Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
98 lines (85 loc) · 13.3 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

98 lines (85 loc) · 13.3 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for macrozheng/mall

Attack Surface: SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious SQL code into application inputs, which is then executed by the database.
  • Mall Contribution: mall's core functionality relies heavily on database interactions for product catalogs, user management, orders, and more. User inputs across the platform, from search bars to order forms, are potential injection points.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a malicious product search query to bypass authentication and access admin panels or extract sensitive customer data from the database.
  • Impact: Data breach (customer PII, product information, admin credentials), data modification (price manipulation, order alteration), denial of service, potential server compromise leading to full system takeover.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Mandatory Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Enforce the use of parameterized queries or prepared statements across the entire codebase for all database interactions.
      • Strict Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust server-side input validation and sanitization for all user-provided data before database queries. Use whitelisting and context-aware escaping.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for Database Access: Configure database user accounts with minimal necessary permissions, limiting the impact of successful SQL injection.
      • Automated Security Scanning and Regular Penetration Testing: Integrate automated static and dynamic security analysis tools into the development pipeline and conduct regular professional penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate SQL injection vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. These scripts execute in the victim's browser, potentially stealing session cookies, redirecting users, or defacing the website.
  • Mall Contribution: mall's e-commerce nature involves significant user-generated content like product reviews, forum discussions, user profiles, and potentially seller product descriptions. These are prime locations for XSS injection if not handled with strict security measures.
  • Example: An attacker injects malicious JavaScript into a product review. When other users view this product page, the script executes, stealing their session cookies and allowing the attacker to hijack their accounts.
  • Impact: Account takeover, theft of sensitive user data (session cookies, personal information, payment details if improperly handled client-side), website defacement impacting brand reputation, potential malware distribution to customers.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Comprehensive Output Encoding: Implement context-aware output encoding for all user-generated content displayed on the website. Use appropriate encoding methods (HTML entity encoding, JavaScript encoding, URL encoding) based on the output context.
      • Strict Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement and rigorously configure CSP headers to tightly control the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources, effectively mitigating many types of XSS attacks.
      • Robust Input Validation and Sanitization (though output encoding is primary defense): While output encoding is key, also implement input validation to reject or sanitize potentially malicious script inputs at the point of entry.
      • Regular Security Code Reviews and Penetration Testing: Conduct thorough security code reviews focusing on XSS prevention and regular penetration testing to identify and remediate XSS vulnerabilities in all user-content areas.

Attack Surface: Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR)

  • Description: Attackers manipulate predictable identifiers (like database IDs or file paths) to access resources they are not authorized to access.
  • Mall Contribution: mall manages numerous resources using IDs, including user orders, profiles, product details, shopping carts, and admin functionalities. Predictable IDs coupled with insufficient authorization checks create IDOR vulnerabilities.
  • Example: An attacker modifies the order ID in a URL from order/123 to order/124 and gains unauthorized access to another user's complete order details, including shipping address, purchased items, and payment information.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive customer data (order history, personal details, payment information), potential data modification (order manipulation, profile changes), privilege escalation if admin resources are vulnerable.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Mandatory Server-Side Authorization Checks: Implement strict and consistent server-side authorization checks before granting access to any resource based on user roles and permissions. Never rely on client-side checks.
      • Use Non-Predictable Object References (UUIDs/GUIDs): Replace sequential, predictable IDs with universally unique identifiers (UUIDs or GUIDs) to make resource guessing significantly harder.
      • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Implementation: Implement a robust RBAC system to manage user permissions and enforce access control policies across all application resources.
      • Comprehensive Security Testing for Authorization Flaws: Conduct thorough security testing specifically focused on identifying and fixing IDOR vulnerabilities and authorization bypass issues across all application functionalities.

Attack Surface: Insecure Authentication and Session Management

  • Description: Weaknesses in how mall verifies user identity and manages user sessions, leading to unauthorized access and account compromise.
  • Mall Contribution: mall requires robust authentication for both customers and administrators to protect sensitive data and functionalities. Weak password policies, lack of MFA, predictable session handling, or insecure session storage directly undermine security.
  • Example:
    • Brute-Force Attack on Weak Passwords: Attackers successfully brute-force user accounts due to weak password policies and lack of account lockout mechanisms.
    • Session Hijacking via Predictable Session IDs: Attackers guess or predict session IDs and hijack active user sessions, gaining unauthorized access.
    • Session Fixation leading to Account Takeover: Attackers exploit session fixation vulnerabilities to pre-set session IDs and then hijack user sessions after login.
  • Impact: Widespread account takeover, unauthorized access to customer data and admin panels, data breaches, financial fraud, reputational damage, complete compromise of the e-commerce platform.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Enforce Strong Password Policies and Account Lockout: Implement and enforce strong password complexity requirements, password length limits, password rotation policies, and account lockout mechanisms to prevent brute-force attacks.
      • Mandatory Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implement and require MFA for all user accounts, especially administrator accounts, to add a critical layer of security beyond passwords.
      • Secure Session Management Best Practices:
        • Generate cryptographically strong, random, and unpredictable session IDs.
        • Implement secure session storage (server-side storage, encrypted cookies with HttpOnly and Secure flags).
        • Implement proper session timeout and secure logout mechanisms.
        • Implement robust protection against session fixation attacks (session ID regeneration after successful login).
      • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing focused on Authentication: Conduct frequent security audits and penetration testing specifically targeting authentication and session management mechanisms to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Insecure File Uploads

  • Description: Allowing users to upload files without rigorous validation can lead to critical vulnerabilities, including remote code execution and server compromise.
  • Mall Contribution: mall likely allows file uploads for product images, user profile pictures, and potentially documents for returns or support. Insecure handling of these uploads can be severely exploited.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a malicious web shell disguised as a product image. If mall lacks proper file type and content validation, the attacker can execute arbitrary code on the server via the uploaded web shell, gaining full control.
  • Impact: Server compromise, remote code execution, complete system takeover, website defacement, malware distribution to users, denial of service, data breaches.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Comprehensive Server-Side File Validation: Implement strict server-side validation of file types, sizes, and content. Use whitelisting for allowed file extensions and MIME types. Perform deep content inspection to detect malicious payloads.
      • Secure File Storage and Access Controls: Store uploaded files outside the web root and configure the web server to prevent direct execution of uploaded files. Use a dedicated, isolated storage service if possible. Implement strict access controls to uploaded files.
      • Antivirus and Malware Scanning: Integrate robust antivirus and malware scanning for all uploaded files to detect and prevent malicious uploads.
      • File Renaming and Sanitization: Rename uploaded files to non-predictable names and sanitize file metadata to prevent path traversal and other attacks.
      • Dedicated Security Review for File Upload Functionality: Conduct a dedicated security review and penetration testing specifically focused on file upload functionalities to ensure robust security.

Attack Surface: Payment Processing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in the integration with payment gateways or in the handling of payment information can lead to massive financial fraud and data breaches, directly impacting the core business of mall.
  • Mall Contribution: As an e-commerce platform, mall's payment processing is a critical function. Vulnerabilities here can have devastating consequences.
  • Example:
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attack during Payment Transaction: If communication with the payment gateway is not perfectly secured (even with HTTPS, implementation flaws can exist), attackers could intercept payment card details during transmission.
    • Payment Manipulation leading to Financial Loss: Attackers manipulate payment requests to alter the payment amount or payment method, defrauding the business.
    • Improper Handling or Storage of Sensitive Payment Data (PCI DSS violation): If mall improperly handles or stores sensitive payment card data (which should be avoided entirely), it becomes a high-value target for data breaches, leading to massive financial and reputational damage and legal repercussions.
  • Impact: Massive financial fraud, large-scale data breach of sensitive payment card information, severe reputational damage, significant legal liabilities and fines, business closure.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Strict PCI DSS Compliance and Regular Audits: Mandatory adherence to PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) if handling any payment card data. Undergo regular PCI compliance audits by qualified security assessors (QSAs). Minimize handling sensitive data directly and leverage secure payment gateways for all payment processing.
      • Tokenization and Secure Payment Gateway Integration: Implement tokenization to replace sensitive payment card data with non-sensitive tokens. Integrate with reputable and PCI DSS compliant payment gateways using secure APIs and following their best practices.
      • End-to-End HTTPS Encryption and Secure Communication Channels: Enforce HTTPS for all communication across the entire website, especially during payment processing. Ensure secure communication channels with payment gateways using TLS 1.2 or higher and strong cipher suites.
      • Dedicated Security Expertise for Payment Systems: Engage dedicated security experts with specific expertise in payment systems and PCI DSS to design, implement, and maintain secure payment processing functionalities.
      • Continuous Security Monitoring and Incident Response Plan: Implement continuous security monitoring for payment systems and establish a robust incident response plan to handle any security incidents related to payment processing immediately.