Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (32 loc) · 7.45 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (32 loc) · 7.45 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for elemefe/element

Attack Surface: Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Component Input Handling

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious scripts into web pages by exploiting vulnerabilities arising from the improper handling of user input rendered within Element-Plus UI components. This occurs when applications fail to sanitize user-provided data before displaying it using Element-Plus components designed for input or data presentation.

  • Element-Plus Contribution: Element-Plus provides various components like <el-input>, <el-textarea>, <el-select>, <el-tooltip>, <el-popover>, and <el-dialog> that can display user-controlled content. Directly rendering unsanitized user input within these components creates XSS vulnerabilities.

  • Example: An application uses <el-tooltip> to display user-provided descriptions. If an attacker inputs the description as <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>, and the application renders this directly into the tooltip without sanitization, the malicious script will execute when a user hovers over the element triggering the tooltip.

  • Impact: Full compromise of the user's browser session, enabling attackers to steal cookies and session tokens, redirect users to malicious sites, deface the website, or perform actions on behalf of the user. This can lead to account takeover, data theft, and further malicious activities.

  • Risk Severity: Critical

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Mandatory Input Sanitization: Enforce strict sanitization of all user-provided data before it is rendered within any Element-Plus component. Utilize robust HTML entity encoding or employ a dedicated sanitization library like DOMPurify to escape or remove potentially malicious HTML, JavaScript, and other code.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for v-html: Avoid using the v-html directive with user-supplied data in Element-Plus components. If absolutely necessary, implement extremely rigorous sanitization and consider alternative approaches that do not involve rendering raw HTML.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP) Enforcement: Implement and strictly configure a Content Security Policy to limit the sources from which the browser can load resources. This significantly reduces the impact of XSS attacks by restricting the execution of inline scripts and blocking the loading of malicious resources from external domains.

Attack Surface: Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Slot Content Injection

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious scripts by exploiting the slot mechanism in Element-Plus components. This happens when applications dynamically render user-provided content within Element-Plus component slots without proper sanitization, allowing execution of attacker-controlled scripts.

  • Element-Plus Contribution: Element-Plus components heavily rely on slots for customization, enabling developers to inject custom content. If applications allow user-provided HTML or JavaScript to be inserted into these slots without sanitization, it becomes a direct vector for XSS attacks.

  • Example: An application allows users to customize the footer of an <el-dialog> using a slot. If an attacker provides <script>alert('XSS')</script> as slot content, and the application directly renders this within the dialog's slot, the script will execute when the dialog is displayed.

  • Impact: Identical to XSS via Component Input Handling: Full compromise of the user's browser session, leading to severe security breaches and potential data loss.

  • Risk Severity: Critical

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Strict Slot Content Sanitization: Mandatorily sanitize all user-provided content before rendering it within Element-Plus component slots. Apply HTML entity encoding or use a sanitization library to neutralize malicious code.
    • Restrict Unsafe Slot Usage: Minimize or eliminate the exposure of slots to user-controlled input, especially slots that render HTML. If customization is needed, consider safer alternatives like providing predefined options or using data-driven approaches instead of raw HTML injection.
    • Secure Template Compilation Practices: If dynamic template compilation is used to render slot content based on user input, ensure the template compilation process is inherently secure and prevents code injection vulnerabilities. Review and harden the template engine configuration.

Attack Surface: Client-Side Logic Vulnerabilities Leading to Security Bypass due to Component Misconfiguration

  • Description: Incorrect configuration or misuse of Element-Plus components can lead to vulnerabilities that bypass intended security controls or introduce unexpected application behavior exploitable by attackers. This arises from a misunderstanding of component properties, event handling, or validation mechanisms.

  • Element-Plus Contribution: Element-Plus components offer extensive configuration options and features, including form validation within <el-form>. Misconfiguring these features, particularly disabling or bypassing validation unintentionally, can create security gaps.

  • Example: A developer incorrectly configures an <el-form> used for user registration, unintentionally disabling client-side validation by providing an empty rules object or misimplementing the validate method. This allows users to submit registration forms with invalid or malicious data (e.g., SQL injection payloads, excessively long strings) that would normally be blocked client-side, potentially leading to server-side vulnerabilities or data integrity issues if server-side validation is also insufficient.

  • Impact: Bypassing intended security controls (like client-side validation), leading to the submission of invalid or malicious data to the server. This can expose server-side vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, command injection), compromise data integrity, or cause application malfunctions.

  • Risk Severity: High

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Comprehensive Documentation Review and Training: Thoroughly study and understand the Element-Plus documentation, especially regarding form validation, component properties, and security best practices. Provide adequate training to development teams on secure Element-Plus usage.
    • Robust Validation Implementation (Client and Server): Implement both client-side validation using Element-Plus form validation features and rigorous server-side validation. Client-side validation should be considered a user experience enhancement and not the primary security mechanism. Server-side validation is crucial for security.
    • Strict Code Reviews with Security Focus: Conduct mandatory code reviews with a strong focus on security, specifically examining how Element-Plus components are configured and used, especially form handling and validation logic.
    • Automated Security Testing and Static Analysis: Integrate automated security testing tools and static analysis tools into the development pipeline to detect potential misconfigurations and vulnerabilities related to Element-Plus component usage early in the development lifecycle.