Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
118 lines (89 loc) · 9.88 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

118 lines (89 loc) · 9.88 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for jodaorg/joda-time

Mitigation Strategy: Explicit and Correct DateTimeZone Handling

Description:

  1. Avoid Default Time Zone: Never use Joda-Time methods that implicitly rely on the system's default time zone. This includes constructors like new DateTime() and methods like DateTime.now() without a DateTimeZone parameter.
  2. Explicit DateTimeZone Objects: Always explicitly create and use DateTimeZone objects. Use DateTimeZone.forID("TimeZoneID") with a valid IANA time zone ID (e.g., "America/Los_Angeles", "UTC"). Prefer DateTimeZone.UTC for internal representations.
  3. Constructor and Method Parameters: Pass the DateTimeZone object to constructors and methods that accept it. For example:
    • new DateTime(dateTimeZone)
    • dateTime.withZone(dateTimeZone)
    • formatter.withZone(dateTimeZone)
  4. User Input Validation: If accepting time zone IDs from users, validate them against the list returned by DateTimeZone.getAvailableIDs(). Reject invalid IDs.
  5. Canonicalization: Before using a user-supplied time zone ID, canonicalize it using DateTimeZone.forID() to handle variations in representation (e.g., "PST" vs. "America/Los_Angeles").

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Time Zone Confusion (High Severity): Incorrect or inconsistent time zone handling can lead to significant logic errors and data corruption.
    • Security Bypass (Medium Severity): Exploiting time zone differences could potentially bypass security checks based on time.

  • Impact:

    • Time Zone Confusion: Risk significantly reduced (90-95%) by enforcing explicit and consistent time zone handling.
    • Security Bypass: Risk moderately reduced (50-70%) by validating and canonicalizing user-provided time zone input.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially. Some code uses explicit DateTimeZone, but other areas rely on the default. User input validation is inconsistent.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent use of explicit DateTimeZone in all Joda-Time interactions.
    • Robust validation and canonicalization of all user-supplied time zone IDs.

Mitigation Strategy: Controlled and Safe Deserialization of Joda-Time Objects

Description:

  1. Avoid Direct Deserialization (Preferred): If possible, do not directly serialize/deserialize Joda-Time objects. Instead, serialize a simpler, safer representation (e.g., milliseconds since the epoch as a long, or an ISO 8601 string). Reconstruct the Joda-Time object on the receiving end using appropriate constructors and methods.
  2. Safe Deserialization Libraries (If Necessary): If direct deserialization is unavoidable, never use standard Java deserialization with untrusted input. Use a secure library like:
    • Jackson:
      • Disable Default Typing: Call objectMapper.disableDefaultTyping(). This is crucial to prevent polymorphic deserialization vulnerabilities.
      • Whitelist Allowed Classes: Use a whitelist to explicitly specify which classes are allowed to be deserialized. Include only the necessary Joda-Time classes (e.g., DateTime, LocalDate, LocalTime, DateTimeZone).
      • Configure JodaModule: Register the JodaModule with the ObjectMapper to handle Joda-Time types correctly: objectMapper.registerModule(new JodaModule());
      • Disable FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES (with caution): If you are absolutely sure about the structure of your JSON, you might consider disabling this feature, but be very careful as it can mask errors.
    • Gson: Create and register custom TypeAdapter instances for each Joda-Time class you need to deserialize. Within the TypeAdapter, perform strict validation of the incoming data before creating the Joda-Time object.
  3. Input Validation (Before Deserialization): Even with safe libraries, perform strict input validation before passing data to the deserialization library. Check for expected data types and formats.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Critical Severity): Insecure deserialization is a major vulnerability that can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.
    • Data Tampering (High Severity): Attackers could modify serialized data to alter the state of Joda-Time objects.

  • Impact:

    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Risk drastically reduced (95-99%) by avoiding insecure deserialization and using safe libraries with proper configuration.
    • Data Tampering: Risk significantly reduced (80-90%) by combining safe deserialization with strict input validation.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially. Jackson is used in some areas, but default typing is not always disabled, and whitelisting is not consistently applied. Input validation is incomplete.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent use of safe deserialization practices (avoiding direct deserialization where possible, disabling default typing in Jackson, using whitelists, and implementing custom TypeAdapters for Gson).
    • Comprehensive input validation before any deserialization occurs.

Mitigation Strategy: Correct and Consistent Parsing with DateTimeFormatter

Description:

  1. Explicit DateTimeFormatter: Always use DateTimeFormatter for parsing strings into Joda-Time objects. Avoid using constructors that directly accept strings.
  2. Lenient vs. Strict: Be explicit about whether you want lenient or strict parsing.
    • Strict Parsing (Recommended): Use formatter.withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT) to reject any input that doesn't precisely match the specified format.
    • Lenient Parsing (Use with Caution): If you must use lenient parsing, be extremely careful about the potential for accepting malformed input. Thoroughly validate the resulting Joda-Time object after parsing.
  3. Specify Time Zone: Use formatter.withZone() to explicitly set the time zone for parsing if the input string doesn't contain time zone information.
  4. Specify Chronology: Use formatter.withChronology() to explicitly set the chronology if you need a chronology other than the default (ISO).
  5. Locale: Use formatter.withLocale() to specify the locale for parsing, especially if dealing with localized date/time formats.
  6. Input Validation: Validate the input string before parsing, checking for length, character restrictions, and any other constraints that can be applied before attempting to parse.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Input Validation Bypass (Medium Severity): Lenient parsing can allow attackers to bypass input validation by providing unexpected date/time strings.
    • Incorrect Date/Time Calculations (High Severity): Incorrect parsing can lead to incorrect date/time values, causing logic errors.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Low Severity): Malformed input could potentially lead to excessive resource consumption during parsing.

  • Impact:

    • Input Validation Bypass: Risk significantly reduced (70-80%) by using strict parsing and pre-parsing input validation.
    • Incorrect Date/Time Calculations: Risk significantly reduced (80-90%) by using explicit formatters and correct parsing settings.
    • Denial of Service: Risk slightly reduced (10-20%) by pre-parsing input validation.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially. DateTimeFormatter is used, but strict parsing is not consistently enforced, and time zones/chronologies are not always explicitly specified.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent use of formatter.withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT).
    • Explicit withZone(), withChronology(), and withLocale() calls where appropriate.
    • Thorough input validation before parsing.

Mitigation Strategy: Prefer Specific Joda-Time Types

Description:

  1. Analyze Requirements: Carefully analyze the specific date/time requirements of each part of the application.
  2. Choose Most Specific Type: Use the most specific Joda-Time class that meets the needs. Avoid using more general types when a more specific type is sufficient.
    • Use LocalDate if you only need a date (year, month, day).
    • Use LocalTime if you only need a time (hour, minute, second, millisecond).
    • Use LocalDateTime if you need a date and time without a time zone.
    • Use DateTime if you need a date and time with a time zone.
    • Use Instant if you need a point in time (milliseconds since the epoch).
    • Use Duration or Period for representing time spans.
  3. Avoid Unnecessary Conversions: Minimize conversions between different Joda-Time types, as each conversion introduces a potential point of error.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Using a more general type than necessary can increase the complexity of the code and make it more prone to errors.
    • Unintended Time Zone Handling (Medium Severity): Using DateTime when LocalDateTime is sufficient could introduce unintended time zone conversions.

  • Impact:

    • Logic Errors: Risk moderately reduced (30-50%) by simplifying the code and reducing the potential for mistakes.
    • Unintended Time Zone Handling: Risk moderately reduced (40-60%) by avoiding unnecessary DateTime usage.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially. Some areas use appropriate specific types, but others use DateTime unnecessarily.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent application of the principle of using the most specific Joda-Time type throughout the codebase.