Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (39 loc) · 6.02 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (39 loc) · 6.02 KB

Threat Model Analysis for dogfalo/materialize

Threat: Client-Side XSS in Materialize JavaScript

  • Description: Attackers could exploit vulnerabilities within Materialize's JavaScript code to inject and execute malicious scripts in a user's browser. This could occur if Materialize improperly handles data when rendering or manipulating DOM elements, allowing for the injection of JavaScript code through crafted inputs or data manipulation.
  • Impact: Account takeover, sensitive data theft (including session cookies, personal information), malware distribution, website defacement, redirection to malicious websites, and unauthorized actions on behalf of the user.
  • Materialize Component Affected: Potentially any JavaScript component that processes user input or dynamically renders content, including but not limited to:
    • Modals
    • Dropdowns
    • Selects
    • Autocomplete
    • Carousel
    • Datepicker
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Materialize Updated: Regularly update Materialize to the latest version to ensure security patches for known vulnerabilities are applied.
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP): Utilize CSP headers to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded and executed, limiting the impact of potential XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Strict Input Sanitization (Server-Side and Client-Side): Sanitize all user inputs on both the server-side and client-side before they are processed or rendered by Materialize components. While client-side sanitization in Materialize might be present, always reinforce with server-side validation and sanitization.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify potential XSS vulnerabilities in the application, including those that might arise from Materialize usage.

Threat: DOM-based XSS via Materialize DOM Manipulation

  • Description: Attackers can exploit how Materialize's JavaScript manipulates the Document Object Model (DOM) to inject malicious scripts. If Materialize components use client-side data sources (e.g., URL fragments, local storage) without proper sanitization when updating the DOM, attackers can craft malicious payloads in these data sources that get executed as JavaScript when processed by Materialize.
  • Impact: Account takeover, sensitive data theft, malware distribution, website defacement, redirection to malicious websites, and unauthorized actions on behalf of the user.
  • Materialize Component Affected: Components that dynamically update the DOM based on client-side data or logic, potentially including:
    • Components using URL parameters or hash for state management.
    • Components that dynamically load content based on client-side logic or data attributes.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize Client-Side Data Reliance: Reduce reliance on client-side data (like URL fragments or local storage) for critical operations within Materialize components.
    • Strict Sanitization of Client-Side Data: If client-side data is used, rigorously sanitize and validate it before using it to manipulate the DOM within Materialize components. Assume client-side data is potentially attacker-controlled.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Employ secure coding practices when integrating Materialize components, especially when dealing with dynamic content loading or DOM manipulation. Avoid directly using unsanitized client-side data in DOM manipulation functions.
    • Regular Security Testing: Perform security testing, specifically focusing on areas where Materialize components interact with client-side data and dynamically update the DOM, to identify and remediate potential DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities.

Threat: Vulnerabilities in Materialize's Dependencies (Potential High/Critical Impact)

  • Description: Although Materialize aims to be lightweight and minimize dependencies, it might rely on external libraries or polyfills in certain versions or for specific functionalities. If these dependencies contain known security vulnerabilities, applications using Materialize could be indirectly affected. Attackers could exploit these dependency vulnerabilities to compromise the application.
  • Impact: Depending on the nature of the dependency vulnerability, impacts could range from Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Remote Code Execution (RCE) to Denial of Service (DoS) or sensitive information disclosure. A vulnerability in a core dependency could have a critical impact on applications using Materialize.
  • Materialize Component Affected: Indirectly affects the entire framework if a vulnerable dependency is used. This is not a specific Materialize component vulnerability, but a risk introduced by its dependency management (or lack thereof, if dependencies are added later).
  • Risk Severity: High (if a critical vulnerability exists in a dependency)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Monitoring: If Materialize introduces dependencies in the future, or if your project adds libraries alongside Materialize, actively monitor these dependencies for known vulnerabilities using dependency scanning tools.
    • Keep Dependencies Updated: If Materialize relies on dependencies, ensure these dependencies are kept updated to their latest versions to patch any security vulnerabilities.
    • Review Materialize's Dependencies: Regularly review Materialize's declared dependencies (if any) and assess their security posture.
    • Consider Dependency-Free Alternatives (If Possible): If security is a paramount concern and vulnerabilities in dependencies are a major risk factor, consider if alternative approaches or framework configurations with fewer or more securely managed dependencies are feasible.