Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
199 lines (180 loc) · 19.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

199 lines (180 loc) · 19.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for atom/atom

Mitigation Strategy: Package Vetting and Auditing

  • Description:
    1. Establish a dedicated team or individual responsible for reviewing Atom packages.
    2. Create a checklist for package vetting, including:
      • Author reputation and history on Atom package registry.
      • Package popularity and community support within the Atom ecosystem.
      • Code review of the package source code (especially for critical packages used within Atom).
      • Static analysis using tools relevant to Atom package languages (JavaScript, CoffeeScript, etc.).
      • Checking for known vulnerabilities in package dependencies using npm audit or similar tools within the Atom package context.
      • Testing the package in a controlled Atom environment before wider deployment.
    3. Maintain a list of approved and disallowed Atom packages.
    4. Regularly re-audit Atom packages, especially after updates or security advisories related to Atom packages.
    5. Document the vetting process specifically for Atom packages and communicate it to the development team.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Atom Package Installation - Severity: High
    • Vulnerable Atom Package Dependencies - Severity: High
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Atom Packages - Severity: High
    • Accidental Introduction of Backdoors or Malware through Atom Packages - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Atom Package Installation: High Risk Reduction
    • Vulnerable Atom Package Dependencies: High Risk Reduction
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Atom Packages: High Risk Reduction
    • Accidental Introduction of Backdoors or Malware through Atom Packages: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. We have a general guideline to use popular Atom packages, but no formal vetting process specifically for Atom packages is documented or consistently followed. Package dependencies are checked occasionally using npm audit in some projects, but not systematically for all Atom-related packages.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalizing the vetting process specifically for Atom packages, creating a documented checklist tailored to Atom packages, assigning responsibility for Atom package vetting, establishing a list of approved/disallowed Atom packages, and implementing regular re-audits of Atom packages. Systematic dependency scanning for all Atom-related packages is also missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for Packages

  • Description:
    1. Investigate Atom's configuration options to restrict package permissions. Check if Atom offers any sandboxing or permission management features specifically for packages.
    2. If direct permission control within Atom is limited, focus on organizational policies related to Atom package usage:
      • Educate developers on the principle of least privilege regarding Atom package installation.
      • Discourage the installation of Atom packages that request broad permissions or access to sensitive resources unless absolutely necessary within the Atom context.
      • Review Atom package permissions during the vetting process (see "Package Vetting and Auditing").
      • If possible, configure development environments to limit the impact of potentially malicious Atom packages (e.g., using containerization or virtual machines for Atom development environments).
    3. Document and enforce guidelines on Atom package permissions and usage.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Privilege Escalation by Malicious Atom Packages - Severity: High
    • Data Exfiltration by Compromised Atom Packages - Severity: High
    • System Resource Abuse by Atom Packages - Severity: Medium
    • Lateral Movement within Development Environment via Atom Packages - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Privilege Escalation by Malicious Atom Packages: Medium Risk Reduction (depends on Atom's permission controls and organizational enforcement)
    • Data Exfiltration by Compromised Atom Packages: Medium Risk Reduction (depends on Atom's permission controls and organizational enforcement)
    • System Resource Abuse by Atom Packages: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Lateral Movement within Development Environment via Atom Packages: Low to Medium Risk Reduction (primarily relies on organizational policies)
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers are generally aware of not installing unnecessary Atom packages, but there are no specific guidelines or technical controls in place to enforce least privilege for Atom packages within Atom itself.
  • Missing Implementation: Exploring and implementing Atom's permission controls for packages (if any), creating and enforcing specific guidelines on Atom package permissions, and potentially using containerization or VMs for Atom development environments to limit Atom package impact.

Mitigation Strategy: Package Dependency Management

  • Description:
    1. Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) specifically for all Atom packages used in the project and development environments. This should include direct and transitive dependencies of Atom packages.
    2. Use dependency scanning tools (e.g., npm audit, Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) to regularly scan the SBOM for Atom package dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    3. Automate dependency scanning as part of the CI/CD pipeline or regular security scans for Atom package related components.
    4. Establish a process for promptly patching or mitigating identified vulnerabilities in Atom package dependencies. This may involve updating packages, applying patches, or finding alternative Atom packages.
    5. Monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases specifically related to Atom packages and their dependencies.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Atom Package Dependencies - Severity: High
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Atom Package Dependencies (Reduced Risk through proactive monitoring and patching) - Severity: Medium
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Vulnerable Atom Package Dependencies - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Atom Package Dependencies: High Risk Reduction
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Atom Package Dependencies: Medium Risk Reduction (reduces the window of vulnerability)
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Vulnerable Atom Package Dependencies: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. npm audit is used sporadically in some projects related to Atom packages. No formal SBOM is maintained specifically for Atom packages, and dependency scanning is not automated or consistently applied across all Atom-related projects.
  • Missing Implementation: Creating and maintaining an SBOM for Atom packages, implementing automated dependency scanning in CI/CD for Atom package components, establishing a formal vulnerability patching process for Atom package dependencies, and consistently monitoring security advisories related to Atom packages.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review for Custom Packages

  • Description:
    1. Mandatory code reviews for all custom Atom packages developed in-house.
    2. Code reviews should specifically focus on security aspects within the context of Atom packages, including:
      • Input validation and sanitization within Atom package code.
      • Output encoding and escaping within Atom package code.
      • Authentication and authorization (if applicable within the Atom package).
      • Secure handling of sensitive data by the Atom package.
      • Proper error handling and logging within the Atom package.
      • Resistance to common web vulnerabilities (XSS, injection, etc.) in the Atom package, especially if it renders web content.
      • Adherence to secure coding practices for Atom package development.
    3. Use static analysis security testing (SAST) tools to automatically identify potential security vulnerabilities in custom Atom package code before code review.
    4. Involve security experts in the code review process for critical or high-risk Atom packages.
    5. Document code review findings and ensure remediation of identified security issues in custom Atom packages.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerabilities in Custom Atom Package Code (e.g., XSS, Injection) - Severity: High
    • Logic Errors in Custom Atom Packages Leading to Security Flaws - Severity: Medium to High
    • Accidental Introduction of Security Weaknesses in Custom Atom Packages - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerabilities in Custom Atom Package Code: High Risk Reduction
    • Logic Errors in Custom Atom Packages Leading to Security Flaws: High Risk Reduction
    • Accidental Introduction of Security Weaknesses in Custom Atom Packages: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Code reviews are generally practiced for significant code changes, but security is not always a primary focus in these reviews, especially for Atom packages. SAST tools are not consistently used for custom Atom package code.
  • Missing Implementation: Making security a mandatory focus in code reviews for custom Atom packages, integrating SAST tools into the development workflow for Atom packages, and involving security experts in reviews of critical Atom packages.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Atom Updates

  • Description:
    1. Establish a policy for updating Atom editor to the latest stable version on a regular schedule (e.g., monthly or quarterly).
    2. Subscribe to Atom's release notes and security advisories to be notified of updates and security patches for Atom.
    3. Test Atom updates in a staging or testing environment before deploying them to production or development environments.
    4. Automate the Atom update process where possible, using package managers or scripting.
    5. Maintain an inventory of Atom installations and their versions to track update status.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Atom Core - Severity: High
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Electron/Chromium within Atom - Severity: High
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Atom (Reduced Risk by minimizing the window of vulnerability) - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Atom Core: High Risk Reduction
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Electron/Chromium within Atom: High Risk Reduction
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Atom: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers are generally encouraged to update Atom, but there is no enforced policy or automated update process for Atom. Tracking of Atom versions across development environments is not systematic.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalizing an Atom update policy, automating Atom updates where feasible, implementing Atom version tracking, and establishing a process for testing Atom updates before widespread deployment.

Mitigation Strategy: Vulnerability Monitoring

  • Description:
    1. Subscribe to security mailing lists and vulnerability databases that track Atom, Electron, and Node.js vulnerabilities (e.g., GitHub Security Advisories, NIST NVD, CVE databases), specifically focusing on those relevant to Atom.
    2. Use vulnerability scanning tools that can identify known vulnerabilities in Atom and its components.
    3. Establish a process for triaging and responding to vulnerability alerts related to Atom. This includes:
      • Assessing the impact of the vulnerability on your application and development environment due to Atom.
      • Prioritizing vulnerabilities based on severity and exploitability in the context of Atom.
      • Developing and implementing mitigation plans (e.g., patching Atom, workarounds).
      • Communicating vulnerability information and mitigation steps to relevant teams regarding Atom vulnerabilities.
    4. Regularly review vulnerability monitoring processes and tools to ensure effectiveness for Atom-related vulnerabilities.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Newly Disclosed Atom Vulnerabilities - Severity: High
    • Delayed Patching of Critical Atom Vulnerabilities - Severity: High
    • Lack of Awareness of Emerging Atom-Related Threats - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Newly Disclosed Atom Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction (reduces reaction time)
    • Delayed Patching of Critical Atom Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction
    • Lack of Awareness of Emerging Atom-Related Threats: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Minimal implementation. Security advisories are checked occasionally, but there is no systematic vulnerability monitoring process or dedicated tooling in place specifically for Atom or its components.
  • Missing Implementation: Setting up subscriptions to relevant security feeds for Atom vulnerabilities, implementing vulnerability scanning tools for Atom, establishing a formal vulnerability triage and response process for Atom vulnerabilities, and regularly reviewing the monitoring process for Atom-related issues.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Default Configuration

  • Description:
    1. Define a secure baseline configuration for Atom for all development environments and any integrated Atom instances.
    2. Disable unnecessary Atom features and packages that are not essential for the application's workflow to reduce the attack surface of Atom.
    3. Review Atom's security settings and configure them according to security best practices and your application's requirements. This might include Atom settings related to:
      • Package installation sources within Atom.
      • Telemetry and data collection in Atom.
      • Network access for packages within Atom.
      • File system access permissions for Atom and its packages.
    4. Distribute and enforce the secure default Atom configuration across all relevant environments using configuration management tools or scripts.
    5. Regularly review and update the secure default Atom configuration as Atom evolves and new security threats emerge.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Default, Insecure Atom Configurations - Severity: Medium
    • Unnecessary Atom Feature Exposure Increasing Attack Surface - Severity: Medium
    • Data Leakage through Atom Telemetry (if enabled by default) - Severity: Low to Medium
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Default, Insecure Atom Configurations: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Unnecessary Atom Feature Exposure Increasing Attack Surface: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Data Leakage through Atom Telemetry: Low to Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Minimal implementation. Developers likely use default Atom configurations, which may not be optimized for security. No centrally managed or enforced secure default Atom configuration exists.
  • Missing Implementation: Defining and documenting a secure default Atom configuration, implementing configuration management to distribute and enforce it, and regularly reviewing and updating the Atom configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Access to Configuration Files

  • Description:
    1. Implement access control mechanisms to restrict write access to Atom's configuration files (config.cson, init.coffee, styles.less, etc.) to authorized personnel only.
    2. Use operating system-level permissions or access control lists (ACLs) to limit file system access to Atom's configuration files.
    3. Prevent unauthorized modification of Atom's configuration files, as they can be used to inject malicious code or alter Atom's behavior.
    4. Monitor changes to Atom configuration files for suspicious activity.
    5. Educate developers about the security risks of modifying Atom configuration files without proper authorization.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Modification of Atom Configuration - Severity: High
    • Privilege Escalation via Atom Configuration Changes - Severity: Medium
    • Backdoor Installation via Atom Configuration - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Modification of Atom Configuration: Medium Risk Reduction (primarily relies on access control and monitoring)
    • Privilege Escalation via Atom Configuration Changes: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Backdoor Installation via Atom Configuration: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Standard operating system file permissions are in place, but there might not be specific restrictions on Atom configuration files beyond general user permissions. No active monitoring of Atom configuration file changes is likely implemented.
  • Missing Implementation: Implementing stricter access control on Atom configuration files, setting up monitoring for unauthorized changes to Atom configuration, and educating developers about the risks associated with Atom configuration file modification.

Mitigation Strategy: Explore Atom Sandboxing Options

  • Description:
    1. Thoroughly research Atom and Electron documentation to identify any built-in sandboxing features or security settings that can be leveraged specifically within Atom.
    2. Investigate operating system-level sandboxing mechanisms (e.g., AppArmor, SELinux, Windows Sandbox) that can be applied to Atom processes.
    3. Evaluate the feasibility and performance impact of implementing sandboxing for Atom.
    4. If sandboxing is feasible, configure and deploy it to restrict the capabilities of Atom processes, limiting their access to system resources, network, and sensitive data within the Atom context.
    5. Regularly review and update sandboxing configurations as Atom and OS sandboxing technologies evolve.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Privilege Escalation from Atom Process - Severity: High
    • System Compromise via Atom Vulnerability - Severity: High
    • Data Exfiltration from Atom Process - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Privilege Escalation from Atom Process: High Risk Reduction
    • System Compromise via Atom Vulnerability: High Risk Reduction
    • Data Exfiltration from Atom Process: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Sandboxing for Atom processes is likely not currently in use.
  • Missing Implementation: Researching and evaluating sandboxing options for Atom, implementing OS-level or Atom/Electron built-in sandboxing, and regularly reviewing and updating sandboxing configurations for Atom.