Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (39 loc) · 5.17 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (39 loc) · 5.17 KB

Threat Model Analysis for qos-ch/slf4j

Threat: Accidental Logging of Sensitive Data

  • Threat: Accidental Logging of Sensitive Data
  • Description: Developers, when using slf4j logging statements, may unintentionally include sensitive information (passwords, API keys, personal data, etc.) in the log messages. If an attacker gains access to the log files generated through slf4j's configured backend, they can retrieve this sensitive data. This vulnerability arises from how developers utilize the slf4j API in their code.
  • Impact: Confidentiality breach, data theft, regulatory non-compliance, reputational damage, account compromise.
  • Affected slf4j Component: slf4j-api (usage by developers), underlying logging framework (writes to log files as configured via slf4j).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement mandatory code reviews with a focus on secure logging practices when using slf4j.
    • Enforce the use of parameterized logging via slf4j to prevent accidental object logging.
    • Conduct regular audits of log files generated through slf4j for sensitive data.
    • Implement data masking or redaction techniques within the application before logging via slf4j.
    • Provide developer training on secure logging practices specifically in the context of using slf4j.
    • Establish and enforce clear guidelines on what types of data are permissible to log when using slf4j.

Threat: Exposure of Log Files

  • Threat: Exposure of Log Files
  • Description: Log files, generated by the underlying logging framework as configured through slf4j, are stored in insecure locations or lack sufficient access controls. An attacker could exploit misconfigurations or vulnerabilities in the system hosting the logs to access these files. This allows them to read sensitive information logged via slf4j. While slf4j doesn't directly manage file storage, its use necessitates log file management, making this a relevant threat.
  • Impact: Confidentiality breach, information leakage, potential for further attacks using exposed information, unauthorized access to system data.
  • Affected slf4j Component: Underlying logging framework (file output, storage, configured via slf4j), system configuration (file permissions, storage location).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Securely configure the underlying logging framework (used with slf4j) to store logs in protected directories.
    • Implement strict access control lists (ACLs) on log files and directories where slf4j-generated logs are stored.
    • Regularly audit log storage configurations and access permissions for logs produced via slf4j.
    • Utilize centralized logging systems with robust security features and access controls for managing logs from slf4j applications.
    • Encrypt log files at rest and in transit, especially when logs contain sensitive data logged through slf4j.
    • Avoid storing logs in publicly accessible locations (e.g., public cloud storage buckets without proper security) for applications using slf4j.

Threat: Vulnerable Logging Backend (Dependency Vulnerability)

  • Threat: Vulnerable Logging Backend (Dependency Vulnerability)
  • Description: Slf4j is a facade and depends on a backend logging framework. If a security vulnerability is discovered in the chosen backend framework (e.g., Logback, Log4j), applications using slf4j and that vulnerable backend become indirectly vulnerable. An attacker could exploit these backend vulnerabilities, potentially leading to remote code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure. The Log4Shell vulnerability in Log4j, often used with slf4j, is a prime example of this critical threat.
  • Impact: Remote code execution, denial of service, information disclosure, complete system compromise, data breach.
  • Affected slf4j Component: Underlying logging framework dependency (Logback, Log4j, etc.), dependency management (Maven, Gradle, etc. used to manage slf4j and its backend).
  • Risk Severity: Critical (depending on the specific vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain up-to-date underlying logging framework dependencies by regularly updating to the latest patched versions. This is crucial for mitigating known vulnerabilities in backends used with slf4j.
    • Implement a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) process to continuously track dependencies, including the logging backend used with slf4j, and identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for the specific logging backend chosen for use with slf4j.
    • Utilize dependency management tools to automate dependency updates and vulnerability scanning for slf4j and its backend dependencies.
    • In the event of critical vulnerabilities in the backend, have a plan to quickly apply patches, consider temporary mitigation measures, or switch to a less vulnerable backend if necessary while patching the primary backend used with slf4j.