Attack Surface: 1. JWT Authentication and Authorization
- Description: Attacks targeting the JSON Web Token (JWT) based authentication and authorization mechanism.
- How
mall
Contributes:mall
uses JWT extensively for user authentication and session management. The entire security model relies on the correct implementation and handling of JWTs withinmall
's codebase. - Example: An attacker forges a JWT with an administrator role by exploiting a weak signing key hardcoded within
mall
or a vulnerability inmall
's JWT validation logic. - Impact: Complete system compromise, unauthorized access to all data and functionality, potential data breaches, and financial loss.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Use a well-vetted and up-to-date JWT library (e.g.,
jjwt
). - Implement strict validation of all standard JWT claims (signature,
exp
,nbf
,iss
,aud
) withinmall
's authentication filters and related code. - Use strong, randomly generated secrets (HS256 or stronger) and store them securely (e.g., environment variables, a secrets vault, never hardcoded in
mall
's repository). - Implement robust secret rotation procedures within
mall
. - Consider short token lifetimes (e.g., 15-30 minutes) and use refresh tokens for longer sessions. Implement refresh token revocation within
mall
. - Thoroughly test all authentication and authorization flows within
mall
, including edge cases and error handling. - Implement rate limiting and account lockout within
mall
's login and password reset functionality to prevent brute-force attacks.
- Use a well-vetted and up-to-date JWT library (e.g.,
- Developers:
- How
Attack Surface: 2. RBAC Implementation Flaws
- Description: Vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or incomplete Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) configuration or logic within
mall
.- How
mall
Contributes:mall
implements a custom RBAC system to manage access to different administrative functions and resources. The correctness of this implementation withinmall
's code is crucial. - Example: A user with a "product manager" role is able to access order management functions due to a misconfigured permission assignment within
mall
's code. - Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data or functionality, potential data modification or deletion, disruption of service.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Adhere strictly to the principle of least privilege within
mall
's code. Grant only the minimum necessary permissions to each role. - Thoroughly review and test the RBAC implementation within
mall
, including all permission assignments and checks in the code. - Use a well-defined and documented authorization framework (Spring Security is used, but its configuration within
mall
is key). - Implement comprehensive unit and integration tests within
mall
to verify RBAC enforcement. - Regularly audit the RBAC configuration and user roles as defined within
mall
.
- Adhere strictly to the principle of least privilege within
- Developers:
- How
Attack Surface: 3. Order Management Manipulation
- Description: Attacks that attempt to modify order details (quantities, prices, addresses) after placement, potentially exploiting race conditions or insufficient validation within
mall
.- How
mall
Contributes: The core functionality ofmall
revolves around order processing. This makes order management, as implemented inmall
's code, a prime target. - Example: An attacker intercepts an order update request and modifies the quantity of an item to a negative value, potentially causing a system error or financial loss, exploiting a vulnerability in
mall
's order processing logic. - Impact: Financial loss, fraud, data corruption, denial of service.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Implement strong server-side validation of all order data before processing any changes within
mall
's order management services. This includes validating quantities, prices, addresses, and any other relevant parameters. - Use atomic operations or database transactions within
mall
's code to prevent race conditions during order updates. - Maintain a detailed audit log of all order modifications within
mall
, including the user who made the change, the timestamp, and the old and new values. - Implement input sanitization and output encoding within
mall
's order processing code to prevent injection attacks.
- Implement strong server-side validation of all order data before processing any changes within
- Developers:
- How
Attack Surface: 4. Database Interactions (Beyond Generic SQLi)
- Description: Vulnerabilities related to how
mall
interacts with its databases, focusing on data exposure through APIs and potential ORM-specific issues withinmall
's code.- How
mall
Contributes:mall
uses multiple databases and relies heavily on database interactions for its core functionality. MyBatis is used as the ORM, and its usage withinmall
is the key concern. - Example: An API endpoint within
mall
intended to return a list of products inadvertently exposes internal database IDs or other sensitive information. A MyBatis dynamic SQL statement withinmall
is vulnerable to a subtle injection attack. - Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized data access, potential system compromise.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Design APIs within
mall
to expose only the minimum necessary data. Use Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) to control the shape of API responses and avoid exposing internal database structures. - Implement strict authorization checks for all API endpoints within
mall
, ensuring that users can only access data they are authorized to see. - Avoid using dynamic SQL in MyBatis within
mall
where possible. If dynamic SQL is necessary, use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent injection vulnerabilities. - Thoroughly review all MyBatis XML mapper files within
mall
for potential injection vulnerabilities. - Regularly audit database queries and API responses generated by
mall
for sensitive data exposure.
- Design APIs within
- Developers:
- How