Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
182 lines (150 loc) · 14.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

182 lines (150 loc) · 14.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for philjay/mpandroidchart

Objective: To achieve unauthorized data access or manipulation within the application by exploiting vulnerabilities in the MPAndroidChart library or its integration.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using MPAndroidChart
└───(OR)─► Exploit Vulnerabilities in MPAndroidChart Library
    ├───(OR)─► **Data Injection Attacks** * (Critical Node)*
    │   ├───(AND)─► **Malicious Data Input to Chart** * (Critical Node)*
    │   │   ├───► **1.3. Injection of Special Characters/Sequences** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │   └───► **2. Unvalidated/Unsanitized Data Source** * (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)*
    │   │       ├───► **2.1. Compromised Data Feed (API, Database)** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │       └───► **2.2. User-Controlled Data Input Directly Charted** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   └───(AND)─► **Insecure Data Handling by Application (Related to Chart Data)** * (Critical Node)*
    │       ├───► **3. Data Display of Sensitive Information Without Proper Access Control** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │       └───► **4. Lack of Input Validation Before Charting (Application Side)** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │
    ├───(OR)─► Library-Specific Vulnerabilities
    │   ├───(AND)─► **Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks** * (Critical Node Category)*
    │   │   └───► **8. Resource Exhaustion Attacks** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │       └───► **8.1. Large Data Sets Causing Memory Exhaustion** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │   └───► **9. Crash Exploitation** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │       └───► **9.1. Triggering Unhandled Exceptions via Malformed Data** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │
    ├───(OR)─► **Configuration and Integration Issues** * (Critical Node)*
    │   ├───(AND)─► Insecure Configuration of MPAndroidChart
    │   │   └───► **12. Using Deprecated or Vulnerable Library Versions** * (High-Risk Path, Critical Node)*
    │   ├───(AND)─► **Insecure Integration within Application** * (Critical Node)*
    │   │   └───► **14. Displaying Sensitive Data in Charts Without Proper Security Measures** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │   │   └───► **15. Lack of Proper Error Handling Around Chart Rendering** * (High-Risk Path)*
    │
    └───(OR)─► **Dependency Vulnerabilities** * (Critical Node)*
        └───(AND)─► **Vulnerabilities in Libraries MPAndroidChart Depends On** * (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)*
            └───► **16. Exploiting Known Vulnerabilities in Transitive Dependencies** * (High-Risk Path)*

Attack Tree Path: 1. Data Injection Attacks (Critical Node)

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious data intended to be charted, aiming to cause unexpected behavior, errors, or compromise the application. This is a broad category encompassing several specific attack vectors.
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all data sources used in charts.
    • Define strict data schemas and enforce them.
    • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements when fetching data from databases.
    • Sanitize user-provided data before charting.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3. Injection of Special Characters/Sequences (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Injecting special characters or sequences into chart data that might cause parsing errors, unexpected behavior, or bypass security checks within the charting library or application's data processing.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Low to Medium (Parsing errors, unexpected behavior, potential DoS)
  • Mitigation:
    • Sanitize input data to remove or escape special characters that could be interpreted maliciously.
    • Use appropriate encoding for data passed to the charting library.
    • Test with various special characters and edge cases to identify potential vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Unvalidated/Unsanitized Data Source (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)

  • Description: The application uses data from external sources (APIs, databases) or user input without proper validation, making it vulnerable to malicious data injection.
  • Mitigation:
    • For External Data Sources:
      • Secure APIs and databases with strong authentication and authorization.
      • Implement input validation at the data source level.
      • Validate data received from external sources within the application before charting.
      • Use data integrity checks (checksums, signatures) to verify data authenticity.
    • For User-Controlled Data Input:
      • Never directly chart user input without validation.
      • Implement strict input validation rules based on expected data types and formats.
      • Sanitize user input to remove potentially harmful characters.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1. Compromised Data Feed (API, Database) (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: If the API or database providing data to the chart is compromised, attackers can inject malicious data into the feed, which will then be displayed in the chart, potentially misleading users or causing application errors.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on security of data sources)
  • Impact: High (Data Exfiltration, Data Modification, Misinformation)
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure data sources (APIs, databases) with strong authentication, authorization, and regular security audits.
    • Implement intrusion detection and prevention systems for data sources.
    • Monitor data sources for unusual activity or data modifications.
    • Validate data received from data feeds within the application.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2. User-Controlled Data Input Directly Charted (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: If the application directly charts user-provided data without validation, attackers can directly input malicious data that is then visualized, leading to misleading charts, client-side issues, or potential vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium (If application allows direct user input for charts)
  • Impact: Medium (Misleading charts, potential client-side DoS)
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid directly charting user input whenever possible.
    • If user input is necessary, implement strict input validation and sanitization before charting.
    • Educate users about the risks of entering untrusted data.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Data Display of Sensitive Information Without Proper Access Control (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: The application displays sensitive data in charts without proper access control mechanisms. Attackers gaining unauthorized access can view this sensitive information.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Common application design flaw)
  • Impact: High (Confidentiality breach, Data Exfiltration)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement robust authentication and authorization to control access to features displaying charts, especially those with sensitive data.
    • Apply the principle of least privilege – grant users only necessary access.
    • Consider data masking or aggregation techniques to reduce the sensitivity of displayed data.
    • Regularly review and audit access control configurations.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Lack of Input Validation Before Charting (Application Side) (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: The application fails to validate data before passing it to MPAndroidChart, even if the data source is considered "safe." This makes the application vulnerable to data injection attacks if the data source is compromised or contains unexpected data.
  • Likelihood: High (Common development oversight)
  • Impact: Medium (Vulnerability to data injection attacks, application instability)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement input validation within the application before data is passed to the charting library.
    • Validate data types, formats, ranges, and expected values.
    • Treat all external data as potentially untrusted and validate it accordingly.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Resource Exhaustion Attacks (High-Risk Path)

  • Description: Attackers send requests that consume excessive resources (memory, CPU) during chart rendering, leading to application slowdown or crashes.

  • Attack Vector: Sending very large datasets to be charted, causing the application to consume excessive memory and potentially crash due to OutOfMemory errors.

  • Likelihood: Medium (Possible if application doesn't limit data size)

  • Impact: Medium (Application DoS)

  • Mitigation:

    • Implement limits on the size of datasets that can be charted.
    • Use pagination or data aggregation techniques to reduce the amount of data processed at once.
    • Monitor application memory usage and set alerts for excessive consumption.
    • Optimize chart rendering performance for large datasets.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Crash Exploitation (High-Risk Path)

  • Description: Attackers send malformed data or trigger specific conditions that cause unhandled exceptions or logic errors within the charting library or application, leading to crashes.

  • Attack Vector: Sending malformed or unexpected data to the charting library that triggers unhandled exceptions, causing the application to crash.

  • Likelihood: Medium (Possible if library or application error handling is weak)

  • Impact: Low to Medium (Application crashes, temporary DoS)

  • Mitigation:

    • Implement robust error handling around chart rendering in the application.
    • Catch and handle exceptions gracefully, preventing application crashes.
    • Log errors securely for debugging and monitoring.
    • Ensure the charting library itself has proper error handling and doesn't expose sensitive information in error messages.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Using Deprecated or Vulnerable Library Versions (High-Risk Path, Critical Node)

  • Attack Vector: Using outdated versions of MPAndroidChart that contain known security vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit these known vulnerabilities to compromise the application.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Common if dependency management is not rigorous)
  • Impact: High (Depends on vulnerabilities in the old version - can range from Information Disclosure to RCE)
  • Mitigation:
    • Maintain a robust dependency management process.
    • Regularly update MPAndroidChart to the latest stable version.
    • Monitor security advisories and release notes for MPAndroidChart and its dependencies.
    • Use dependency scanning tools to identify vulnerable dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 14. Displaying Sensitive Data in Charts Without Proper Security Measures (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Application developers inadvertently display sensitive data in charts without implementing proper security measures (access control, data masking, etc.), leading to unauthorized access and data breaches.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Common application design flaw)
  • Impact: High (Confidentiality breach, Data Exfiltration)
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid displaying sensitive data in charts if not absolutely necessary.
    • If sensitive data must be displayed, implement strong access control, data masking, or aggregation techniques.
    • Conduct security reviews to identify and mitigate unintentional exposure of sensitive data in charts.

Attack Tree Path: 15. Lack of Proper Error Handling Around Chart Rendering (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Insufficient error handling around chart rendering in the application can lead to application instability, unexpected behavior, or potential information leakage in error messages when MPAndroidChart encounters errors.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Common development oversight)
  • Impact: Low to Medium (Application instability, DoS, potential information leakage in error messages)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement comprehensive error handling around chart rendering.
    • Catch and handle exceptions gracefully.
    • Log errors securely for debugging and monitoring.
    • Avoid exposing detailed error information to end-users in production.

Attack Tree Path: 16. Exploiting Known Vulnerabilities in Transitive Dependencies (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector: Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies of MPAndroidChart to compromise the application.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on dependency management and vulnerability landscape)
  • Impact: High (Depends on the vulnerability - can range from Information Disclosure to RCE)
  • Mitigation:
    • Perform regular dependency scanning to identify vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
    • Update vulnerable dependencies to patched versions as soon as available.
    • Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to manage and monitor open-source dependencies.
    • Consider using dependency management tools that provide vulnerability alerts.