Mitigation Strategy: Careful Animation Timing and Placement Review (animate.css Specific)
-
Description:
- Code Review (animate.css Focus): Concentrate code reviews on the HTML and JavaScript where
animate.css
classes are applied. Verify that the combination of the element, the chosenanimate.css
class (e.g.,animate__fadeIn
,animate__bounceOutLeft
), and any custom CSS modifying the animation properties doesn't create a deceptive scenario. - Animation Property Analysis (animate.css Focus): For each
animate.css
animation used, analyze these CSS properties in the context of the specific class:animation-name
: Understand the precise visual effect of the chosenanimate.css
class. Is it a movement, a fade, a pulse, etc.?animation-duration
: Check if the default duration of theanimate.css
class is appropriate, or if it's been overridden. Too fast or too slow can be problematic.animation-delay
: If a delay is used, ensure it's not creating a timing attack opportunity or misdirection.animation-timing-function
: Understand how theanimate.css
class's easing function affects the animation's perceived speed and smoothness.animation-iteration-count
: Be extremely cautious withanimate.css
classes used withanimation-iteration-count: infinite
. Ensure this is absolutely necessary and doesn't cause performance or usability issues.
- Interactive Element Focus (animate.css Focus): Ensure that
animate.css
classes applied to interactive elements (buttons, links, form fields) do not, through their specific animation effects, cause:- Unexpected movement under the cursor.
- Obscuration or difficulty in interaction.
- Overlapping with other interactive elements.
- Manual Testing (animate.css Focus): Test each
animate.css
animation in the context of the application. Try to interact with the page in ways that might exploit the specific animation's behavior.
- Code Review (animate.css Focus): Concentrate code reviews on the HTML and JavaScript where
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: (Severity: High) - Prevents deceptive use of
animate.css
animations. - Phishing/Deception through Visual Mimicry: (Severity: Medium) - Reduces the risk of
animate.css
being used for visual deception.
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: (Severity: High) - Prevents deceptive use of
-
Impact:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Phishing/Deception through Visual Mimicry: Moderately reduces the risk.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example: Code reviews check for
animate.css
class usage, but don't consistently analyze animation properties in detail.) <-- Fill in based on your project -
Missing Implementation: (Example: Need to formalize the animation property analysis within code reviews, specifically focusing on how
animate.css
classes are used and modified.) <-- Fill in based on your project
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Animating Critical Actions (animate.css Specific)
-
Description:
- Identify Critical Actions: Maintain a list of critical actions (form submissions, purchases, deletions, etc.).
- Restrict
animate.css
Usage: For elements triggering these actions:- Preferably, do not apply any
animate.css
classes. - If animation is absolutely required for UX reasons, use only extremely subtle
animate.css
classes that do not involve movement or significant changes in opacity (e.g., a very subtleanimate__pulse
with a short duration and low amplitude might be acceptable, butanimate__bounceIn
would not). Avoid anyanimate.css
classes that move the element (animate__slideIn...
,animate__bounce...
, etc.).
- Preferably, do not apply any
- Code Review Enforcement: Enforce this restriction during code reviews. Reject any use of
animate.css
classes on critical action elements that could be deceptive.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: (Severity: High) - Prevents deceptive use of
animate.css
on critical actions.
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: (Severity: High) - Prevents deceptive use of
-
Impact:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: Very high impact.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example: Most critical actions avoid
animate.css
, but there are a few exceptions that need review.) <-- Fill in based on your project -
Missing Implementation: (Example: Need a clear policy, enforced through code reviews, prohibiting or severely restricting
animate.css
on critical action elements.) <-- Fill in based on your project
Mitigation Strategy: User-Controllable Animation Disabling (animate.css Specific)
-
Description:
prefers-reduced-motion
(animate.css Focus): This is the most important step, and it directly impactsanimate.css
.-
Add this CSS, which targets all animations and transitions, including those from
animate.css
:@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { /* Disable or significantly reduce animations */ * { animation-duration: 0.01ms !important; animation-iteration-count: 1 !important; transition-duration: 0.01ms !important; transition-delay: 0.01ms !important; } }
-
This effectively disables all
animate.css
animations (and other animations) when the user has enabled "Reduce motion" in their OS/browser settings.
-
- User Preference Setting (Optional, but Recommended - animate.css Focus):
- Provide a user setting to disable animations.
- Store this preference.
- Use JavaScript to add/remove a class (e.g.,
animations-disabled
) to the<body>
. - Use CSS similar to the
prefers-reduced-motion
example, but targeting.animations-disabled *
, to disableanimate.css
(and other) animations when the class is present. This gives the user explicit control beyond the OS setting.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: (Severity: High)
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): (Severity: Medium)
- Phishing/Deception through Visual Mimicry: (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Animation-based Clickjacking/UI Redressing: High impact.
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): Medium impact.
- Phishing/Deception through Visual Mimicry: Medium impact.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example:
prefers-reduced-motion
is supported. A custom user setting is not yet implemented.) <-- Fill in based on your project -
Missing Implementation: (Example: Implement a user-accessible setting to disable animations, which would also disable
animate.css
.) <-- Fill in based on your project
Mitigation Strategy: Limit Concurrent Animations (animate.css Specific)
-
Description:
- Identify
animate.css
Triggers: Analyze howanimate.css
classes are added to elements. Are they added on page load, on user interaction (click, scroll), or via JavaScript timers? - Stagger
animate.css
Application: If multiple elements are likely to receiveanimate.css
classes simultaneously (e.g., a list of items all animating in at once), use JavaScript to add the classes with small delays. This prevents a sudden burst of animation.- Example (JavaScript - conceptual):
const items = document.querySelectorAll('.list-item'); items.forEach((item, index) => { setTimeout(() => { item.classList.add('animate__animated', 'animate__fadeInUp'); }, index * 100); // Delay each item by 100ms * its index });
- Example (JavaScript - conceptual):
- Prioritize
animate.css
Animations: If someanimate.css
animations are more visually important, ensure they are triggered first or with less delay. - Event Listener Management (with
animate.css
): Ifanimate.css
classes are added in response to user events (clicks, scrolls), use debouncing or throttling to limit how often the classes are applied, preventing excessive animation triggering. This is especially important if the event fires frequently (like scroll events).
- Identify
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): Medium impact.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example: No specific strategies are in place to limit concurrent
animate.css
animations.) <-- Fill in based on your project -
Missing Implementation: (Example: Review code to identify areas where multiple
animate.css
animations might be triggered at once. Use JavaScript to stagger or prioritize the application ofanimate.css
classes.) <-- Fill in based on your project
Mitigation Strategy: Optimize Animation Properties (animate.css Indirect)
-
Description:
- Understand
animate.css
's Properties: Whileanimate.css
itself generally uses performant properties (transform
andopacity
), be aware of which properties each class modifies. For example,animate__slideInLeft
usestransform: translateX()
. - Avoid Overriding with Expensive Properties: If you override any of
animate.css
's default styles (e.g., with custom CSS), be extremely careful not to introduce animations on expensive properties (width, height, top, left, etc.). This negates the performance benefits ofanimate.css
. - Review Custom Animations: If you create custom animations that use
animate.css
as a base (e.g., by chaininganimate.css
classes or modifying their properties), ensure these custom animations also prioritizetransform
andopacity
.
- Understand
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Animation-Induced Denial of Service (Client-Side): Medium impact.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example: Developers are generally aware of performant animation properties, but there's no formal check for overrides that might negate
animate.css
's benefits.) <-- Fill in based on your project -
Missing Implementation: (Example: Code reviews should specifically check for any custom CSS that overrides
animate.css
styles and introduces animations on expensive properties.) <-- Fill in based on your project