Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
140 lines (111 loc) · 15.9 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

140 lines (111 loc) · 15.9 KB

Okay, let's dive into a deep security analysis of Stirling-PDF, based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Stirling-PDF application, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities in its key components, data flows, and deployment model. The analysis aims to provide actionable mitigation strategies to enhance the application's security posture and protect user data. We will specifically focus on vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches, system compromise, or denial of service, given the application's local processing nature.

  • Scope:

    • The Stirling-PDF web application itself (Spring Boot).
    • The PDF processing engine and its interaction with external libraries (PDFBox, OCRmyPDF, etc.).
    • The Docker containerization and deployment model.
    • The build process and dependency management.
    • Data flow between the user, the application, and the local filesystem.
    • Exclusion: We will not be performing a full code audit, but rather a threat-model-driven analysis based on the provided design and publicly available information. We also won't deeply analyze the security of the underlying operating system or Docker host, assuming they are reasonably secured.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Component Analysis: We'll use the C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the application's structure, components, and their interactions.
    2. Threat Modeling: We'll identify potential threats based on the application's design, accepted risks, and known vulnerabilities associated with the technologies used. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to systematically explore threats.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: We'll analyze the security implications of each key component and identify potential vulnerabilities based on common attack patterns and known weaknesses in the used libraries.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified vulnerability, we'll propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Stirling-PDF.
    5. Dependency Analysis: We will look at the key dependencies and their known vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, referencing the C4 diagrams and descriptions:

  • Web Application (Spring Boot):

    • Threats:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If user-provided data (e.g., filenames, metadata extracted from PDFs) is displayed without proper output encoding, an attacker could inject malicious scripts. This is a high risk if any PDF metadata is displayed.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): An attacker could trick a user into performing unintended actions (e.g., deleting files, changing settings) if the application doesn't have CSRF protection. This is a medium risk.
      • Injection Attacks (Command Injection, Path Traversal): If user input is used to construct file paths or system commands without proper sanitization, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands or access unauthorized files. This is a high risk due to the file manipulation nature of the application.
      • Session Management Issues: While primarily local, if session management is implemented, vulnerabilities like session fixation or predictable session IDs could be exploited. This is a low risk given the current design, but high if authentication is added.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The web application could be vulnerable to resource exhaustion attacks, either through large file uploads or by exploiting vulnerabilities in the Spring Boot framework itself. This is a medium risk.
      • Improper Error Handling: Revealing too much information in error messages (stack traces, internal file paths) could aid attackers in discovering vulnerabilities. This is a medium risk.

  • PDF Processing Engine (Java Library using PDFBox, OCRmyPDF, etc.):

    • Threats:
      • Malicious PDF Exploits: This is the highest risk. PDF libraries, especially those dealing with complex formats and features (like JavaScript, forms, embedded objects), are often targets for exploitation. A crafted PDF could trigger buffer overflows, integer overflows, or other vulnerabilities in the parsing libraries, leading to arbitrary code execution.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Complex or malformed PDFs could cause excessive resource consumption (CPU, memory), leading to a denial of service. "PDF bombs" are a specific example of this.
      • XXE (XML External Entity) Attacks: If the PDF parsing library processes XML data within the PDF and doesn't properly disable external entity resolution, an attacker could potentially read local files or access internal network resources. This is a high risk if XML parsing is involved.
      • Image Parsing Vulnerabilities: If images are extracted or processed, vulnerabilities in image parsing libraries (which are often used by PDF libraries) could be exploited. This is a medium risk.
      • OCR-Specific Vulnerabilities: OCR engines (like Tesseract, used by OCRmyPDF) can also have vulnerabilities, especially if they support scripting or complex input formats. This is a medium risk.

  • External Library APIs:

    • Threats:
      • Supply Chain Attacks: The security of Stirling-PDF is directly tied to the security of its dependencies. Vulnerabilities in PDFBox, OCRmyPDF, or any other library could be exploited. This is a high and ongoing risk.
      • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Even well-maintained libraries can have undiscovered vulnerabilities. This is an unavoidable risk, but mitigation strategies can reduce the impact.

  • Local Filesystem:

    • Threats:
      • Path Traversal: If the application doesn't properly sanitize file paths constructed from user input, an attacker could potentially read or write files outside the intended directory. This is a high risk.
      • File Overwrite: An attacker could potentially overwrite critical system files or the application's own files if permissions are not properly configured. This is a medium risk, mitigated by Docker containerization.
      • Data Leakage: Temporary files or intermediate processing results could be left on the filesystem, potentially exposing sensitive data. This is a medium risk.

  • Docker Container:

    • Threats:
      • Container Escape: If a vulnerability in the application or a library allows for arbitrary code execution, an attacker might be able to escape the container and gain access to the host system. This is a medium risk, but the impact is high.
      • Misconfigured Docker: Incorrect Docker configurations (e.g., running as root, excessive privileges, exposed ports) could increase the attack surface. This is a medium risk, dependent on user configuration.
      • Image Vulnerabilities: The base Docker image itself (e.g., the Java runtime) could contain vulnerabilities. This is a medium risk, mitigated by using official and up-to-date images.

3. Inferring Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the provided information, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Stirling-PDF follows a fairly standard web application architecture, with a Spring Boot front-end handling user interactions and a back-end (the PDF processing engine) performing the core logic. The application is likely a monolithic application packaged within a single Docker container.

  • Components:

    • Web UI: Handles user input, displays results, and interacts with the back-end.
    • Controller Layer (Spring Boot): Receives requests from the UI, validates input, and invokes the appropriate services.
    • Service Layer: Contains the business logic for PDF manipulation, orchestrating the use of external libraries.
    • Data Access Layer (likely minimal): Interacts with the local filesystem to read and write PDF files.
    • External Libraries (PDFBox, OCRmyPDF, etc.): Provide the core PDF processing functionality.

  • Data Flow:

    1. User uploads a PDF file through the web UI.
    2. The web application (Spring Boot) receives the file and likely stores it temporarily.
    3. The controller layer validates the request and passes the file (or a reference to it) to the service layer.
    4. The service layer uses external libraries (PDFBox, OCRmyPDF) to perform the requested operation (split, merge, etc.).
    5. The external libraries read and process the PDF data.
    6. The service layer receives the processed PDF data.
    7. The web application writes the processed PDF to the local filesystem.
    8. The user downloads the processed PDF from the web UI.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Stirling-PDF

Here are specific security considerations, tailored to Stirling-PDF:

  • PDF Parsing is the Primary Attack Vector: The most likely and dangerous attacks will involve maliciously crafted PDF files. This is where the majority of security efforts should be focused.
  • Local File System Interaction is Critical: Careful handling of file paths and permissions is essential to prevent path traversal and other file-related vulnerabilities.
  • Dependency Management is Paramount: Regularly updating dependencies and monitoring for vulnerabilities is crucial due to the reliance on external libraries.
  • Denial of Service is a Real Threat: Users can intentionally or unintentionally upload files that could cause the application to crash or become unresponsive.
  • Containerization Provides Some Isolation, But It's Not a Silver Bullet: Container escape is a possibility, and misconfigurations can weaken security.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies for Stirling-PDF:

  • 1. Robust Input Validation and Sanitization:

    • File Type Validation: Strictly enforce that only PDF files are accepted. Do not rely solely on file extensions; use a library like Apache Tika to determine the actual file type based on content.
    • File Size Limits: Implement reasonable file size limits to prevent denial-of-service attacks. This should be configurable by the user/administrator.
    • Filename Sanitization: Sanitize filenames to prevent path traversal attacks. Remove or replace any characters that could be used to navigate the file system (e.g., "..", "/", ""). Use a whitelist approach, allowing only a specific set of characters (alphanumeric, hyphen, underscore).
    • Input Stream Handling: Process PDF files as streams rather than loading the entire file into memory at once. This helps mitigate memory exhaustion attacks.

  • 2. Secure PDF Processing:

    • Disable Risky PDF Features: If possible, disable features in PDFBox and other libraries that are not strictly necessary for Stirling-PDF's functionality. This includes disabling JavaScript execution, form processing, and embedded objects. PDFBox allows for granular control over these features. This is a crucial step.
    • Regularly Update PDF Libraries: Keep PDFBox, OCRmyPDF, and all other dependencies up-to-date. Automate this process using Dependabot or a similar tool.
    • Consider Sandboxing: Explore options for sandboxing the PDF processing components. This could involve using a separate process, a more restrictive container (e.g., gVisor, Kata Containers), or a WebAssembly runtime. This is a high-impact mitigation, but also more complex to implement.
    • XXE Prevention: Explicitly disable external entity resolution in any XML parsing that occurs within the PDF processing libraries. PDFBox provides options for this.
    • Fuzz Testing: Integrate fuzz testing into the CI/CD pipeline. Fuzz testing involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data to the application to identify potential vulnerabilities. Tools like Jazzer can be used for Java applications.

  • 3. Web Application Security:

    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to mitigate XSS vulnerabilities. This should restrict the sources from which the application can load resources (scripts, styles, images, etc.).
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Protection: Use Spring Security's built-in CSRF protection mechanisms.
    • Output Encoding: Encode all user-provided data before displaying it in the UI. Use appropriate encoding methods for the context (e.g., HTML encoding, JavaScript encoding).
    • Secure Session Management (if applicable): If session management is added, use strong session IDs, set the HttpOnly and Secure flags on cookies, and implement proper session timeout mechanisms.
    • Error Handling: Avoid revealing sensitive information in error messages. Provide generic error messages to the user and log detailed error information separately.

  • 4. Docker Security:

    • Run as Non-Root: Modify the Dockerfile to run the application as a non-root user within the container. This significantly reduces the impact of a container escape.
    • Limit Resource Usage: Use Docker's resource limits (CPU, memory) to prevent a compromised container from consuming excessive resources on the host system.
    • Use Official Base Images: Use official and up-to-date base images (e.g., from AdoptOpenJDK or a similar trusted source) for the Java runtime.
    • Regularly Scan Images: Use a container image scanning tool (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to identify vulnerabilities in the Docker image. Integrate this into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Least Privilege for Volumes: Mount volumes with the least necessary privileges. If possible, mount volumes as read-only.

  • 5. Build Process Security:

    • Continue Using SAST (SpotBugs): Ensure that SpotBugs (or a similar SAST tool) is run on every build.
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use a tool like OWASP Dependency-Check or Snyk to identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies. Integrate this into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Automated Security Testing: Consider adding other automated security testing tools, such as dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools (e.g., OWASP ZAP), to the CI/CD pipeline.

  • 6. Monitoring and Logging:

    • Log Sensitive Events: Log all security-relevant events, such as file uploads, processing errors, and failed login attempts (if authentication is added).
    • Monitor Resource Usage: Monitor CPU, memory, and disk usage to detect potential denial-of-service attacks or other anomalies.
    • Regularly Review Logs: Establish a process for regularly reviewing logs to identify potential security issues.

  • 7. Dependency Analysis:

    • PDFBox: A critical dependency. Regularly check for CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) related to PDFBox. Prioritize updates that address security issues.
    • OCRmyPDF: Another critical dependency, relying on Tesseract. Similar to PDFBox, monitor for CVEs and prioritize security updates.
    • Spring Framework: While generally robust, Spring has had its share of vulnerabilities. Keep Spring Boot and all related Spring modules updated.
    • Other Dependencies: Use gradle dependencies to get a full list of dependencies and their versions. Use a tool like OWASP Dependency-Check to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in these dependencies.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, Stirling-PDF can significantly improve its security posture and reduce the risk of data breaches, system compromise, and denial-of-service attacks. The most important steps are those related to secure PDF processing (disabling risky features, sandboxing, fuzz testing) and dependency management.