources and starving other parts of the application.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) through Resource Exhaustion (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of DoS attacks targeting resource exhaustion.
    • Resource Starvation (Low Reduction): Reduces risk of resource starvation within the application.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Partially implemented. Default ExoPlayer resource management is used, but no custom limits are enforced.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Analysis of appropriate resource limits for ExoPlayer in our application.
    • Configuration of ExoPlayer to enforce defined resource limits.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Media Content Size and Duration (before ExoPlayer processing)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Validate Media Content Size and Duration (for ExoPlayer)
  • Description:
    1. Obtain Content Size and Duration: Before passing media to ExoPlayer, attempt to obtain the content size and duration:
      • For URLs: Check Content-Length header in HTTP response and potentially use media metadata retrieval APIs if available.
      • For Files: Get file size and use media metadata libraries to determine duration.
    2. Define Acceptable Limits: Define maximum acceptable limits for media content size and duration based on your application's use case and device capabilities.
    3. Validate Against Limits: Validate the obtained content size and duration against the defined limits.
    4. Reject Exceeding Content: If the media content exceeds the limits, do not pass it to ExoPlayer. Handle the error and log the rejected media.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) through Large Media Files (Medium Severity): Prevents DoS attacks using excessively large media files designed to consume excessive resources during processing by ExoPlayer.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of resource exhaustion from processing very large or long media files.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) through Large Media Files (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of DoS attacks using oversized media.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Reduction): Reduces risk of resource exhaustion from processing large media.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Not currently implemented. No validation of media size or duration before ExoPlayer processing.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Implementation of media content size and duration validation before passing to ExoPlayer.
    • Definition of appropriate size and duration limits for media content.