Mitigation Strategy: Data Binding and Injection Vulnerabilities
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Data Binding with Spring's Mechanisms
Description:
- Specific DTOs: Use Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) with well-defined fields for request data, rather than binding directly to domain or generic objects. This limits the attack surface.
@InitBinder
Whitelisting: Within your Spring controllers, use@InitBinder
methods to explicitly define which fields are allowed to be bound from request parameters. This provides a whitelist approach.@InitBinder public void initBinder(WebDataBinder binder) { binder.setAllowedFields("firstName", "lastName", "email"); // Only these fields }
DataBinder.setDisallowedFields()
Blacklisting: UseDataBinder.setDisallowedFields()
to explicitly disallow binding to sensitive fields, such as those related to class loaders or other internal mechanisms (e.g.,class
,classLoader
,protectionDomain
). This is a crucial defense against vulnerabilities like Spring4Shell.@InitBinder public void initBinder(WebDataBinder binder) { binder.setDisallowedFields("class.*", "Class.*", "*.class.*", "*.Class.*"); }
- Avoid
@ModelAttribute
onClass
Objects: Never use@ModelAttribute
to bind request data directly tojava.lang.Class
or related objects. This is a high-risk practice. - Leverage Spring's Validation Framework: Use Spring's built-in validation features (
@Valid
, validation annotations like@NotBlank
,@Size
,@Email
, etc.) on your DTOs. This integrates with Spring's data binding and provides a convenient way to enforce validation rules.
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Property Injection (e.g., Spring4Shell) (Severity: Critical): Exploiting vulnerabilities in Spring's data binding mechanisms to inject malicious values and execute arbitrary code.
- Property Manipulation (Severity: High): Unauthorized modification of object properties through Spring's data binding, leading to unexpected behavior.
Impact:
- RCE: Risk significantly reduced (from Critical to Low/Medium, depending on the completeness of the implementation, especially the use of
setDisallowedFields()
). - Property Manipulation: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low).
Currently Implemented:
- Example:
@InitBinder
used inUserController
andProductController
. DTOs used for most request payloads. Basic validation with@Valid
.
Missing Implementation:
- Example:
DataBinder.setDisallowedFields()
not consistently used across all controllers. Some older controllers still use broad@ModelAttribute
binding.
Mitigation Strategy: Expression Language Injection (SpEL Injection)
Mitigation Strategy: Secure SpEL Usage within Spring
Description:
- Avoid User Input in SpEL: The primary mitigation is to avoid directly embedding user-supplied input into SpEL expressions used within Spring (e.g., in
@PreAuthorize
, view templates, or other Spring components). - Parameterized SpEL (Spring Security): When using SpEL in Spring Security annotations (like
@PreAuthorize
,@PostAuthorize
), use parameterized expressions instead of string concatenation. This is a key Spring Security best practice.// Vulnerable: @PreAuthorize("hasRole('" + userRole + "')") // Mitigated (using parameter): @PreAuthorize("hasRole(#role)") public void someMethod(@Param("role") String role) { ... }
- Restricted
EvaluationContext
(Advanced): If you must use dynamic SpEL evaluation with some influence from user input, create a customStandardEvaluationContext
and restrict the available variables and functions. This significantly limits the attacker's capabilities, even if they can inject some SpEL code. This is a Spring-specific technique.StandardEvaluationContext context = new StandardEvaluationContext(); context.setVariable("userInput", sanitizedUserInput); // Sanitize! // ... restrict available functions and properties ... ExpressionParser parser = new SpelExpressionParser(); Expression exp = parser.parseExpression("someExpression"); Object result = exp.getValue(context);
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE) via SpEL Injection (Severity: Critical): Attackers can execute arbitrary code by injecting malicious SpEL expressions into Spring components.
- Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium/High): Attackers can access sensitive data exposed through SpEL expressions within Spring.
Impact:
- RCE: Risk significantly reduced (from Critical to Low/Medium, depending on the strictness of the restrictions and the avoidance of direct user input).
- Information Disclosure: Risk reduced (from Medium/High to Low/Medium).
Currently Implemented:
- Example: Most uses of
@PreAuthorize
use parameterized expressions.
Missing Implementation:
- Example: A custom
EvaluationContext
is not yet implemented for a specific feature that uses dynamic SpEL based on user-configured settings. A comprehensive audit of all SpEL usage within Spring components is needed.
Mitigation Strategy: Spring Security Misconfigurations (Focusing on Spring Security Features)
Mitigation Strategy: Correct and Complete Spring Security Configuration
Description:
- Proper Authentication and Authorization: Use Spring Security's features (e.g.,
@EnableWebSecurity
,@PreAuthorize
,@PostAuthorize
, method security) correctly. Define clear authentication and authorization rules. Avoid overly permissive configurations. - CSRF Protection (Spring Security): Ensure that Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection is enabled (it's on by default in recent Spring Security versions) and that your forms include the CSRF token. This is a core Spring Security feature.
- Session Management (Spring Security): Configure Spring Security's session management to prevent session fixation attacks. Use features like
sessionManagement().sessionFixation().migrateSession()
(ornewSession()
) in your Spring Security configuration. - Secure Actuator Endpoints (Spring Boot): If using Spring Boot Actuator, secure its endpoints appropriately. Either disable them in production if not needed (
management.endpoints.web.exposure.exclude=*
) or restrict access using Spring Security. - Disable TRACE Method (Spring MVC): If you are using Spring MVC, disable the HTTP TRACE method using Spring configuration.
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Authentication Bypass (Severity: Critical): Unauthorized access due to misconfigured Spring Security authentication.
- Authorization Bypass (Severity: Critical): Users accessing resources they shouldn't, due to misconfigured Spring Security authorization.
- Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (Severity: High): Attackers performing actions on behalf of users, mitigated by Spring Security's CSRF protection.
- Session Fixation (Severity: High): Attackers hijacking sessions, mitigated by Spring Security's session management.
- Information Disclosure via Actuator (Severity: Medium/High): Leakage of sensitive information through Spring Boot Actuator, mitigated by securing or disabling the endpoints using Spring Security.
- Cross-Site Tracing (XST) (Severity: Medium): Potential exposure of cookies or headers, mitigated by disabling TRACE method.
Impact:
- Authentication/Authorization Bypass: Risk significantly reduced (from Critical to Low, with proper Spring Security configuration).
- CSRF: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low, with Spring Security's CSRF protection enabled).
- Session Fixation: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low, with proper Spring Security session management).
- Information Disclosure (Actuator): Risk reduced (from Medium/High to Low/Medium, by securing or disabling Actuator endpoints with Spring Security).
- XST: Risk reduced.
Currently Implemented:
- Example: Spring Security configured with basic role-based access control. CSRF protection is enabled. Actuator endpoints are secured using Spring Security.
Missing Implementation:
- Example: Session fixation protection not explicitly configured (relying on default, which might not be the most secure option). A comprehensive review of all
@PreAuthorize
and@PostAuthorize
annotations is needed. TRACE method is not disabled.