Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
300 lines (237 loc) · 15.5 KB

sec-design.md

File metadata and controls

300 lines (237 loc) · 15.5 KB

BUSINESS POSTURE

Business Priorities and Goals:

  • Provide a lightweight, efficient, and easy-to-use view binding solution for Android developers.
  • Reduce boilerplate code related to view lookups, improving code readability and maintainability.
  • Offer a compile-time solution, avoiding runtime reflection for better performance.
  • Minimize the impact on application size and performance.
  • Maintain backward compatibility with older Android versions.
  • Provide clear and concise documentation and support for users.

Business Risks:

  • Security control: Dependency vulnerabilities: Reliance on third-party libraries (including transitive dependencies) could introduce security vulnerabilities if those libraries have known or unknown weaknesses.
  • Security control: Code injection: Improper handling of annotations or code generation could potentially lead to code injection vulnerabilities, although this is less likely given the library's design.
  • Accepted risk: Compatibility issues: While backward compatibility is a goal, there's always a risk of compatibility issues with specific Android versions or device configurations.
  • Accepted risk: Maintenance overhead: As an open-source project, maintaining the library and addressing user issues requires ongoing effort.
  • Accepted risk: Adoption risk: Developers may choose alternative solutions or stick with manual view binding, limiting the library's impact.

SECURITY POSTURE

Existing Security Controls:

  • Security control: Compile-time safety: Butter Knife operates at compile time, reducing the risk of runtime errors and vulnerabilities associated with reflection-based solutions.
  • Security control: Limited scope: The library focuses solely on view binding, minimizing its attack surface compared to more complex frameworks.
  • Security control: Open-source: The code is publicly available for review and scrutiny by the community, increasing the chances of identifying and addressing potential security issues. (Described in GitHub repository)
  • Security control: Widely used: The library's popularity means it has been tested and used in a wide range of applications, increasing the likelihood that common vulnerabilities have been discovered and addressed.

Accepted Risks:

  • Accepted risk: Third-party dependencies: The library may have dependencies on other libraries, which could introduce their own security risks.
  • Accepted risk: Code generation: While compile-time, the code generation process itself could theoretically have vulnerabilities, though this is a low risk.
  • Accepted risk: User implementation errors: Developers could misuse the library in ways that introduce security vulnerabilities in their own applications.

Recommended Security Controls:

  • Security control: Regular dependency updates: Continuously monitor and update dependencies to address known vulnerabilities. Implement automated dependency scanning.
  • Security control: Security audits: Conduct periodic security audits of the codebase, including the code generation logic.
  • Security control: Input validation: While Butter Knife itself doesn't handle user input directly, provide guidance to developers on secure input handling practices in the documentation.

Security Requirements:

  • Authentication: Not directly applicable to Butter Knife, as it's a view binding library. Authentication should be handled within the application's business logic.
  • Authorization: Not directly applicable. Authorization should be handled within the application's business logic.
  • Input Validation: Not directly applicable to Butter Knife. However, developers using Butter Knife should still implement proper input validation in their application code to prevent vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting (XSS) or injection attacks.
  • Cryptography: Not directly applicable to Butter Knife. Cryptographic operations should be handled by dedicated libraries and APIs within the application.

DESIGN

C4 CONTEXT

graph LR
    User["Android User"]
    ButterKnife["Butter Knife"]
    AndroidApp["Android Application"]
    AndroidOS["Android OS"]

    User -- Uses --> AndroidApp
    AndroidApp -- Binds Views Using --> ButterKnife
    AndroidApp -- Runs On --> AndroidOS
    ButterKnife -- Generates Code For --> AndroidApp
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: Android User
    • Type: Person
    • Description: The end-user interacting with the Android application.
    • Responsibilities: Interacts with the UI of the Android application.
    • Security controls: None directly applicable to Butter Knife. Security controls are implemented within the Android application itself (e.g., authentication, authorization).

  • Element:

    • Name: Butter Knife
    • Type: Library
    • Description: A view binding library for Android that simplifies UI development.
    • Responsibilities: Generates boilerplate code for view binding at compile time.
    • Security controls: Compile-time safety, limited scope, open-source, widely used.

  • Element:

    • Name: Android Application
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The Android application that utilizes Butter Knife for view binding.
    • Responsibilities: Provides application functionality to the user, utilizes Butter Knife to bind views.
    • Security controls: Implements application-specific security controls (authentication, authorization, input validation, etc.).

  • Element:

    • Name: Android OS
    • Type: Operating System
    • Description: The Android operating system on which the application runs.
    • Responsibilities: Provides the underlying platform and services for the application.
    • Security controls: Android OS security features (sandboxing, permissions, etc.).

C4 CONTAINER

graph LR
    User["Android User"]
    AndroidApp["Android Application"]
    ButterKnifeLib["Butter Knife Library"]
    ButterKnifeProcessor["Butter Knife Annotation Processor"]
    AndroidOS["Android OS"]
    GeneratedCode["Generated Binding Code"]

    User -- Uses --> AndroidApp
    AndroidApp -- Uses --> ButterKnifeLib
    AndroidApp -- Includes --> GeneratedCode
    AndroidApp -- Runs On --> AndroidOS
    ButterKnifeProcessor -- Processes Annotations During Compilation --> GeneratedCode
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: Android User
    • Type: Person
    • Description: The end-user interacting with the Android application.
    • Responsibilities: Interacts with the UI of the Android application.
    • Security controls: None directly applicable.

  • Element:

    • Name: Android Application
    • Type: Mobile App
    • Description: The Android application that utilizes Butter Knife for view binding.
    • Responsibilities: Provides application functionality, uses Butter Knife for view binding.
    • Security controls: Implements application-specific security controls.

  • Element:

    • Name: Butter Knife Library
    • Type: Library
    • Description: The runtime component of Butter Knife.
    • Responsibilities: Provides core functionality and APIs for view binding.
    • Security controls: Limited scope.

  • Element:

    • Name: Butter Knife Annotation Processor
    • Type: Annotation Processor
    • Description: The compile-time component of Butter Knife.
    • Responsibilities: Processes annotations and generates binding code.
    • Security controls: Compile-time safety.

  • Element:

    • Name: Generated Binding Code
    • Type: Code
    • Description: The code generated by the Butter Knife annotation processor.
    • Responsibilities: Provides the concrete implementation for view binding.
    • Security controls: Inherits security controls from the annotation processor.

  • Element:

    • Name: Android OS
    • Type: Operating System
    • Description: The Android operating system.
    • Responsibilities: Provides the underlying platform.
    • Security controls: Android OS security features.

DEPLOYMENT

Deployment Solutions:

  1. Standard Android Application Package (APK): The most common deployment method. The application, including Butter Knife's generated code, is packaged into an APK file and distributed through the Google Play Store or other channels.
  2. Android App Bundle (AAB): A more modern publishing format that allows Google Play to optimize the APK for different device configurations, reducing download size. Butter Knife is compatible with AAB.
  3. Manual Installation (Sideloading): The APK can be manually installed on a device, bypassing the Play Store. This is typically used for testing or development.

Chosen Solution (Detailed Description): Standard Android Application Package (APK)

graph LR
    DeveloperMachine["Developer Machine"]
    BuildServer["Build Server (e.g., CI)"]
    ArtifactRepository["Artifact Repository (e.g., local, Nexus)"]
    GooglePlayStore["Google Play Store"]
    AndroidDevice["Android Device"]

    DeveloperMachine -- Pushes Code To --> BuildServer
    BuildServer -- Builds & Packages --> ArtifactRepository
    ArtifactRepository -- Publishes APK --> GooglePlayStore
    GooglePlayStore -- Downloads & Installs --> AndroidDevice
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: Developer Machine
    • Type: Workstation
    • Description: The developer's computer where the code is written and modified.
    • Responsibilities: Code development, testing, and pushing to the build server.
    • Security controls: Development environment security best practices (e.g., secure coding practices, IDE security settings).

  • Element:

    • Name: Build Server (e.g., CI)
    • Type: Server
    • Description: A server that automates the build process (e.g., Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI).
    • Responsibilities: Compiles the code, runs tests, and packages the application into an APK.
    • Security controls: Build server security best practices (e.g., access control, secure configuration, dependency scanning).

  • Element:

    • Name: Artifact Repository (e.g., local, Nexus)
    • Type: Repository
    • Description: Stores the built APK file.
    • Responsibilities: Stores and manages build artifacts.
    • Security controls: Access control, integrity checks.

  • Element:

    • Name: Google Play Store
    • Type: App Store
    • Description: Google's official app store for Android applications.
    • Responsibilities: Distributes the application to users.
    • Security controls: Google Play Store security checks and policies.

  • Element:

    • Name: Android Device
    • Type: Mobile Device
    • Description: The end-user's Android device.
    • Responsibilities: Runs the Android application.
    • Security controls: Android OS security features.

BUILD

graph LR
    Developer["Developer"]
    SourceCode["Source Code Repository (e.g., Git)"]
    CI_Server["CI Server (e.g., GitHub Actions)"]
    BuildTools["Build Tools (e.g., Gradle)"]
    AnnotationProcessor["Butter Knife Annotation Processor"]
    GeneratedCode["Generated Binding Code"]
    APK["APK File"]
    StaticAnalysis["Static Analysis Tools (e.g., FindBugs, Lint)"]

    Developer -- Commits Code --> SourceCode
    SourceCode -- Triggers Build --> CI_Server
    CI_Server -- Uses --> BuildTools
    BuildTools -- Compiles --> SourceCode
    BuildTools -- Uses --> AnnotationProcessor
    AnnotationProcessor -- Generates --> GeneratedCode
    BuildTools -- Includes --> GeneratedCode
    BuildTools -- Packages into --> APK
    CI_Server -- Runs --> StaticAnalysis
    StaticAnalysis -- Analyzes --> SourceCode
    StaticAnalysis -- Analyzes --> GeneratedCode
    StaticAnalysis -- Provides Reports --> CI_Server
Loading

Build Process Description:

  1. Code Commit: The developer commits code changes to the source code repository (e.g., Git).
  2. Build Trigger: The CI server (e.g., GitHub Actions) detects the code change and triggers a build.
  3. Compilation: The build tools (e.g., Gradle) compile the source code, including the Butter Knife annotations.
  4. Annotation Processing: The Butter Knife annotation processor runs during compilation, generating the binding code.
  5. Code Generation: The generated binding code is included in the build.
  6. Packaging: The build tools package the compiled code and resources into an APK file.
  7. Static Analysis: Static analysis tools (e.g., FindBugs, Lint) are run on the source code and generated code to identify potential bugs and security vulnerabilities.
  8. Artifact Creation: The final APK file is created as a build artifact.

Security Controls in Build Process:

  • Security control: Source Code Management: Using a secure source code repository (e.g., Git) with access control and versioning.
  • Security control: CI/CD Pipeline: Automating the build process using a CI server (e.g., GitHub Actions, Jenkins) to ensure consistency and repeatability.
  • Security control: Dependency Management: Using a build tool (e.g., Gradle) to manage dependencies and track their versions.
  • Security control: Static Analysis: Integrating static analysis tools (e.g., FindBugs, Lint, SonarQube) into the build process to identify potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Security control: Annotation Processor Security: Ensuring the security of the annotation processor itself, as it generates code.
  • Security control: Build Artifact Security: Securely storing and managing the generated APK file.

RISK ASSESSMENT

Critical Business Processes:

  • Android application functionality: The primary business process is the functionality provided by the Android application that uses Butter Knife. Butter Knife itself is a supporting component.
  • User experience: Providing a smooth and responsive user experience is crucial. Butter Knife contributes to this by improving performance compared to reflection-based solutions.
  • Development efficiency: Butter Knife helps developers build and maintain applications more efficiently.

Data Protection:

  • Butter Knife does not directly handle or store any sensitive data. Data sensitivity is determined by the Android application that uses Butter Knife.
  • The Android application using Butter Knife is responsible for protecting any sensitive data it handles, such as:
    • Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
    • Financial data
    • Authentication credentials
    • Health data
    • Location data
    • Any other data considered sensitive by the application's purpose and applicable regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).

QUESTIONS & ASSUMPTIONS

Questions:

  • Are there any specific compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) that the Android application using Butter Knife must adhere to?
  • What is the expected lifespan of the Android application and the frequency of updates?
  • What is the target audience for the Android application (e.g., general public, enterprise users)?
  • What are the specific security concerns of the developers or organization creating the Android application?
  • Are there any existing security policies or guidelines that should be followed?

Assumptions:

  • Business Posture: The primary goal is to simplify Android development and improve application performance. The project has a moderate risk appetite, balancing innovation with stability.
  • Security Posture: The developers are aware of basic security principles but may not have extensive security expertise. The project relies on the security of the underlying Android platform and the build tools.
  • Design: The application follows standard Android development practices. The build process uses Gradle and a CI server. The deployment follows the standard APK distribution model.