Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
304 lines (239 loc) · 16.4 KB

sec-design.md

File metadata and controls

304 lines (239 loc) · 16.4 KB

Project Design Document: GraalVM

BUSINESS POSTURE

GraalVM is a high-performance, embeddable, polyglot runtime from Oracle. It aims to improve application performance and efficiency while providing seamless interoperability between different programming languages. Given its nature and backing by Oracle, a large enterprise, we can infer the following business priorities and goals:

Priorities:

  • Performance: Significantly improve the performance of applications, especially those written in Java and other JVM-based languages.
  • Efficiency: Reduce resource consumption (CPU, memory) of applications.
  • Polyglot Support: Enable developers to use the best language for a specific task without performance penalties or complex interoperability issues.
  • Developer Productivity: Simplify development by allowing developers to use familiar tools and libraries across different languages.
  • Enterprise Adoption: Drive adoption of GraalVM in enterprise environments, positioning it as a superior runtime for cloud and microservices architectures.
  • Innovation: Push the boundaries of runtime technology and contribute to the evolution of programming languages and virtual machines.

Goals:

  • Become a leading runtime for cloud-native applications.
  • Attract a large and active community of developers and contributors.
  • Establish GraalVM as a viable alternative to traditional JVMs.
  • Generate revenue through commercial offerings (e.g., GraalVM Enterprise Edition).
  • Integrate with popular frameworks and tools.

Business Risks:

  • Security Vulnerabilities: As a complex runtime environment, GraalVM is susceptible to security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. This is a critical risk given its potential use in enterprise and cloud environments.
  • Compatibility Issues: Ensuring compatibility with existing applications and libraries is crucial for adoption. Incompatibilities could hinder migration and lead to user frustration.
  • Performance Regressions: While performance is a key priority, there's a risk of introducing performance regressions in specific scenarios or for certain workloads.
  • Complexity: The polyglot nature and advanced features of GraalVM introduce complexity, which could make it challenging for developers to understand and use effectively.
  • Competition: GraalVM faces competition from other JVM implementations and alternative runtime environments.

SECURITY POSTURE

Existing Security Controls:

  • security control: Secure Coding Practices: The project likely follows secure coding practices to minimize vulnerabilities. This is implied by Oracle's involvement and the project's maturity. (Location: Development process, not explicitly documented in the repository's root).
  • security control: Regular Security Audits: Given Oracle's security focus, it's highly probable that GraalVM undergoes regular security audits, both internal and external. (Location: Not directly visible in the repository, but expected from an Oracle project).
  • security control: Vulnerability Reporting Program: Oracle likely has a vulnerability reporting program that encourages responsible disclosure of security issues. (Location: Oracle's general security policies).
  • security control: Code Reviews: The project uses GitHub, which facilitates code reviews as part of the development workflow. (Location: GitHub pull requests).
  • security control: Static Analysis: It's likely that static analysis tools are used to identify potential security vulnerabilities during development. (Location: Not explicitly mentioned, but standard practice for a project of this scale).
  • security control: Fuzzing: Fuzzing is a technique that is likely used to test the robustness of GraalVM components. (Location: Not explicitly mentioned, but standard practice).

Accepted Risks:

  • accepted risk: Complexity of Polyglot Runtime: The inherent complexity of supporting multiple languages increases the attack surface and the potential for unforeseen interactions that could lead to vulnerabilities.
  • accepted risk: Reliance on External Libraries: GraalVM depends on various external libraries, which may have their own security vulnerabilities.
  • accepted risk: Emerging Technology: As a relatively new technology, GraalVM may have undiscovered vulnerabilities that are not yet known to the security community.

Recommended Security Controls:

  • Implement Software Composition Analysis (SCA): To track and manage dependencies and their associated vulnerabilities.
  • Implement Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): To identify vulnerabilities in the running application.
  • Enhance Fuzzing Coverage: Expand fuzzing efforts to cover a wider range of inputs and components.
  • Security Training for Developers: Provide regular security training to developers to ensure they are aware of the latest security threats and best practices.

Security Requirements:

  • Authentication:

    • GraalVM itself does not handle user authentication directly. Authentication is typically managed by the application or framework running on GraalVM.
    • Requirement: Applications running on GraalVM must implement secure authentication mechanisms appropriate for their use case.

  • Authorization:

    • Similar to authentication, GraalVM does not directly manage authorization. This is the responsibility of the application or framework.
    • Requirement: Applications must implement proper authorization controls to restrict access to resources based on user roles and permissions.

  • Input Validation:

    • GraalVM provides some level of input validation through its language implementations (e.g., type checking in Java). However, applications must perform thorough input validation to prevent vulnerabilities like injection attacks.
    • Requirement: All input from external sources (e.g., user input, network requests) must be validated before being processed.

  • Cryptography:

    • GraalVM provides access to cryptographic libraries (e.g., Java Cryptography Architecture).
    • Requirement: Applications must use strong cryptographic algorithms and manage keys securely. Sensitive data must be encrypted both in transit and at rest.

DESIGN

C4 CONTEXT

graph LR
    subgraph GraalVM Ecosystem
        User(("User")) --> GraalVM[(GraalVM)]
        GraalVM -- "Uses" --> JVM[("JVM (HotSpot)")]
        GraalVM -- "Interacts with" --> NativeOS[("Native OS")]
        GraalVM -- "Can compile to" --> NativeImage[("Native Image")]
        GraalVM -- "Supports" --> OtherLanguages[("Other Languages\n(Python, Ruby, R, JavaScript, LLVM)")]
    end
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element: User

    • Name: User
    • Type: Person
    • Description: A developer or end-user interacting with applications running on GraalVM.
    • Responsibilities: Interacts with applications, provides input, receives output.
    • Security controls: Authentication and authorization mechanisms within the application.

  • Element: GraalVM

    • Name: GraalVM
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The core GraalVM runtime environment.
    • Responsibilities: Executes code, manages memory, provides polyglot capabilities.
    • Security controls: Secure coding practices, regular security audits, vulnerability reporting program.

  • Element: JVM

    • Name: JVM (HotSpot)
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The underlying Java Virtual Machine (HotSpot) that GraalVM can run on.
    • Responsibilities: Provides the base JVM functionality.
    • Security controls: Standard JVM security features.

  • Element: Native OS

    • Name: Native OS
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The operating system on which GraalVM runs.
    • Responsibilities: Provides system resources, manages processes.
    • Security controls: OS-level security features (e.g., user accounts, file permissions).

  • Element: Native Image

    • Name: Native Image
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: A standalone executable generated by GraalVM Native Image technology.
    • Responsibilities: Runs as a native application without a JVM.
    • Security controls: Reduced attack surface compared to running on a full JVM.

  • Element: Other Languages

    • Name: Other Languages (Python, Ruby, R, JavaScript, LLVM)
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: Programming languages supported by GraalVM.
    • Responsibilities: Provide language-specific runtime environments.
    • Security controls: Language-specific security features and sandboxing mechanisms.

C4 CONTAINER

graph LR
    subgraph GraalVM
        Compiler[(Compiler)]
        LanguageRuntimes[(Language Runtimes)]
        Truffle[(Truffle Framework)]
        SubstrateVM[(Substrate VM)]

        Compiler -- "Compiles" --> LanguageRuntimes
        LanguageRuntimes -- "Uses" --> Truffle
        LanguageRuntimes -- "Runs on" --> SubstrateVM
    end
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element: Compiler

    • Name: Compiler
    • Type: Container
    • Description: The GraalVM compiler, which optimizes code for different languages.
    • Responsibilities: Performs just-in-time (JIT) compilation, ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation (for Native Image).
    • Security controls: Code analysis and optimization techniques to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

  • Element: Language Runtimes

    • Name: Language Runtimes
    • Type: Container
    • Description: Runtime environments for supported languages (e.g., Java, JavaScript, Python).
    • Responsibilities: Execute code, manage language-specific data structures.
    • Security controls: Language-specific security features, sandboxing, and isolation mechanisms.

  • Element: Truffle Framework

    • Name: Truffle Framework
    • Type: Container
    • Description: A framework for building language interpreters and tools.
    • Responsibilities: Provides APIs for creating language implementations, enables interoperability between languages.
    • Security controls: Secure design principles for language interoperability.

  • Element: Substrate VM

    • Name: Substrate VM
    • Type: Container
    • Description: A framework for building native images.
    • Responsibilities: Provides a minimal runtime environment for native images, manages memory, handles system calls.
    • Security controls: Reduced attack surface, memory safety features.

DEPLOYMENT

Possible Deployment Solutions:

  1. Traditional JVM Deployment: GraalVM can be used as a drop-in replacement for the standard HotSpot JVM. Applications are packaged as JAR files and executed using the java command.
  2. Native Image Deployment: Applications can be compiled into standalone native images using GraalVM Native Image. This results in faster startup times and reduced resource consumption.
  3. Containerized Deployment (Docker): GraalVM can be used within Docker containers, both for running applications on the JVM and for deploying native images.
  4. Cloud Platform Deployment (e.g., Kubernetes): GraalVM can be deployed on cloud platforms like Kubernetes, leveraging container orchestration capabilities.

Chosen Deployment Solution (Containerized Deployment with Docker):

graph LR
    subgraph Docker Host
        subgraph GraalVM Container
            Application[(Application)]
            GraalVMRuntime[(GraalVM Runtime)]
        end
    end
    NativeOS[("Native OS")]
    DockerHost -- "Runs on" --> NativeOS
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element: Docker Host

    • Name: Docker Host
    • Type: Infrastructure Node
    • Description: The physical or virtual machine that runs the Docker engine.
    • Responsibilities: Hosts Docker containers.
    • Security controls: OS-level security, Docker daemon security configuration.

  • Element: GraalVM Container

    • Name: GraalVM Container
    • Type: Container
    • Description: A Docker container running the GraalVM runtime and the application.
    • Responsibilities: Provides an isolated environment for the application.
    • Security controls: Container isolation, image security scanning, minimal base image.

  • Element: Application

    • Name: Application
    • Type: Container
    • Description: The application code running on GraalVM.
    • Responsibilities: Performs the application's business logic.
    • Security controls: Application-level security measures (authentication, authorization, input validation, etc.).

  • Element: GraalVM Runtime

    • Name: GraalVM Runtime
    • Type: Container
    • Description: The GraalVM runtime environment within the container.
    • Responsibilities: Executes the application code.
    • Security controls: GraalVM's built-in security features.

  • Element: Native OS

    • Name: Native OS
    • Type: Infrastructure Node
    • Description: Operating System of Docker Host.
    • Responsibilities: Provides system resources.
    • Security controls: OS-level security features.

BUILD

graph LR
    Developer(("Developer")) --> CodeRepository(("Code Repository\n(GitHub)"))
    CodeRepository -- "Triggers" --> CI[("CI/CD Pipeline\n(GitHub Actions)")]
    CI -- "Builds" --> JAR[(JAR File)]
    CI -- "Builds" --> NativeImage[(Native Image)]
    CI -- "Performs" --> SecurityChecks[("Security Checks\n(SAST, SCA)")]
    SecurityChecks -- "Reports to" --> CI
    JAR -- "Published to" --> ArtifactRepository1[("Artifact Repository\n(Maven Central)")]
    NativeImage -- "Published to" --> ArtifactRepository2[("Artifact Repository\n(Container Registry)")]
Loading

Build Process Description:

  1. Developers commit code to the GitHub repository.
  2. This triggers the CI/CD pipeline (likely GitHub Actions, given the repository).
  3. The CI pipeline performs various build steps, including:
    • Compiling code.
    • Running unit tests.
    • Performing security checks (SAST, SCA).
    • Building JAR files (for JVM deployment).
    • Building native images (using GraalVM Native Image).
  4. Build artifacts (JAR files, native images) are published to artifact repositories (e.g., Maven Central for JARs, a container registry for native images).

Security Controls in Build Process:

  • Code Reviews: Enforced through GitHub pull requests.
  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST): Integrated into the CI pipeline to identify vulnerabilities in the source code.
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Used to identify and manage vulnerabilities in dependencies.
  • Build Automation: Ensures consistent and repeatable builds, reducing the risk of manual errors.
  • Artifact Signing: Build artifacts (JARs, native images) should be digitally signed to ensure their integrity and authenticity. (Not explicitly mentioned, but recommended).

RISK ASSESSMENT

Critical Business Processes:

  • Application execution: GraalVM is responsible for running applications, so its stability and performance are critical.
  • Polyglot language support: The ability to seamlessly execute code from different languages is a key feature.
  • Native image generation: Native Image technology is a major differentiator for GraalVM.

Data Sensitivity:

  • GraalVM itself does not store or manage sensitive data directly. However, the applications running on GraalVM may handle sensitive data. The sensitivity of this data depends on the specific application.
  • Examples:
    • A financial application running on GraalVM would handle highly sensitive financial data.
    • A simple web application might only handle moderately sensitive user data (e.g., usernames, email addresses).
    • A command-line utility might not handle any sensitive data.

QUESTIONS & ASSUMPTIONS

Questions:

  • What specific SAST and SCA tools are used in the GraalVM build process?
  • Are there any specific security certifications or compliance requirements that GraalVM aims to meet?
  • What is the process for handling security vulnerabilities discovered in GraalVM?
  • What are the specific performance benchmarks and targets for GraalVM?
  • What level of support is provided for different operating systems and architectures?
  • Is there a detailed threat model for GraalVM?

Assumptions:

  • BUSINESS POSTURE: Oracle prioritizes security and invests significant resources in securing GraalVM.
  • SECURITY POSTURE: Secure coding practices, regular security audits, and a vulnerability reporting program are in place.
  • DESIGN: The provided C4 diagrams and deployment model represent a common and recommended configuration, but specific deployments may vary. The build process utilizes CI/CD and includes security checks.