Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
327 lines (281 loc) · 25.9 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

327 lines (281 loc) · 25.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for signalapp/signal-server

Objective: To compromise an application using signal-server by exploiting vulnerabilities in signal-server to achieve unauthorized access to user data, disrupt communication services, or gain control over the server infrastructure.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root Goal: Compromise Application via Signal-Server (High-Risk Focus)

├───[1.0] Exploit Network Communication Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│   └───[1.2] Denial of Service (DoS) / Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks (High-Risk Path)
│       ├───[1.2.1] Resource Exhaustion Attacks (High-Risk Path)
│       │   ├───[1.2.1.a] Connection Exhaustion (High-Risk Path)
│       │   │   └───[1.2.1.a.i] Flood server with connection requests (High-Risk Path)
│       ├───[1.2.1.d] Bandwidth Exhaustion (High-Risk Path)
│       │   └───[1.2.1.d.i] Flood server with large data packets (High-Risk Path)
│       └───[1.2.3] Application-Level DoS (High-Risk Path)
│           └───[1.2.3.a] Abuse specific API endpoints with malicious or excessive requests (High-Risk Path)

├───[2.0] Exploit Authentication and Authorization Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│   ├───[2.1] Authentication Bypass (High-Risk Path)
│   │   ├───[2.1.2] Vulnerabilities in Authentication Mechanism (e.g., OAuth, custom auth) (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   └───[2.1.2.a] Identify and exploit flaws in authentication logic within Signal-Server (High-Risk Path)
│   │   ├───[2.2] Authorization Bypass (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   ├───[2.2.1] Privilege Escalation (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   │   └───[2.2.1.a] Exploit flaws to gain higher privileges than intended (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   ├───[2.2.2] Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in API endpoints (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   │   └───[2.2.2.a] Manipulate API parameters to access resources belonging to other users (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   └───[2.2.3] Missing or Improper Authorization Checks (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │       └───[2.2.3.a] Access restricted resources without proper authorization (High-Risk Path)

├───[3.0] Exploit Data Storage and Processing Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│   ├───[3.1] Data Breach / Information Disclosure (High-Risk Path)
│   │   ├───[3.1.1] Database Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   ├───[3.1.1.b] Database Access Control Issues (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   │   └───[3.1.1.b.i] Exploit misconfigurations to gain unauthorized database access (High-Risk Path)
│   │   ├───[3.1.3] Insecure API Responses (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   └───[3.1.3.a] API endpoints leaking sensitive data in responses (High-Risk Path)
│   │   └───[3.2] Data Manipulation / Integrity Compromise (High-Risk Path)
│   │       ├───[3.2.1] Data Injection Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│   │       │   ├───[3.2.1.b] Parameter Tampering (High-Risk Path)
│   │       │   │   └───[3.2.1.b.i] Modify request parameters to alter data (High-Risk Path)
│   │       │   └───[3.2.1.c] Input Validation Failures (High-Risk Path)
│   │       │       └───[3.2.1.c.i] Send malformed input to bypass validation and corrupt data (High-Risk Path)

├───[4.0] Exploit Server-Side Vulnerabilities in Signal-Server Application Code
│   ├───[4.2] Logic Bugs and Design Flaws (High-Risk Path)
│   │   └───[4.2.3] Business Logic Flaws (High-Risk Path)
│   │       └───[4.2.3.a] Exploit flaws in the application's business logic for unauthorized actions (High-Risk Path)
│   └───[4.3] Dependency Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)
│       ├───[4.3.1] Vulnerable Libraries/Frameworks (High-Risk Path)
│       │   └───[4.3.1.a] Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in dependencies used by Signal-Server (High-Risk Path)
│       └───[4.3.2] Outdated Dependencies (High-Risk Path)
│           └───[4.3.2.a] Exploit vulnerabilities in outdated versions of dependencies (High-Risk Path)

├───[5.0] Exploit Operational and Configuration Weaknesses (High-Risk Path)
│   ├───[5.1] Insecure Server Configuration (High-Risk Path)
│   │   ├───[5.1.3] Default Configurations Left Unchanged (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   └───[5.1.3.a] Exploit default configurations that are insecure (High-Risk Path)
│   │   └───[5.1.4] Insufficient Logging and Monitoring (High-Risk Path)
│   │   │   └───[5.1.4.a] Exploit lack of monitoring to perform attacks undetected (High-Risk Path)
│   └───[5.2] Insecure Deployment Practices (High-Risk Path)
│       ├───[5.2.1] Exposed Management Interfaces (High-Risk Path)
│       │   └───[5.2.1.a] Access and exploit management interfaces that are not properly secured (High-Risk Path)
│       └───[5.2.2] Lack of Security Updates and Patching (High-Risk Path)
│           └───[5.2.2.a] Exploit known vulnerabilities in outdated Signal-Server version or underlying OS (High-Risk Path)

└───[6.0] Social Engineering and Insider Threats (High-Risk Path)
    └───[6.1] Phishing Attacks against Administrators (High-Risk Path)
        └───[6.1.1] Gain credentials to administrative accounts (High-Risk Path)

Attack Tree Path: 1.0 Exploit Network Communication Vulnerabilities -> 1.2 Denial of Service (DoS) / Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks

  • Attack Vector Description: Overwhelm the Signal-Server with malicious traffic to make it unavailable to legitimate users. This can be achieved through various methods like connection floods, bandwidth exhaustion, or application-level attacks.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Service disruption, availability issues)
  • Effort: Minimal to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Rate Limiting and Request Throttling.
    • Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) and DDoS protection services.
    • Optimize server resources and application code for performance.
    • Implement proper input validation to prevent application-level DoS.
    • Utilize Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to distribute traffic.

Attack Tree Path: 2.0 Exploit Authentication and Authorization Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vector Description: Bypass authentication mechanisms or authorization checks to gain unauthorized access to the application and its data. This includes exploiting vulnerabilities in custom authentication logic, IDOR flaws, and missing authorization checks.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Significant to Critical (Unauthorized access, data breach, system compromise)
  • Effort: Low to Moderate (for simpler flaws like IDOR or missing checks) to Moderate to High (for complex auth bypass)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate to Difficult
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Strong Authentication Mechanisms (Multi-Factor Authentication where applicable).
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing of authentication and authorization logic.
    • Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC).
    • Thorough Authorization Checks at every API endpoint and resource access point.
    • Secure Session Management practices.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 Authentication Bypass -> 2.1.2 Vulnerabilities in Authentication Mechanism -> 2.1.2.a Identify and exploit flaws in authentication logic within Signal-Server

  • Attack Vector Description: Discover and exploit vulnerabilities in the custom authentication logic implemented within Signal-Server. This could involve flaws in OAuth implementation, custom token validation, or other authentication processes.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: Critical (Authentication bypass, unauthorized access) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Moderate to High
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Difficult
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Coding Practices for authentication logic.
    • Thorough Code Reviews and Security Audits of authentication code.
    • Penetration Testing focused on authentication mechanisms.
    • Use well-vetted and established authentication libraries and frameworks where possible.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Authorization Bypass -> 2.2.1 Privilege Escalation -> 2.2.1.a Exploit flaws to gain higher privileges than intended

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit vulnerabilities in the authorization logic to elevate privileges beyond what is intended for the user. This could allow a regular user to gain administrative access or access resources they should not be able to.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: Critical (Unauthorized access to sensitive functions and data) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Moderate to High
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Difficult
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Principle of Least Privilege in authorization design.
    • Robust Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC).
    • Thorough Authorization Checks at every access point.
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing of authorization logic.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Authorization Bypass -> 2.2.2 Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in API endpoints -> 2.2.2.a Manipulate API parameters to access resources belonging to other users

  • Attack Vector Description: Manipulate API parameters (e.g., IDs) to access resources that belong to other users or are not intended for the current user to access. This is a common vulnerability in web APIs.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Significant (Data breach, unauthorized access to user data)
  • Effort: Low to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement proper authorization checks before accessing any resource based on user identity.
    • Avoid exposing direct object references in API endpoints. Use indirect references or UUIDs.
    • Implement access control lists (ACLs) or similar mechanisms to manage resource access.
    • Automated API security testing for IDOR vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Authorization Bypass -> 2.2.3 Missing or Improper Authorization Checks -> 2.2.3.a Access restricted resources without proper authorization

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit API endpoints or functionalities where authorization checks are missing or improperly implemented. This allows attackers to bypass intended access controls and access restricted resources or perform unauthorized actions.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Significant to Critical (Unauthorized access, data breach, system compromise) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Authorization Checks for all API endpoints and resource access points.
    • Code Reviews to identify missing authorization checks.
    • Penetration Testing to verify authorization enforcement.
    • Automated API security testing for authorization vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Exploit Data Storage and Processing Vulnerabilities -> 3.1 Data Breach / Information Disclosure -> 3.1.1 Database Vulnerabilities -> 3.1.1.b Database Access Control Issues -> 3.1.1.b.i Exploit misconfigurations to gain unauthorized database access

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit misconfigurations in database access controls to gain unauthorized access to the database. This could involve weak database credentials, overly permissive firewall rules, or misconfigured user permissions.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: Critical (Full database breach, data exfiltration) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Database Access Controls and Authentication.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for database user permissions.
    • Regular Security Audits of database configurations.
    • Database Firewall and Network Segmentation.
    • Monitor database access logs for anomalies.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Exploit Data Storage and Processing Vulnerabilities -> 3.1 Data Breach / Information Disclosure -> 3.1.3 Insecure API Responses -> 3.1.3.a API endpoints leaking sensitive data in responses

  • Attack Vector Description: API endpoints unintentionally return sensitive data in their responses, which should not be exposed to unauthorized users. This could include user credentials, internal system information, or other confidential data.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Information disclosure, user data leaks)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Careful Design of API Responses to avoid including sensitive data.
    • Data Sanitization and Filtering in API responses.
    • Regular API Security Testing and Code Reviews to identify data leakage.
    • Automated API security testing for sensitive data exposure.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Exploit Data Storage and Processing Vulnerabilities -> 3.2 Data Manipulation / Integrity Compromise -> 3.2.1 Data Injection Vulnerabilities -> 3.2.1.b Parameter Tampering -> 3.2.1.b.i Modify request parameters to alter data

  • Attack Vector Description: Modify request parameters to manipulate data or application behavior in unintended ways. This could involve changing prices, quantities, user roles, or other data through parameter manipulation.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Data manipulation, business logic bypass)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Input Validation and Sanitization on all request parameters.
    • Server-side validation of data integrity and business logic.
    • Use of checksums or digital signatures to protect data integrity.
    • Parameter Tampering detection mechanisms.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Exploit Data Storage and Processing Vulnerabilities -> 3.2 Data Manipulation / Integrity Compromise -> 3.2.1 Data Injection Vulnerabilities -> 3.2.1.c Input Validation Failures -> 3.2.1.c.i Send malformed input to bypass validation and corrupt data

  • Attack Vector Description: Send malformed or unexpected input to the application to bypass input validation checks and potentially corrupt data or cause application errors.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Data corruption, application errors, potential security bypass)
  • Effort: Low to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Comprehensive Input Validation on all user inputs.
    • Use of whitelisting for input validation where possible.
    • Robust Error Handling to prevent data corruption and application crashes.
    • Input Fuzzing and Security Testing to identify input validation weaknesses.

Attack Tree Path: 4.0 Exploit Server-Side Vulnerabilities in Signal-Server Application Code -> 4.2 Logic Bugs and Design Flaws -> 4.2.3 Business Logic Flaws -> 4.2.3.a Exploit flaws in the application's business logic for unauthorized actions

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit flaws in the application's business logic to perform unauthorized actions or manipulate business processes in unintended ways. This could involve bypassing payment processes, gaining unauthorized access to features, or manipulating data through logical flaws.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Unauthorized actions, business process disruption, data manipulation)
  • Effort: Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate to Difficult
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thorough Design and Code Reviews of business logic.
    • Extensive Functional Testing and Business Logic Testing.
    • Penetration Testing focused on business logic flaws.
    • Anomaly Detection and Monitoring of business processes.

Attack Tree Path: 4.0 Exploit Server-Side Vulnerabilities in Signal-Server Application Code -> 4.3 Dependency Vulnerabilities -> 4.3.1 Vulnerable Libraries/Frameworks -> 4.3.1.a Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in dependencies used by Signal-Server

  • Attack Vector Description: Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and frameworks used by Signal-Server. Publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in dependencies can be easily exploited if not patched.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Significant to Critical (Varies depending on vulnerability, can be RCE, data breach, DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Low to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for dependencies.
    • Regularly Scan Dependencies for known vulnerabilities using vulnerability scanners.
    • Timely Patching and Updating of vulnerable dependencies.
    • Automated Dependency Management and Vulnerability Monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: 4.0 Exploit Server-Side Vulnerabilities in Signal-Server Application Code -> 4.3 Dependency Vulnerabilities -> 4.3.2 Outdated Dependencies -> 4.3.2.a Exploit vulnerabilities in outdated versions of dependencies

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit vulnerabilities present in outdated versions of dependencies used by Signal-Server. Failing to update dependencies leaves the application vulnerable to known exploits.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Significant to Critical (Varies depending on vulnerability, can be RCE, data breach, DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Low to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Establish a Regular Patching and Update Cycle for dependencies.
    • Automated Dependency Update processes.
    • Dependency Monitoring tools to track outdated versions.
    • Security Audits to ensure dependencies are up-to-date.

Attack Tree Path: 5.0 Exploit Operational and Configuration Weaknesses -> 5.1 Insecure Server Configuration -> 5.1.3 Default Configurations Left Unchanged -> 5.1.3.a Exploit default configurations that are insecure

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit default configurations that are left unchanged and are inherently insecure. This could include default passwords, exposed services, or insecure default settings in server software or applications.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Depends on default configuration, can be information disclosure, access control bypass)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Server Hardening and Secure Configuration Practices.
    • Change Default Passwords and Configurations immediately upon deployment.
    • Regular Security Audits of server configurations.
    • Configuration Management tools to enforce secure configurations.

Attack Tree Path: 5.0 Exploit Operational and Configuration Weaknesses -> 5.1 Insecure Server Configuration -> 5.1.4 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring -> 5.1.4.a Exploit lack of monitoring to perform attacks undetected

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit the lack of sufficient logging and monitoring to perform malicious activities without being detected. This allows attackers to operate stealthily and prolong their access or impact.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Moderate (Increased attack success rate, delayed incident response)
  • Effort: Minimal
  • Skill Level: Novice
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Difficult
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Comprehensive Logging and Monitoring of system and application activity.
    • Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system for log aggregation and analysis.
    • Real-time Security Monitoring and Alerting.
    • Regular Security Audits of logging and monitoring configurations.

Attack Tree Path: 5.0 Exploit Operational and Configuration Weaknesses -> 5.2 Insecure Deployment Practices -> 5.2.1 Exposed Management Interfaces -> 5.2.1.a Access and exploit management interfaces that are not properly secured

  • Attack Vector Description: Access and exploit management interfaces (e.g., admin panels, database management tools) that are exposed to the internet or not properly secured with strong authentication and access controls.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium
  • Impact: Critical (Full system compromise, administrative access) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Moderate
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Management Interfaces and restrict access to authorized networks only (e.g., VPN, internal network).
    • Strong Authentication and Multi-Factor Authentication for management interfaces.
    • Regular Security Audits of management interface security.
    • Network Segmentation to isolate management interfaces.

Attack Tree Path: 5.0 Exploit Operational and Configuration Weaknesses -> 5.2 Insecure Deployment Practices -> 5.2.2 Lack of Security Updates and Patching -> 5.2.2.a Exploit known vulnerabilities in outdated Signal-Server version or underlying OS

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploit known vulnerabilities in outdated versions of Signal-Server or the underlying operating system. Failing to apply security updates leaves the system vulnerable to publicly known exploits.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Significant to Critical (Depends on vulnerability, can be RCE, data breach, DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Establish a Regular Patching and Update Cycle for Signal-Server and the underlying OS.
    • Automated Patch Management processes.
    • Vulnerability Scanning to identify outdated and vulnerable software.
    • Security Audits to ensure systems are up-to-date with security patches.

Attack Tree Path: 6.0 Social Engineering and Insider Threats -> 6.1 Phishing Attacks against Administrators -> 6.1.1 Gain credentials to administrative accounts

  • Attack Vector Description: Use phishing techniques to trick administrators into revealing their credentials. This can be done through emails, fake login pages, or other social engineering methods.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Critical (Administrative access, system compromise) [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Effort: Low to Moderate
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Moderate
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Security Awareness Training for administrators on phishing and social engineering.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts.
    • Email Security solutions to filter phishing emails.
    • Regular Security Drills and Phishing Simulations.