Attack Surface: Vulnerable Plugins
- Description: Jenkins plugins, while extending functionality, can contain critical security vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE), authentication bypasses, or significant information disclosure.
- Jenkins Contribution: Jenkins' plugin architecture relies on third-party code, increasing the attack surface and potential for vulnerabilities within the Jenkins ecosystem.
- Example: A plugin with an unauthenticated RCE vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins server simply by sending a crafted request.
- Impact: Full compromise of the Jenkins server, data breaches, unauthorized access to connected systems, and complete disruption of CI/CD pipelines.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Mandatory Plugin Updates: Implement a strict policy for regularly updating plugins to the latest versions, prioritizing security updates.
- Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate automated plugin vulnerability scanning into your Jenkins management process.
- Plugin Whitelisting: Restrict plugin installations to a pre-approved list of trusted and regularly vetted plugins.
- Minimize Plugin Usage: Reduce the number of installed plugins to the absolute minimum required functionality to decrease the attack surface.
- Security Monitoring & Alerts: Actively monitor plugin security advisories and set up alerts for newly discovered vulnerabilities in used plugins.
Attack Surface: Script Injection in Pipelines
- Description: Jenkins Pipelines, using Groovy scripts, are vulnerable to script injection when user-controlled input or external data is not properly sanitized. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master or agents.
- Jenkins Contribution: Jenkins' "Pipeline as Code" feature, while powerful, inherently involves dynamic script execution, creating a direct pathway for injection vulnerabilities if not secured.
- Example: A pipeline takes a user-provided branch name and uses it unsanitized in a shell command. An attacker injects malicious shell commands within the branch name, leading to command execution on the Jenkins agent.
- Impact: Remote code execution on Jenkins master or agents, allowing for complete system takeover, data exfiltration, and manipulation of the CI/CD process.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strict Input Sanitization: Implement rigorous input sanitization and validation for all user-provided data and external data used in Pipeline scripts.
- Secure Scripting Practices: Avoid dynamic script evaluation with user input. Use parameterized builds with caution and validate parameters thoroughly.
- Principle of Least Privilege for Pipelines: Run pipeline scripts with the minimum necessary permissions, avoiding execution as root or with overly broad credentials.
- Static Pipeline Analysis: Use static analysis tools to automatically scan Jenkinsfile definitions for potential script injection vulnerabilities.
- Code Review for Pipelines: Mandate code reviews for all Jenkinsfile changes to identify and prevent injection vulnerabilities before deployment.
Attack Surface: Unsecured Jenkins Remoting
- Description: The Jenkins remoting protocol (JNLP or SSH) used for communication between master and agents can be exploited if not properly secured. This includes unencrypted communication, deserialization vulnerabilities, and agent impersonation.
- Jenkins Contribution: Jenkins' distributed architecture relies on remoting, and historically, default configurations might have been insecure (e.g., unencrypted JNLP). Vulnerabilities in the remoting protocol itself are direct Jenkins weaknesses.
- Example: Unencrypted JNLP communication allows network attackers to intercept credentials or inject malicious commands. Deserialization vulnerabilities in older JNLP versions allow RCE by sending crafted serialized objects.
- Impact: Remote code execution on master or agents, agent hijacking, man-in-the-middle attacks, and unauthorized access to the Jenkins environment and connected systems.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enforce JNLP-over-HTTPS or SSH: Mandatory configuration to use JNLP-over-HTTPS or SSH for all agent communication to ensure encryption.
- Disable Unnecessary JNLP Ports: Disable the JNLP port if not actively used or restrict access via firewalls.
- Regularly Update Jenkins Core and Agents: Keep both Jenkins master and agents updated to patch remoting protocol vulnerabilities, including deserialization issues.
- Agent-to-Master Security Hardening: Configure agent-to-master security settings to limit agent capabilities and restrict outbound connections from agents.
- Strong Agent Authentication: Implement robust agent authentication mechanisms to prevent unauthorized agents from connecting.
Attack Surface: Insufficient Access Control
- Description: Weak or misconfigured Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Jenkins can grant excessive privileges to users, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive configurations, jobs, credentials, and functionalities.
- Jenkins Contribution: Jenkins' flexible RBAC system, if not carefully planned and implemented, can easily result in overly permissive access, directly exposing Jenkins resources.
- Example: Granting "Administer" permissions to a large number of users, or allowing developers "Job/Configure" access when they only need "Job/Read," enabling them to modify critical build processes or inject malicious code.
- Impact: Unauthorized modification of Jenkins configurations, jobs, and pipelines, access to sensitive credentials, escalation of privileges, and potential system compromise.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Principle of Least Privilege: Strictly adhere to the principle of least privilege when assigning roles and permissions in Jenkins.
- Role-Based Access Control Planning: Carefully plan and define roles and permissions based on job functions and responsibilities.
- Regular Access Control Audits: Conduct periodic audits of user permissions and role assignments to identify and rectify any over-permissioning.
- Granular Permissions using Matrix-Based Security: Utilize Jenkins' matrix-based security to fine-tune permissions at a granular level, controlling access to specific jobs and resources.
- External Authentication and Authorization Integration: Integrate Jenkins with external identity providers (LDAP, Active Directory, OAuth) for centralized user management and consistent access policies.
Attack Surface: Default Credentials
- Description: Jenkins instances left with default administrative credentials are critically vulnerable, allowing immediate and complete takeover by attackers.
- Jenkins Contribution: Jenkins' initial setup, if not properly secured, can leave default credentials active, a direct and easily exploitable vulnerability in a new or misconfigured Jenkins instance.
- Example: An attacker attempts to log in using common default credentials like "admin/admin" and gains full administrative access to the Jenkins server.
- Impact: Complete compromise of the Jenkins server, full administrative control, data breaches, and total disruption of CI/CD pipelines.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Mandatory Password Change on First Login: Enforce immediate password change for the administrative user during the initial Jenkins setup.
- Disable Default Accounts: If possible, disable or remove default administrative accounts after creating secure replacements.
- Strong Password Policies: Implement and enforce strong password policies for all Jenkins users, including administrators.
- Regular Security Scanning for Default Credentials: Include checks for default credentials in regular security scans of the Jenkins instance.
- Security Awareness Training: Train administrators and users on the critical importance of changing default credentials and maintaining strong passwords.