Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (90 loc) · 9.45 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

102 lines (90 loc) · 9.45 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for stirling-tools/stirling-pdf

Objective: Compromise Application via Stirling-PDF by Exploiting High-Risk Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

└── [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via Stirling-PDF [HIGH-RISK PATH START] ├── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Input Processing Vulnerabilities │ ├── AND Malicious PDF Upload │ │ ├── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit PDF Parser Vulnerabilities (Stirling-PDF or Underlying Libraries) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Buffer Overflow in Parser │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause Denial of Service (DoS) or Remote Code Execution (RCE) on Server │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Integer Overflow in Parser │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS or RCE on Server │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Logic Errors in Parser (e.g., Path Traversal via Filename) │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Read/Write Arbitrary Files on Server │ │ │ └── Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if PDF contains serialized objects) │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] RCE on Server │ │ ├── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in PDF Processing Modules (Stirling-PDF Modules) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Image Extraction Module │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS or RCE during image processing │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Text Extraction Module (OCR, etc.) │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS or RCE during text extraction │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in PDF Manipulation Modules (Merge, Split, etc.) │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS or RCE during PDF manipulation │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Conversion Modules (PDF to other formats) │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS or RCE during format conversion │ │ └── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Resource Exhaustion via Large/Complex PDFs [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS by overloading server resources (CPU, Memory, Disk) ├── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Configuration Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH START] │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Misconfiguration of Stirling-PDF Settings │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Enable Debug/Verbose Logging in Production │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Information Disclosure via logs (paths, internal data) │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies (Libraries used by Stirling-PDF) │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in PDF Parsing Libraries (e.g., pdf.js, poppler-utils, etc.) │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] RCE or DoS via vulnerable library │ │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Image Processing Libraries (if used) │ │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] RCE or DoS via vulnerable image library │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in other dependencies (e.g., Node.js modules) │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] RCE or DoS via other vulnerable dependencies ├── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Output Handling Vulnerabilities │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Resource Exhaustion via Output Generation [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Generate excessively large output files │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] Cause DoS by filling up disk space or overloading download bandwidth └── OR [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Operational Vulnerabilities └── [CRITICAL NODE] DoS via Repeated Malicious Requests [HIGH-RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] Overload Stirling-PDF processing with numerous malicious PDF requests [HIGH-RISK PATH END]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Input Processing Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vector: Uploading a malicious PDF file to the application.
  • Why High-Risk: Input processing, especially of complex formats like PDF, is a common source of vulnerabilities. Successful exploitation can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), or Arbitrary File Access.
  • Critical Nodes within this path:
    • Exploit PDF Parser Vulnerabilities:
      • Attack Vector: Crafting a PDF that triggers vulnerabilities (Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow, Logic Errors, Deserialization issues) in the PDF parsing libraries used by Stirling-PDF.
      • Why High-Risk: PDF parsers are complex and historically prone to vulnerabilities. Exploits can lead to RCE or DoS.
      • Mitigation: Keep Stirling-PDF and its PDF parsing dependencies updated. Consider sandboxing.
    • Exploit Vulnerabilities in PDF Processing Modules:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in Stirling-PDF modules responsible for image extraction, text extraction (OCR), PDF manipulation, or format conversion.
      • Why High-Risk: Modules handling specific PDF functionalities can also contain vulnerabilities leading to RCE or DoS during processing.
      • Mitigation: Keep Stirling-PDF updated. Disable unnecessary modules if possible.
    • Exploit Resource Exhaustion via Large/Complex PDFs:
      • Attack Vector: Uploading extremely large or computationally complex PDFs designed to consume excessive server resources (CPU, Memory, Disk).
      • Why High-Risk: Easy to execute, high likelihood of success in causing DoS if resource limits are not in place.
      • Mitigation: Implement strict resource limits (file size, processing time, memory usage).

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Configuration Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting insecure configurations of Stirling-PDF or its environment.
  • Why High-Risk: Misconfigurations are common and can expose sensitive information or create pathways for further attacks. Dependency vulnerabilities are a major source of RCE.
  • Critical Nodes within this path:
    • Misconfiguration of Stirling-PDF Settings - Enable Debug/Verbose Logging in Production:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting debug or verbose logging enabled in a production environment to gain access to sensitive information exposed in logs (paths, internal data, potentially secrets).
      • Why High-Risk: Information disclosure can aid further attacks or directly leak sensitive data. Misconfigurations are common.
      • Mitigation: Disable debug/verbose logging in production. Securely manage and monitor logs.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities - Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Dependencies:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in outdated or vulnerable libraries used by Stirling-PDF (PDF parsing libraries, image processing libraries, other Node.js modules).
      • Why High-Risk: Dependency vulnerabilities are a major attack vector. Exploits are often publicly available, leading to RCE or DoS.
      • Mitigation: Implement robust dependency management, vulnerability scanning, and regular updates of Stirling-PDF and its dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Output Handling Vulnerabilities - Resource Exhaustion via Output Generation

  • Attack Vector: Triggering Stirling-PDF to generate excessively large output files (e.g., through specific PDF operations or content).
  • Why High-Risk: Can lead to Denial of Service by filling up disk space or overloading download bandwidth. Relatively easy to trigger.
  • Critical Nodes within this path:
    • Generate excessively large output files:
      • Attack Vector: Crafting input PDFs or using Stirling-PDF features in a way that results in extremely large output files.
      • Why High-Risk: DoS impact, relatively easy to achieve.
      • Mitigation: Implement output size limits. Monitor disk space and bandwidth usage.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Operational Vulnerabilities - DoS via Repeated Malicious Requests

  • Attack Vector: Flooding the application with numerous requests to process (potentially malicious) PDFs, overwhelming Stirling-PDF and the server.
  • Why High-Risk: Simple and effective DoS attack. High likelihood of success if rate limiting is not in place.
  • Critical Nodes within this path:
    • Overload Stirling-PDF processing with numerous malicious PDF requests:
      • Attack Vector: Sending a high volume of requests to the application's Stirling-PDF processing endpoint.
      • Why High-Risk: Easy to perform, can quickly lead to DoS.
      • Mitigation: Implement rate limiting, request throttling, and potentially use a Web Application Firewall (WAF).