Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (42 loc) · 7.24 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

49 lines (42 loc) · 7.24 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for adam-p/markdown-here

Attack Surface: 1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Markdown Injection (Critical)

  • Description: Malicious Javascript code injected through Markdown syntax, executed in a user's browser after Markdown-Here conversion to HTML.
  • Markdown-Here Contribution: Markdown-Here's primary function of converting Markdown to HTML, if not properly sanitized, creates a direct pathway for injecting and executing malicious scripts.
  • Example:
    • Markdown Input: `<img src="x" onerror="alert('Critical XSS Vulnerability!')">`
    • Markdown-Here Conversion (Vulnerable): <img src="x" onerror="alert('Critical XSS Vulnerability!')">
    • Execution: Browser executes the Javascript alert('Critical XSS Vulnerability!') from the onerror attribute.
  • Impact: Complete compromise of user accounts, session hijacking, data theft, malware distribution, website defacement, and arbitrary code execution within the user's browser.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust HTML Sanitization: Implement a strong HTML sanitization library (like DOMPurify or Bleach) after Markdown-Here performs the Markdown to HTML conversion. Whitelist allowed HTML tags and attributes, and strictly escape or remove any potentially dangerous elements or Javascript code.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Enforce a strict CSP to control resource loading in the browser, significantly limiting the impact of XSS attacks by restricting script sources and inline execution.
    • Regular Security Audits and Testing: Conduct frequent security audits and penetration testing specifically targeting XSS vulnerabilities in the Markdown-Here integration and sanitization processes.

Attack Surface: 2. HTML Injection and Content Spoofing (High)

  • Description: Injection of arbitrary HTML through Markdown, leading to content manipulation, visual deception, and phishing opportunities, even without direct Javascript execution.
  • Markdown-Here Contribution: Markdown-Here's HTML generation capabilities can be exploited to inject HTML tags that, while not executing scripts, can drastically alter the visual presentation and potentially mislead users.
  • Example:
    • Markdown Input: `[Urgent Security Alert! Click Here](https://malicious.example.com) <div style="position:fixed; top:0; left:0; width:100%; height:100%; background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0.9); z-index:9999;"> <h1 style="color:red; text-align:center;">URGENT SECURITY ALERT!</h1> <p style="text-align:center;">Your account may be compromised. Click the link above to verify.</p> </div>`
    • Markdown-Here Conversion (Vulnerable): <a href="https://malicious.example.com">Urgent Security Alert! Click Here</a> <div style="position:fixed; top:0; left:0; width:100%; height:100%; background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0.9); z-index:9999;"> <h1 style="color:red; text-align:center;">URGENT SECURITY ALERT!</h1> <p style="text-align:center;">Your account may be compromised. Click the link above to verify.</p> </div>
    • Execution: The injected <div> overlays the entire page with a fake security alert, making the malicious link appear legitimate and urgent.
  • Impact: Highly effective phishing attacks, significant reputation damage, widespread user confusion and distrust, manipulation of critical information displayed to users.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict and Context-Aware HTML Sanitization: Implement a highly restrictive HTML sanitizer that aggressively removes or neutralizes HTML tags and attributes that enable visual manipulation (e.g., style, position, z-index, layout-altering tags). Sanitization should be context-aware, considering the intended use of Markdown-Here and the acceptable HTML elements.
    • Content Preview and Moderation: For user-generated Markdown, provide a clear preview of the rendered HTML after sanitization. Implement content moderation workflows to review and approve Markdown content before it is displayed publicly, especially in sensitive areas.
    • User Education (Contextual Warnings): In contexts where HTML injection is a significant risk, display clear warnings to users about the potential dangers of clicking links or interacting with content from untrusted sources, even if it appears to be within the application.

Attack Surface: 3. Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in Markdown Parsing (High)

  • Description: Specially crafted Markdown input exploits inefficient regular expressions within Markdown-Here's parsing engine, leading to excessive CPU consumption and denial of service.
  • Markdown-Here Contribution: Markdown-Here's parsing process relies on regular expressions to interpret Markdown syntax. Vulnerable regex patterns can be triggered by malicious input, causing the parser to become extremely slow and resource-intensive.
  • Example: (Conceptual - ReDoS patterns are complex and parser-specific)
    • Markdown Input: `[Very long link text with many nested brackets](aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...)` (Input designed to trigger backtracking in regex matching link text or URLs).
    • Markdown-Here Parsing (Vulnerable): The parsing process gets stuck in exponential backtracking while processing the complex input, consuming excessive CPU time.
    • Execution: Repeated requests with ReDoS-triggering Markdown can overload the server or client, leading to application unresponsiveness or complete denial of service.
  • Impact: Application-wide slowdowns, server resource exhaustion, denial of service for all legitimate users, potential for infrastructure instability.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Complexity Limits: Implement strict limits on the size and complexity of Markdown input. Reject excessively long inputs, deeply nested structures, or inputs with patterns known to trigger ReDoS in regex engines.
    • ReDoS-Resistant Parser or Regex Optimization: Investigate and replace vulnerable regular expressions in Markdown-Here's parsing logic with optimized, ReDoS-resistant alternatives. Consider using Markdown parser libraries specifically designed to mitigate ReDoS risks.
    • Rate Limiting and Request Throttling: Implement aggressive rate limiting and request throttling to limit the number of Markdown processing requests from a single source, mitigating the impact of automated ReDoS attacks.
    • Resource Monitoring and Alerting: Continuously monitor server resource usage (CPU, memory) during Markdown processing. Set up alerts to detect unusual spikes in resource consumption that might indicate a ReDoS attack in progress, allowing for rapid response and mitigation.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF with ReDoS protection rules to detect and block malicious requests attempting to exploit ReDoS vulnerabilities in Markdown parsing.