Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (68 loc) · 11.3 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (68 loc) · 11.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dogfalo/materialize

Objective: Compromise Application Using Materialize CSS Vulnerabilities by focusing on high-risk areas.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Application Using Materialize CSS Vulnerabilities
├───[AND] Exploit Client-Side Vulnerabilities
│   ├───[OR] **Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Materialize Components**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   ├───[OR] **Input Injection into Materialize Components**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Inject Malicious Input into Form Fields Styled by Materialize**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **User submits form with malicious input, Materialize JS renders without proper sanitization, executing XSS.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Inject Malicious Input into URL Parameters Used by Materialize Components**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **Application uses URL parameters to dynamically render content within Materialize components, leading to XSS.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   ├───[OR] Exploit Materialize CSS Vulnerabilities
│   │   ├───[AND] **CSS Injection to Deface or Phish**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Inject Malicious CSS to Alter Visual Appearance**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **Inject CSS to overlay fake login forms, hide content, or deface the application's visual elements.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   ├───[OR] **Exploit Configuration/Implementation Vulnerabilities Related to Materialize**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   ├───[AND] **Insecure CDN Usage for Materialize**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Compromise CDN Serving Materialize Files**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **If using a compromised CDN, attacker can replace Materialize files with malicious versions, injecting JavaScript or CSS into all applications using that CDN version. (Supply Chain Attack)**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   ├───[AND] **Developer Misuse of Materialize Components**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Exposing Sensitive Data in Materialize Components without Proper Security**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **Developers might incorrectly use Materialize components (e.g., modals, tooltips) to display sensitive data without proper authorization or sanitization, leading to information disclosure.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Relying on Client-Side Validation Provided by Materialize Alone**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **Developers might rely solely on Materialize's client-side validation, which can be easily bypassed, leading to data integrity issues or server-side vulnerabilities.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**
│   │   │   ├───[AND] **Insecure Integration with Backend Systems via Materialize Components**  **(HIGH-RISK PATH)**
│   │   │   │   └───[Action] **Developers might use Materialize components to interact with backend systems in an insecure manner, e.g., exposing API keys or sensitive endpoints in client-side JavaScript interacting with Materialize UI elements.**  **(CRITICAL NODE)**

Attack Tree Path: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Materialize Components (CRITICAL NODE)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how Materialize's JavaScript components handle and render user-provided data, leading to the execution of malicious scripts in the user's browser.
  • Impact: Account takeover, session hijacking, data theft, defacement of the application, redirection to malicious sites, malware distribution.
  • Mitigation: Implement robust input sanitization and output encoding for all user-provided data rendered within Materialize components. Use Content Security Policy (CSP) to further mitigate XSS risks. Regularly update Materialize and its dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: Input Injection into Materialize Components (CRITICAL NODE)

  • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious input into various sources (form fields, URL parameters) that are then processed and rendered by Materialize's JavaScript components without proper sanitization, resulting in XSS.

    • 2.1. Inject Malicious Input into Form Fields Styled by Materialize (HIGH-RISK PATH)

      • Attack Action: Attacker crafts malicious JavaScript code and injects it into form fields that are styled and potentially processed by Materialize's JavaScript. When the form is submitted or processed client-side, Materialize's JavaScript renders this malicious input without proper sanitization, leading to XSS.
      • Example: Injecting <script>alert('XSS')</script> into a text field styled by Materialize.
      • Mitigation: Server-side and client-side input validation and sanitization. Use appropriate output encoding when rendering form field values.

    • 2.2. Inject Malicious Input into URL Parameters Used by Materialize Components (HIGH-RISK PATH)

      • Attack Action: Attacker modifies URL parameters to include malicious JavaScript code. If the application uses these URL parameters to dynamically populate content within Materialize components (e.g., using JavaScript to fetch and display data based on URL parameters), and this data is rendered without sanitization, XSS can occur.
      • Example: Modifying a URL like example.com/page?name=<script>alert('XSS')</script> if the 'name' parameter is used to display content within a Materialize component.
      • Mitigation: Avoid directly using URL parameters to dynamically render content without sanitization. If necessary, sanitize and validate URL parameters on both client and server sides before rendering.

Attack Tree Path: CSS Injection to Deface or Phish (CRITICAL NODE)

  • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious CSS code to alter the visual appearance of the application for malicious purposes, such as defacement or phishing.

    • 3.1. Inject Malicious CSS to Alter Visual Appearance (HIGH-RISK PATH)
      • Attack Action: Attacker injects CSS code, potentially through user-controlled input fields that are not properly sanitized for CSS, or by exploiting vulnerabilities that allow CSS injection. This injected CSS can be used to overlay fake login forms on top of legitimate ones, hide content, or completely deface the application's visual elements, leading to phishing attacks or damage to the application's reputation.
      • Example: Injecting CSS to hide the real login form and display a fake one that steals credentials.
      • Mitigation: Sanitize user-provided CSS if allowed. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict the sources of CSS and prevent inline styles. Regularly review and test CSS handling in the application.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Configuration/Implementation Vulnerabilities Related to Materialize (CRITICAL NODE)

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from insecure configuration or implementation practices related to how Materialize is used in the application.

    • 4.1. Insecure CDN Usage for Materialize (CRITICAL NODE)

      • 4.1.1. Compromise CDN Serving Materialize Files (HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE)
        • Attack Action: If the CDN serving Materialize files is compromised by an attacker, they can replace the legitimate Materialize files with malicious versions. These malicious files can contain injected JavaScript or CSS code that will be executed in every application that loads Materialize from the compromised CDN. This is a supply chain attack with potentially widespread impact.
        • Example: Attacker compromises a popular CDN and replaces the Materialize JavaScript file with one that includes a script to steal user credentials.
        • Mitigation: Use reputable and trustworthy CDNs. Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) to verify the integrity of files fetched from the CDN. Consider self-hosting Materialize files for maximum control over the supply chain.

    • 4.2. Developer Misuse of Materialize Components (CRITICAL NODE)

      • 4.2.1. Exposing Sensitive Data in Materialize Components without Proper Security (HIGH-RISK PATH)

        • Attack Action: Developers might mistakenly use Materialize components like modals, tooltips, or dropdowns to display sensitive data (e.g., API keys, personal information) without implementing proper authorization or sanitization. This can lead to unintended information disclosure if these components are accessible to unauthorized users or if the data is not properly sanitized before display.
        • Example: Displaying a user's API key in a Materialize tooltip that is visible to all users.
        • Mitigation: Implement proper authorization and access control mechanisms. Avoid displaying sensitive data in client-side components unless absolutely necessary and with appropriate security measures. Sanitize sensitive data before displaying it in UI components.

      • 4.2.2. Relying on Client-Side Validation Provided by Materialize Alone (HIGH-RISK PATH)

        • Attack Action: Developers might rely solely on Materialize's client-side validation for security purposes, assuming it is sufficient to prevent malicious input or ensure data integrity. However, client-side validation can be easily bypassed by attackers by disabling JavaScript or using browser developer tools. This can lead to data integrity issues, server-side vulnerabilities, or other security problems if the backend systems rely on the bypassed client-side validation.
        • Example: Relying on Materialize's form validation to prevent SQL injection without server-side validation.
        • Mitigation: Always implement server-side validation as the primary security measure. Client-side validation should only be used for user experience improvements, not for security.

      • 4.2.3. Insecure Integration with Backend Systems via Materialize Components (HIGH-RISK PATH)

        • Attack Action: Developers might integrate Materialize components with backend systems in an insecure manner, such as embedding API keys or sensitive endpoint URLs directly in client-side JavaScript code that interacts with Materialize UI elements. This can expose sensitive backend resources and API keys to attackers who can inspect the client-side code or network requests.
        • Example: Hardcoding an API key in JavaScript code used to fetch data for a Materialize data table.
        • Mitigation: Avoid hardcoding sensitive information in client-side code. Use secure methods for managing API keys and backend communication, such as backend proxies or secure environment variables. Implement proper authorization and authentication for backend API endpoints.