Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
135 lines (96 loc) · 14.8 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

135 lines (96 loc) · 14.8 KB

Okay, here's a deep analysis of the security considerations for Chart.js, based on the provided security design review:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Chart.js, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components, data flows, and deployment models, with a particular emphasis on how Chart.js handles user-provided data and configurations. The ultimate goal is to enhance the security posture of applications that utilize Chart.js.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the Chart.js library itself (version as available on the provided GitHub repository link), its interaction with web applications, and common deployment scenarios. It does not cover the security of the web applications that use Chart.js, except where Chart.js's design directly impacts their security. We will focus on the core charting functionality and not on any specific plugins or extensions unless they are part of the core library.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Component Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the architecture, components, and data flow of Chart.js and its integration with web applications.
    2. Codebase and Documentation Review: Examine the Chart.js codebase (via the GitHub link) and official documentation to identify potential security-relevant areas. This includes looking for input handling, data rendering, and interaction with the DOM.
    3. Threat Modeling: Based on the architecture and code review, identify potential threats, focusing on those relevant to a client-side JavaScript charting library.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats, considering existing security controls.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to mitigate identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture of Chart.js and applications using it.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components identified in the C4 diagrams:

  • User (Web Browser):

    • Implication: The user's browser is the primary attack surface. Vulnerabilities in the browser itself, or in extensions, could be exploited to compromise the application. Chart.js runs within the browser's security context.
    • Specific to Chart.js: If Chart.js has an XSS vulnerability, the user's browser is where the attack would execute.

  • Chart.js API (JavaScript):

    • Implication: This is the core of the library. Any vulnerabilities here are directly exploitable. The API handles user-provided data and configurations, making it a critical area for security review.
    • Specific to Chart.js: The API's handling of data and options objects is crucial. We need to examine how it processes these to prevent injection attacks.

  • HTML5 Canvas (DOM Element):

    • Implication: Chart.js renders charts onto an HTML5 canvas. While the canvas itself has some built-in security features, vulnerabilities in the browser's canvas implementation could be a concern. More importantly, how Chart.js writes to the canvas is critical.
    • Specific to Chart.js: We need to ensure that Chart.js doesn't introduce vulnerabilities when drawing to the canvas based on user-provided data (e.g., drawing text that could contain malicious scripts).

  • Web Application (Your Code):

    • Implication: This is outside the direct scope of Chart.js's security, but it's the most important factor. The web application is responsible for sanitizing and validating all data before passing it to Chart.js. A vulnerable web application can make even a perfectly secure Chart.js instance vulnerable.
    • Specific to Chart.js: The web application must treat all data and configuration options passed to Chart.js as potentially malicious.

  • Developer:

    • Implication: The developer's understanding of secure coding practices and Chart.js's security considerations is crucial. Mistakes made by the developer (e.g., failing to sanitize input) are a major source of vulnerabilities.
    • Specific to Chart.js: Developers need to be aware of the "accepted risks" outlined in the security posture and follow best practices for data handling.

  • NPM Registry / CDN:

    • Implication: These are the distribution channels for Chart.js. Compromise of the registry or CDN could lead to the distribution of a malicious version of Chart.js (supply chain attack).
    • Specific to Chart.js: Using a compromised version of Chart.js would expose all applications using it to significant risk.

  • Webpack/Build Server/CI/CD Pipeline:

    • Implication: These components are part of the development and deployment process. Security vulnerabilities here could lead to the inclusion of malicious code or misconfiguration of the deployed application.
    • Specific to Chart.js: Ensuring that the build process uses a trusted version of Chart.js and that the build artifacts are not tampered with is essential.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the C4 diagrams, codebase, and documentation, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Chart.js is a client-side JavaScript library. It's designed to be integrated into web applications and run entirely within the user's browser. It has a modular architecture, allowing for different chart types and features to be included as needed.

  • Components:

    • Core: Handles chart creation, updating, and rendering.
    • Chart Types: Specific modules for different chart types (line, bar, pie, etc.).
    • Scales: Handles data scaling and axis rendering.
    • Elements: Represents individual chart elements (bars, lines, points, etc.).
    • Plugins: Provides additional functionality (e.g., data labels, zooming).

  • Data Flow:

    1. The web application provides data and configuration options to the Chart.js API.
    2. The Chart.js API processes this data and configuration.
    3. The core module creates the appropriate chart type and scales.
    4. Chart elements are created and rendered onto the HTML5 canvas.
    5. User interactions (e.g., hovering, clicking) may trigger updates to the chart.

4. Security Considerations (Tailored to Chart.js)

Here are the key security considerations, specifically tailored to Chart.js:

  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting): This is the primary concern. Chart.js accepts user-provided data for labels, tooltips, and other text elements. If this data is not properly sanitized, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript code that would execute in the context of the user's browser. This could lead to data theft, session hijacking, or website defacement. The "accepted risk" that implementers must sanitize input is critical here.

  • Data Injection: Beyond XSS, other forms of data injection are possible. For example, an attacker might try to inject malicious values into the chart data itself, leading to unexpected behavior or denial-of-service. While Chart.js might not be directly vulnerable to SQL injection (since it doesn't interact with a database), it could be used as a vector to display malicious data retrieved from a vulnerable backend.

  • Configuration Injection: Chart.js uses a configuration object to control various aspects of the chart's appearance and behavior. If an attacker can control this configuration object, they might be able to cause unexpected behavior or potentially exploit vulnerabilities in Chart.js's internal logic.

  • Denial-of-Service (DoS): While less likely to be a critical vulnerability in a client-side library, an attacker might be able to provide extremely large or complex data sets that cause Chart.js to consume excessive resources, leading to browser slowdowns or crashes.

  • Third-Party Dependency Vulnerabilities: Chart.js relies on external dependencies (though it aims to minimize them). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies could be exploited to compromise applications using Chart.js. This is a "supply chain" risk.

  • Data Leakage (Indirect): Chart.js itself doesn't store data persistently, but if the implementing application passes sensitive data to Chart.js (e.g., PII, financial data), and that data is exposed in the chart (e.g., in labels or tooltips), it could be visible to anyone viewing the page. This is primarily the responsibility of the implementing application, but it's a consideration for how Chart.js is used.

  • Canvas Security: While less common, vulnerabilities in the browser's implementation of the HTML5 canvas could potentially be exploited through Chart.js. This is a lower-likelihood risk.

5. Mitigation Strategies (Actionable and Tailored to Chart.js)

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies:

  • 1. MANDATORY Input Sanitization (by Implementers):

    • Action: The most critical mitigation is for web applications using Chart.js to strictly sanitize and validate all user-provided data and configuration options before passing them to Chart.js. This is not Chart.js's responsibility, but it's essential for secure use.
    • Technique: Use a dedicated sanitization library (like DOMPurify) to remove any potentially malicious HTML or JavaScript from data that will be displayed in labels, tooltips, or other text elements. Use a schema validation library (like Ajv) to validate the structure and content of the configuration object.
    • Chart.js Specific: Provide very clear documentation and examples demonstrating how to securely handle user input with Chart.js. Emphasize the importance of sanitization and validation. Consider adding a prominent warning to the documentation about the risks of XSS.

  • 2. Content Security Policy (CSP):

    • Action: Implement a strict CSP on web pages that use Chart.js. This will help mitigate the impact of XSS vulnerabilities, even if they exist.
    • Technique: Use the Content-Security-Policy HTTP header to restrict the sources from which the browser can load resources (scripts, styles, images, etc.). A well-configured CSP can prevent the execution of inline scripts and limit the loading of external scripts to trusted sources.
    • Chart.js Specific: The CSP should allow the Chart.js library to be loaded (from a trusted CDN or self-hosted location) and should allow the use of the canvas element. It should disallow inline scripts (script-src 'self') and unsafe-eval (unsafe-eval).

  • 3. Regular Dependency Audits and Updates:

    • Action: Regularly audit and update Chart.js's dependencies to address known vulnerabilities.
    • Technique: Use tools like npm audit or yarn audit to identify vulnerable dependencies. Use a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tool to automate this process.
    • Chart.js Specific: Maintain a clear list of dependencies and their versions. Establish a process for quickly updating dependencies when vulnerabilities are discovered.

  • 4. SAST and DAST:

    • Action: Incorporate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) into the development and testing process.
    • Technique: Use SAST tools to scan the Chart.js codebase for potential vulnerabilities. Use DAST tools to test running applications that use Chart.js for runtime vulnerabilities.
    • Chart.js Specific: Focus SAST scans on areas that handle user-provided data and configurations. Use DAST to test for XSS and other injection vulnerabilities.

  • 5. Subresource Integrity (SRI):

    • Action: When loading Chart.js from a CDN, use Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes to ensure that the loaded file has not been tampered with.
    • Technique: Include the integrity attribute in the <script> tag that loads Chart.js. This attribute contains a cryptographic hash of the expected file content. The browser will verify that the downloaded file matches the hash before executing it.
    • Chart.js Specific: Provide the correct SRI hashes for each release of Chart.js in the documentation.

  • 6. Consider "Safe" Rendering Options (Future Enhancement):

    • Action: Explore the possibility of adding "safe" rendering options to Chart.js that would automatically sanitize data before rendering it. This would provide an additional layer of defense, even if the implementing application fails to sanitize input.
    • Technique: This could involve integrating a sanitization library directly into Chart.js or providing a configuration option to enable automatic sanitization.
    • Chart.js Specific: This would be a significant change to Chart.js and would need to be carefully designed to avoid performance impacts and maintain backward compatibility. It could be offered as an optional feature.

  • 7. Robust Error Handling:

    • Action: Ensure that Chart.js handles errors gracefully and does not expose sensitive information in error messages.
    • Technique: Use try...catch blocks to handle potential errors. Avoid displaying detailed error messages to the user.
    • Chart.js Specific: Review error handling in Chart.js to ensure that it doesn't leak information that could be useful to an attacker.

  • 8. Documentation and Security Guidance:

    • Action: Provide comprehensive documentation and security guidance to help developers use Chart.js securely.
    • Technique: Include a dedicated security section in the documentation. Provide clear examples of how to sanitize input and configure Chart.js securely. Explain the potential risks of using user-provided data.
    • Chart.js Specific: The documentation should be the primary resource for developers to learn about Chart.js security. It should be kept up-to-date with the latest security best practices.

  • 9. Vulnerability Disclosure Program:

    • Action: Maintain clear instructions (SECURITY.md) for reporting security vulnerabilities, and have a process for responding to and addressing reported issues promptly.
    • Technique: Use a bug bounty program or a dedicated security email address. Acknowledge reports quickly and provide updates to reporters.
    • Chart.js Specific: This is already in place, but it's important to maintain and actively manage it.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the security posture of Chart.js and the applications that use it can be significantly improved. The most crucial point remains the responsibility of the implementing application to sanitize all user input. Chart.js can provide tools and guidance, but it cannot guarantee security if the application using it is vulnerable.