Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
145 lines (126 loc) · 19.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

145 lines (126 loc) · 19.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for spring-projects/spring-framework

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Scanning

  • Description:
    1. Utilize dependency scanning tools (like OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk, or GitHub Dependency Scanning) that are compatible with Spring projects (Maven or Gradle).
    2. Integrate the chosen tool into your Spring project's build process (e.g., Maven or Gradle plugins) or CI/CD pipeline.
    3. Configure the tool to specifically scan Spring Framework and related dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    4. Regularly review scan reports to identify vulnerabilities in Spring Framework or its dependencies.
    5. Prioritize remediation of vulnerabilities affecting Spring Framework components based on severity and exploitability.
    6. Update vulnerable Spring Framework libraries to patched versions provided by Spring projects.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerable Spring Framework Dependencies (High Severity): Exploitation of known security vulnerabilities within the Spring Framework libraries themselves or direct dependencies used by Spring. This can lead to remote code execution, data breaches, or denial of service attacks specifically targeting weaknesses in the framework.
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerable Spring Framework Dependencies: High reduction in risk. Proactively identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the core framework and its ecosystem, preventing exploits targeting Spring-specific weaknesses.
  • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented
  • Missing Implementation: CI/CD pipeline integration for Spring dependency scanning, configuration of build tools (Maven/Gradle) with dependency scanning plugins focused on Spring ecosystem.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Spring Framework Dependencies Up-to-Date

  • Description:
    1. Establish a process for regularly monitoring for updates and security advisories specifically related to Spring Framework and Spring Boot projects.
    2. Subscribe to official Spring project security mailing lists, blogs, and release notes to stay informed about security patches and recommended updates.
    3. Periodically review and update Spring Framework and Spring Boot versions in your project's dependency management files (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle).
    4. Prioritize upgrading to the latest stable and patched versions of Spring Framework and Spring Boot to benefit from security fixes and improvements.
    5. Thoroughly test the application after Spring Framework updates to ensure compatibility and prevent regressions introduced by framework changes.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerable Spring Framework Dependencies (High Severity): Similar to dependency scanning, keeping Spring Framework updated directly mitigates the risk of using outdated versions with known vulnerabilities specific to the framework.
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerable Spring Framework Dependencies: High reduction in risk. Prevents the application from being vulnerable to exploits targeting known weaknesses in older versions of Spring Framework.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Developers update Spring Framework occasionally for new features, but security updates are not systematically prioritized or tracked for Spring specifically.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalized process for tracking Spring Framework security updates, proactive monitoring of Spring security advisories, and a prioritized schedule for applying Spring Framework security patches.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable CSRF Protection (Spring Security)

  • Description:
    1. Ensure Spring Security is included as a dependency in your Spring project.
    2. Verify that CSRF protection is enabled in your Spring Security configuration. By default, Spring Security enables CSRF protection for state-changing requests when using web-based security.
    3. If using custom Spring Security configurations, explicitly enable CSRF protection using Spring Security's configuration DSL (e.g., .csrf().enable() in Java configuration or <csrf> in XML configuration).
    4. For Spring MVC applications using AJAX or JavaScript frameworks, ensure proper handling of CSRF tokens. Spring Security provides mechanisms to expose the CSRF token (e.g., via meta tags or cookies) for client-side inclusion in requests.
    5. For Spring WebFlux applications, CSRF protection is also available and configurable within the reactive security context.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (High Severity): Prevents CSRF attacks specifically in Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux applications by leveraging Spring Security's built-in CSRF protection features. This mitigates unauthorized actions performed by authenticated users due to malicious requests originating from different sites.
  • Impact:
    • CSRF: High reduction in risk. Effectively mitigates CSRF attacks in Spring applications by utilizing Spring Security's framework-level protection mechanisms.
  • Currently Implemented: Implemented in default Spring Security configuration for standard web forms within Spring MVC.
  • Missing Implementation: Verification of CSRF token handling for AJAX requests and API endpoints in Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux applications. Documentation for developers on Spring Security's CSRF handling for different client types and application architectures.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Input Validation (Spring MVC Validation)

  • Description:
    1. Utilize Spring MVC's validation framework based on JSR 303/380 annotations (e.g., @NotNull, @Size, @Email, @Pattern, custom validators).
    2. Apply validation annotations to request parameters, path variables, and request bodies within Spring MVC controllers. Use @Valid or @Validated annotations on controller method parameters to trigger validation.
    3. Define comprehensive validation rules specifically tailored to the expected input formats and constraints of your Spring MVC application.
    4. Leverage Spring's BindingResult to handle validation errors in controllers and return appropriate error responses to clients.
    5. Create custom validators using Spring's Validator interface or JSR 303/380 constraints for complex validation logic specific to your Spring application's domain.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • SQL Injection (High Severity): Prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities in Spring Data JPA or JDBC based applications by validating inputs before they are used in database queries.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Reduces XSS risks in Spring MVC views by validating user inputs that are dynamically rendered in web pages.
    • Command Injection (High Severity): Mitigates command injection by validating inputs used in system commands executed by the Spring application.
    • Data Integrity Issues (Medium Severity): Ensures data consistency and integrity within the Spring application by enforcing validation rules on user inputs processed by Spring MVC.
  • Impact:
    • SQL Injection, XSS, Command Injection: High reduction in risk. Significantly reduces injection attack vectors within Spring MVC applications by leveraging Spring's validation framework for input sanitization and verification.
    • Data Integrity Issues: High reduction in risk. Improves data quality and application reliability within the Spring ecosystem.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic validation annotations are used in some Spring MVC controllers, but not consistently across all input points. Custom validators specific to Spring application logic are rarely used.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic review of all Spring MVC controller input points for validation gaps, implementation of comprehensive validation rules using Spring's framework, creation of custom validators for Spring-specific business logic, and consistent error handling using BindingResult in Spring controllers.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Exception Handling (Spring MVC Exception Handling)

  • Description:
    1. Implement global exception handling in Spring MVC using @ControllerAdvice and @ExceptionHandler annotations.
    2. Create @ExceptionHandler methods within @ControllerAdvice classes to handle specific exceptions or broader exception types thrown within Spring MVC controllers.
    3. Log detailed error information (including stack traces) securely to server-side logs within Spring exception handlers for debugging and monitoring purposes in Spring applications.
    4. For client-facing error responses in Spring MVC, return generic, user-friendly error messages that do not expose sensitive information or internal Spring application details. Utilize Spring MVC's ResponseEntity to customize error responses.
    5. Avoid displaying raw stack traces or internal Spring Framework error details directly to end-users in production environments.
    6. Consider using Spring MVC's custom error pages or JSON error responses configured through ResponseEntity to provide a consistent and secure error handling experience within the Spring application.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from gaining sensitive information about the Spring application's internal workings, configuration, or code through detailed error messages exposed by default Spring exception handling.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Moderate reduction in risk. Limits information leakage in Spring applications by controlling error responses and preventing exposure of sensitive Spring framework details.
  • Currently Implemented: Default Spring Boot error handling is in place, which provides generic error pages in production Spring applications. However, custom global exception handling using Spring MVC's @ControllerAdvice is not implemented.
  • Missing Implementation: Implementation of @ControllerAdvice and @ExceptionHandler for global exception handling in Spring MVC, customization of error responses using ResponseEntity, secure logging of detailed errors within Spring exception handlers, and suppression of sensitive Spring-related information in client-facing error messages.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Proper Output Encoding (Spring Templating Engines)

  • Description:
    1. Utilize appropriate output encoding mechanisms provided by Spring MVC's supported templating engines (e.g., Thymeleaf, JSP, FreeMarker).
    2. For Thymeleaf in Spring MVC, use Thymeleaf's standard dialect which automatically escapes HTML by default. For dynamic content, use Thymeleaf's escaping features (e.g., th:text, th:utext with caution) to control output encoding within Spring views.
    3. For JSP in Spring MVC, use JSTL's <c:out> tag with escapeXml="true" (default) for HTML escaping when rendering dynamic content in Spring views.
    4. When outputting data in JavaScript contexts within Spring MVC views, use JavaScript-specific encoding functions to prevent JavaScript injection vulnerabilities.
    5. Choose encoding strategies based on the output context (HTML, JavaScript, URL, etc.) relevant to Spring MVC views.
    6. Regularly review Spring MVC templates and code to ensure consistent and correct output encoding is applied to all dynamic content rendered by Spring's view layer.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Prevents XSS vulnerabilities in Spring MVC applications by ensuring proper output encoding of dynamic content rendered by Spring's templating engines. This mitigates injection of malicious scripts into web pages served by the Spring application.
  • Impact:
    • XSS: High reduction in risk. Effectively mitigates XSS vulnerabilities in Spring MVC applications by leveraging the output encoding features of Spring's view technologies.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Thymeleaf is used in Spring MVC with default HTML escaping. However, JavaScript and URL encoding are not consistently applied in Spring views where needed.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic review of Spring MVC templates and code for output encoding gaps, implementation of JavaScript and URL encoding within Spring views where necessary, developer training on secure output encoding practices within the context of Spring MVC templating.

Mitigation Strategy: Follow Principle of Least Privilege in Security Configuration (Spring Security)

  • Description:
    1. When configuring Spring Security for your Spring application, adhere to the principle of least privilege.
    2. Define Spring Security roles and permissions that are as restrictive as possible, granting users and roles only the minimum necessary access to resources and functionalities within the Spring application.
    3. Avoid using overly broad or wildcard permissions in Spring Security configurations (e.g., permitAll(), hasRole('ADMIN') for excessive parts of the application).
    4. Implement fine-grained authorization rules in Spring Security based on specific resources, actions, and user roles using Spring Security's expression language or custom authorization logic.
    5. Regularly review and refine Spring Security configurations to ensure they consistently enforce the principle of least privilege as the Spring application evolves and new features are added.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Reduces the risk of users gaining unauthorized access to resources or functionalities within the Spring application due to overly permissive Spring Security configurations.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Limits the potential damage if an attacker compromises an account with limited privileges in the Spring application, as the account will have restricted access enforced by Spring Security.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Access, Privilege Escalation: High reduction in risk. Significantly reduces the impact of compromised accounts or internal threats within the Spring application by enforcing strict access control through Spring Security.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Role-based access control is used in Spring Security, but permissions are sometimes overly broad. Fine-grained authorization using Spring Security's expression language is not consistently applied.
  • Missing Implementation: Review and refinement of existing Spring Security configurations to enforce least privilege more rigorously, implementation of fine-grained authorization rules for sensitive resources using Spring Security, regular security configuration audits specifically for Spring Security.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Actuator Endpoints (Spring Boot Actuator Security)

  • Description:
    1. If using Spring Boot Actuator in your Spring application, secure actuator endpoints to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive management and monitoring information.
    2. By default, Spring Boot Actuator endpoints are often accessible without authentication. Configure Spring Security to require authentication and authorization for accessing Actuator endpoints.
    3. Use Spring Boot Actuator's security configurations (e.g., management.endpoints.web.exposure.include, management.endpoints.web.exposure.exclude, management.security.roles) in conjunction with Spring Security to control access.
    4. Restrict access to sensitive Actuator endpoints (e.g., /env, /beans, /jolokia, /metrics) to administrative roles or specific authorized users defined in Spring Security.
    5. Consider disabling Actuator endpoints that are not essential in production environments using Spring Boot Actuator configuration properties to minimize the attack surface.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure (Medium to High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access to sensitive application information exposed by Spring Boot Actuator endpoints, such as environment variables, configuration details, and application metrics.
    • Application Manipulation (Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized users from using Spring Boot Actuator endpoints to manipulate the application's state or behavior, such as shutting down the application or changing logging levels.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure, Application Manipulation: Moderate to High reduction in risk. Protects sensitive Spring Boot application information and management functionalities from unauthorized access by securing Actuator endpoints.
  • Currently Implemented: Actuator is included in the Spring Boot project, but endpoints are currently accessible without authentication.
  • Missing Implementation: Configuration of Spring Security to secure Spring Boot Actuator endpoints, restriction of access to sensitive Actuator endpoints based on Spring Security roles, review of exposed Actuator endpoints and disabling unnecessary ones in Spring Boot configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid User Input in SpEL Expressions (Spring Expression Language)

  • Description:
    1. Minimize or completely avoid using user-controlled input directly within Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions in your Spring application.
    2. If SpEL is absolutely necessary with user input, rigorously sanitize and validate the input to prevent SpEL injection vulnerabilities. However, direct user input in SpEL is generally discouraged.
    3. If dynamic expression evaluation is required based on user input, explore safer alternatives to SpEL if possible, or carefully design and restrict the allowed input patterns for SpEL expressions.
    4. Regularly review code that uses SpEL to identify and eliminate any instances where user input is directly incorporated into SpEL expressions without proper security considerations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • SpEL Injection (High Severity): Prevents SpEL injection vulnerabilities in Spring applications where attackers could manipulate user input to inject malicious SpEL expressions. Successful SpEL injection can lead to remote code execution on the server.
  • Impact:
    • SpEL Injection: High reduction in risk. Eliminates or significantly reduces the risk of SpEL injection vulnerabilities by avoiding or carefully controlling user input within SpEL expressions in Spring applications.
  • Currently Implemented: Developers are generally unaware of SpEL injection risks. No specific measures are in place to prevent user input in SpEL expressions.
  • Missing Implementation: Code review to identify and eliminate or secure instances of user input in SpEL expressions, developer training on SpEL injection vulnerabilities and secure coding practices when using SpEL in Spring applications, and establishment of coding guidelines to avoid user input in SpEL.