Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (70 loc) · 7.26 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (70 loc) · 7.26 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for keycloak/keycloak

Attack Surface: Brute-force Attacks on Authentication Endpoints

  • Description: Attackers attempt to guess user credentials by repeatedly trying different usernames and passwords against Keycloak's login endpoints.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak provides the authentication endpoints that are the target of these attacks. Misconfiguration or lack of rate limiting in Keycloak directly contributes to this attack surface.
  • Example: An attacker uses a script to try thousands of common passwords against a known username on the Keycloak login page.
  • Impact: Successful brute-force attacks can lead to account compromise, unauthorized access to applications and data, and potential data breaches.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Implement Rate Limiting: Configure Keycloak's built-in rate limiting features to restrict login attempts.
      • Account Lockout Policies: Enable and configure account lockout policies in Keycloak.
      • Strong Password Policies: Enforce strong password complexity requirements and password rotation policies within Keycloak realms.
      • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enable and enforce MFA for users.
      • Monitor Login Attempts: Implement logging and monitoring of failed login attempts.

Attack Surface: Password Reset Flow Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in the password reset process can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to accounts.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak's password reset functionality, if not properly configured or if vulnerabilities exist in its implementation, can be exploited.
  • Example: A password reset link sent via email contains a predictable token. An attacker guesses the token and resets the user's password.
  • Impact: Account takeover, unauthorized access to applications and data.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Strong Reset Token Generation: Use cryptographically secure random number generators for reset tokens.
      • Token Expiration: Implement short expiration times for password reset tokens.
      • Secure Token Delivery: Ensure password reset links are delivered over HTTPS.
      • Validate User Identity: Implement additional verification steps during password reset.
      • Rate Limiting on Reset Requests: Limit the number of password reset requests.

Attack Surface: Redirect URI Manipulation in OAuth/OIDC

  • Description: Attackers manipulate the redirect_uri parameter in OAuth 2.0 or OIDC flows to redirect users to attacker-controlled websites after successful authentication.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak's OAuth 2.0 and OIDC implementation relies on redirect_uri validation. Misconfiguration or vulnerabilities in this validation can lead to exploitation.
  • Example: An attacker modifies the redirect_uri to a malicious site in the authorization request, potentially stealing authorization codes or tokens after user authentication.
  • Impact: Authorization code or token theft, account compromise, data breaches.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Strict Redirect URI Whitelisting: Configure Keycloak clients with a strict whitelist of valid redirect_uri patterns.
      • Validate redirect_uri on the Server-Side: Always validate the redirect_uri parameter on the server-side.

Attack Surface: Insecure Client Registration (Dynamic Client Registration)

  • Description: If dynamic client registration is enabled in Keycloak and not properly secured, attackers can register malicious clients.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak's dynamic client registration feature, if enabled without proper access controls, directly introduces this attack surface.
  • Example: Dynamic client registration is enabled without authentication, allowing an attacker to register a malicious client for phishing or impersonation.
  • Impact: Rogue clients can be used for phishing, data theft, and impersonation attacks.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Disable Dynamic Client Registration (if not needed): Disable dynamic client registration if it's not required.
      • Secure Dynamic Client Registration Endpoint: Secure the registration endpoint with authentication and authorization.
      • Client Review and Approval Process: Implement a review and approval process for dynamically registered clients.

Attack Surface: Exposed Admin Console

  • Description: The Keycloak Admin Console, if accessible from the public internet without proper access controls, becomes a prime target for attackers.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak provides the Admin Console, and its accessibility is a direct configuration concern.
  • Example: The Keycloak Admin Console is accessible on a public IP address without IP restrictions or strong authentication, making it vulnerable to attacks.
  • Impact: Full compromise of the Keycloak instance, including user data and configurations.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Network Segmentation: Restrict access to the Admin Console to a private network or trusted IP ranges.
      • Strong Authentication for Admin Console: Enforce strong authentication, including MFA, for Admin Console access.
      • Disable Public Access (if possible): Disable public access and only allow access from internal networks or VPNs.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Keycloak's Codebase and Dependencies

  • Description: Security vulnerabilities in Keycloak's Java codebase or its third-party dependencies can be exploited by attackers.
  • Keycloak Contribution: Keycloak, like any software, is susceptible to vulnerabilities in its own code and the libraries it uses.
  • Example: A known vulnerability (CVE) in a library used by Keycloak is exploited to gain unauthorized access or execute code on the Keycloak server.
  • Impact: Ranging from information disclosure and denial of service to remote code execution and full system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Varies (can be Critical or High depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers/Administrators:
      • Regularly Update Keycloak: Keep Keycloak updated to the latest stable version to patch vulnerabilities.
      • Dependency Scanning: Implement dependency scanning to identify and address vulnerabilities in Keycloak's dependencies.
      • Security Patch Management: Promptly apply security patches released by the Keycloak project and its dependencies.