Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
207 lines (173 loc) · 15.3 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

207 lines (173 loc) · 15.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for lmax-exchange/disruptor

Objective: Compromise Application Using Disruptor

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Using Disruptor [CRITICAL NODE]
└───[OR]─ Exploit Disruptor Misconfiguration/Misuse in Application [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
    ├───[OR]─ Ring Buffer Starvation (Consumer Bottleneck) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
    │   ├─── Overload Consumers with Complex Processing [HIGH RISK]
    │   └─── Introduce Errors in Event Handlers Causing Consumer Failure/Backpressure [HIGH RISK]
    ├───[OR]─ Wait Strategy Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
    ├───[OR]─ Event Handler/Consumer Exploitation (Indirectly related to Disruptor) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
    │   ├───[OR]─ Backpressure Manipulation for DoS [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
    │   │   ├─── Flood System with Events Faster Than Consumers Can Process [HIGH RISK]
    │   │   └─── Introduce Events that Cause Slow Processing in Consumers [HIGH RISK]
    │   └───[OR]─ Data Corruption via Concurrent Access in Event Handlers (Application Logic) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
    │       ├─── Analyze Event Handler Code for Concurrency Issues [HIGH RISK]
    │       └─── Craft Events to Trigger Race Conditions in Handlers [HIGH RISK]
    └───[OR]─ Resource Exhaustion Related to Disruptor Usage [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
        └───[OR]─ Memory Exhaustion due to Event Accumulation (Misuse) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]
            └─── Block or Slow Down Consumers Intentionally [HIGH RISK]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Disruptor Misconfiguration/Misuse in Application [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: This is a broad category encompassing vulnerabilities arising from incorrect configuration or improper usage of the Disruptor framework within the application. These are often more likely than framework-level bugs and can lead to significant issues.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Ring Buffer Starvation (Consumer Bottleneck)
    • Wait Strategy Exploitation (Inefficient or Misconfigured)
    • Event Handler/Consumer Exploitation (Application Logic Issues)
    • Resource Exhaustion Related to Disruptor Usage (Memory, CPU)
  • Potential Impact: Performance degradation, Denial of Service (DoS), data corruption, instability.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Properly configure Disruptor components (Ring Buffer size, Wait Strategy).
    • Optimize consumer performance to avoid bottlenecks.
    • Implement robust error handling in consumers.
    • Monitor Disruptor performance and resource usage.
    • Conduct thorough testing and code reviews focusing on Disruptor integration.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Ring Buffer Starvation (Consumer Bottleneck) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Occurs when consumers are significantly slower than producers, causing the Ring Buffer to fill up and leading to backpressure. This can degrade performance and potentially lead to DoS.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Overload Consumers with Complex Processing [HIGH RISK]: Send events that require computationally expensive processing by consumers, slowing them down.
    • Introduce Errors in Event Handlers Causing Consumer Failure/Backpressure [HIGH RISK]: Craft events that trigger errors in event handlers, causing consumers to fail or become stuck, leading to backpressure.
  • Potential Impact: Performance degradation, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Optimize consumer performance and event handler logic.
    • Horizontal scaling of consumers if necessary.
    • Implement monitoring for consumer lag.
    • Consider backpressure handling mechanisms in producers.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Overload Consumers with Complex Processing [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: A specific method to induce Ring Buffer Starvation by overwhelming consumers with computationally intensive tasks.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Flood the system with events designed to trigger complex and time-consuming processing within the event handlers.
  • Potential Impact: Performance degradation, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Optimize event handler code for performance.
    • Implement resource limits for event processing.
    • Consider offloading heavy processing to separate services.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Introduce Errors in Event Handlers Causing Consumer Failure/Backpressure [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Another method to induce Ring Buffer Starvation by causing consumer failures through crafted events.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Send events that trigger exceptions or errors within the event handler logic, causing consumers to stop processing or become stuck in error states.
  • Potential Impact: Performance degradation, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement robust error handling within event handlers to prevent failures.
    • Implement retry mechanisms or dead-letter queues for failed events.
    • Monitor error rates in event handlers.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Wait Strategy Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]:

  • Attack Description: Exploiting misconfigurations or inefficient choices of Wait Strategies, potentially leading to CPU exhaustion or performance degradation.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • CPU Exhaustion via Busy Spin Wait Strategy (If Misconfigured)
    • Denial of Service via Inefficient Wait Strategy (Under Specific Load)
  • Potential Impact: Performance degradation, Denial of Service (DoS), CPU resource exhaustion.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Choose appropriate Wait Strategies based on application requirements.
    • Avoid busy-spin Wait Strategies in most scenarios.
    • Performance test with different Wait Strategies under realistic load.
    • Monitor CPU usage and Wait Strategy performance.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Event Handler/Consumer Exploitation (Indirectly related to Disruptor) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities within the application's event handlers and consumers, which are indirectly related to Disruptor but critical for overall application security.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Backpressure Manipulation for DoS
    • Data Corruption via Concurrent Access in Event Handlers
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), data corruption, data integrity loss.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Design thread-safe event handlers.
    • Implement robust input validation and rate limiting.
    • Monitor backpressure levels.
    • Conduct thorough code reviews and concurrency testing of event handlers.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Backpressure Manipulation for DoS [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Intentionally creating backpressure to slow down or halt the system, leading to Denial of Service.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Flood System with Events Faster Than Consumers Can Process [HIGH RISK]: Send a high volume of events to overwhelm consumers.
    • Introduce Events that Cause Slow Processing in Consumers [HIGH RISK]: Craft events that trigger slow or resource-intensive processing in event handlers.
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), performance degradation.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement rate limiting on event producers.
    • Optimize consumer performance.
    • Monitor backpressure levels and queue lengths.
    • Consider implementing event dropping or throttling mechanisms if necessary.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Flood System with Events Faster Than Consumers Can Process [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: A direct method to trigger Backpressure Manipulation for DoS by overwhelming the system with a high volume of events.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Send a large number of events to the application's event intake, exceeding the processing capacity of the consumers.
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), performance degradation.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement rate limiting and input validation at the event intake point.
    • Ensure sufficient consumer capacity to handle expected event volumes.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Introduce Events that Cause Slow Processing in Consumers [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: A more targeted method to trigger Backpressure Manipulation for DoS by crafting specific events that cause consumers to process them slowly.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Analyze consumer logic and identify event types or payloads that trigger slow processing.
    • Craft and send events of these types to deliberately slow down consumers.
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), performance degradation.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Optimize event handler code for performance, especially for potentially slow processing paths.
    • Implement timeouts or resource limits for event processing.
    • Validate and sanitize event payloads to prevent injection of malicious or resource-intensive data.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Data Corruption via Concurrent Access in Event Handlers (Application Logic) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Race conditions within the application's event handlers due to improper handling of concurrent access to shared resources.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Analyze Event Handler Code for Concurrency Issues [HIGH RISK]: Review event handler code to identify potential race conditions, shared mutable state, and lack of synchronization.
    • Craft Events to Trigger Race Conditions in Handlers [HIGH RISK]: Send events designed to trigger identified race conditions in event handlers.
  • Potential Impact: Data corruption, data integrity loss, inconsistent application state.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Design thread-safe event handlers, avoiding shared mutable state.
    • Use proper synchronization mechanisms (locks, atomic operations, etc.) when necessary.
    • Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on concurrency in handlers.
    • Implement unit and integration tests to verify thread safety.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Analyze Event Handler Code for Concurrency Issues [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: The preparatory step for exploiting data corruption vulnerabilities by identifying weaknesses in event handler concurrency management.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Review and analyze the source code of event handlers, looking for patterns that indicate potential race conditions or improper synchronization.
  • Potential Impact: Enables exploitation of Data Corruption via Concurrent Access in Event Handlers.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Proactive code reviews focusing on concurrency.
    • Static analysis tools to detect potential concurrency issues.
    • Security training for developers on concurrent programming best practices.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Craft Events to Trigger Race Conditions in Handlers [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: The active exploitation step for data corruption, where specific events are crafted to trigger identified race conditions.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Based on the analysis of event handler code, create events with payloads and timing designed to maximize the probability of race conditions occurring during concurrent processing.
  • Potential Impact: Data corruption, data integrity loss, inconsistent application state.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Effective mitigation of underlying concurrency issues in event handlers (see mitigations for Data Corruption via Concurrent Access).
    • Input validation and sanitization to prevent injection of malicious payloads designed to trigger race conditions.

Attack Tree Path: 13. Resource Exhaustion Related to Disruptor Usage [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Exploiting resource limitations related to Disruptor usage, specifically memory exhaustion due to event accumulation.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Memory Exhaustion due to Event Accumulation (Misuse)
    • CPU Exhaustion due to Inefficient Disruptor Usage (Less High-Risk, not included in sub-tree)
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application instability, system crash.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Proper Ring Buffer sizing.
    • Consumer performance optimization.
    • Resource monitoring (memory, CPU).
    • Backpressure handling and event dropping (if acceptable).

Attack Tree Path: 14. Memory Exhaustion due to Event Accumulation (Misuse) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: Causing memory exhaustion by intentionally preventing consumers from processing events, leading to event accumulation in the Ring Buffer.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Block or Slow Down Consumers Intentionally [HIGH RISK]: Prevent consumers from processing events, causing them to accumulate in the Ring Buffer and consume memory.
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application instability, system crash.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Proper Ring Buffer sizing and monitoring.
    • Consumer performance optimization and scaling.
    • Backpressure handling and event dropping (if acceptable).
    • Resource limits for Disruptor usage.

Attack Tree Path: 15. Block or Slow Down Consumers Intentionally [HIGH RISK]:

  • Attack Description: A direct action to trigger Memory Exhaustion due to Event Accumulation by actively hindering consumer processing.
  • Attack Steps:
    • Employ techniques to block or significantly slow down consumers, such as overloading them with complex tasks, introducing errors, or exploiting vulnerabilities in consumer logic.
  • Potential Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application instability, system crash.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Robust consumer error handling and recovery mechanisms.
    • Resource monitoring and alerting for consumer slowdowns.
    • Input validation and rate limiting to prevent malicious event injection.