Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (46 loc) · 7.12 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (46 loc) · 7.12 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for dcloudio/uni-app

Attack Surface: Inconsistent Platform API Handling

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from differences in how platform-specific APIs are implemented and handled across various target platforms (iOS, Android, WeChat Mini Program, H5, etc.).
  • uni-app Contribution: uni-app abstracts native APIs, and inconsistencies in these abstractions or underlying platform behaviors are the direct source of this risk. This is a core uni-app concern.
  • Example: A file storage API might be handled securely on iOS but have a permission bypass vulnerability on Android due to differences in uni-app's implementation for that platform, not just a general Android vulnerability.
  • Impact: Data leakage, unauthorized access to device resources, privilege escalation (depending on the specific API).
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the API and the nature of the inconsistency).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer: Rigorous testing on all target platforms. Use conditional compilation (#ifdef, #ifndef) to handle platform-specific differences explicitly and securely. Stay updated on platform-specific security best practices and API changes. Avoid assumptions about consistent behavior across platforms. Thoroughly review uni-app's documentation and source code (where available) for the specific APIs being used.
    • User: Keep the application and the device's operating system updated.

Attack Surface: Native API Exposure (via Plugins)

  • Description: Vulnerabilities introduced through the use of native code (Java, Kotlin, Objective-C, Swift, C/C++) accessed via uni-app's native plugin mechanism (uni.requireNativePlugin) or custom-built plugins.
  • uni-app Contribution: uni-app provides the mechanism (uni.requireNativePlugin) to access native code, creating a direct pathway for vulnerabilities in that native code to be exposed. This is a core feature enabling this attack surface.
  • Example: A custom image processing plugin written in C++ might have a buffer overflow vulnerability that can be triggered through the uni-app interface (using uni.requireNativePlugin), leading to arbitrary code execution.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, data corruption.
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer: Apply secure coding practices rigorously to all native code. Perform thorough security audits and penetration testing of native plugins. Minimize the use of native plugins when possible, favoring uni-app's built-in APIs. Keep native dependencies up-to-date. Use memory-safe languages where feasible. Sandboxing techniques, if available on the target platform, should be considered for native code execution.
    • User: Be cautious about installing applications that require numerous or unusual permissions, which might indicate extensive use of native plugins.

Attack Surface: Third-Party Plugin Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Security weaknesses present in third-party plugins obtained from the DCloud plugin market or other sources.
  • uni-app Contribution: The uni-app ecosystem and its plugin marketplace are the direct enablers of this risk. While third-party code is always a risk, uni-app's reliance on its plugin system makes this a core concern.
  • Example: A popular payment plugin, integrated via the uni-app plugin system, might have a flaw allowing attackers to intercept transaction data.
  • Impact: Varies widely – could range from data leakage to complete application compromise, depending on the plugin.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the plugin and the vulnerability).
  • Mitigation Strategies: * Developer: Carefully vet all third-party plugins specifically designed for uni-app. Review source code (if available), check the plugin's reputation on the DCloud marketplace, and examine its update history. Prefer plugins from reputable sources and those actively maintained. Regularly update plugins. Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to identify vulnerable dependencies within the uni-app plugins. * User: Be cautious about installing applications that rely on a large number of third-party plugins, especially from unknown developers within the uni-app ecosystem.

Attack Surface: uni-app Framework (Runtime) Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Security flaws within the core uni-app framework itself, affecting the runtime environment. This is entirely within uni-app's domain.
  • uni-app Contribution: The framework itself is the source of the vulnerability. This is a direct and fundamental risk.
  • Example: A vulnerability in the framework's data binding mechanism (a core uni-app feature) could allow an attacker to manipulate data, potentially leading to privilege escalation.
  • Impact: Varies widely – could range from minor data leaks to complete application compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer: Keep the uni-app framework updated to the latest version, including all security patches. Monitor the uni-app community and security advisories specifically for vulnerability reports affecting the uni-app runtime. Report any suspected vulnerabilities to DCloud.
    • User: Keep the application updated. This is the primary way users receive uni-app framework updates.

Attack Surface: uniCloud Specific Attack Surface (if used)

  • Description: Vulnerabilities related to the uniCloud serverless backend, including cloud functions, database access, and authentication.
  • uni-app Contribution: uniCloud is a service offered by DCloud, tightly integrated with uni-app. Its misuse or inherent vulnerabilities directly impact the uni-app application.
  • Example: A cloud function with insufficient input validation could allow an attacker to inject malicious code or perform unauthorized database operations.
  • Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized data modification, denial of service, account compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer: Implement robust input validation and sanitization in uniCloud functions. Enforce least privilege principle for database access within uniCloud. Use strong authentication and authorization mechanisms (e.g., multi-factor authentication) provided by uniCloud. Regularly review and audit uniCloud configuration and code. Follow secure coding best practices for serverless development specifically within the uniCloud environment.
    • User: Use strong, unique passwords. Enable multi-factor authentication if available within the application's uniCloud-backed authentication system.