Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
67 lines (58 loc) · 9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

67 lines (58 loc) · 9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for caolan/async

Mitigation Strategy: Provide Error Callbacks in Async Functions

  • Description:
    1. When using async.series, async.parallel, async.waterfall, or similar control flow functions, ensure that every step in the asynchronous flow is a function that accepts a callback.
    2. This callback should be the standard Node.js style callback: callback(err, result).
    3. Always pass a callback function as the final argument to these async functions.
    4. Inside each step function, after performing the asynchronous operation, invoke the callback.
    5. If the operation was successful, call callback(null, result).
    6. If an error occurred, call callback(error).
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unhandled Exceptions (High Severity): Prevents application crashes due to unhandled errors in asynchronous operations orchestrated by async.
      • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information through default error messages when exceptions within async flows are not caught.
      • Application Instability (Medium Severity): Improves application stability by preventing unexpected terminations due to errors in async managed workflows.
    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of unhandled exceptions and related threats specifically within async based asynchronous logic. Ensures errors are propagated and can be handled gracefully within async control flows.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Error callbacks are used in some parts of the application where async is utilized, particularly in database interactions and API calls managed with async.
    • Missing Implementation: Error callbacks are not consistently implemented across all asynchronous operations using async. Specifically, some older modules and less frequently used async workflows might be missing proper error callbacks.

Mitigation Strategy: Check for Errors in Callbacks

  • Description:
    1. Within each callback function provided to async control flow functions, immediately check the first argument (err).
    2. Use an if (err) condition to determine if an error occurred within the async step.
    3. If err is truthy (an error exists), handle the error appropriately within the context of the async workflow. This might involve:
      • Logging the error using a logging library, specifically noting the async context.
      • Returning an error response to the client (for API endpoints managed by async flows).
      • Calling the main callback of the async function with the error to propagate it further up the async chain.
      • Implementing fallback logic or graceful degradation within the async workflow.
    4. If err is falsy (no error), proceed with processing the result (second argument of the callback) and continue the asynchronous flow managed by async.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unhandled Exceptions (High Severity): Prevents application crashes within async workflows by ensuring errors are detected and handled.
      • Incorrect Application State (Medium Severity): Prevents the application from proceeding with further async operations when a critical error has occurred, potentially leading to inconsistent data or behavior within async managed processes.
      • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Reduces the chance of exposing error details if error handling logic within async callbacks is in place to sanitize or mask error messages before displaying them to users or logging them.
    • Impact: Significantly reduces the impact of errors within async workflows by ensuring they are actively checked and handled, preventing cascading failures and data corruption in async operations.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Error checking is present in many critical asynchronous operations using async, but not consistently enforced across all parts of the codebase where async is used.
    • Missing Implementation: Consistent error checking needs to be enforced in all callback functions within async workflows. Code reviews and static analysis tools should be used to identify and rectify missing error checks, especially in newly developed features and less frequently maintained modules that utilize async.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize async.ensureAsync for Synchronous Functions

  • Description:
    1. If you are incorporating synchronous functions within async control flow functions (e.g., within async.series or async.waterfall), wrap these synchronous functions using async.ensureAsync(fn).
    2. async.ensureAsync takes a synchronous function fn as input and returns a new function that is compatible with async's asynchronous control flow.
    3. This ensures that if a synchronous function throws an exception, it is caught and passed as an error to the async control flow's error handling mechanism, rather than crashing the application synchronously and bypassing async's error handling.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unhandled Exceptions (High Severity): Prevents synchronous exceptions within async flows from bypassing asynchronous error handling provided by async and crashing the application.
      • Inconsistent Error Handling (Medium Severity): Ensures that both synchronous and asynchronous errors are handled within the same error handling framework defined by async, maintaining consistency in error management within async workflows.
    • Impact: Partially reduces the risk of unhandled exceptions specifically arising from synchronous functions embedded in async workflows. Improves consistency in error handling within async based asynchronous logic.
    • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. The project currently does not explicitly use async.ensureAsync. Synchronous functions are generally avoided within async flows, but there might be instances where they are present without proper wrapping, potentially undermining async's error handling.
    • Missing Implementation: A code review should be conducted to identify any synchronous functions used within async workflows. Where found, these functions should be wrapped with async.ensureAsync. This should be incorporated into development best practices and code review checklists specifically for code utilizing async.

Mitigation Strategy: Throttling Concurrent Tasks in async.parallel and async.queue

  • Description:
    1. When using async.parallel or async.queue to manage concurrent asynchronous tasks, configure the concurrency option provided by async.
    2. Set a reasonable concurrency limit based on server resource capacity and the nature of the tasks being managed by async. This limit determines the maximum number of tasks that async will run concurrently at any given time.
    3. For async.parallel, pass the concurrency as the first argument: async.parallel(tasks, concurrency, callback).
    4. For async.queue, set the concurrency when creating the queue: async.queue(worker, concurrency).
    5. By limiting concurrency within async, you prevent the application from spawning an unbounded number of parallel tasks managed by async that could overwhelm server resources.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Reduces the risk of DoS by limiting the number of concurrent tasks managed by async that can consume server resources.
      • Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion by controlling the level of parallelism in asynchronous operations orchestrated by async.
      • Application Slowdown (Medium Severity): Protects application performance by preventing excessive concurrency within async workflows from degrading responsiveness.
    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of DoS and resource exhaustion caused by uncontrolled concurrency within async workflows. Directly controls the resource consumption of async's concurrent operations.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Concurrency limits are used in some async.parallel and async.queue instances, particularly for background processing tasks managed by async. However, it's not consistently applied across all concurrent asynchronous operations using async.
    • Missing Implementation: A review of all async.parallel and async.queue usages should be conducted to ensure appropriate concurrency limits are set. Default concurrency limits should be established as a best practice for new implementations that utilize async's concurrency features.