Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (72 loc) · 6.84 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (72 loc) · 6.84 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for qos-ch/logback

Objective: Exfiltrate Data, Disrupt Service, or Execute Code via Logback Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

                                     +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                     |  Exfiltrate Data, Disrupt Service, or Execute Code  |
                                     |          via Logback Exploitation                  |
                                     +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                                        |
         +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
         |                                |                                |
+--------+--------+             +--------+--------+             +--------+--------+
|  Log Injection  |             |  JNDI Lookup   |             |  Vulnerable   |
| (Data Leakage) |             |    (RCE)       |             |  Logback      |
|                |             |                |             |  Version      |
+--------+--------+             +--------+--------+             |  (CVEs)       |
         |                                |        [HIGH RISK]          |                |
         |                                |                                |                |
         |          +---------------------+---------------------+          |                |
         |          |                     |                     |          |                |
         |          |        +--------+--------+        +--------+--------+          |                |
         |          |        |  LDAP  |        |  RMI   |        |          |                |
         |          |        +--------+--------+        +--------+--------+          |                |
         |          |                     |                     |          |                |
         |          +---------------------+---------------------+          |                |
+--------+--------+             +--------+--------+             +--------+--------+
|  Sensitive    |             |  Unsafe       |             |  Exploit       |
|  Data in      |             |  Deserial.    |             |  Specific     |
|  Log Message  | [HIGH RISK]  |  of JNDI     |             |  CVE          | [CRITICAL]
+--------+--------+ [CRITICAL]  |  References  | [CRITICAL]    +--------+--------+
                                +--------+--------+

Attack Tree Path: Log Injection (Data Leakage) via Sensitive Data in Log Message

  • Description: The application inadvertently logs sensitive information (passwords, API keys, PII, etc.) without proper redaction or masking. This is not a Logback vulnerability per se, but Logback becomes the storage mechanism for this sensitive data, making it a target.
  • [HIGH RISK] and [CRITICAL]: High risk due to the commonality of this error and the direct impact of data exposure. Critical because the presence of sensitive data in logs is the compromise.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High (common developer mistake)
  • Impact: High to Very High (depending on the sensitivity of the data)
  • Effort: Very Low (simply reading logs)
  • Skill Level: Novice
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (depends on log monitoring and access controls)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement strict coding guidelines to prevent logging of sensitive data.
    • Use data redaction/masking techniques before logging.
    • Conduct regular code reviews to identify and correct logging of sensitive information.
    • Employ static analysis tools to detect potential sensitive data leaks.

Attack Tree Path: JNDI Lookup (RCE) via Unsafe Deserialization of JNDI References

  • Description: Logback is configured to use JNDI (e.g., via JNDIConfiguration or a vulnerable appender). An attacker controls the JNDI lookup string, pointing it to a malicious LDAP or RMI server. This server returns a serialized Java object that, upon deserialization by Logback, executes arbitrary code.
  • [HIGH RISK] and [CRITICAL]: High risk due to the potential for RCE, especially with older Logback/JRE versions or misconfigurations. Critical because successful exploitation leads directly to RCE. The "Unsafe Deserialization" node is critical as the point of vulnerability.
  • Likelihood: Low (with modern Logback and JRE), Medium to High (with older versions or misconfigurations)
  • Impact: Very High (Remote Code Execution)
  • Effort: Medium to High (requires setting up a malicious server and crafting the JNDI string)
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard (requires network monitoring and understanding of JNDI exploitation)
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid JNDI: Do not use JNDI features in Logback unless absolutely necessary.
    • Update Logback: Use the latest stable version of Logback.
    • Update JRE: Use a modern JRE with JNDI restrictions enabled (often the default).
    • Explicitly Disable JNDI: If JNDI is unavoidable, configure Logback and the JRE to explicitly disable remote code loading via JNDI (e.g., com.sun.jndi.ldap.object.trustURLCodebase=false, com.sun.jndi.rmi.object.trustURLCodebase=false).
    • Network Segmentation: Isolate the application server to limit the impact of a successful JNDI exploit.

Attack Tree Path: Vulnerable Logback Version (CVEs) via Exploit Specific CVE

  • Description: The application uses a version of Logback with a known, publicly disclosed vulnerability (CVE). An attacker exploits this specific CVE to achieve their goal (which could range from DoS to RCE, depending on the CVE).
  • [CRITICAL]: Critical because it represents a direct and known path to exploitation. The "Exploit Specific CVE" node is the actual execution of the exploit.
  • Likelihood: Low (if regularly updated), Medium to High (if using vulnerable versions)
  • Impact: Varies (depends on the specific CVE)
  • Effort: Varies (depends on the CVE)
  • Skill Level: Varies (depends on the CVE)
  • Detection Difficulty: Varies (depends on the CVE and available detection mechanisms)
  • Mitigation:
    • Regular Updates: Keep Logback and all other dependencies up to date. This is the most important mitigation.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities in your dependencies.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Stay informed about newly discovered vulnerabilities in Logback and other libraries.
    • Patch Management: Implement a robust patch management process to quickly apply security updates.