Threat: Rogue Microservice Registration
-
Threat: Rogue Microservice Registration
- Description: An attacker registers a malicious microservice with the service discovery mechanism (e.g., Eureka, Consul) to intercept legitimate traffic intended for
mall
services. The attacker could steal data (order details, customer information), manipulate responses (change prices, confirm fake orders), or cause a denial of service. - Impact: Data breach, data manipulation, service disruption, loss of customer trust, financial loss.
- Affected Component: Service Discovery (Eureka/Consul), Spring Cloud Gateway, all
mall
microservices (e.g.,mall-order
,mall-product
,mall-auth
). - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement mutual TLS (mTLS) between all
mall
microservices. - Secure the service discovery mechanism itself: strong passwords, network segmentation (separate network for internal services), strict access control.
- Implement service-to-service authentication using JWTs or other secure tokens, verifying the identity of each microservice.
- Regularly audit service registrations and configurations within Eureka/Consul.
- Implement mutual TLS (mTLS) between all
- Description: An attacker registers a malicious microservice with the service discovery mechanism (e.g., Eureka, Consul) to intercept legitimate traffic intended for
-
Threat: Malicious Message Injection (RabbitMQ)
- Description: An attacker gains access to the RabbitMQ message broker used by
mall
and injects malicious messages. These messages could trigger unintended actions withinmall
's microservices, such as creating fraudulent orders, canceling legitimate orders, manipulating inventory data, or triggering unauthorized promotions. - Impact: Financial loss, data corruption (order database, inventory database), operational disruption, reputational damage.
- Affected Component: RabbitMQ,
mall-order
,mall-promotion
,mall-inventory
, and any othermall
microservice consuming messages from RabbitMQ. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use strong, unique passwords for RabbitMQ users specifically configured for
mall
. - Implement message signing and verification (e.g., using digital signatures) within the
mall
microservices to ensure message authenticity and integrity. This requires code changes in message producers and consumers. - Use dedicated RabbitMQ queues with appropriate access controls (ACLs) for different message types and
mall
microservice consumers. - Implement input validation and sanitization for all message handlers within the
mall
microservices. - Monitor RabbitMQ queues used by
mall
for unusual activity (high message rates, unexpected message types).
- Use strong, unique passwords for RabbitMQ users specifically configured for
- Description: An attacker gains access to the RabbitMQ message broker used by
Threat: JWT Forgery
-
Threat: JWT Forgery
- Description: An attacker compromises the JWT secret key used by
mall-auth
or finds a vulnerability in the JWT library used bymall
. This allows them to forge JWT tokens, granting them unauthorized access tomall
's resources or allowing them to impersonate othermall
users. - Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data (customer data, order data), privilege escalation, account takeover, reputational damage.
- Affected Component:
mall-auth
, Spring Security, allmall
microservices relying on JWT authentication. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use a strong, randomly generated, and long JWT secret key specific to the
mall
deployment. - Store the secret key securely outside of the
mall
codebase (e.g., using a secrets management solution like HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, or environment variables securely injected at runtime). Never commit the secret key to the code repository. - Implement short token expiration times (e.g., 15-30 minutes) and use refresh tokens for longer sessions within
mall-auth
. - Consider using asymmetric keys (public/private key pairs) for JWT signing within
mall-auth
. - Validate the JWT signature and claims (issuer, audience, expiration) on every request within each
mall
microservice. - Regularly rotate the JWT secret key.
- Use a strong, randomly generated, and long JWT secret key specific to the
- Description: An attacker compromises the JWT secret key used by
Threat: Elasticsearch Data Tampering
-
Threat: Elasticsearch Data Tampering
- Description: An attacker gains direct access to the Elasticsearch cluster used by
mall
and modifies indexed data (product details, prices, search results). This could lead to misinformation, price manipulation, or denial of service by corrupting themall-search
index. - Impact: Data corruption, financial loss (due to incorrect pricing), reputational damage, service disruption (search functionality).
- Affected Component: Elasticsearch,
mall-search
,mall-product
. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enable Elasticsearch security features (authentication, authorization, TLS) for the cluster used by
mall
. - Restrict network access to the Elasticsearch cluster (firewall, security groups), allowing access only from authorized
mall
microservices. - Use strong passwords and role-based access control (RBAC) within Elasticsearch, limiting
mall-search
's access to only necessary indices and operations. - Implement data validation and sanitization before indexing data within
mall-product
andmall-search
. - Regularly audit Elasticsearch data and configurations specific to the
mall
indices.
- Enable Elasticsearch security features (authentication, authorization, TLS) for the cluster used by
- Description: An attacker gains direct access to the Elasticsearch cluster used by
Threat: Redis Data Tampering
-
Threat: Redis Data Tampering
- Description: An attacker gains access to the Redis server used by
mall
and modifies cached data (product prices, user sessions, inventory counts). This could lead to inconsistencies, incorrect pricing displayed to customers, or unauthorized access. - Impact: Data inconsistency, financial loss (incorrect pricing), potential privilege escalation (session hijacking), service disruption.
- Affected Component: Redis,
mall-common
(likely where Redis caching logic resides), anymall
microservice using Redis (e.g.,mall-product
,mall-order
,mall-auth
). - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enable Redis authentication (password protection) for the Redis instance used by
mall
. - Use TLS for communication between
mall
microservices and Redis. - Restrict network access to the Redis instance, allowing connections only from authorized
mall
microservices. - Use Redis ACLs (Access Control Lists) for fine-grained access control, limiting the operations each
mall
microservice can perform on Redis. - Avoid storing highly sensitive data directly in Redis; encrypt sensitive data within the
mall
microservices before caching. - Implement appropriate cache eviction policies within
mall-common
to prevent data staleness.
- Enable Redis authentication (password protection) for the Redis instance used by
- Description: An attacker gains access to the Redis server used by
-
Threat: Microservice Communication Tampering
- Description: An attacker intercepts and modifies requests/responses between
mall
's microservices. This could lead to data corruption, manipulation of business logic (e.g., changing order totals), or unauthorized access to data. - Impact: Data corruption, data breach, service disruption, financial loss.
- Affected Component: All
mall
microservices, Spring Cloud Gateway. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use HTTPS (TLS) for all inter-service communication between
mall
microservices. This is a configuration change within each microservice and the gateway. - Implement message integrity checks (e.g., using checksums or digital signatures) within the
mall
microservices. This requires code changes. - Consider using a service mesh (e.g., Istio, Linkerd) for enhanced security and observability, although this adds complexity.
- Use HTTPS (TLS) for all inter-service communication between
- Description: An attacker intercepts and modifies requests/responses between
Threat: Direct Database Access
-
Threat: Direct Database Access
- Description: An attacker gains direct access to the database (MySQL or MongoDB) used by
mall
and bypasses application-level security controls. They could then modify, delete, or steal data (customer information, order details, product data). - Impact: Data breach, data corruption, data loss, complete system compromise.
- Affected Component: MySQL, MongoDB, all
mall
microservices interacting with the database (e.g.,mall-order
,mall-product
,mall-user
). - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use strong, unique passwords for database users specifically for the
mall
application. - Restrict network access to the database servers, allowing connections only from authorized
mall
microservices. - Implement database-level auditing and monitoring, specifically tracking access and changes from
mall
microservices. - Use database user accounts with least privilege access (grant only necessary permissions to each
mall
microservice). For example,mall-order
should only have access to order-related tables. - Regularly back up the
mall
database. - Consider using database encryption at rest.
- Use strong, unique passwords for database users specifically for the
- Description: An attacker gains direct access to the database (MySQL or MongoDB) used by
Threat: Elasticsearch Denial of Service
-
Threat: Elasticsearch Denial of Service
- Description: An attacker sends a large volume of complex or unoptimized search requests to
mall-search
, overwhelming the Elasticsearch cluster and causing performance degradation or denial of service for themall
application's search functionality. - Impact: Service disruption (search functionality unavailable), performance degradation, inability for customers to search for products.
- Affected Component: Elasticsearch,
mall-search
. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Optimize Elasticsearch queries for performance within
mall-search
. - Implement rate limiting and throttling for search requests, either at the API Gateway or within
mall-search
itself. - Monitor Elasticsearch cluster resource usage (CPU, memory, disk I/O) and scale resources as needed for the
mall
deployment. - Use circuit breakers within
mall-search
to prevent cascading failures. - Implement query validation and sanitization within
mall-search
to prevent malicious or overly complex queries.
- Optimize Elasticsearch queries for performance within
- Description: An attacker sends a large volume of complex or unoptimized search requests to
Threat: RabbitMQ Denial of Service
-
Threat: RabbitMQ Denial of Service
- Description: An attacker floods the RabbitMQ instance used by
mall
with messages, or slow consumers cause a buildup of messages, leading to queue exhaustion and service disruption formall
's asynchronous operations. - Impact: Service disruption, message loss, delayed processing of orders and other operations within
mall
. - Affected Component: RabbitMQ,
mall-order
,mall-promotion
,mall-inventory
(and any othermall
microservices using RabbitMQ). - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement rate limiting for message producers within the relevant
mall
microservices. - Ensure consumers (within
mall
microservices) are properly scaled to handle the expected message load. - Use message acknowledgments and retries appropriately within the
mall
microservices. - Monitor RabbitMQ queue lengths and resource usage for the queues used by
mall
. - Implement dead-letter queues within
mall
's RabbitMQ configuration to handle undeliverable messages.
- Implement rate limiting for message producers within the relevant
- Description: An attacker floods the RabbitMQ instance used by
Threat: Microservice Resource Exhaustion
-
Threat: Microservice Resource Exhaustion
- Description: An attacker targets a specific
mall
microservice (e.g.,mall-order
,mall-product
) with a large number of requests, exhausting its resources (CPU, memory, network connections) and causing it to crash or become unresponsive. - Impact: Service disruption (specific
mall
functionality unavailable), performance degradation, potential cascading failures to othermall
services. - Affected Component: Any
mall
microservice. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement rate limiting and throttling for all
mall
microservice endpoints, either at the API Gateway or within each microservice itself. - Use circuit breakers within each
mall
microservice to prevent cascading failures. - Monitor resource usage (CPU, memory, network) for each
mall
microservice and scale resources as needed. - Implement auto-scaling based on resource utilization for the
mall
deployment.
- Implement rate limiting and throttling for all
- Description: An attacker targets a specific
Threat: Spring Security Misconfiguration
-
Threat: Spring Security Misconfiguration
- Description: Incorrectly configured Spring Security roles and permissions within
mall-auth
or othermall
microservices allow users with limited privileges to access unauthorized resources or perform unauthorized actions within themall
application. - Impact: Privilege escalation, unauthorized access to data, unauthorized actions (e.g., modifying orders, changing user roles).
- Affected Component:
mall-auth
, Spring Security, allmall
microservices relying on Spring Security. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully define roles and permissions in Spring Security within
mall-auth
and other microservices, based on the principle of least privilege. - Use method-level security annotations (e.g.,
@PreAuthorize
,@PostAuthorize
) within themall
microservices to enforce fine-grained access control. - Regularly review and audit Spring Security configurations across all
mall
microservices. - Use a well-defined and documented authorization policy for the entire
mall
application. - Thoroughly test authorization rules within the
mall
application.
- Carefully define roles and permissions in Spring Security within
- Description: Incorrectly configured Spring Security roles and permissions within
Threat: Internal Endpoint Exposure
-
Threat: Internal Endpoint Exposure
- Description: The Spring Cloud Gateway used by
mall
is misconfigured, exposing internalmall
microservice endpoints that should not be directly accessible from the outside. - Impact: Unauthorized access to internal
mall
services, potential for data breaches or manipulation. - Affected Component: Spring Cloud Gateway, all
mall
microservices. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully configure routing rules in the API Gateway to expose only the necessary public endpoints for the
mall
application. - Implement authentication and authorization at the gateway level to protect internal
mall
services. - Use a whitelist approach for allowed routes within the gateway configuration.
- Regularly review and audit gateway configurations specific to the
mall
deployment.
- Carefully configure routing rules in the API Gateway to expose only the necessary public endpoints for the
- Description: The Spring Cloud Gateway used by