Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (64 loc) · 5.66 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (64 loc) · 5.66 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for qos-ch/slf4j

Objective: Compromise application using SLF4j by exploiting weaknesses within SLF4j or its usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND] Exploit SLF4j Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[OR] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Backend [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH - if backend is vulnerable]
│   │       ├───[Action] Exploit Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in backend (e.g., Log4Shell if Log4j is used and vulnerable) [HIGH-RISK PATH - if backend is vulnerable]
│   ├───[OR] Exploit Misuse of SLF4j API leading to Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] Log Injection via User-Controlled Input [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[Action] Identify log statements that include user-controlled input without proper sanitization [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[OR] Exploit Log Injection Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │       ├───[Action] Format String Vulnerability in Logging [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │       └───[Action] Sensitive Data Logging [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the ultimate attacker goal - to fully compromise the application. Success at this node means the attacker has achieved significant control over the application and its environment.
  • Attack Vectors Leading Here (from sub-tree):
    • Exploiting SLF4j Weaknesses.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit SLF4j Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This node represents the broad category of attacks that target weaknesses related to SLF4j, either in the underlying logging backend or in how SLF4j is used in the application.
  • Attack Vectors Leading Here (from sub-tree):
    • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Backend.
    • Exploit Misuse of SLF4j API leading to Vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Backend [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH - if backend is vulnerable]

  • Description: This path becomes high-risk if the application uses a logging backend (like Log4j, Logback, etc.) that has known, exploitable vulnerabilities. The most critical example is Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploit Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in backend:
      • Vulnerability: Known RCE vulnerabilities in the logging backend (e.g., Log4Shell in Log4j).
      • Likelihood: Low to Medium (depends on backend and patch status).
      • Impact: Critical (full application compromise).
      • Effort: Low to Medium (exploits often public).
      • Skill Level: Medium.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Misuse of SLF4j API leading to Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This path is high-risk because it targets common developer mistakes in using the SLF4j API, particularly when handling user-controlled input in log messages.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Log Injection via User-Controlled Input [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Vulnerability: Including user-controlled input directly into log messages without proper sanitization or using parameterized logging.
      • Likelihood: High (common coding mistake).
      • Impact: Varies, can lead to format string vulnerabilities, log forging, sensitive data logging.
      • Effort: Low to Medium.
      • Skill Level: Low to Medium.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
      • Sub-Vectors:
        • Identify log statements that include user-controlled input without proper sanitization [HIGH-RISK PATH]: This is the prerequisite step, identifying vulnerable logging points in the code.
        • Exploit Log Injection Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: This node groups the specific types of log injection exploits.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Log Injection Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This node represents the exploitation of vulnerabilities arising from log injection.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Format String Vulnerability in Logging [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Vulnerability: Using string concatenation with user-controlled input in log messages, allowing format string specifiers to be interpreted by the logging backend.
      • Likelihood: Medium (less common now, but still possible).
      • Impact: Significant to Critical (information disclosure, potentially code execution).
      • Effort: Low to Medium.
      • Skill Level: Medium.
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard.
    • Sensitive Data Logging [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Vulnerability: Unintentionally logging sensitive data (passwords, API keys, PII) in log messages.
      • Likelihood: High (very common mistake).
      • Impact: Significant to Critical (data breach, privacy violation).
      • Effort: Low (simply accessing logs).
      • Skill Level: Low.
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium.