Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
130 lines (106 loc) · 8.16 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

130 lines (106 loc) · 8.16 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for stirling-tools/stirling-pdf

Objective: Exfiltrate sensitive data, execute arbitrary code on the server, or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) by exploiting vulnerabilities in Stirling-PDF.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Stirling-PDF (Overall: High Risk)
    |
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |												|
    2. Arbitrary Code Execution (H Impact, M Likelihood)						3. Denial of Service (DoS) (M Impact, H Likelihood)
    |												|
    ---------------------										---------------------
    |					|										|					|
    2.1 PDF			  2.2 Exploit									3.1 Resource		  3.2 PDF
    Injection			 Vulnerabilities								Exhaustion			 Structure
    (M Likelihood)		    (L Likelihood)								(H Likelihood)		    Exploitation
    (H Impact)		        (H Impact)									(M Impact)		        (M Likelihood)
    																		(L Effort)		        (M Impact)
    																		(L Skill)			    (H Effort)
    																		(L Detection)		     (M Skill)
    																									(M Detect)
    |					|										|					|
    2.1.1				     2.2.1 (Hypo-										3.1.1				     3.2.1
    Inject				    thetical,										Excessive				 Malformed
    Malicious				        based on										Memory				    PDF with
    JavaScript			        past PDF										Allocation			        Deeply
    into PDF				          library										(e.g.,				    Nested
    Fields				    vulnerabilities)									large				    Objects
    (e.g.,				    - XXE via										images,				    (M Impact)
    form					  XML parsing										complex				    (M Likelihood)
    fields,				           - RCE via										operations)			       (M Effort)
    annotations)			      image										(H Likelihood)		    (M Skill)
    (H Impact)			        processing										(M Impact)			        (M Detect)
    (M Likelihood)		    - Buffer										(L Effort)
    (M Effort)			        overflows										(L Skill)
    (M Skill)			         in parsing										(L Detection)
    (M Detection)			     logic
    							  (H Impact)
    							  (L Likelihood)
    							  (H Effort)
    							  (H Skill)
    							  (H Detection)
    |					|										|					|
    2.1.1.1				     2.2.1.1											3.1.1.1				     3.2.1.1
    Upload a				    (If a specific										Upload a				    Upload a
    PDF with				    vulnerability										PDF designed			      PDF with
    malicious				        is found,										to consume			        thousands
    JavaScript			        detail it here)										excessive			         of deeply
    designed to																		memory,				    nested
    execute on																		triggering			        objects,
    the server																		OOM errors.			       triggering
    when the																		(M Impact)			        parsing
    PDF is																		(H Likelihood)		    errors or
    processed																		(L Effort)			        infinite
    or viewed.																		(L Skill)			         loops.
    (H Impact)																		(L Detection)			     (M Impact)
    (M Likelihood)																									(M Likelihood)
    (M Effort)																									(M Effort)
    (M Skill)																									(M Skill)
    (M Detection)

Attack Tree Path: 2. Arbitrary Code Execution (High Impact, Medium Likelihood)

  • Description: This is the most severe threat, as it allows an attacker to gain full control of the server.
  • Justification: While exploiting a zero-day is less likely, the potential impact is catastrophic. Code injection via PDF fields is a more realistic, though still challenging, attack vector.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 PDF Injection (Medium Likelihood, High Impact)

  • Description: Attacker injects malicious JavaScript into PDF form fields or annotations.
  • Justification: This relies on the application not properly sanitizing user-supplied data within the PDF. If successful, the attacker can execute arbitrary code in the context of the server or other users.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1.1 Upload a PDF with malicious JavaScript

  • Description: The attacker crafts a PDF with malicious JavaScript embedded in form fields or annotations.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Depends on the application's input validation and sanitization.
  • Impact: High. Could lead to complete server compromise.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires crafting the malicious PDF.
  • Skill Level: Medium. Requires knowledge of JavaScript and PDF manipulation.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Requires monitoring for unusual JavaScript execution and potentially analyzing PDF content.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Exploit Vulnerabilities (Low Likelihood, High Impact)

  • Description: Attacker exploits a vulnerability in Stirling-PDF or its dependencies (e.g., buffer overflow, XXE).
  • Justification: This is less likely without a known vulnerability, but the impact is severe.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1.1 (Hypothetical - Specific Vulnerability)

  • Description: Placeholder for a specific vulnerability if one is discovered. Details would depend on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Likelihood: Low (until a specific vulnerability is found).
  • Impact: High (potential for complete system compromise).
  • Effort: High (requires significant research and exploit development).
  • Skill Level: High (expert-level vulnerability research and exploitation skills).
  • Detection Difficulty: High (likely requires advanced intrusion detection and forensic analysis).

Attack Tree Path: 3. Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Impact, High Likelihood)

  • Description: Attacker aims to make the application unavailable by overwhelming it with malicious PDFs.
  • Justification: DoS attacks are generally easier to execute than code execution attacks, and PDF processing can be resource-intensive.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1 Resource Exhaustion (High Likelihood, Medium Impact)

  • Description: Attacker uploads very large or complex PDFs to consume server resources.
  • Justification: This is a common and relatively easy attack to perform.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1.1 Upload a PDF designed to consume excessive memory

  • Description: The attacker uploads a PDF with large images, complex operations, or other features designed to consume a large amount of memory.
  • Likelihood: High. Easy to create such PDFs.
  • Impact: Medium. Can cause service disruption or crashes.
  • Effort: Low. Minimal technical skill required.
  • Skill Level: Low.
  • Detection Difficulty: Low. Easily detected through resource monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2 PDF Structure Exploitation (Medium Likelihood, Medium Impact)

  • Description: Attacker crafts a malformed PDF to trigger parsing errors or infinite loops.
  • Justification: Exploiting parsing vulnerabilities can be more complex than simple resource exhaustion, but still achievable.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2.1.1 Upload a PDF with thousands of deeply nested objects

  • Description: The attacker creates a PDF with a deeply nested structure designed to cause parsing issues.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Requires some understanding of PDF structure.
  • Impact: Medium. Can cause service disruption or crashes.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires crafting a specifically malformed PDF.
  • Skill Level: Medium.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Requires monitoring for crashes and analyzing malformed PDFs.