Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
41 lines (34 loc) · 5.7 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

41 lines (34 loc) · 5.7 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for jodaorg/joda-time

Attack Surface: 1. Insecure Deserialization

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities during the deserialization of Joda-Time objects from untrusted sources, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution.
  • Joda-Time Contribution: Joda-Time objects like DateTime, LocalDate, and others are serializable. If an application deserializes these objects from untrusted input without proper safeguards, it becomes vulnerable to deserialization attacks. Attackers can craft malicious serialized Joda-Time data to execute arbitrary code upon deserialization.
  • Example: An application receives serialized data from a user, which is then deserialized into a Joda-Time DateTime object. An attacker crafts a malicious serialized payload that, when deserialized as a DateTime object, triggers code execution due to underlying Java deserialization vulnerabilities or classpath manipulation.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), full system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid Deserialization from Untrusted Sources: The most effective mitigation is to avoid deserializing Joda-Time objects from untrusted sources altogether. Use safer data exchange formats and parse date/time strings explicitly.
    • Implement Secure Deserialization Practices: If deserialization is necessary, employ robust input validation and consider using secure deserialization libraries or mechanisms to prevent exploitation. Restrict the classes allowed during deserialization.

Attack Surface: 2. Input Parsing Vulnerabilities (Format String Exploitation leading to DoS or Logic Errors)

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in Joda-Time's date/time parsing functions through manipulation of format strings or locale settings, potentially leading to Denial of Service or logic errors with security implications.
  • Joda-Time Contribution: Joda-Time's DateTimeFormat.forPattern() and similar parsing methods can be misused if applications allow user-controlled format patterns or locales without proper validation. Maliciously crafted patterns can lead to excessive resource consumption during parsing.
  • Example: An application allows users to specify a custom date/time format pattern that is directly passed to DateTimeFormat.forPattern(). An attacker provides an extremely complex or deeply nested pattern, causing the parsing process to consume excessive CPU and memory, leading to a Denial of Service. Alternatively, locale manipulation could cause misinterpretation of date/time values, leading to incorrect security decisions.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) through resource exhaustion.
    • Logic errors leading to security vulnerabilities (e.g., authorization bypass) due to misparsed dates.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strictly Control Format Patterns: Never allow user-provided format patterns to be directly used in Joda-Time parsing functions. Whitelist a limited set of predefined, safe format patterns.
    • Sanitize and Validate Input: Thoroughly sanitize and validate all date/time strings received from external sources before parsing.
    • Use Predefined Formatters: Prefer using predefined formatters like ISODateTimeFormat whenever possible, as they are less prone to format string manipulation issues.
    • Control Locale Settings: Explicitly set and control the locale used for parsing, avoiding reliance on user-provided or system-default locales if security-sensitive operations are involved.

Attack Surface: 3. Outdated Library Risk (Leading to Unpatched Vulnerabilities)

  • Description: The inherent risk of using an outdated and unmaintained library like Joda-Time, which will not receive security patches for newly discovered vulnerabilities.
  • Joda-Time Contribution: Joda-Time is in maintenance mode, meaning active development and security patching have ceased. Any newly discovered vulnerabilities in Joda-Time will likely remain unpatched by the project itself, leaving applications vulnerable.
  • Example: A new security vulnerability is discovered within the Joda-Time library itself. Because Joda-Time is no longer actively maintained, no official patch is released. Applications using Joda-Time remain vulnerable to this newly discovered exploit.
  • Impact: Exposure to known and future vulnerabilities without official fixes, potentially leading to various attack vectors depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High (and increasing over time)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Migrate to java.time: The primary and most effective mitigation is to migrate away from Joda-Time to the actively maintained java.time API (introduced in Java 8 and later). This eliminates the risk of using an outdated library.
    • Monitor for Vulnerabilities: Continuously monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for any reported vulnerabilities in Joda-Time, even though official patches are unlikely.
    • Consider Community Patches (with Extreme Caution): In critical situations where migration is not immediately possible and vulnerabilities are discovered, explore community-provided patches with extreme caution and thorough testing before deployment.
    • Prioritize Migration: Make migrating away from Joda-Time a high priority in the development roadmap to address this fundamental security risk.