Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
67 lines (56 loc) · 6.86 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

67 lines (56 loc) · 6.86 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for cypress-io/cypress

Attack Surface: 1. Vulnerable Test Dependencies

  • Description: Third-party Node.js packages used within Cypress tests (plugins, custom commands, helper libraries) may contain security vulnerabilities.
  • Cypress Contribution: Cypress's extensibility through plugins and custom commands necessitates the use of external dependencies, increasing the potential for introducing vulnerable code. This is a direct consequence of Cypress's design.
  • Example: A Cypress plugin used for generating test data relies on an outdated version of faker.js that has a known Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability.
  • Impact: An attacker could exploit the vulnerability in the dependency during test execution, potentially leading to denial of service in the CI/CD environment, or even code execution if the vulnerability allows it.
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical if the vulnerability allows code execution in a sensitive environment).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly audit and update test dependencies using tools like npm audit or yarn audit.
    • Use a lockfile (package-lock.json or yarn.lock) to ensure consistent dependency versions.
    • Employ a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., Snyk, Dependabot) as part of the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Carefully vet and select only well-maintained and reputable Cypress plugins.

Attack Surface: 2. Secrets Exposure in Test Code

  • Description: Sensitive information (API keys, passwords, database credentials) are inadvertently included in test code or configuration files.
  • Cypress Contribution: Cypress tests often require interaction with APIs and services, creating a temptation to hardcode credentials for convenience. The need to interact with real or mock services within the Cypress test context is the direct link.
  • Example: A Cypress test includes a hardcoded AWS access key ID and secret access key to interact with an S3 bucket during testing. This code is committed to a public GitHub repository.
  • Impact: An attacker could gain access to the exposed secrets and use them to compromise the associated services (e.g., access data, modify resources, incur costs).
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Never hardcode secrets in test code or configuration files.
    • Use environment variables (e.g., CYPRESS_API_KEY) and access them within tests using Cypress.env().
    • Utilize a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault).
    • Implement pre-commit hooks or CI/CD checks (e.g., using tools like git-secrets or TruffleHog) to scan for potential secrets exposure.

Attack Surface: 3. Malicious Test Code Injection (CI/CD)

  • Description: An attacker gains access to the CI/CD pipeline or source code repository and injects malicious code into Cypress tests.
  • Cypress Contribution: Cypress tests are executed as part of the CI/CD pipeline, making them a potential target. The fact that Cypress is the testing framework being executed is the direct link. The attacker is targeting the Cypress test execution itself.
  • Example: An attacker compromises a developer's credentials and modifies a Cypress test to include a script that exfiltrates environment variables from the CI/CD runner.
  • Impact: The injected code could compromise the CI/CD environment, steal sensitive data, deploy malicious artifacts, or even compromise the application being tested.
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strict access controls and the principle of least privilege for the CI/CD pipeline and source code repository.
    • Require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users with access to these systems.
    • Use code reviews and require approvals for all changes to test code.
    • Run Cypress tests in isolated environments (e.g., Docker containers) to limit the impact of any potential compromise.
    • Monitor CI/CD logs for suspicious activity and implement security alerts.

Attack Surface: 4. Running Tests Against Production

  • Description: Executing Cypress end-to-end tests directly against a live production environment.
  • Cypress Contribution: Cypress's ability to interact with a live application as a browser automation tool makes it tempting (but dangerous) to test directly against production. This is a direct consequence of Cypress's capabilities.
  • Example: A Cypress test that creates and deletes user accounts is accidentally run against the production database, resulting in the deletion of real user data.
  • Impact: Data loss, service disruption, exposure of sensitive information, and potential legal or reputational damage.
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Never run Cypress tests directly against a production environment without extreme caution and safeguards.
    • Always use a dedicated testing or staging environment that mirrors production as closely as possible.
    • If absolutely necessary to test read-only functionality in production, do so with extreme care, robust monitoring, and alerting, and with a clear understanding of the risks. Implement circuit breakers or kill switches to quickly stop tests if issues arise.

Attack Surface: 5. Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Cypress Plugins

  • Description: Security flaws within third-party Cypress plugins that extend Cypress's core functionality.
  • Cypress Contribution: Cypress's plugin architecture allows for easy extension, but this also introduces the risk of using vulnerable plugins. The direct link is the use of the Cypress plugin system itself.
  • Example: A Cypress plugin designed to interact with a specific API contains a vulnerability that allows for cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
  • Impact: The plugin's vulnerability could be exploited to compromise the test environment or potentially the application being tested, depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thoroughly vet any third-party plugins before using them. Research the plugin's reputation, review its source code (if available), and check for known vulnerabilities.
    • Prefer plugins from reputable sources and those that are actively maintained.
    • Regularly update plugins to the latest versions to patch any discovered vulnerabilities.
    • Consider contributing to the security of open-source plugins by reporting any vulnerabilities you find.