Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
129 lines (104 loc) · 7.75 KB

File metadata and controls

129 lines (104 loc) · 7.75 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for jakewharton/butterknife

Mitigation Strategy: Use the Latest Version

  • Description:

    1. Open the project's build.gradle (Module: app) file.
    2. Locate the dependencies block.
    3. Find the lines referencing butterknife and butterknife-compiler.
    4. Check the version numbers against the latest stable release on the Butter Knife GitHub repository (or Maven Central).
    5. If the versions are outdated, update them to the latest stable release. For example:
      implementation 'com.jakewharton:butterknife:10.2.3' // Replace with latest
      annotationProcessor 'com.jakewharton:butterknife-compiler:10.2.3' // Replace with latest
    6. Sync the project with Gradle files (usually a prompt appears in Android Studio).
    7. Rebuild the project (Build -> Rebuild Project).
    8. Thoroughly test the application to ensure no regressions were introduced.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Reflection-based attacks (Low Severity): Older versions relied more on runtime reflection. Newer versions use compile-time code generation, minimizing this risk. The severity is low because exploiting reflection in this context is complex and requires specific conditions.
    • Vulnerabilities in older Butter Knife versions (Variable Severity): Any security vulnerabilities discovered and patched in newer releases are mitigated. The severity depends on the specific vulnerability.
    • Code generation bugs (Low Severity): Newer versions may have bug fixes related to code generation, reducing the chance of unexpected behavior.
  • Impact:

    • Reflection-based attacks: Risk significantly reduced (almost eliminated if using version 10+).
    • Vulnerabilities in older versions: Risk eliminated for patched vulnerabilities.
    • Code generation bugs: Risk reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Partially Implemented. MainActivity and HomeFragment are using the latest version (10.2.3), but SettingsActivity is still using an older version (8.8.1). This is tracked in Jira ticket BK-123.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: SettingsActivity, ProfileFragment, and any newly added modules need to be checked and updated. A regular dependency update check should be incorporated into the development workflow.

Mitigation Strategy: ProGuard/R8 Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Open the proguard-rules.pro file in your project (usually in the app module).
    2. Ensure ProGuard/R8 is enabled in your build.gradle (Module: app) file for release builds:
      buildTypes {
          release {
              minifyEnabled true
              proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
          }
      }
    3. Add the required Butter Knife ProGuard rules to proguard-rules.pro. These rules are essential and are found in the Butter Knife GitHub documentation. Example (incomplete - consult the official documentation):
      -keep class butterknife.** { *; }
      -keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
          @butterknife.* <methods>;
      }
      -keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
          @butterknife.* <fields>;
      }
      
    4. Build a release version of your application (Build -> Generate Signed Bundle / APK).
    5. Thoroughly test the release build. ProGuard misconfiguration is a common cause of runtime crashes. Pay close attention to any functionality using Butter Knife.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Reverse Engineering (Low Severity): Obfuscation makes it harder for attackers to understand the generated code and the application's view binding logic.
    • Code Tampering (Low Severity): While ProGuard doesn't prevent code tampering directly, it makes it more difficult.
    • Application Size and Attack Surface (Low Severity): Removing unused code reduces the overall size of the application and, consequently, the potential attack surface.
  • Impact:

    • Reverse Engineering: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Code Tampering: Risk slightly reduced.
    • Application Size: Application size reduced, leading to a smaller attack surface.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Implemented. ProGuard is enabled for release builds, and the Butter Knife rules are present in proguard-rules.pro. Automated tests include release build testing.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: None. However, regular review of the ProGuard rules is needed to ensure they are still up-to-date with the Butter Knife documentation and any new features added to the application.
  • Description:

    1. In every Fragment that uses Butter Knife:
    2. Declare a private Unbinder variable: private Unbinder unbinder;
    3. In onCreateView(), after inflating the layout, bind the views using ButterKnife.bind(this, view) and assign the result to the unbinder variable.
    4. Override onDestroyView().
    5. Inside onDestroyView(), check if unbinder is not null, and if it isn't, call unbinder.unbind().
      @Override
      public void onDestroyView() {
          super.onDestroyView();
          if (unbinder != null) {
              unbinder.unbind();
          }
      }
  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) due to NullPointerExceptions (Low Severity): Prevents crashes caused by accessing views after they have been destroyed.
    • Memory Leaks (Low Severity): Unbinding prevents the Fragment from holding references to views that are no longer needed, preventing memory leaks.
  • Impact:

    • DoS due to NPEs: Risk significantly reduced (almost eliminated if implemented correctly).
    • Memory Leaks: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Partially Implemented. HomeFragment and ProfileFragment correctly unbind views.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: SettingsFragment and NotificationsFragment are missing the unbinder.unbind() call in onDestroyView(). This needs to be added. A code review process should be implemented to catch this in the future.
  • Description:

    1. Identify any uses of @BindViews with a potentially large or unbounded list of views.
    2. If the number of views could be very large, consider alternative binding methods:
      • Bind views individually within a loop.
      • Use a RecyclerView (recommended for lists).
    3. If using a RecyclerView, Butter Knife can still be used to bind views within the ViewHolder.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Excessive Memory Allocation (Very Low Severity): Reduces the risk of allocating a very large array if the number of views is unexpectedly high. This is a very unlikely attack vector.
  • Impact:

    • Excessive Memory Allocation: Risk slightly reduced (already very low).
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Not Applicable. The application primarily uses RecyclerView for lists, and @BindViews is only used for small, fixed-size groups of views.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: None. However, this should be kept in mind as a best practice when adding new features.