Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (56 loc) · 10.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

65 lines (56 loc) · 10.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for bigskysoftware/htmx

Mitigation Strategy: CSRF Token Implementation for htmx Requests

  • Mitigation Strategy: CSRF Token Implementation for htmx Requests
  • Description:
    1. Generate CSRF tokens server-side: Implement your backend's standard CSRF token generation mechanism. This usually involves creating a unique, session-specific token.
    2. Embed CSRF token in initial HTML: Include the CSRF token in the initial HTML page load. A common approach is to place it in a <meta> tag in the <head> or as a hidden input field in a form that is part of the initial page.
    3. Configure htmx to send CSRF token: Utilize htmx's hx-headers attribute to automatically include the CSRF token in headers for all state-changing requests (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH). The header name should match what your backend expects (e.g., X-CSRF-Token, CSRF-Token). You can retrieve the token value from the <meta> tag or hidden input using JavaScript and set it dynamically, or if your backend framework provides a way to access the token in templates, directly embed it into the hx-headers attribute.
    4. Validate CSRF token on the server for htmx endpoints: Ensure your server-side CSRF protection middleware or logic is applied to all endpoints that handle htmx requests and modify server-side state. This middleware should validate the X-CSRF-Token header (or wherever you send the token) against the expected token for the user's session.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from exploiting htmx's dynamic request capabilities to force users to perform unintended actions on the application when authenticated. Without CSRF protection, an attacker could craft malicious websites that trigger htmx requests to your application on behalf of a logged-in user.
  • Impact:
    • CSRF: High reduction. Implementing CSRF tokens specifically for htmx requests effectively mitigates CSRF vulnerabilities in htmx-driven interactions.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. CSRF protection is enabled for standard form submissions, but explicit configuration for htmx requests using hx-headers is not fully implemented across all htmx interactions.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing explicit configuration of hx-headers to include CSRF tokens for all htmx requests that perform state-changing operations (POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH). Need to review all htmx usage and ensure CSRF protection is consistently applied to relevant requests.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting for htmx Endpoints

  • Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting for htmx Endpoints
  • Description:
    1. Identify resource-intensive htmx endpoints: Determine which htmx endpoints are frequently used, computationally expensive, or access sensitive resources. These are prime candidates for rate limiting. Consider endpoints that handle search, data updates, or complex UI interactions driven by htmx.
    2. Implement rate limiting specifically for htmx routes: Configure rate limiting middleware or logic on the server to target these identified htmx endpoints. This can be done based on IP address, user session, or other relevant identifiers.
    3. Set appropriate rate limits for htmx interactions: Define rate limits that are reasonable for legitimate user interactions via htmx but restrictive enough to prevent abuse and DoS attempts. Consider the frequency of expected htmx requests for typical user workflows.
    4. Handle rate limit exceeded responses for htmx: When htmx requests are rate-limited, ensure the server returns appropriate HTTP status codes (e.g., 429 - Too Many Requests) and informative error messages in the htmx response. Consider providing feedback to the user in the UI via htmx's error handling mechanisms (e.g., hx-on::response-error).
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via htmx requests (Medium to High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the server by sending a large volume of rapid htmx requests. Htmx's ease of triggering frequent requests can be exploited in DoS attacks if not rate-limited.
    • Abuse of htmx-driven features (Medium Severity): Limits the potential for abuse of specific htmx-powered features, such as rapid data updates or resource-intensive searches, by malicious actors.
  • Impact:
    • DoS: Medium to High reduction. Rate limiting specifically tailored to htmx endpoints effectively mitigates DoS risks associated with rapid htmx interactions.
    • Abuse of htmx features: Medium reduction. Reduces the potential for malicious exploitation of htmx-driven functionalities.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented for htmx endpoints specifically. General rate limiting might be in place at the infrastructure level, but not fine-grained control for specific htmx routes.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing rate limiting middleware or logic specifically configured for identified resource-intensive or frequently accessed htmx endpoints. Need to implement route-based rate limiting for htmx interactions.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling for htmx Responses

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling for htmx Responses
  • Description:
    1. Implement generic error responses for htmx requests: For all htmx endpoints, configure server-side error handling to return generic, non-revealing error messages in htmx responses. Avoid exposing detailed error information, stack traces, or internal server paths in the HTML fragments or JSON responses sent back to htmx.
    2. Log detailed errors server-side for htmx errors: Implement robust server-side logging to capture detailed error information (including stack traces, request details, and user context) when errors occur during htmx request processing. This logging is crucial for debugging and monitoring but should not be exposed to the client.
    3. Use appropriate HTTP status codes in htmx error responses: Return semantically meaningful HTTP status codes in htmx error responses (e.g., 400 for client-side errors, 500 for server-side errors). Htmx can use these status codes to trigger specific error handling logic on the client-side (e.g., using hx-on::response-error).
    4. Avoid sensitive data in htmx error messages: Carefully review any error messages that are displayed to the user via htmx to ensure they do not inadvertently disclose sensitive information. Focus on user-friendly, generic error messages.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure via htmx error responses (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from gaining insights into the server-side implementation, configuration, or data by analyzing detailed error messages returned in htmx responses. Htmx's partial page updates can make it easier to inadvertently expose information in error fragments if not handled securely.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Medium reduction. Secure error handling for htmx responses significantly reduces the risk of information leakage through error messages in dynamic updates.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Generic error pages are configured for full page errors, but error handling within htmx response fragments might not be consistently secure and might leak information in development environments.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to specifically review and standardize error handling for all htmx endpoints to ensure generic error responses are consistently returned in htmx responses, while detailed errors are logged server-side. Need to ensure production error handling is configured to avoid information disclosure in htmx fragments.

Mitigation Strategy: Open Redirect Prevention for hx-redirect

  • Mitigation Strategy: Open Redirect Prevention for hx-redirect
  • Description:
    1. Validate and sanitize HX-Redirect URLs server-side: When using hx-redirect by returning the HX-Redirect header, strictly validate and sanitize the URL provided in this header on the server before sending it to the client.
    2. Implement a whitelist of allowed redirect destinations: Maintain a server-side whitelist of allowed domains or URL patterns that are considered safe redirect targets. Only allow redirects to URLs that match this whitelist.
    3. Avoid directly using user-provided data in hx-redirect URLs: Never directly use user-provided input to construct hx-redirect URLs without rigorous validation and sanitization. User input should be treated as untrusted and potentially malicious.
    4. Consider relative redirects: Prefer using relative URLs for hx-redirect whenever possible, as they are inherently safer than absolute URLs and prevent redirection to external domains.
    5. Confirmation pages for external redirects (optional but recommended for sensitive applications): For redirects to external domains (even whitelisted ones), consider implementing an intermediary confirmation page that warns the user they are being redirected to an external site and requires explicit confirmation before proceeding.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Open Redirect (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from exploiting hx-redirect to redirect users to malicious external websites. Attackers could craft URLs that, when processed by the application and used in hx-redirect, redirect users to phishing sites or sites hosting malware.
  • Impact:
    • Open Redirect: Medium reduction. Implementing strict validation and whitelisting for hx-redirect URLs effectively mitigates open redirect vulnerabilities associated with htmx's redirect feature.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. hx-redirect might be used in some parts of the application, but without specific validation or sanitization of the redirect URLs on the server-side.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing server-side validation and sanitization logic for URLs used in HX-Redirect headers. Need to implement URL validation and ideally a whitelist of allowed redirect destinations for all uses of hx-redirect.