Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (42 loc) · 5.19 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (42 loc) · 5.19 KB

Threat Model Analysis for jakewharton/butterknife

Threat: Malicious Annotation Processor Injection

  • Description: An attacker compromises the build environment or software supply chain and replaces the legitimate Butterknife annotation processor with a malicious one. During the build process, this malicious processor injects arbitrary code into the generated Butterknife binding classes. This allows the attacker to gain full control over the application's execution flow.
  • Impact: Critical. Full application compromise, including data theft, malware distribution, denial of service, and other severe impacts due to arbitrary code execution within the application's context.
  • Butterknife Component Affected: Annotation Processor, Generated Binding Classes
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use reputable and trusted build tools and dependency repositories (Gradle, Maven Central, Google Maven).
    • Implement dependency scanning and vulnerability analysis in the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Regularly update build tools and dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Verify dependency integrity using checksums or signatures when available.
    • Employ build environment security hardening best practices.

Threat: Annotation Processor Bug Exploitation

  • Description: An attacker discovers and exploits a bug or vulnerability within the Butterknife annotation processor itself. This could lead to unexpected or malicious code generation, potentially resulting in memory corruption, unexpected application behavior, or even limited code execution depending on the nature of the vulnerability. The attacker might craft specific code structures that trigger the bug during annotation processing.
  • Impact: High. Depending on the bug, impact could range from application crashes and unexpected behavior to memory corruption or limited code execution, potentially leading to further exploitation.
  • Butterknife Component Affected: Annotation Processor, Code Generation Logic
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use stable and well-tested Butterknife versions.
    • Stay updated with Butterknife security advisories and bug fixes released by the maintainers and community.
    • Perform code reviews of the generated Butterknife binding classes, especially in security-sensitive areas, to identify any unexpected or suspicious code.
    • Report any suspected bugs or vulnerabilities in Butterknife to the maintainers.

Threat: Dependency Confusion Attack on Butterknife

  • Description: An attacker attempts a dependency confusion attack by uploading a malicious package with the same name as Butterknife to a public repository that the build system might check before the legitimate repository (e.g., due to misconfiguration). The build system could then download and use the malicious package instead of the genuine Butterknife library. This allows the attacker to inject malicious code into the application through a compromised dependency.
  • Impact: High. Similar to malicious annotation processor injection, this can lead to arbitrary code execution and full application compromise.
  • Butterknife Component Affected: Dependency Resolution, Build System Integration
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Explicitly define trusted and legitimate dependency repositories in the build configuration (e.g., using mavenCentral() and google() in Gradle).
    • Implement dependency verification mechanisms to ensure dependencies are downloaded from trusted sources.
    • Regularly audit project dependencies and their sources to detect any anomalies.
    • Consider using private or mirrored repositories for better control and security of dependencies.

Threat: Compromised Butterknife Distribution

  • Description: An attacker compromises the official distribution channel of Butterknife (e.g., Maven Central, GitHub releases). The distributed library itself is modified to include malicious code. Developers unknowingly include this compromised library in their applications, leading to widespread compromise.
  • Impact: Critical. Widespread impact affecting all applications using the compromised version of Butterknife. Leads to arbitrary code execution and full application compromise across numerous applications.
  • Butterknife Component Affected: Butterknife Library Distribution
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use dependencies only from trusted and reputable repositories like Maven Central or Google Maven.
    • Monitor for any unusual changes or security advisories related to the Butterknife library from official sources.
    • Consider using Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to continuously monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities and potential anomalies.
    • Verify library checksums or signatures if provided by official distribution channels to ensure integrity.