Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
18 lines (9 loc) · 2.74 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

18 lines (9 loc) · 2.74 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for jakewharton/butterknife

Attack Surface: Key Attack Surface List: Butter Knife (Direct, High/Critical Severity)

  • (Empty - No entries meet the criteria)

Attack Surface: Explanation and Justification

  1. Reflection-Based Manipulation (Indirect): While Butter Knife uses reflection, the attack vector is indirect. The attacker cannot directly interact with Butter Knife's reflection APIs. They must manipulate application data that indirectly influences the generated code. This indirection, combined with the difficulty of exploiting reflection in modern Android environments (especially with ProGuard/R8), reduces the severity to Low or Medium at most. It's not a direct attack on Butter Knife.

  2. Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed Layouts (Highly Unlikely): This attack requires the attacker to modify the application's resources (layout files), which is typically prevented by Android's security model (APK signing, sandboxing). Butter Knife is merely the component that processes the layout; it's not the source of the vulnerability. The vulnerability lies in the ability to modify the APK, not in Butter Knife itself. Therefore, it's not a direct attack, and the severity is Low.

  3. Incorrect Usage Leading to Logic Errors: This is a category of developer error, not a direct vulnerability of Butter Knife. While Butter Knife's API can be misused, the resulting vulnerabilities are in the application's logic, not in Butter Knife itself. The severity is also highly variable, ranging from Low to Medium, depending on the specific error.

  4. Annotation Processor Vulnerabilities (Extremely Low Probability): While this is the most direct attack vector (affecting the build-time component of Butter Knife), the severity is Extremely Low. It requires compromising the build environment or supplying a malicious version of the library, which are highly unlikely scenarios given standard security practices. Furthermore, even if successful, the attack occurs during build time, not at runtime, making it less directly impactful to users.

In summary: Butter Knife, when used in a standard Android development environment with common security practices (ProGuard/R8, input validation, secure build environment), does not introduce any direct attack vectors with High or Critical severity. The potential risks are indirect, low severity, and mitigated by standard security measures. The library is designed to be secure, and the primary concerns are related to how the application uses it, rather than vulnerabilities within the library itself.