Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
109 lines (85 loc) · 10.4 KB

File metadata and controls

109 lines (85 loc) · 10.4 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for alvarotrigo/fullpage.js

Objective: Compromise Application Using fullpage.js

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Using fullpage.js [CRITICAL]
├── Exploit fullpage.js Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL]
│   └── Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL]
│       ├── Inject malicious script into data processed by fullpage.js (e.g., section titles, attributes) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └── Reflected XSS [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └── Inject malicious script in URL parameters used in fullpage.js configuration or callbacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└── Exploit Misconfiguration/Misuse of fullpage.js [CRITICAL]
    └── Improper Sanitization/Encoding of Data used with fullpage.js [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL]
        └── Application fails to sanitize data (e.g., section titles, descriptions) that is then rendered by fullpage.js, leading to XSS [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL]
            └── Inject malicious content through application data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • Description: The attacker's ultimate objective is to successfully compromise the web application that utilizes the fullpage.js library. This could involve various forms of compromise, such as gaining unauthorized access, stealing data, defacing the application, or disrupting its functionality.
  • Likelihood: Variable (Depends on application security posture and attacker motivation)
  • Impact: Critical (Full compromise of the application and potentially associated systems and data)
  • Effort: Variable (Depends on the chosen attack path and application vulnerabilities)
  • Skill Level: Variable (Can range from Script Kiddie to Expert Hacker depending on the attack path)
  • Detection Difficulty: Variable (Depends on the attack method and security monitoring in place)
  • Description: This category focuses on directly exploiting security weaknesses or bugs within the fullpage.js library itself. If vulnerabilities exist in fullpage.js's code, an attacker could leverage them to compromise applications using the library.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on the presence of undiscovered vulnerabilities in fullpage.js)
  • Impact: High (Potentially widespread impact on applications using vulnerable versions of fullpage.js)
  • Effort: Medium to High (Requires reverse engineering, code analysis, and vulnerability research)
  • Skill Level: Skilled Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires deep code analysis and understanding of fullpage.js internals)
  • Description: XSS vulnerabilities are a primary concern when dealing with DOM manipulation libraries like fullpage.js. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into the application, which are then executed in users' browsers.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High (XSS is a common web application vulnerability, especially when handling dynamic content)
  • Impact: High (Account compromise, session hijacking, data theft, defacement, malware distribution)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Depending on the type of XSS and the application's security measures)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by WAFs, vulnerability scanners, and code review, but DOM-based XSS can be harder)
  • Description: This is a Stored XSS scenario. If the application stores data (like section titles, descriptions, or any data attributes used by fullpage.js) without proper sanitization, an attacker can inject malicious scripts into this stored data. When fullpage.js renders this data, the malicious script will be executed in the user's browser.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on how the application handles and sanitizes data used by fullpage.js)
  • Impact: High (Persistent XSS affecting all users who view the compromised content)
  • Effort: Medium (Requires finding injection points in data storage and crafting XSS payloads)
  • Skill Level: Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by vulnerability scanners, code review, and input validation checks)
  • Description: In Reflected XSS, the malicious script is injected through user input, often via URL parameters or form submissions. If fullpage.js or the application processes these inputs without proper sanitization and reflects them back in the response, the script can be executed.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Fullpage.js core is less likely to directly process URL parameters, but custom integrations might)
  • Impact: Medium to High (Non-persistent XSS, affecting users who click on malicious links or submit manipulated forms)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Simple URL manipulation or form submission)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (WAFs, server-side logging, and input validation can detect reflected XSS)
  • Description: This is a specific instance of Reflected XSS targeting URL parameters. If the application passes URL parameters directly into fullpage.js configuration options or callback functions without sanitization, an attacker can inject malicious scripts through these parameters.
  • Likelihood: Low (Depends on application design and how URL parameters are used with fullpage.js)
  • Impact: Medium to High (Reflected XSS impact, potentially session hijacking or redirection)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (URL manipulation)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (WAFs, server-side logging, input validation)
  • Description: This category focuses on vulnerabilities arising from developers incorrectly configuring or misusing the fullpage.js library. This includes insecure configuration options, improper data handling, and flawed integration with application logic.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Developer errors in configuration and integration are common)
  • Impact: Variable (Depends on the specific misconfiguration or misuse, can range from information disclosure to XSS)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Often requires identifying configuration flaws or logic errors in application code)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Code review, security audits, and configuration analysis can identify misconfigurations)
  • Description: This is a fundamental web application security issue. If the application fails to properly sanitize or encode data before using it in conjunction with fullpage.js (especially data that is rendered in the DOM), it can lead to XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: High (Improper sanitization is a very common web application vulnerability)
  • Impact: High (Primarily XSS vulnerabilities, with associated impacts)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Finding unsanitized data inputs and crafting XSS payloads)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (WAFs, vulnerability scanners, and code review can detect sanitization issues)
  • Description: This is the most direct and critical high-risk path. It highlights the specific scenario where the application's failure to sanitize data directly results in XSS when fullpage.js renders that unsanitized data. This is the root cause of the most likely XSS vulnerability in this context.
  • Likelihood: High (If data used by fullpage.js is not properly sanitized)
  • Impact: High (XSS vulnerability)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Finding unsanitized data inputs)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Vulnerability scanners, code review, penetration testing)
  • Description: This is the action an attacker takes to exploit the "Application fails to sanitize data..." vulnerability. It involves injecting malicious content (typically JavaScript code) into application data fields (like section titles, descriptions, etc.) that are subsequently processed and rendered by fullpage.js.
  • Likelihood: High (If sanitization is missing)
  • Impact: High (XSS vulnerability)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Crafting XSS payloads and injecting them into data inputs)
  • Skill Level: Script Kiddie to Average Hacker
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Input validation, output encoding, WAFs)